Rectus Sheath Block Improves Patient Recovery Following Open Aortic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain management remains a barrier to recovery following aortic surgery. Although epidural catheters help in adjunctive pain management, less is known about the use of rectus sheath blocks. We compared patient recovery following open abdominal aortic surgery (OAS) with and without adjunctive rectus block. METHODS: Adult patients undergoing open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair and aortobifemoral or aortoiliac bypass for occlusive disease were identified and stratified by use of general anesthesia alone (GA) versus adjunctive use of a rectus sheath block (GA + RB). A small number of patients with GA and concomitant epidural analgesia, along with patients that had retroperitoneal repairs, were not included in further analysis. Outcomes included time to extubation, intraoperative and postoperative morphine milligram equivalents (MME) utilization, length of stay, discharge MME, and postoperative complications. Categorial data were compared with Person Chi-Square tests or Fisher's exact tests. Continuous data were tested with independent t-tests or Mann-Whitney U-tests. RESULTS: From January 2017 to April 2022, there were 106 patients who underwent open aortic surgery, 55 patients with GA alone, 39 with GA + RB, and 12 patients who had a GA with concomitant epidural analgesia. Between GA and GA + RB, patients were comparable in both groups in terms of age, BMI (body mass index), smoking history, hypertension, diabetes, CAD (coronary artery disease), COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), and ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) class and prior opioid use. Patients with GA + RB were more likely to have scheduled elective procedures (80% GA cohort vs. 94.9% RB, P = 0.040), and a lower incidence of retroperitoneal exposure (14.5% GA cohort vs. 0% RB, P = 0.019). Patients with GA + RB had shorter time to extubation than GA (84.6% < 12 hr vs. 44.4%, P < 0.001), greater rate of procedural ketamine usage (GA + RB: 61.5% vs. GA: 40.0%, P = 0.049), lower MME at first postoperative day (median MME GA + RB: 25.0 vs. GA: 67.5, P = 0.002), lower discharge MME (median MME GA + RB: 142.5 vs. GA: 225.0, P = 0.036), and overall shorter length of stay (median stay GA + RB: 5 vs. GA: 6 days, P = 0.006). Postoperative complications were similar between groups. Similar findings were found in the comparison between elective-only GA and GA + RB patients and after exclusion of patients who only had a single shot of regional anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: Patients that receive adjunctive rectus sheath blocks for pain control following OAS utilize fewer opioid medications during hospital stay and at discharge. Rectus sheath blocks represent an alternative option to other periprocedural analgesia following open aortic surgery.

Use of the right retroperitoneum as an alternative approach to the abdominal aorta.

OBJECTIVE: The left retroperitoneal approach to the aorta is a well-established technique for aortic exposure. The right retroperitoneal approach to the aorta is performed less commonly, and the outcomes remain unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of right retroperitoneal aortic-based procedures and to determine its utility in aortic reconstruction when faced with hostile anatomy or infection in the abdomen or left flank. METHODS: A retrospective query of a vascular surgery database from a tertiary referral center was performed for all retroperitoneal aortic procedures. Individual patient charts were reviewed, and data were collected. Demographics, indications, intraoperative details, and outcomes were tabulated. RESULTS: From 1984 through 2020, there have been 7454 open aortic procedures; 6076 were retroperitoneal-based, and 219 of which were performed from the right retroperitoneal approach (Rrp). Aneurysmal disease was the most common indication (48.9%), and graft occlusion was the most common postoperative complication (11.4%). The average aneurysm size was 5.5 cm, and the most common reconstruction was with a bifurcated graft (77.6%). Average intraoperative blood loss was 923.8 mL (range, 50-6800 mL; median, 600 mL). Perioperative complications occurred in 56 patients (25.6%) for a total of 70 complications. Perioperative mortality occurred in two patients (0.91%). The 219 patients treated with Rrp required 66 subsequent procedures in 31 patients. These included 29 extra-anatomic bypasses, 19 thrombectomies/embolectomies, 10 bypass revisions, 5 infected graft excisions, and 3 aneurysm revisions. Eight Rrp eventually underwent a left retroperitoneal approach for aortic reconstruction. Fourteen patients with a left-sided aortic procedure required a Rrp. CONCLUSIONS: The right retroperitoneal approach to the aorta is a useful technique in the setting of prior surgery, anatomic abnormality, or infection that complicates the use of other more frequently employed approaches. This review demonstrates comparable outcomes and the technical feasibility of this approach. The right retroperitoneal approach to aortic surgery should be considered a viable alternative to left retroperitoneal and transperitoneal access in patients with complex anatomy or prohibitive pathology for more traditional exposure.

