[Guideline-adherent psychiatric psychotherapeutic treatment of bipolar disorders : Which resources are needed?] / Leitliniengerechte psychiatrisch-psychotherapeutische Behandlung bei bipolaren Störungen : Welche Ressourcen werden dafür benötigt?

In this article the guideline-adherent psychiatric psychotherapeutic treatment of patients with bipolar disorders is outlined and the required resources are estimated. Based on the core recommendations of the S3 guidelines for diagnostics and treatment of bipolar disorders published in 2012, inpatient treatment needs in hours per week and per patient are determined for both manic and bipolar depressive episodes. The resulting staffing requirements are estimated on this basis. In summary, for guideline-adherent inpatient psychiatric psychotherapeutic treatment the additional needs regarding the physician/psychotherapeutic domain add up to 44 min per patient and week during a manic episode and 88 min for patients with bipolar depression when compared to current psychiatry staffing regulations.

[Guideline-adherent inpatient psychiatric psychotherapeutic treatment of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia : Normative definition of personnel requirements]. / Leitliniengerechte stationäre psychiatrisch-psychotherapeutische Behandlung psychischer und Verhaltenssymptome bei Demenz : Normative Personalbedarfsermittlung.

BACKGROUND: Dementia is of increasing medical and societal relevance. Hospitalization of dementia patients is mostly due to behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD). There is a need for sufficient qualified personnel in hospitals in order to be able to effectively treat these symptoms. OBJECTIVES: This study aims at identifying the personnel requirements for guideline-conform, evidence-based inpatient treatment concepts for patients with BPSD and to compare these with the resources defined by the German psychiatric personnel regulations (Psych-PV). Furthermore, it was the aim to identify how often patients with dementia received non-pharmacological therapy during inpatient treatment. METHODS: Based on the current scientific evidence for treatment of BPSD, a schedule for a multimodal non-pharmacological treatment was defined and based on this the corresponding personnel requirements were calculated. Using the treatment indicators in psychiatry and psychosomatics (VIPP) database as a reference, it was calculated on what proportion of treatment days patients were classified into G1 according to the German Psych-PV and at least once received more than two treatment units per week. RESULTS: For the implementation of a guideline-oriented and evidence-based treatment plan, a higher need for personnel resources than that provided by the Psych-PV was detected in all areas. Currently patients with dementia who received at least more than two treatment units per week during inpatient hospitalization, were classified into G1 according to German Psych-PV on 17.9 % of treatment days. CONCLUSION: Despite evidence for the efficacy of non-pharmacological treatment measures on BPSD, these forms of treatment cannot be sufficiently provided under the current conditions. The realization of a new quality controlled therapeutic concept is necessary to enable optimized treatment of patients with BPSD.

[Guideline-adherent inpatient psychiatric psychotherapeutic treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder : Normative definition of personnel requirements]. / Leitliniengerechte stationäre psychiatrisch-psychotherapeutische Behandlung der Zwangsstörung : Normative Personalbedarfsermittlung.

BACKGROUND: Guideline-oriented inpatient psychiatric and psychotherapeutic treatment of patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is an important part of the care available for these patients. It may not be adequately reflected in the current personnel resources available according to the German psychiatry personnel regulation (Psych-PV). OBJECTIVES: The goal of this work was to assess the personnel resources necessary for a guideline-oriented inpatient psychiatric and psychotherapeutic treatment of patients with OCD and compare the necessary resources with the resources available according to Psych-PV. METHODS: Based on the German national guidelines for OCD and a meta-analysis on treatment intensity, we formulated a normative weekly treatment plan. Based on this plan we calculated the necessary personnel resources and compared these with the resources available according to Psych-PV category A1 (standard care). RESULTS: The weekly treatment time for a guideline-oriented inpatient psychiatric and psychotherapeutic treatment of patients with OCD is 23.5 h per week. This corresponds to a weekly personnel requirement of 20.9 h. This requirement is only partly reflected in the Psych-PV (17.3 h, 82.8 %). The coverage of personnel resources by Psych-PV is even lower for psychotherapy provided by psychiatrist and psychologists (38.3 %, i. e. 183 min in the normative plan versus 70 min in Psych-PV). CONCLUSIONS: The current paper shows that the personal resources required for a guideline-oriented inpatient psychiatric and psychotherapeutic treatment of patients with OCD is not adequately reflected in the German psychiatry personnel regulation (Psych-PV). The actual shortage may be underestimated in our paper.

