Complication of Gastric Cancer Surgery: A Single Centre Experience.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Gastric cancer surgery is still characterised by high morbidity and mortality. However, in 2018 an online platform, GASTRODATA has been proposed in Europe to standardize the recording of gastric surgery complications. The aim of the study was to present a single center experience regarding incidence and grading of acute postoperative complications in a population of patients treated surgically for gastric cancer on the basis of the gastrodata online platform. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The present study was a single center, observational, retrospective trial held in the General Surgery Unit of the Sant'Andrea Hospital of Rome. The study included 181 consecutive patients who underwent gastric surgical resection for cancer from May 2004 to December 2020 with curative R0 purpose. RESULTS: Thirty-three percent of patients reported at least one complication, while seventeen percent of the whole population reported a complication classified as at least grade 3 on the Clavien Dindo Classification. The most frequent complications were disorders of the respiratory system (13.3%), followed by bleeding (7.6%) and wound infections (6.2%). Deaths accounted for 3.7% of the population. CONCLUSION: A list of defined complications of gastrectomy, if systematically adopted in the Literature, could lead to a reduction in the wide variation of proposals for treatment and assessment. Objectively evaluating the impact of complications on outcomes can lead to quality improvement project proposals.

Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula: Is Minimally Invasive Surgery Better than Open? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is gaining popularity. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after minimally invasive versus open procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following the PRISMA statement, literature research was conducted focusing on papers comparing the incidence of POPF after open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) versus minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD). RESULTS: Twenty-one papers were included in this meta-analysis, for a total of 4,448 patients. A total of 2,456 patients (55.2%) underwent OPD, while 1,992 (44.8%) underwent MIPD. Age, ASA score III patients, incidence of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and duct diameter were significantly lower in the MIPD group. No statistically significant differences were found between the OPD and MIPD regarding the incidence of major complications (15.6% vs. 17.0%, respectively, p=0.55), mortality (3.7% vs. 2.4%, p=0.81), and POPF rate (14.3% vs. 12.9%, p=0.25). CONCLUSION: MIPD and OPD had comparable rates of postoperative complications, postoperative mortality, and POPF.

Impact of Anastomotic Leakage on Overall and Disease-free Survival After Surgery for Gastric Carcinoma: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Gastric cancer is the fifth most frequently diagnosed cancer and the second most common cause of cancer-related death. The only potentially curative treatment is surgical resection, which is associated with potentially severe complications, such as anastomotic leakage. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the relationship between anastomotic leakage and overall and disease-free survival after surgery for gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed and 7 articles published between 2010 and 2019 were included, including a total of 7,167 patients. RESULTS: Among the included studies the frequency of anastomotic leakage ranged from 6 to 41%. Patients affected by anastomotic leakage had an overall survival ranging between 4.1 and 97.6 months, whereas patients who did not experience anastomotic leakage had an overall survival between 23 and 109.5 months. CONCLUSION: Closer follow-up or even more aggressive oncological therapy may be considered for patients affected by anastomotic leakage after surgery for gastric cancer.

Follow-up after curative resection for gastric cancer: Is it time to tailor it?

There is still no consensus on the follow-up frequency and regimen after curative resection for gastric cancer. Moreover, controversy exists regarding the utility of follow-up in improving survival, and the recommendations of experts and societies vary considerably. The main reason to establish surveillance programs is to diagnose tumor recurrence or metachronous cancers early and to thereby provide prompt treatment and prolong survival. In the setting of gastric malignancies, other reasons have been put forth: (1) the detection of adverse effects of a previous surgery, such as malnutrition or digestive sequelae; (2) the collection of data; and (3) the identification of psychological and/or social problems and provision of appropriate support to the patients. No randomized controlled trials on the role of follow-up after curative resection of gastric carcinoma have been published. Herein, the primary retrospective series and systematic reviews on this subject are analyzed and discussed. Furthermore, the guidelines from international and national scientific societies are discussed. Follow-up is recommended by the majority of institutions; however, there is no real evidence that follow-up can improve long-term survival rates. Several studies have demonstrated that it is possible to stratify patients submitted to curative gastrectomy into different classes according to the risk of recurrence. Furthermore, promising studies have identified several molecular markers that are related to the risk of relapse and to prognosis. Based on these premises, a promising strategy will be to tailor follow-up in relation to the patient and tumor characteristics, molecular marker status, and individual risk of recurrence.

