A Randomized Phase I Study of the Anti-Interleukin-33 Antibody Tozorakimab in Healthy Adults and Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Tozorakimab is a human monoclonal antibody that neutralizes interleukin (IL)-33. IL-33 is a broad-acting epithelial "alarmin" cytokine upregulated in lung tissue of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This first-in-human, phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (NCT03096795) evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PKs), immunogenicity, target engagement, and pharmacodynamics (PDs) of tozorakimab. This was a 3-part study. In part 1, 56 healthy participants with a history of mild atopy received single escalating doses of either intravenous or subcutaneous tozorakimab or placebo. In part 2, 24 patients with mild COPD received multiple ascending doses of subcutaneous tozorakimab or placebo. In part 3, 8 healthy Japanese participants received a single intravenous dose of tozorakimab or placebo. The safety data collected included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), vital signs, and clinical laboratory parameters. Biological samples for PKs, immunogenicity, target engagement, and PD biomarker analyses were collected. No meaningful differences in the frequencies of TEAEs were observed between the tozorakimab and placebo arms. Three tozorakimab-treated participants with COPD experienced treatment-emergent serious adverse events. Subcutaneous or intravenous tozorakimab demonstrated linear, time-independent PKs with a mean half-life of 11.7-17.3 days. Treatment-emergent anti-drug antibody frequency was low. Engagement of tozorakimab with endogenous IL-33 in serum and nasal airways was demonstrated. Tozorakimab significantly reduced serum IL-5 and IL-13 levels in patients with COPD compared with placebo. Overall, tozorakimab was well tolerated, with a linear, time-independent serum PK profile. Additionally, biomarker studies demonstrated proof of mechanism. Overall, these data support the further clinical development of tozorakimab in COPD and other inflammatory diseases.

A novel somatostatin receptor ligand for human ACTH - and GH -secreting pituitary adenomas.

OBJECTIVE: Somatostatin receptor ligands have come to play a pivotal role in the treatment of both ACTH- and GH-secreting pituitary adenomas. Clinical efficacy averages 30-50%, thus a considerable number of patients with Cushing's disease or acromegaly remain unresponsive to this therapeutic approach. HTL0030310 is a new somatostatin receptor ligand selective for subtype 5 over subtype 2, thus with a different receptor profile compared to clinical somatostatin receptor ligands. DESIGN: Assessment of the effect of HTL0030310 on hormone secretion in human ACTH- and GH-secreting pituitary adenomas in vitro. METHODS: Primary cultures from 3 ACTH-secreting and 5 GH-secreting pituitary adenomas were treated with 1, 10 and 100 nM HTL0030310 alone or with 10 nM CRH or GHRH, respectively. Parallel incubations with 10 nM pasireotide were also carried out. ACTH and GH secretion were assessed after 4 and 24 hour incubation; SSTR2, SSTR3, SSTR5, GH and POMC expression were evaluated after 24 hours. RESULTS: HTL0030310 reduced unchallenged ACTH and POMC levels up to 50% in 2 ACTH-secreting adenomas and blunted CRH-stimulated ACTH/POMC by 20-70% in all 3 specimens. A reduction in spontaneous GH secretion was observed in 4 GH-secreting adenomas and in 2 specimens during GHRH co-incubation. SSTRs expression was detected in all specimens. CONCLUSIONS: This first study on a novel somatostatin receptor 5-preferring ligand indicates that HTL0030310 can inhibit hormonal secretion in human ACTH- and GH-secreting pituitary adenomas. These findings suggest a potential new avenue for somatostatin ligands in the treatment of Cushing's disease and acromegaly.

A phase 1b/2a multicenter study of the safety and preliminary pharmacodynamic effects of selective muscarinic M1 receptor agonist HTL0018318 in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease.