[Guideline-oriented inpatient psychiatric psychotherapeutic/psychosomatic treatment of anxiety disorders : How many personnel are need?]. / Leitliniengerechte stationäre psychiatrisch-psychotherapeutische/psychosomatische Behandlung von Angsterkrankungen : Wieviel Personal ist erforderlich?

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The reimbursement of inpatient psychiatric psychotherapeutic/psychosomatic hospital treatment in Germany is regulated by the German personnel ordinance for psychiatric hospitals (Psych-PV), which has remained unchanged since 1991. The aim of this article was to estimate the personnel requirements for guideline-adherent psychiatric psychotherapeutic hospital treatment. METHODS: A normative concept for the required psychotherapeutic "dose" for anxiety disorders was determined based on a literature review. The required staffing contingent was compared to the resources provided by the Psych-PV based on category A1. RESULTS: According to the German policy guidelines for outpatient psychotherapy, a quota of 25 sessions of 50 min each (as a rule plus 5 probatory sessions) is reimbursed. This approach is supported by studies on dose-response relationships. As patients undergoing inpatient treatment for anxiety disorders are usually more severely ill than outpatients, a contingent of 30 sessions for the average treatment duration of 5 weeks seems appropriate in order to fully exploit the costly inpatient treatment time (300 min per patient and week). In contrast, only 70 min are reimbursed according to the Psych-PV. The total personnel requirement for the normative concept is 624 min per patient and week. The Psych-PV only covers 488 min (78 %). CONCLUSION: Currently, the time contingents for evidence-based psychiatric psychotherapeutic/psychosomatic hospital care are nowhere near sufficient. In the development of future reimbursement systems this needs to be corrected.

[Normative definition of staff requirement for a guideline-adherent inpatient qualified detoxification treatment in alcohol dependence]. / Personalbedarfsermittlung für eine leitliniengerechte stationäre Qualifizierte Entzugsbehandlung bei Alkoholabhängigkeit.

The central element of the "qualified withdrawal treatment" of alcohol dependence is - in addition to physical withdrawal treatment - psychotherapy. The treatment of the underlying addictive disorder that is displayed by intoxication, harmful behaviour and withdrawal symptoms is only possible with a combination of somatic and psychotherapeutic treatment elements. The successfully established multimodal therapy of the "qualified alcohol withdrawal treatment", postulated in the current S3-Treatment Guidelines, requires a multi-disciplinary treatment team with psychotherapeutic competence. The aim of the present work is to calculate the normative staff requirement of a guideline-based 21-day qualified withdrawal treatment and to compare the result with the staffing regulations of the German Institute for Hospital Reimbursement. The present data support the hypothesis that even in the case of a hundred per cent implementation of these data, adequate therapy of alcohol-related disorders, according to the guidelines, is not feasible. This has to be considered when further developing the finance compensation system based on the described superseded elements of the German Institute for Hospital Reimbursement.

[Admission and discharge decisions in psychiatric hospitals : The 7-day cycle: analysis based on the VIPP database]. / Aufnahme- und Entlassentscheidungen in der Psychiatrie : Der 7-Tage-Zyklus: Analyse auf Grundlage der VIPP-Datenbank.