Carotid Restenosis Following Endarterectomy in Patients Managed With Single Antiplatelet Therapy Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Antiplatelet therapy is a cornerstone in the management of carotid artery disease following carotid endarterectomy (CEA). There is a paucity of data regarding the effect of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) on restenosis rates. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent CEA from January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2013 was performed at a single center. Study groups consisted of subjects who received DAPT and those who received single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) following CEA. Restenosis was evaluated by carotid duplex. Severity and timing of restenosis, postoperative complications, and reinterventions were compared between study groups. RESULTS: Between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2013, 1453 patients underwent CEA. The SAPT group consisted of 245 patients and the DAPT group consisted of 1208 patients. No difference in restenosis was identified between groups at less than 6 weeks (6.5% vs. 11.7% 50-79% stenosis, 0% vs. 2.2% 80-99% stenosis, 2.2% vs. 0.6% occlusion, p = 0.368), and 6 weeks to 2 years (20.6% vs. 17.9% 50-79% stenosis, 1.1% vs. 1.0% 80-99% stenosis, 1.6% vs. 0.4% occlusion, p = 0.242). A higher rate of restenosis in SAPT was found greater than 2 years from surgery (68.4% vs. 82.4% <50% stenosis, 29.9% vs. 16.1% 50-79% stenosis, 0% vs. 0.6% 80-99% stenosis, 1.7% vs. 0.9% occlusion p = 0.004). This finding persisted on multivariable analysis with 31.6% of the SAPT group showing >50% stenosis vs. 17.6% of the DAPT group (adjusted OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.30-0.76, p = 0.002). In a propensity matched-population, 32.7% of the SAPT group demonstrated restenosis vs. 13.7% of the DAPT group (adjusted OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.16-0.77, p = 0.009). There was no difference in the need for reintervention between study groups (DAPT 3.8% vs SAPT 3.3%, p = 0.684). CONCLUSION: Following CEA, patients on DAPT exhibited lower rates of late restenosis. Despite this finding, a clinical difference in reintervention was not found during this study period.

Endovascular Management of Middle Aortic Syndrome Presenting with Uncontrolled Hypertension.

Middle Aortic Syndrome is a rare vascular disorder consisting of narrowing or stenosis of the distal thoracic or abdominal aorta. It is described in the literature in the form of case studies and case series. The authors present an unusual case of Middle Aortic Syndrome attributed to Takayasu's arteritis in a 60-year-old female who presented to the emergency department with uncontrolled hypertension. Traditional intervention involves open surgical bypass. This case study reviews the published literature on this rare syndrome and illustrates a successful alternative to open surgery through an endovascular approach.

Analgesic efficacy of laparoscopic-guided transverse abdominis plane block using liposomal bupivacaine in bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain management is a major contributor to recovery and discharge in bariatric surgery. Local anesthetic agents are of particular interest: they're non-sedating and may reduce postoperative pain and hospital length of stay (LOS). DESIGN: Researchers queried the Bariatric Surgery Service Database for patients undergoing laparoscopic weight loss surgery from January 2012-December 2014. Patients were divided between those who did and did not receive liposomal bupivacaine intra-operatively. Measures included demographics, narcotic use, LOS, antiemetic use, and pain scales. RESULTS: The liposomal group consisted of 233 patients and the PCA group consisted of 243 patients. The liposomal group had significantly less narcotic use than the PCA group in terms of IV morphine equivalents. This did not translate into a reduction in LOS in the liposomal group. CONCLUSIONS: TAP block using liposomal bupivacaine provides effective analgesia comparable to PCA.

Increased Incidence of Surgical Site Infection in IBD Patients.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection is a key hospital-level patient safety indicator. All risk factors for surgical site infection are not always taken into account and adjusted for. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to measure the impact of IBD in comparison with diverticulitis and colorectal cancer on the national rates of surgical site infection. DESIGN: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database was queried for all patients undergoing elective colectomy for colon cancer, diverticulitis, and IBD from 2008 through 2012. OUTCOME MEASURES: The association between surgical site infection and IBD patients was assessed. Patient demographics, rates of surgical site infection, wound class, return to operating room, and various patient characteristics were analyzed. Logistic regression was performed to determine the association with surgical site infection. RESULTS: The query yielded 71,845 patients undergoing elective colectomy. Of these patients, 42,132 had colon cancer, 22,143 had diverticulitis, and 7570 had IBD. The rate of surgical site infection was 12.0% for colon cancer, 12.8% for diverticulitis, and 18.0% for IBD. Return to operating room within 30 days was 7.3% for IBD patients, 4.4% for patients with diverticulitis, and 4.9% for patients with colorectal cancer. Return to operating room within 30 days had the highest correlation to surgical site infection in both univariate and multivariable analysis. Other associative factors for surgical site infection common to both analyses included diabetes mellitus, smoking, open procedures, and obesity. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by the data collection errors inherent to large databases, exclusion of emergent operations, and the inability to identify patients taking immunosuppressive agents. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with IBD undergoing elective colectomy have significantly increased rates of surgical site infection, specifically deep and organ/space infections. Given this information, risk adjustment models for surgical site infection may need to include IBD in their calculation.

Open reduction and internal fixation of rib fractures in polytrauma patients with flail chest.