INTRODUCTION: This study examined the safety and pharmacodynamic effects of selective muscarinic M1 receptor orthosteric agonist HTL0018318 in 60 patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD) on background donepezil 10 mg/day. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 4-week safety study of HTL0018318 with up-titration and maintenance phases, observing exploratory effects on electrophysiological biomarkers and cognition. RESULTS: Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were mild and less frequently reported during maintenance versus titration. Headache was most commonly reported (7-21%); 0 to 13% reported cholinergic TEAEs (abdominal pain, diarrhea, fatigue, nausea) and two patients discontinued due to TEAEs. At 1 to 2 hours post-dose, HTL0018318-related mean maximum elevations in systolic and diastolic blood pressure of 5 to 10 mmHg above placebo were observed during up-titration but not maintenance. Postive effects of HTL0018318 were found on specific attention and memory endpoints. DISCUSSION: HTL0018318 was well tolerated in mild-to-moderate AD patients and showed positive effects on attention and episodic memory on top of therapeutic doses of donepezil.

Pharmacodynamic biomarkers and differential effects of TNF- and GM-CSF-targeting biologics in rheumatoid arthritis.

AIM: The aim of our study was to identify pharmacodynamic biomarkers and assess differential effects of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)- and non-TNF-targeting agents on rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with an inadequate response to anti-TNF agents (anti-TNF-IR) in comparison with biologic-naïve patients. METHODS: EARTH EXPLORER 2, a phase IIb trial, evaluated golimumab, an anti-TNF antibody, and mavrilimumab, an granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) receptor antibody, in disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD)-IR and anti-TNF-IR patients. Our current study assessed peripheral protein markers and gene expression levels in association with clinical response post-treatment in two disease strata. RESULTS: Serum proteomics results indicated the existence of specific pharmacodynamic markers for golimumab and mavrilimumab, regardless of prior anti-TNF treatment. In contrast, both antibodies induced early and sustained suppression of RA disease markers, including interleukin (IL)-6, C-reactive protein, IL2RA, and matrix metalloproteinase 1, in DMARD-IR patients. Golimumab-induced early changes rapidly returned toward baseline concentrations in anti-TNF-IR patients, whereas mavrilimumab-induced changes were maintained through to day 169. RNA sequencing demonstrated gene expression changes at day 169 after administration of mavrilimumab but not golimumab in anti-TNF-IR patients. Additionally, receiver operating characteristic curve and regression analysis showed the association of early IL-6 change and subsequent clinical responses to golimumab in anti-TNF-IR patients. CONCLUSION: Our results revealed golimumab- and mavrilimumab-specific pharmacodynamic biomarkers, and demonstrated differential biomarker-treatment relationships in anti-TNF-IR and DMARD-IR patients, respectively. Early IL-6 change after anti-TNF antibody treatment may be a potential predictive biomarker for selection of different treatment regimens in anti-TNF-IR patients.

Mavrilimumab, a Fully Human Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Receptor α Monoclonal Antibody: Long-Term Safety and Efficacy in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Mavrilimumab, a human monoclonal antibody, targets granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor α. We undertook to determine the long-term safety and efficacy of mavrilimumab in rheumatoid arthritis patients in 2 phase IIb studies (1071 and 1107) and in 1 open-label extension study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01712399). METHODS: In study 1071, patients with an inadequate response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) received mavrilimumab (30, 100, or 150 mg) or placebo every other week plus methotrexate. In study 1107, patients with an inadequate response to anti-tumor necrosis factor agents and/or DMARDs received 100 mg mavrilimumab every other week or 50 mg golimumab every 4 weeks plus methotrexate. Patients entering the open-label extension study received 100 mg mavrilimumab every other week plus methotrexate. Long-term safety and efficacy of mavrilimumab were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 442 patients received mavrilimumab (14 of 245 patients from study 1071, 9 of 70 patients from study 1107, and 52 of 397 patients from the open-label extension study discontinued mavrilimumab treatment throughout the studies). The cumulative safety exposure was 899 patient-years; the median duration of mavrilimumab treatment was 2.5 years (range 0.1-3.3 years). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were nasopharyngitis (n = 69; 7.68 per 100 patient-years) and bronchitis (n = 51; 5.68 per 100 patient-years). At weeks 74 and 104, 3.5% and 6.2% of patients, respectively, demonstrated reduction in forced expiratory volume in 1 second, while 2.9% and 3.4% of patients, respectively, demonstrated reduction in forced vital capacity (>20% reduction from baseline to <80% predicted). Most pulmonary changes were transient and only infrequently associated with AEs. Mavrilimumab at 100 mg every other week demonstrated sustained efficacy; at week 122, 65.0% of patients achieved a Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using the C-reactive protein level (DAS28-CRP) of <3.2, and 40.6% of patients achieved a DAS28-CRP of <2.6. CONCLUSION: Long-term treatment with mavrilimumab maintained response and was well-tolerated with no increased incidence of treatment-emergent AEs. Safety data were comparable with those from both phase IIb qualifying studies.