BACKGROUND: The legislation requires all scientific societies in the field of inpatient psychiatric and psychosomatic healthcare to survey and assess the effects and financial incentives of the new flat rate day-based remuneration system in psychiatric and psychosomatic facilities (PEPP system). As day-based remuneration systems may be an incentive to extend treatment, it is necessary to measure and analyze the future development of the number of cases and the duration of treatment. OBJECTIVES: This article surveys admission and discharge decisions of psychiatric and psychosomatic facilities. The distribution of admissions and discharges throughout the days of the week were analyzed to search for evidence of a systematic extension of treatment over the weekend. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The analysis is based on data from the Versorgungsrelevante Indikatoren in der Psychiatrie und Psychosomatik (VIPP, treatment-relevant indicators in psychiatry and psychosomatics) project database, which contains routine data from psychiatric and psychosomatic facilities. On this basis the distributions of admissions and discharges throughout the days of the week were analyzed on aggregate and diagnosis-specific levels. RESULTS: Patients were mostly admitted to hospitals within the first 3 weekdays. The discharge mostly took place on Fridays and not as a financial incentive on Mondays. Regarding the patient length of stay a 7-day cycle can be observed, which may indicate the importance of medical and organizational factors in discharge decisions. CONCLUSION: The results do not show evidence for a systematic extension of treatment over the weekend. Over the next years it will be important to observe the development of the duration of treatment and the number of cases to assess the influence of the economic incentives of the PEPP system on the utilization of psychiatric and psychosomatic healthcare.

[Calculating personnel allocation at 100 % implementation of the Psychiatry Personnel Act. Can it be done on the basis of existing routine data?]. / Berechnung der Personalbemessung bei einer Umsetzung von 100 % Psych-PV. Kann diese auf der Grundlage vorliegender Routinedaten erfolgen?

From 1 January 2019, after completion of the convergence phase, the Psychiatry Personnel Act (Psych-PV) will no longer be the basis of budget negotiations of psychiatric hospitals and departments with the health insurance funds in Germany. Instead, the new compounding remuneration system for psychiatric and psychosomatic inpatient institutions (PEPP) will provide a new framework. The Federal Joint Committee (Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss, G-BA) has been given the task of elaborating a directive on the basis of the expiring Psych-PV in order to redefine standards for personnel allocation within this new framework. This task presupposes the existence of reliable data in the psychiatric hospitals and departments for categorizing patients following the Psych-PV. It presupposes further that these data allow an exact calculation of the personnel to which the clinics are entitled. This article shows that the so-called §-21 dataset from the database of the VIPP project (indicators of patient care in psychiatric and psychosomatic facilities) allows this calculation. The VIPP dataset was used as a basis to calculate the personnel requirements. Exemplary analyses illustrate that the information available regarding the Psych-PV can be transformed in minutes per day, minutes per month and full time positions. Therefore, this information would also be available to the Institute for the Hospital Remuneration System (InEK).

[Guideline-adherent psychiatric-psychotherapeutic hospital care: Normative definition of staff required using the example of depression]. / Leitliniengerechte psychiatrisch-psychotherapeutische Krankenhausbehandlung : Normative Personalermittlung am Beispiel Depression.

BACKGROUND: Unipolar depression is of high relevance in German inpatient treatment. An effective psychiatric psychotherapeutic hospital treatment also requires sufficient staff for carrying out psychotherapeutic treatment. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to define the staff requirements for guideline-adherent psychiatric-psychotherapeutic inpatient treatment of depression on the basis of a weekly treatment schedule for a 5-week admission period. A further aim was to compare the staff required with the resources defined by the German psychiatric staffing regulations (Psych-PV). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The weekly schedule was normatively defined on the basis of the current evidence for treatment efficacy and effectiveness. The staff required was calculated on the basis of the weekly schedule. The time for psychotherapy defined by the Psych-PV was calculated using the treatment classification provided by a large nationwide database. RESULTS: Regarding psychotherapy, 280 min per week is regarded as necessary and usually sufficient according to the current evidence. The results showed clearly higher requirements of working time of psychiatrists and psychologists than those defined by the Psych-PV. In particular, the Psych-PV allows only 72 min for psychotherapy per patient and week and only a limited amount of direct patient contact with psychiatrists. CONCLUSION: The figures provided impressively show that the Psych-PV does not allow effective guideline-adherent hospital treatment within a reasonable length of hospital stay. Despite its evidential effectiveness, psychotherapeutic treatment cannot be sufficiently provided under the current financing circumstances.

