Systematic Review of Financial Interventions for Adults Experiencing Behavioral Health Conditions.

OBJECTIVE: The authors reviewed the literature on finance-based interventions used to improve clinical and psychosocial outcomes among adults experiencing mental disorders, substance use disorders, or both. METHODS: A systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature, published from 1900 to 2022, was conducted. Only studies with participants with a mental disorder or a substance use disorder, a structured finance-based intervention or program, a quantitative dependent variable in a behavioral health outcomes domain, and a defined research design were included. Studies were rated with a quality assessment tool, and overall evidence (levels I-VII) for the outcomes was rated. RESULTS: In total, 544 articles were identified, screened for eligibility, and reduced to 55 articles. These articles were rated by two independent raters, and 18 articles were ultimately included. Of these 18 articles, four reported findings of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), one conducted a secondary analysis of an RCT, and the remaining articles were observational studies. The most studied intervention was representative payeeship, which reduced substance use and enhanced money management, showing the strongest evidence for improving outcomes among adults with behavioral health conditions. Weaker evidence suggested that financial education and assistance interventions could improve health care utilization and other psychosocial outcomes among individuals with mental or substance use disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Level II-V evidence indicates that finance-based interventions can improve outcomes among adults experiencing behavioral health conditions. Further research is needed to assess the impact of interventions beyond representative payee programs on objectively measured outcomes.

Terms That Refer to Homeless Populations: National Surveys of Several Stakeholder Groups.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the descriptive terms used in referring to homeless populations. METHODS: Data were from a 2020 national survey of 6,607 middle- and low-income U.S. adults with or without lived experiences of homelessness and a 2021 survey of a convenience sample of 354 U.S. researchers, homelessness service providers, and policy makers. RESULTS: Among the middle- and low-income adults, 70%-73% reported using the term "homeless person," although adults with histories of homelessness were more likely to use "person experiencing homelessness" than those with no such histories. Among the providers, researchers, and policy makers, ≥39% reported using "person experiencing homelessness" in both writing and speaking, and they also had consensus around using "person at risk of homelessness" and "person in shelter." CONCLUSIONS: Most stakeholders agreed that "homeless person" or "person experiencing homelessness" are acceptable terms. Because usage may vary by social background, profession, and individual, best practice may be to ask individuals with experiences of homelessness what terms they prefer to use.

A National Study of Zoom Fatigue and Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Implications for Future Remote Work.

Overuse of videoconferencing for work may contribute to what has been called "Zoom fatigue": feeling anxious, socially isolated, or emotionally exhausted due to lack of social connection. Given implications for employee well-being, this study investigated Zoom fatigue at work and its potential link to mental health symptoms. A national survey of mental health symptoms was conducted in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic in August 2020. Adults (n = 902) endorsing a shift at work to videoconferencing completed an online survey; survey criteria included an age minimum of 22 years and reported annual gross income of <$75,000. Statistical raking was employed to weight the sample using U.S. census data on geographic region, age, gender, race, and ethnicity. A three-item Zoom Fatigue Scale measuring perceived stress, isolation, and depression associated with videoconferencing at work showed good internal consistency (α = 0.85). Higher scores on this scale were related to being married, nonwhite race, post-high school education, severe mental illness, greater loneliness, lower social support, lacking money for food, and more weekly videoconference calls. Depressive symptoms demonstrated a significant association with Zoom fatigue, even when adjusting for demographic, psychosocial, and clinical covariates. The study findings indicated that employers and employees should consider a complex array of individual-level and environment-level factors when assessing how videoconferencing at work may engender stress, social isolation, and emotional exhaustion. This impact could adversely impact mental health, work productivity, and quality of life, even after the COVID-19 pandemic.