A Randomized Phase IIb Study of Mavrilimumab and Golimumab in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: This 24-week, phase IIb, double-blind study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mavrilimumab (a monoclonal antibody to granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor α) and golimumab (a monoclonal antibody to tumor necrosis factor [anti-TNF]) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have had an inadequate response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) (referred to as DMARD-IR) and/or inadequate response to other anti-TNF agents (referred to as anti-TNF-IR). METHODS: Patients with active RA and a history of DMARD-IR (≥1 failed regimen) or DMARD-IR (≥1 failed regimen) and anti-TNF-IR (1-2 failed regimens) were randomized 1:1 to receive either mavrilimumab 100 mg subcutaneously every other week or golimumab 50 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks alternating with placebo every 4 weeks, administered concomitantly with methotrexate. The primary end points were the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement (ACR20), 50% improvement, and 70% improvement response rates at week 24, percentage of patients achieving a Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using C-reactive protein level (DAS28-CRP) of <2.6 at week 24, percentage of patients with a score improvement of >0.22 on the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) disability index (DI) at week 24, and safety/tolerability measures. This study was not powered to formally compare the 2 treatments. RESULTS: At week 24, differences in the ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 response rates between the mavrilimumab treatment group (n = 70) and golimumab treatment group (n = 68) were as follows: in all patients, -3.5% (90% confidence interval [90% CI] -16.8, 9.8), -8.6% (90% CI -22.0, 4.8), and -9.8% (90% CI -21.1, 1.4), respectively; in the anti-TNF-IR group, 11.1% (90% CI -7.8, 29.9), -8.7% (90% CI -28.1, 10.7), and -0.7% (90% CI -18.0, 16.7), respectively. Differences in the percentage of patients achieving a DAS28-CRP of <2.6 at week 24 between the mavrilimumab and golimumab groups were -11.6% (90% CI -23.2, 0.0) in all patients, and -4.0% (90% CI -20.9, 12.9) in the anti-TNF-IR group. The percentage of patients achieving a >0.22 improvement in the HAQ DI score at week 24 was similar between the treatment groups. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 51.4% of mavrilimumab-treated patients and 42.6% of golimumab-treated patients. No deaths were reported, and no specific safety signals were identified. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study demonstrate the clinical efficacy of both treatments, mavrilimumab at a dosage of 100 mg every other week and golimumab at a dosage of 50 mg every 4 weeks, in patients with RA. Both regimens were well-tolerated in patients who had shown an inadequate response to DMARDs and/or other anti-TNF agents.

Blockade of GM-CSF pathway induced sustained suppression of myeloid and T cell activities in rheumatoid arthritis.