[Structural quality in psychiatric and psychotherapeutic hospitals]. / Strukturqualität in psychiatrischen und psychotherapeutischen Kliniken.

BACKGROUND: The new German flat rate reimbursement system for psychiatry and psychosomatics (PEPP) is primarily based on the diagnostic classification and the costs of therapeutic processes. In 2019 the current normative standard for calculating the therapeutic staff in psychiatric clinics (Psych-PV) will be substituted by a stepwise adaptation process over 5 years. Using regionally calculated remuneration factors, all clinic budgets should eventually converge to comparable values. AIM: Major factors influencing the structural quality of therapy in psychiatric clinics are identified and recommendations are given to support the work of the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) which has been appointed to develop new recommendations for the minimum setting of personnel requirements. RESULTS: The full reimbursement of the necessary staff and of the costs resulting from outsourcing of day clinics and outpatient departments in the community, including the obligation to treat psychiatric emergency patients is mandatory and currently not sufficiently guaranteed in the new PEPP system. A workflow which opens the possibility to finance therapeutic innovations (e.g. psychotherapy) and helps to overcome the financial sectorial boundaries between inpatient and outpatient treatment is also missing. DISCUSSION: A mandatory recommendation for minimum staff settings needs a guaranteed full financing from the political side. Additionally, important would be an option for financing of therapeutic innovations and increased costs because of changed patient structures with respect to diagnosis and severity. Moreover, a sufficient remuneration for regional treatment responsibilities and for additional financial outlay resulting from structural costs for regionally outsourced departments is needed to avoid supplementary financing by reducing the budget for the therapeutic staff.

[Where is convergence of psychiatry budgets leading to? A comparison of staffing regulations and actual personnel resources]. / Wohin führt die Konvergenz der Psychiatriebudgets? Ein Vergleich von Psych-PV-Vorgaben und tatsächlichen Personalressourcen.

BACKGROUND: Staffing regulations have determined the number of qualified staff required for sufficient, appropriate and economical inpatient mental health care in Germany since 1991. This minimum level of structural quality will probably be abolished in the context of the convergence of hospital budgets starting in 2019. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyze the current fulfilment of staffing regulations in terms of time per patient in a large nationwide sample. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The required minutes of staff time as defined by staffing regulations were calculated for each patient using the treatment classifications provided by a large nationwide database. The actual use of staff time was calculated on the basis of average costs published by the German Institute for Hospital Reimbursement. Both figures were compared to calculate the fulfilment of staffing regulations. RESULTS: The study included approximately 95,000 inpatient episodes from 46 psychiatric hospitals and departments with a total length of stay of almost 2.5 million days. On average, the weekly use of staff resources per patient was 190 min (10 %) below the requirements of the staffing regulations. The largest gap in absolute terms was found in nursing staff where the weekly time per patient was 189 min (14 %) below the requirements of the staffing regulations. CONCLUSION: The convergence of psychiatric hospital budgets starts in 2019 below a level of funding required to fulfil staffing regulations. This would perpetuate inadequately funded structures and should initially be opposed with a demand for complete fulfilment of staffing regulations. Thereafter, a normative consent should be reached to define the resources required for current inpatient mental health care.

[Features of regional mandatory psychiatric care in Germany: analysis using the VIPP databank]. / Merkmale einer regionalen Pflichtversorgung in Deutschland: Eine Analyse mithilfe der VIPP-Datenbank.

