Advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the elderly: effective and well tolerated weekly gemcitabine and cisplatin regimen. A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: The frequency of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) increases with age and more effective and less toxic chemotherapy schedules are needed in elderly patients. Cisplatin-based regimens are considered the best treatment for advanced NSCLC, although they produce only a modest advantage in overall survival with considerable toxicity. METHODS: In the present study the activity and toxicity of a weekly gemcitabine and cisplatin schedule was evaluated in a small group of advanced NSCLC patients aged 68 years or more. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 i.v. and cisplatin 35 mg/m2 i.v., both given weekly on days 1, 8, 15 followed by 1 week of rest. RESULTS: Fifteen previously untreated patients entered the study; their median age was 72 years (range 68-76). One hundred and sixteen weekly administrations were delivered. The median dose-intensity was 614.5 mg/m2 per week for gemcitabine (82%) and 21 mg/m2 per week for cisplatin (80%). All the 15 patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. The overall response rate was 40% [95% CI = 16-68%]. The main toxicity was WHO grade III-IV thrombocytopenia that was recorded in 6 patients (40%). Other major toxicities were very low and no treatment-related deaths were reported. CONCLUSIONS: This schedule appears to be active, to have a favourable toxicity profile and can be considered in advanced NSCLC elderly patients. Of interest, the patients enrolled received high dose intensities of both drugs.

A phase II study of Tomudex alternated with methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin in first-line chemotherapy of metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: This multicenter phase II study was designed to assess the efficacy of the alternating schedule of tomudex with methotrexate (MTX)/5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) in first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically proven metastatic colorectal cancer and at least one bidimensionally measurable lesion, aged 18-70, with performance status < or = 2, normal baseline biological values, and no prior chemotherapy, were selected. Treatment was tomudex 3 mg/m2 and, after two weeks, MTX, 200 mg/m2 by 30' infusion after hydration with 1500 ml saline solution, followed on day 2 by 5-FU, 600 mg/m2 and leucovorin, orally, 15 mg for six times every 6 hours, beginning 24 hours after MTX. Cycles were repeated every four weeks. Tumor response assessment was performed after three cycles. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were enrolled in this study, of whom twenty-four had liver metastases, nine local relapse, five lymph node involvement, four lung metastases, and three peritoneal carcinomatosis. Four patients achieved objective responses (one complete and three partial), for an overall response rate of 12% (95% CI: 0%-22%). Twelve patients had stable disease and 18 progressed on therapy. Median survival for all patients was 13 months. Two patients experienced grade 3 WHO neutropenia while hepatotoxicity was reported in 13 patients (6 grade 1, 3 grade 2, 3 grade 3, 1 grade 4), suggesting that this combination could increase hepatic toxicity in comparison to tomudex or MTX/5-FU alone. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that this regimen does not warrant further investigation in advanced colorectal cancer patients, at least not with this schedule and doses.

A combination of gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil in advanced pancreatic cancer, a report from the Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract Cancer (GISCAD).

In a randomized clinical trial, gemcitabine (GEM) was more effective than 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in advanced pancreatic cancer patients. GEM and 5-FU have different mechanisms of action and their combination, from a theoretical point of view, could result in a higher activity. To test activity and feasibility of such a combination, a multi-institutional phase II study was initiated in November 1996 by the Italian Group for the study of Digestive Tract Cancer (GISCAD). Primary objectives of this study were to determine the activity in terms of response rate and clinical benefit, while the secondary objective was toxicity. According to the optimal two-stage phase II design, 54 patients were enrolled. Schedule was: GEM 1000 mg m(-2) intravenous (i.v.), and 5-FU 600 mg m(-2) bolus i.v. weekly for 3 weeks out of every 4. All the 54 patients were symptomatic (pain, weight loss, dyspepsia). A clinical benefit was obtained in 28 patients (51%) (95% confidence interval (CI) 38-64%). Two patients achieved a partial response and 34 a stable disease. Median survival for all the patients was 7 months. Side-effects were mild: no gastrointestinal or haematological grade 3-4 toxicity (WHO) were recorded. We observed only six episodes of grade 2 (WHO) leukopenia and seven episodes of thrombocytopenia. Although the non-randomized design of this study suggests caution in the interpretation of these data, in consideration of the low incidence of toxicity and the favourable results obtained in terms of clinical benefit, it may be worthwhile to test more active schedules of 5-FU (continuous infusion) in combination with gemcitabine.

Weekly gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study.

BACKGROUND: The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin has proven effective in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the optimal schedule for administration of the two drugs has not yet been determined. In this study we evaluated the activity and toxicity of a weekly gemcitabine and cisplatin schedule. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-six untreated patients with stage IIIB IV NSCLC entered the study. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 i.v. and cisplatin 35 mg/m2 i.v., both given weekly on day 1,8, and 15, followed by one week of rest. RESULTS: Ninety-seven courses (273 weekly administrations) were delivered. The median dose-intensity was 612 mg/m2 per week for gemcitabine (82%) and 21 mg/m2 per week for cisplatin (80%). All 36 of the patients were evaluable for toxicity, and 30 for response. Partial remissions were observed in 12 patients, for an overall response rate of 40% (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 22.5%-57.5%). Most of the partial remissions were seen in IIIB patients (54% of the stage IIIB and 22% of the stage IV patients responded). According to the intent-to-treat principle, the response rate was 33.3% (12 of 36 patients). The median response duration was 9.9 months (range 4-23) and the median survival time 11.8 months (range 1-24). World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3-4 myelotoxicity was: thrombocytopenia in nine patients (25%), neutropenia in six (16.6%) and anemia in six (16.6%); there was very little additional major toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: This regimen appears to be active and to have a favourable toxicity profile.