Objectives: Targeting the granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) pathway holds great potential in the treatment of inflammatory diseases. Mavrilimumab, a human monoclonal GM-CSF receptor-α antibody, has demonstrated clinical efficacy in RA. Our current study aimed to elucidate mechanisms of action and identify peripheral biomarkers associated with therapeutic responses of GM-CSF antagonism in RA. Methods: A 24-week placebo (PBO)-controlled trial was conducted in 305 RA patients who received mavrilimumab (30, 100 or 150 mg) or PBO once every 2 weeks. Serum biomarkers and whole blood gene expression profiles were measured by protein immunoassay and whole genome microarray. Results: Mavrilimumab treatment induced significant down-regulation of type IV collagen formation marker (P4NP 7S), macrophage-derived chemokine (CCL22), IL-2 receptor α and IL-6 compared with PBO. Both early and sustained reduction of P4NP 7S was associated with clinical response to 150 mg mavrilimumab treatment. Gene expression analyses demonstrated reduced expression of transcripts enriched in macrophage and IL-22/IL-17 signalling pathways after GM-CSF blockade therapy. Myeloid and T cell-associated transcripts were suppressed in mavrilimumab-treated ACR20 responders but not non-responders. While CCL22 and IL-6 down-regulation may reflect a direct effect of GM-CSFR blockade on the production of pro-inflammatory mediators by myeloid cells, the suppression of IL-2 receptor α and IL-17/IL-22 associated transcripts suggests an indirect suppressive effect of mavrilimumab on T cell activation. Conclusion: Our results demonstrated association of peripheral biomarker changes with therapeutic response to mavrilimumab in RA patients. The sustained efficacy of mavrilimumab in RA may result from both direct effects on myeloid cells and indirect effects on T cell activation after GM-CSFR blockade.

A randomised phase IIb study of mavrilimumab, a novel GM-CSF receptor alpha monoclonal antibody, in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: Despite the therapeutic value of current rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatments, agents with alternative modes of action are required. Mavrilimumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody targeting the granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor-α, was evaluated in patients with moderate-to-severe RA. METHODS: In a phase IIb study (NCT01706926), patients with inadequate response to ≥1 synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug(s), Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)-C reactive protein (CRP)/erythrocyte sedimentation rate ≥3.2, ≥4 swollen joints despite methotrexate (MTX) were randomised 1:1:1:1 to subcutaneous mavrilimumab (150, 100, 30 mg), or placebo every other week (eow), plus MTX for 24 weeks. Coprimary outcomes were DAS28-CRP change from baseline to week 12 and American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 response rate (week 24). RESULTS: 326 patients were randomised (150 mg, n=79; 100 mg, n=85; 30 mg, n=81; placebo, n=81); 305 completed the study (September 2012-June 2013). Mavrilimumab treatment significantly reduced DAS28-CRP scores from baseline compared with placebo (change from baseline (SE); 150 mg: -1.90 (0.14), 100 mg: -1.64 (0.13), 30 mg: -1.37 (0.14), placebo: -0.68 (0.14); p<0.001; all dosages compared with placebo).Significantly more mavrilimumab-treated patients achieved ACR20 compared with placebo (week 24: 73.4%, 61.2%, 50.6% vs 24.7%, respectively (p<0.001)). Adverse events were reported in 43 (54.4%), 36 (42.4%), 41 (50.6%) and 38 (46.9%) patients in the mavrilimumab 150, 100, 30 mg eow and placebo groups, respectively. No treatment-related safety signals were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Mavrilimumab significantly decreased RA disease activity, with clinically meaningful responses observed 1 week after treatment initiation, representing a novel mechanism of action with persuasive therapeutic potential. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01706926; results.

Efficacy and safety of mavrilimumab in Japanese subjects with rheumatoid arthritis: findings from a Phase IIa study.

OBJECTIVE: A phase IIa study investigated efficacy and safety/tolerability of ascending doses of mavrilimumab (anti-granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor [GM-CSFR]α monoclonal antibody) in adult subjects with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis from Japan and Europe. Findings from the Japanese population are presented. METHODS: Fifty-one subjects received mavrilimumab (10-100 mg) or placebo subcutaneously every other week for 12 weeks, followed by a 12-week follow-up period. The primary endpoint was the proportion of subjects achieving a Disease Activity Score using 28 joints (DAS28)-C-reactive protein (CRP) response (decrease > 1.2 from baseline). Secondary endpoints included DAS28-CRP remission, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response. RESULTS: By Week 12, more mavrilimumab- versus placebo-treated subjects achieved a DAS28-CRP response (50.0% vs. 23.5%, p = 0.081); a significant response was seen in the 30 mg and 100 mg dose groups (both 75.0% vs. 23.5%, p = 0.028). The 100 mg group also demonstrated statistically significant HAQ-DI and ACR20 responses at Week 12. Results were generally consistent between Japanese and European populations. Overall, adverse events (AEs) were mild to moderate in intensity with one serious AE of pneumonia, considered possibly treatment-related. CONCLUSIONS: A rapid and clinically meaningful response was seen in subjects treated with GM-CSFRα blockade with mavrilimumab, supporting further investigation of mavrilimumab for the treatment of RA in Japanese subjects.