BACKGROUND: The regional mandatory care is a central element of psychiatric treatment in Germany. Therefore, it is possible to realize care near to the place of residence of psychiatric patients and good contact to the outpatient health system. Up to now the new payment system in psychiatry in Germany does not explicitly include this central factor. AIM: The article investigates which criteria possibly describe psychiatric mandatory care and whether they can be ascertained from routine data. MATERIAL: The results are based on the so-called § 21 records of 47 psychiatric and psychosomatic clinics all of which participated in the German VIPP (healthcare indicators in psychiatry and psychosomatics) project. It is obligatory to send the standardized § 21 record to the Institute for the Hospital Remuneration System (InEK) annually. RESULTS: The study identified two factors which could describe clinics with regional mandatory care. Many patients attend these hospitals outside the core time of Monday to Friday, 8 am to 5 pm and the distance to their place of residence is shorter. This is associated with a higher day-related valuation, the so-called day mix index (DMI). DISCUSSION: Routine data contain information describing regional mandatory psychiatric care. Patients treated in this system show a higher DMI. This means higher proceeds for the hospitals but it is not clear if these proceeds are able to cover the higher costs in clinics with regional mandatory care. Therefore, it is necessary for the InEK to set up a new cost center for all clinics which participate as a so-called calculation site. By posting all structural costs of mandatory care in this cost center it will be possible to compare them with the income of psychiatric clinics in the future.

[The new payment system in psychiatry - do elderly people belong to the losers? An analysis on the basis of the VIPP1 data base]. / Das neue Entgeltsystem in der Psychiatrie - gehören ältere Patienten zu den Verlierern? Eine Analyse auf der Grundlage der VIPP-Datenbank.

The development of the lump-sum reimbursement System in psychiatry and psychosomatics (PEPP) (Klimke et al., 2014) is being negatively considered - also in gerontopsychiatry.Thus it is reasonable to make a timely analysis of the effects of PEPP on health-care structures. For this two analyses have been carried out. On the one hand the day mix index of elderly patients (> 64 years) was compared with that of younger ones (> 17 years, < 65 years). On the other hand younger and older were included in the analysis with regard to the available treatment minutes in exact daily classifications according to the PsychPV. It is seen that evaluation of the individual day was markedly higher for gerontopsychiatric patients not only in inpatient (difference > 0.1) but also in outpatient (difference > 0.07) setting. The exact daily classifications according to PsychPV, however, were markedly poorer for the elderly patients. Thus, on the basis of routine data of VIPP projects, a clear change can be seen in favour of the elderly patient under PEPP conditions as compared to financing according to PsychPV. However, concern remains that the ageing population and modernisation of therapy are not being sufficiently taken into account. The new reimbursement system merely regulates the distribution of available resources; if these resources are too low nothing will change by the PEPP-System.

[Indicators of patient care in Psychiatric and Psychosomatic Facilities (VIPP project)--a database project]. / Versorgungsindikatoren in der Psychiatrie und Psychosomatik (VIPP)--Ein Datenbank-Projekt.

INTRODUCTION: In Germany a new and unique remuneration system for psychiatric and psychosomatic stationary treatments (PEPP system) was introduced in 2013 on an optional basis. From 2015 it will be mandatory for psychiatric and psychosomatic facilities. The introduction of the PEPP system brings up different questions regarding the possible incentives of the new remuneration system and its effects on the supply of psychiatric and psychosomatic treatments. To conduct these necessary analyses a reliable database is needed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The goal of the project "Indicators of patient care in Psychiatric and Psychosomatic Facilities" (VIPP project) is to gather a representative database which reflects the situation of day-to-day patient care performed by German psychiatric and psychosomatic facilities. The §â€Š21 data set represents the basis of this database which will be complemented by other data sources (i. e., financial statements and other economic data). A number of more than 100 ,000 cases per year has already been exceeded. These case data were provided by a wide range of psychiatric hospitals, departments and universities that participate in this project. The dataset is anonymised and by pooling the data it is not possible to identify the cases of a specific clinic. Participants receive a web-based access and have the possibility to analyse the data independently. RESULTS: Using the examples of coding accuracy and rehospitalisation rates the variety as well as the enormous potential of this database can be demonstrated. DISCUSSION: On the base of the VIPP database valid patient care indicators can be identified and cross-sectional analyses can be conducted. From such results key data on health economic strategies can be derived and the incentives, strengths and limitations of this constantly changing system can be identified.