Mitoxantrone, fluorouracil, and L-folinic acid in anthracycline-pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients.

In this phase II trial we have evaluated the activity and toxicity of a combination regimen containing mitoxantrone, L-leucovorin, and fluorouracil in patients with advanced breast cancer pretreated with anthracyclines. Forty-six patients were included into the study; they received a total of 227 cycles of chemotherapy. Median age was 63 years (range 34-78), median performance status was 80 (range 60-100). Visceral metastases were present in 37 patients, 6 patients had bone involvement only, while 3 patients had soft tissue/lymph node disease. Median number of previous chemotherapy regimens for advanced disease was 2 (range 1-3). Ten patients had anthracycline primary resistance (progressive disease during treatment). Twenty-three patients received mitoxantrone 12 mg/sqm day 1; fluorouracil 370 mg/sqm and L-folinic acid 100 mg/sqm days 1-3 administered every three weeks. Another group of 23 patients were treated with the same regimen using a prolonged 5FU/L-FA schedule (5 days). Two complete responses and 6 partial responses were recorded with the 3-day schedule; 7 partial responses in the 5-day schedule (overall response rate 32.6%, 95% C.I. 19-46%). Two partial responses were observed in patients with anthracycline primary resistance. Median response duration was 9 months (range 3-16). Hematologic toxicity was mild: grade 3-4 leukopenia was recorded in 5 patients, grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia in 3 patients. Grade III-IV stomatitis and diarrhea was recorded in 4 and 5 patients respectively (all receiving the 5-day 5-FU/L-FA schedule). Cardiac toxicity was observed in two cases. This regimen proved active in advanced breast cancer following anthracycline-containing chemotherapy, and the 3-day schedule could be offered to such patients with acceptable toxicity.

Granisetron plus dexamethasone in moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: evaluation of activity during three consecutive courses of chemotherapy.

In this study we evaluated the antiemetic activity of a combination of 3 mg granisetron in a short i.v. infusion followed by 12 mg dexamethasone i.v. in 64 patients with cancer receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy scheduled in a single day. No patient had previously undergone chemotherapy and three consecutive cycles were evaluated. Response to antiemetic treatment was graded as follows: complete response, no episodes of vomiting; major response, only one episode; minor response, two to four episodes; failure, more than four episodes. Nausea was graded as absent, mild, moderate or severe (patients bedridden). At the first cycle a complete protection from acute vomiting and nausea was achieved in 95% and 73% of patients respectively; the rate of complete response for delayed vomiting was 90%, while 45% of patients complained of delayed nausea. The antiemetic and antinausea efficacy remained substantially unchanged during the second and third cycles of chemotherapy. Constipation and headache were the most frequent adverse events. In conclusion this antiemetic regimen appears very effective in preventing nausea and vomiting in moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

Autologous bone marrow purging with LAK cells.

In this study we will demonstrate that LAK cells, in vitro, can lyse hematologic neoplastic cells with a minor toxicity of the staminal autologous marrow cells. In fact, after bone marrow and LAK co-culture at a ratio of 1/1 for 8 hours, the inhibition on the GEMM colonies resulted to be 20% less compared to the untreated marrow. These data made LAK an inviting agent for marrow purging in autologous bone marrow transplantation.

Limiting dilution analysis of IL-2 producing cells: I. Studies of normal human peripheral blood.

BACKGROUND: After marrow transplantation, the interaction of helper T lymphocytes from the donor with the patient alloantigens leads to cellular activation and release of IL-2 as initial events of the graft versus host reaction. A method for assessing the size of the pool containing allospecific helper T cells capable of producing IL-2 could be applied in the selection of better donors for marrow transplantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: PBMC are added to replicate sets of wells each containing various amounts of EBV-LCL cells and PHA. After culture for some days the supernatant is removed from each well and added to IL-2 dependent CTLL-2 line. The proliferation of the CTLL-2 line is assessed by pulse labeling with 3H-thimidine. The precursor frequency of cell capable of producing IL-2 per ml/blood is estimated from the minimum X2 regression of the function of non-responding wells plotted as logarithmic function of the number of PBMC added per well. RESULTS: Approximately 30-40% of PBMC are found to produce IL-2 under the following conditions in culture: the optimal PHA concentration is 1.25 micrograms/ml, the optimal number of stimulator EBV-LCL cells is 1 x 10(3) and 3 days of culture are required. CONCLUSION: Here we report a rapid and quantitative technique of limiting dilution analysis that can estimate the frequency of peripheral blood mononuclear cells capable of secreting interleukin-2 following interaction with specific alloantigen.

Quantitation of T cell depletion by limiting dilution analysis.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated a culture method for enumeration of residual T cells remaining in marrow after treatment with antibody and complement or with immunotoxin. METHODS: Marrow cells were cultured at limiting dilutions with phytohemagglutinin in the presence of Epstein Barr virus transformed human lymphoblastoid cells, and supernates were tested three days later for IL-2 by a cell proliferation assay. This method provides a simple, reliable, objective and rapid enumeration of T cells in marrow before and after treatment. RESULTS: Approximately 6% of untreated marrow mononuclear cells can produce IL-2 in such clonal cultures. Treatment with antibodies and complement under conditions identical to those used for our previous clinical trials produced a 3.7 log depletion of IL-2 precursors, whereas treatment with a ricin A chain anti-CD3 immunotoxin produced a 3.0 log depletion. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical correlations are in progress for assessing whether T cell depletion evaluated with the present method equals previous techniques. The extreme depletion of T cells accomplished by these methods may partly account for the high graft failure rate seen in our clinical trials.