Tumor-Stroma Ratio is an independent predictor for overall survival and disease free survival in gastric cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Despite different prognostic factors have been already studied, patients undergoing potentially curative resection for gastric cancer, still have a poor outcome. There is therefore the need to identify novel prognostic factors. Recently, Tumor-Stroma Ratio (TSR) was proven to be associated with prognosis in different types of cancers. Aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of TSR in gastric cancer patients. METHODS: 106 patients underwent gastrectomy between January 2004 and December 2015. Demographics and histopathological characteristics were collected. We considered a 50% TSR cutoff value to divide patients in Stroma-Rich (≥50%) and Stroma-Poor (<50%) groups. RESULTS: Forty-one (38.7%) patients were classified as Stroma-Poor while 65 (61.3%) as Stroma-Rich (61.3%). The Stroma-Rich patients had a higher number of positive lymph-nodes, lymph node ratio (LNR), a higher percentage of T3/T4 local invasion and N2/N3, and a more advanced TNM. Moreover, these patients showed a higher percentage of lymphovascular and perineural invasion. With a median FU of 38 months Stroma-Rich patients had a significantly worse 5-years actuarial overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) compared to Stroma-Poor patients. Moreover, the multivariate analysis showed that Stroma-Rich was the only independent factor associated with OS and DFS together with TNM-Stage. CONCLUSIONS: TSR is an independent marker of poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer that should be readily incorporated into routine clinical pathology reporting. Identification of sensitive markers for patients who had undergone curative gastrectomy and who are at high risk of recurrence could provide useful information for planning follow-up after surgery or intensive and or/targeting adjuvant chemotherapy.

Influence of perineural invasion in predicting overall survival and disease-free survival in patients With locally advanced gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of perineural invasion (PNI) in locally advanced gastric cancer patients who underwent D2 gastrectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: The records of a series of 103 patients undergoing D2 gastrectomy with curative intent combined with adjuvant chemotherapy from January 2004 to December 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: PNI was positive in 47 (45.6%) specimens. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 81%, 55%, and 42%, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 76%, 57%, and 49%, respectively. A multivariate analysis showed that age number of positive lymph nodes, T stage, and PNI were independently associated with overall survival. Regarding DFS, the multivariate analysis showed that only PNI was independently associated with DFS. CONCLUSIONS: PNI and T stage and positive lymph nodes are independent markers of poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer. PNI should be incorporated in the postoperative staging system for planning follow-up after surgery and in our opinion to propose more aggressive postoperative therapies in PNI-positive patients.

Pulmonary metastases from gastric cancer: Is there any indication for lung metastasectomy? A systematic review.

It is still not clear whether pulmonary resection may have a role in the multidisciplinary management of gastric cancer lung metastases. A systematic literature search was performed to identify all studies published between January 1998 and December 2014 about pulmonary resection of gastric cancer metastases. Ten studies published between 1998 and 2013 were retrieved, including a total of 44 patients. After gastrectomy, median disease-free interval was 35 months. Thirty-eight patients had single lung metastases, whereas six presented with more than one lesion. Median overall survival after lung resection was 45 months, and median disease-free survival was 9 months. Our analysis of the recent literature shows that lung metastasectomy for gastric cancer pulmonary metastases has been reported only in the setting of anecdotic cases or small series of highly selected patients. Lung metastasectomy has no role in the standard management of metastatic gastric patients and may actually be proposed only in individual highly selected cases.

Patients' quality of life and role of the ambulatory in after-surgery stoma care. A single center experience.

AIM: The aim is to assess on which aspects of everyday-life the post surgery stoma-care ambulatory should physically and psychologically assist the patients. MATERIAL OF STUDY: Seventy patients (33 male, 37 female, mean age 68 years) accepted to fill-in the Stoma-QoL questionnaire from January to December 2011. The questionnaire consists of 20 questions addressing different possible discomforts of everyday life. RESULTS: Our results demonstrate that patients with temporary ileostomy have a mean score of quality of life index of 63. Patients with ileostomy demonstrated a higher quality of life score compared to patients with colostomy. DISCUSSION: Our results confirmed that patients with ileostomy have a better perception of quality of life compared to patients with colostomy. Moreover, our data clearly show that patients are more concerned on stoma management compared to the hypothetical prejudice of society. CONCLUSIONS: The stoma care ambulatory have a crucial role, offering to the patient and his/her family an adequate psychological support, and teaching the management of the stoma and the pouch.