[Reimbursement in psychiatry and psychosomatics: proof of concept for a system based on daily costs]. / Vergütungssystem für Psychiatrie und Psychosomatik: Studie zur Machbarkeit eines tageskostenbasierten Entgeltsystems.

BACKGROUND: In Germany a new reimbursement system for psychiatry and psychosomatics is under development. Based on total costs of each case from selected hospitals and day clinics, in 2013 the Institute for the Hospital Remuneration System (InEK) proposed to reimburse the hospital costs daily with step-wise decreasing remuneration, mainly depending on the ICD-10 diagnosis, duration of stay and some complicating factors (PEPP grouper). It is controversial whether this degressive system will result in an inadequate remuneration of patients with longer duration of severe symptoms, such as suicidality in depression or autoaggressive behavior in borderline personality disorder and will eventually lead to advantages for acutely ill patients with short duration of stay compared to chronically ill patients. OBJECTIVES: This study formulated and tested an alternative remuneration system (proof of concept) mainly based on an analysis of daily cost data instead of the total costs of each case. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study is based on 147,749 treatment days from 4,633 cases of patients with psychotic disorders (PEPP-PA03) in 6 hospitals. As possible cost separating factors the study analyzed days with and without intensive psychiatric care, 1 to 1 care, psychological diagnostics, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), acute crisis intervention, age at admission, the first days of treatment and day of discharge. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Nearly all factors tested were shown to be statistically significant in separating daily hospital costs. Based on these findings an alternative calculation algorithm (TEPPconcret), which grouped the cases with respect to age, intensive care, 1 to 1 care, treatment days 1-4 and day of discharge, was formulated and tested. For psychotic disorders TEPPconcret with a basic rate complemented by daily add-on payments depending on the effort involved, is a serious alternative to the PEPP system and awaits further evaluation.

[Lump sum payment system in psychiatry and psychosomatics: concomitant research - quo vadis?]. / Pauschalierendes Entgeltsystem in der Psychiatrie und Psychosomatik : Begleitforschung - quo vadis?

The new lump sum payment scheme for psychiatric and psychosomatic services is coming into force in 2013. This constitutes another step on the way to performance-based financial compensation of inpatient and day hospital treatment in psychiatric and psychosomatic hospitals in Germany. This fundamental change needs to be accompanied by scientific evaluation with regards to its effects. This article reflects on the legal foundations of such evaluations and the current progress of preparation. Furthermore, own approaches for analysing the effects of the new finance scheme are presented.

[Guideline compliance in the treatment of schizophrenic patients. Introduction of a computer-assisted treatment pathway]. / Leitlinienkonformität in der Behandlung schizophrener Patienten. Einführung eines IT-gestützten Behandlungspfades.