Efficacy and safety of mavrilimumab in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: Mavrilimumab, a human monoclonal antibody targeting the alpha subunit of the granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor, was evaluated in a phase 2 randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to investigate efficacy and safety in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Subcutaneous mavrilimumab (10 mg, 30 mg, 50 mg, or 100 mg) or placebo was administered every other week for 12 weeks in subjects on stable background methotrexate therapy. The primary endpoint was the proportion of subjects achieving a ≥1.2 decrease from baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28-CRP) at week 12. RESULTS: 55.7% of mavrilimumab-treated subjects met the primary endpoint versus 34.7% placebo (p=0.003) at week 12; for the 10 mg, 30 mg, 50 mg, and 100 mg groups, responses were 41.0% (p=0.543), 61.0% (p=0.011), 53.8% (p=0.071), and 66.7% (p=0.001) respectively. Response rate differences from placebo were observed at week 2 and increased throughout the treatment period. The 100 mg dose demonstrated a significant effect versus placebo on DAS28-CRP<2.6 (23.1% vs 6.7%, p=0.016), all categories of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria (ACR20: 69.2% vs 40.0%, p=0.005; ACR50: 30.8% vs 12.0%, p=0.021; ACR70: 17.9% vs 4.0%, p=0.030), and the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (-0.48 vs -0.25, p=0.005). A biomarker-based disease activity score showed a dose-dependent decrease at week 12, indicating suppression of disease-related biological pathways. Adverse events were generally mild or moderate in intensity. No significant hypersensitivity reactions, serious or opportunistic infections, or changes in pulmonary parameters were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Mavrilimumab induced rapid clinically significant responses in RA subjects, suggesting that inhibiting the mononuclear phagocyte pathway may provide a novel therapeutic approach for RA.

Vandetanib with FOLFIRI in patients with advanced colorectal adenocarcinoma: results from an open-label, multicentre Phase I study.

PURPOSE: The safety and tolerability of vandetanib (ZACTIMA; ZD6474) plus FOLFIRI was investigated in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: Patients eligible for first- or second-line chemotherapy received once-daily oral doses of vandetanib (100 or 300 mg) plus 14-day treatment cycles of FOLFIRI. RESULTS: A total of 21 patients received vandetanib 100 mg (n = 11) or 300 mg (n = 10) + FOLFIRI. Combination therapy was well tolerated at both vandetanib dose levels. There were no DLTs in the vandetanib 100 mg cohort and one DLT of hypertension (CTCAE grade 3) in the 300 mg cohort. The most common adverse events were diarrhoea (n = 20), nausea (n = 12) and fatigue (n = 10). Two patients (one in each cohort) discontinued vandetanib due to adverse events (rash, 100 mg cohort; hypertension, 300 mg cohort). There was no apparent pharmacokinetic interaction between vandetanib and FOLFIRI. Preliminary efficacy results included two confirmed partial responses in the 100 mg cohort and 9 patients with stable disease > or =8 weeks (100 mg, n = 7; 300 mg, n = 2). CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily vandetanib (100 or 300 mg) in combination with a standard FOLFIRI regimen was generally well tolerated in patients with advanced CRC.

Open-label phase I trial of vandetanib in combination with mFOLFOX6 in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Vandetanib (ZACTIMA) is a once-daily oral inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor, epidermal growth factor and RET receptor tyrosine kinases. The safety and tolerability of vandetanib plus mFOLFOX6 was investigated in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: Patients eligible for first- or second-line chemotherapy received once-daily oral doses of vandetanib (100 or 300 mg) plus 14-day treatment cycles of mFOLFOX6. RESULTS: Seventeen patients received vandetanib 100 mg (n = 9) or 300 mg (n = 8) plus mFOLFOX6. The protocol definition of a tolerable dose (vandetanib-related dose-limiting toxicity [DLT] in less than two patients) was met in both dose cohorts, with one DLT of diarrhoea reported in each. Overall, the most common adverse events were diarrhoea, nausea and lethargy (all n = 11). There was no pharmacokinetic interaction between vandetanib and mFOLFOX6. Preliminary efficacy results included one complete response and three confirmed partial responses. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced CRC, once-daily vandetanib (100 or 300 mg) with mFOLFOX6 was generally well tolerated.