BACKGROUND: Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of fractured ribs for flail chest is safe and effective but who is most likely to benefit is unknown. Our purpose is to compare ORIF with nonoperative management (NOM) in polytrauma patients. METHODS: Albany Medical Center Hospital Trauma Registry was queried for adult patients with flail chest admitted over 7 years. RESULTS: Eighty-six patients with radiographic flail chest were identified who met inclusion criteria. The 41 ORIF and 45 NOM patients had similar demographics and injury severity. Hospital length of stay and intensive care unit length of stay were significantly longer in the ORIF group than that of the NOM group. There was a trend toward longer time on the ventilator in the ORIF group. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study, patients treated by ORIF had longer hospitalization and ventilator duration. Future studies should be designed to optimally identify patients who are most likely to benefit from ORIF.

Laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for complicated diverticulitis is safe: review of 576 consecutive colectomies.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic resection of diverticular disease is typically offered to selected patients. We present the outcomes of laparoscopic colectomy in consecutive patients suffering from either simple diverticulitis (SD) or complicated diverticulitis (CD). PURPOSE: To examine the outcomes of laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for complicated diverticulitis. METHODS: Between December 2001 and May 2013, all patients with diverticulitis requiring elective operation were offered laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy as the initial approach. All cases were managed at a large tertiary care center on the colorectal surgery service. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were prospectively entered into the colorectal surgery service database (CRSD) and analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Of the 576 patients in the CRSD, 139 (24.1%) had CD. The overall conversion rate was 12.8% (n = 74). The average BMI was 29.8 kg/m(2). The conversion rate for CD was 12.2%. The return of bowel function time was delayed in the CD group when compared to the SD group (3.1 vs 3.8 days, p = 0.04). The hospital length of stay (HLOS) was similar between the groups (5.1 vs 5.8 days, p = 0.08). The overall anastomotic leak rate was 2.1% (n = 12). Patients undergoing laparoscopic resection for SD had a postoperative complication rate of 10.0% (n = 38), whereas those with CD had a postoperative morbidity rate of 19.6% (n = 24). CD patients who had conversion to an open procedure had an even higher rate of postoperative complications (29.4%, n = 5, p = 0.35). On non-parsimonious multivariate adjustment, only CD (RR 1.96, 95% CI 1.11-3.46, p = 0.02) was found to be an independent risk factor for the development of postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Complicated diverticulitis did not affect the conversion rate to an open procedure. However, patients with CD are prone to postoperative complications. The laparoscopic approach to sigmoid colectomy is safe and preferable in experienced hands.

Construct validation: simulation of thoracoscopic intrathoracic anastomosis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We sought to develop a simulation model that accurately replicates the challenges of the thoracoscopic intrathoracic anastomosis. This model is intended to serve as a teaching tool during the introduction to, and development of, the skills required to perform a thoracoscopic intrathoracic anastomosis during an Ivor Lewis minimally invasive esophagectomy. METHODS: The simulation model uses porcine tissue placed within an artificial hemithorax and covered with a synthetic skin. The model is draped to simulate a realistic operative setting, and ports are placed in standard surgical fashion. Dissection of the esophagus from the mediastinum is then performed, followed by the creation of an esophagogastric anastomosis. The effectiveness of the training model was evaluated using volunteer general and thoracic surgery residents at varying stages of surgical training. The quality of the anastomoses created were evaluated using both objective and subjective criteria, and successful anastomoses were tested for leaks using hydrostatic pressure. RESULTS: Objective evaluation showed that successful completion of the anastomosis task increased with the number of attempts, with 100% of participants successfully completing an anastomosis by the final attempt. The time to completion of a successful anastomosis also improved across successive attempts. Moreover, objective measures also showed improvement over time based on the graded quality of the completed anastomosis. CONCLUSION: As surgical techniques continue to evolve, so must the means by which they are taught. This simulation model shows effectiveness in the training of general and thoracic surgery residents performing thoracoscopic intrathoracic anastomosis during the Ivor Lewis minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Non-small cell lung cancer therapy: safety and efficacy in the elderly.

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to evaluate and review the current literature on the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the elderly. METHODS: We selected recent peer-reviewed articles addressing ageing, cancer treatment in the elderly, and lung cancer treatment in the elderly. We defined elderly as over the age of 70. RESULTS: The population is ageing dramatically throughout most of the world. Given that situation, clinicians are seeing and being asked to treat more elderly patients that have NSCLC. Elderly patients are less likely to participate or be allowed to participate in prospective or retrospective studies of treatments for NSCLC. Elderly patients are also less likely to be staged appropriately for their advanced tumors, and are less likely to be referred for surgery or adjuvant therapy after surgery. When treatment is tailored to patient comorbidities but not to age, the data support survival and outcomes comparable to those of younger patients. CONCLUSIONS: Data are limited on the treatment of elderly patients with NSCLC. No data exist to support limiting recommendations for treatment based on age alone. Treatments should be determined on an individual basis.