BACKGROUND: The goal of S3 Guidelines for the Treatment of Schizophrenia was to improve the care of patients with schizophrenic psychoses. However, the publication of guidelines alone does not ensure their consistent implementation. The use of treatment pathways represents one possible approach to help implement the complex treatment recommendations contained in the S3 Guidelines. The first computer-assisted treatment pathway for patients with schizophrenic psychoses was successfully incorporated into the everyday routine of psychiatric hospitals. The aim of the present study was to systematically analyse the impact of this measure on guideline compliance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on the S3 Guidelines for the Treatment of Schizophrenia developed by the German Association of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Neurology (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Nervenheilkunde; DGPPN), diagnostic and treatment procedures were defined by a multiprofessional working group with members from five different hospitals and subsequently incorporated into an existing hospital information system. In one of the five hospitals, the impact of this measure was analysed in a pilot study in a systematic manner. In the year 2007, approximately 100 patients in each of two wards in the hospital received in a parallel group design either standard care or care based on a computer-assisted treatment pathway. Based on their place of residence, patients were assigned to the two units consecutively. Both groups were analysed to determine the extent to which the care they received conformed to treatment guidelines. Data available from the years 2004 and 2005 served as a historical comparison to the present results. RESULTS: The differences in guideline compliance between the two wards were heterogeneous and, in certain respects, counterintuitive. As expected, the treatment pathway group showed an increased number of laboratory tests, more frequent drug screening at hospital admission and more appropriate dosing of neuroleptics. However, the rate of participation in psychoeducational interventions was disappointing. A conspicuous finding was the negative relationship between initial disease severity and compliance with guidelines on psychopharmacological treatment. In contrast, the historical comparison revealed that guideline compliance had increased slightly in both the treatment pathway and standard treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Developing computer-assisted treatment pathways based on S3 Guidelines and incorporating them into existing hospital information systems is feasible and well accepted by users. The initial effects on guideline compliance are mostly positive, but not strongly so. Moreover, there was a reduction in duration of hospital stay. Disease-related factors such as disease severity appear to compromise guideline compliance.

Psychodynamic vulnerability factors in the development of panic disorders--a prospective trial in patients after vestibular neuritis.

BACKGROUND: In our 2-year prospective study of 80 patients admitted consecutively to our clinic with an episode of acute vestibular neuritis, a total of 8 patients later developed a panic disorder according to DSM-III-R criteria. The goal of our analysis was to determine whether certain conflict patterns (e.g. in the area of autonomy vs. dependence) or deficient psychological structure could predict later panic disorder, as might be expected based on psychodynamic theory. SAMPLING AND METHODS: Between 4 and 8 weeks after the acute vestibular episode, we evaluated all patients using operationalized psychodynamic diagnostics (OPD). With the different axes of the OPD system, we were able to assess patients' experience of illness (Axis I), potential conflicts (Axis III), and psychological structure (Axis IV) in a semiquantitative manner. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Poor psychosocial integration, a lack of social support, a high burden of suffering, and moderate to severe impairment of self-experience were able to account for 32.1% (Nagelkerkes R(2)=0.321) of variance in the development of panic disorder over the course of 2 years. However, contrary to what might have been expected based on psychodynamic theory, patients who later developed a panic disorder did not exhibit any differences in their Axis III or IV scores compared to patients who remained psychologically healthy.

The impact of cognitions on the development of panic and somatoform disorders: a prospective study in patients with vestibular neuritis.

BACKGROUND: There is a high incidence of panic and somatoform disorders after vestibular neuritis. However, the occurrence of psychiatric disorders has been shown to be unrelated to persistent functional vestibular impairment. The aim of the present study was to examine the role played by cognitions in the development of panic and somatoform disorders. METHOD: In a 2-year prospective study, cognitions were recorded at various stages using the Agoraphobic Cognitions Questionnaire and Body Sensations Questionnaire. Our analysis focused on whether body-related anxiety or panic-related thoughts can predict the development of a panic or somatoform disorder. RESULTS: Fear arising on the first day of an acute vestibular episode did not predict the development of panic or somatoform disorders. One week after the dysfunction, however, the fear of vertigo was a significant predictor, explaining 20% of the variance in the development of either disorder. After 6 weeks, persistent fear of vertigo or vomiting predicted approximately 30% of the variance, and after 6 months panic-related thoughts predicted 40% of the variance and, with the inclusion of body-related fears, as much as 60% of the variance in the development of panic or somatoform disorders. CONCLUSION: Our data confirm prospectively a number of fundamental assumptions of cognitive theory concerning the development of anxiety disorders. Subjects who experience vertigo as particularly alarming focus more intensely than other patients on the negative symptoms they perceive as being related to the disorder. Patients with panic-related cognitions were prone to develop panic or somatoform disorders.