Efficacy and Safety of Salmeterol/Fluticasone Propionate Combination Delivered by the Diskustrade mark or Pressurised Metered-Dose Inhaler in Children with Asthma.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Salmeterol and fluticasone propionate are well established in the treatment of childhood asthma, and their combination is effective in children aged 4-11 years. Asthma guidelines recommend that the inhaler device best suited to the individual should be used to administer asthma treatment. The aim of this study was to further evaluate the efficacy of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination (SFC) delivered by the Diskustrade mark (50/100mug, one inhalation twice daily) and compare it with that observed when SFC is delivered by a chlorofluorocarbon-free pressurised metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) [25/50mug, two inhalations twice daily] in children aged 4-11 years with persistent asthma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This equivalence study had a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group design and comprised asthmatic children aged 4-11 years who required beclometasone (beclomethasone dipropionate)

Short-term safety and tolerability of double-dose salmeterol/fluticasone propionate in adult asthmatic patients.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of asthma exacerbations in patients receiving salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (Seretidetrade mark or Advair((R))) is low. However, when asthma control deteriorates, clinicians may instruct patients to double the dose of their inhaled corticosteroid medication for a short period. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate that doubling the dose of Seretidetrade mark for a period of 2 weeks in subjects with persistent asthma is safe and well tolerated. METHODS: This randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study was conducted in primary-care centres. Adults with a post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) of >/=70% predicted were stratified to receive a single dose of Seretidetrade mark 50mug/100mug, 50mug/250mug or 50mug/500mug twice daily from a Diskustrade mark inhaler for a 4-week run-in period, dependent on the dose of inhaled corticosteroid on entry. Subjects were then randomised to receive either an extra inhalation of the same dose of Seretidetrade mark received during the run-in (double dose) or an inhalation of matching placebo (single dose) for 14 days in a 2 : 1 ratio. Subjects were asked to record any adverse events, morning and evening heart rate (HR), peak flow and relief medication use in daily record cards. The primary endpoint was tremor as perceived by the subject. Clinic evaluations included HR, 12-lead ECG, and potassium and glucose levels. RESULTS: 110 and 208 subjects received single- and double-dose Seretidetrade mark, respectively. Only one subject experienced tremor. This was classified as mild and occurred in a subject receiving double-dose Seretidetrade mark (50mug/100mug). There was no difference between the treatment groups in the incidence of tremor (difference <1%; 95% CI -6, 8). Other salmeterol-related adverse events (palpitations, muscle cramps and headache) and fluticasone propionate-related events (oral candidiasis and hoarseness) occurred in a similar percentage of subjects in each treatment group. The treatment differences for morning and evening HR measurements showed small differences between the two groups (<2 beats/min). The adjusted mean treatment difference (double dose - single dose) in morning HR was 1.1 beats/min (95% CI 0.2, 2.0) and evening HR was 0.9 beats/min (95% CI 0.1, 1.7). Seven percent of subjects receiving single-dose Seretidetrade mark and 8% receiving double-dose Seretidetrade mark had a QTc change from baseline in the interval 30-59 msec. No increases above 59 msec were seen in either group. There were no clinically significant changes from baseline for potassium levels. Two percent of subjects in the single dose and <1% in the double-dose group had a change from a non-clinically significant baseline blood glucose assessment to a clinically significant abnormality at the end of treatment. CONCLUSION: In circumstances in which a physician may be considering doubling the dose of Seretidetrade mark for a short period of time in adult asthmatics, this study demonstrates that doubling the dose for a period of 2 weeks is safe and well tolerated.