Subthalamic stimulation modulates context-dependent effects of beta bursts during fine motor control.

Increasing evidence suggests a considerable role of pre-movement beta bursts for motor control and its impairment in Parkinson's disease. However, whether beta bursts occur during precise and prolonged movements and if they affect fine motor control remains unclear. To investigate the role of within-movement beta bursts for fine motor control, we here combine invasive electrophysiological recordings and clinical deep brain stimulation in the subthalamic nucleus in 19 patients with Parkinson's disease performing a context-varying task that comprised template-guided and free spiral drawing. We determined beta bursts in narrow frequency bands around patient-specific peaks and assessed burst amplitude, duration, and their immediate impact on drawing speed. We reveal that beta bursts occur during the execution of drawing movements with reduced duration and amplitude in comparison to rest. Exclusively when drawing freely, they parallel reductions in acceleration. Deep brain stimulation increases the acceleration around beta bursts in addition to a general increase in drawing velocity and improvements of clinical function. These results provide evidence for a diverse and task-specific role of subthalamic beta bursts for fine motor control in Parkinson's disease; suggesting that pathological beta bursts act in a context dependent manner, which can be targeted by clinical deep brain stimulation.

Vagus nerve stimulation for the treatment of narcolepsy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: No study on neurostimulation in narcolepsy is available until now. Arousal- and wake-promoting effects of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) have been demonstrated in animal experiments and are well-known as side effects of VNS therapy in epilepsy and depression. The objective was to evaluate the therapeutic effect of VNS on daily sleepiness and cataplexies in narcolepsy. METHODS: In our open-label prospective comparative study, we included narcolepsy patients who were treated with VNS because of depression or epilepsy and compared them to controls without narcolepsy treated with VNS for depression or epilepsy (18 patients in each group, aged 31.5 ± 8.2 years). We evaluated daily sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale, ESS) and the number of cataplexies per week before the implantation of VNS and at three and six month follow-ups. RESULTS: Compared to baseline (ESS: 15.9 ± 2.5) patients with narcolepsy showed a significant improvement on ESS after three months (11.2 ± 3.3, p < 0.05) and six months (9.6 ± 2.8, p < 0.001) and a trend to reduction of cataplexies. No significant ESS-improvement was observed in patients without narcolepsy (14.9 ± 3.9, 13.6 ± 3.7, 13.2 ± 3.5, p = 0.2 at baseline, three and six months, correspondingly). Side effects did not differ between the study groups. CONCLUSION: In this first evaluation of VNS in narcolepsy, we found a significant improvement of daily sleepiness due to this type of neurostimulation. VNS could be a promising non-medical treatment in narcolepsy.