Does pulsatile perfusion improve outcome after cardiac surgery? A propensity-matched analysis of 1959 patients.

OBJECTIVE: We analyzed the influence of pulsatile perfusion on recovery after coronary bypass grafting (CABG) or aortic valve replacement (AVR). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2008 and December 2010, 1959 consecutive patients underwent CABG, AVR, or both. The choice for pulsatile perfusion (PP, n=220) or non-pulsatile perfusion (NPP, n=1739) was made by the surgeon. Patient propensity score to receive PP or NPP was calculated according to 15 preoperative variables. Resulting propensity scores, logistic EuroSCORE, perfusion type and surgeon were analyzed to evaluate their role for mortality, length of postoperative ICU and hospital stay (LOHS), transfusion requirements and renal function. Risk stratified non-parametric univariate analyses and propensity adjusted multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: EuroSCORE and hospital mortality did not differ significantly between PP and NPP. EuroSCORE was the best predictive factor for all examined variables (p<0.001). PP was superior concerning LOHS (p=0.019) and this benefit increased with higher logistic EuroSCORE. The surgeon significantly influenced ventilation time, ICU stay and transfusion requirements. CONCLUSION: Pulsatile perfusion did not influence perioperative outcome parameters, renal function and mortality, but resulted in shorter hospital stay, especially in critically ill patients.

Outcome following single vs bilateral lung transplantation in recipients 60 years of age and older.

AIMS: The significant shortage of donor organs in lung transplantation necessitates a careful selection of lung transplant recipients. The outcome of lung transplant recipients aged 60 years and older has not been analyzed systematically. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our experience with older recipients. Between January 1999 and July 2003, 248 patients underwent lung transplantation at our institution, of which 18 were aged 60 years and older (7.3%, range 60-66, mean 62 +/- 1.1). RESULTS: Eleven (61%) of the recipients 60 years and older received a single (SLTx) and seven (39%), a bilateral lung transplant. Donor age in the single transplant cohort was 30 +/- 4 years. It was 33 +/- 3 years in bilateral patients. Posttransplant ventilation time was significantly different among groups, with 282 +/- 32 hours after bilateral and 56 +/- 13 hours after transplant (P < .05). Also significantly longer was the length of the ICU stay in the bilateral group. First PaO2 in the ICU was not different among the two groups. The 1-year survival in the single transplant group was significantly better compared to the bilateral group with 73% versus 43%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The 1-year survival following lung transplantation in patients older than 60 years is markedly reduced compared to recipients under 60 years of age. If a lung transplant is considered in a recipient above the age of 60 years, a single transplant should be favoured. If that is not indicated, patients over 60 should be very carefully selected for bilateral transplant.

Matched-pair analysis of conventional versus endoluminal AAA treatment outcomes during the initial phase of an aortic endografting program.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether endovascular stent-grafts implanted during the early phase of an aortic endografting program have advantages over conventional surgical procedures for treatment of infrarenal aortic aneurysm (AAA). METHODS: In the first months of an endografting program, 37 patients (36 men; mean age 67.9 +/- 7.1 years, range 55 to 86) underwent AAA repair with endovascular implantation of a Vanguard (n = 17) or Talent (n = 20) bifurcated stent-graft. Data collected during the perioperative period and in follow-up were compared retrospectively to a matched group of 37 elective surgical patients. RESULTS: All endograft implantations were completed. Two type I and 6 type II endoleaks (21.6%) were seen postoperatively. Five type II sealed without intervention; 1 type I endoleak was corrected with an additional stent, but 1 type I and 1 type II endoleaks persisted despite attempts with coil embolization. Two (5.4%) endograft patients died during the perioperative period; however, this was not significantly different (p = 0.15) from the control group. In the mean follow-up of 12 +/- 6 months for both groups, 1 (2.7%) late conversion was necessary at 2 years for aneurysm expansion in an endograft patient with an unsealed type I endoleak. CONCLUSIONS: In our learning curve experience with aortic endografting, postoperative morbidity and mortality were higher in endograft patients compared to conventionally treated controls. Only in the endograft group was reoperation required during follow-up. Careful monitoring with periodic imaging studies is mandatory after endoluminal AAA treatment.

Human cytokine responses to coronary artery bypass grafting with and without cardiopulmonary bypass.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is associated with a systemic inflammatory response. This has been attributed to cytokine release caused by extracorporeal circulation and myocardial ischemia. This study compares the inflammatory response after CABG with cardiopulmonary bypass and after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCABG) without cardiopulmonary bypass. METHODS: Cytokine release and complement activation (interleukin-6 and interleukin-8, soluble tumor necrosis factor receptors 1 and 2, complement factor C3a, and C1 esterase inhibitor) were determined in 24 patients before and after CABG or MIDCABG. The maximum body temperature, chest drainage, and fluid balance were recorded for 24 hours after operation. RESULTS: Release of interleukin-6, interleukin-8, and tumor necrosis factor receptors 1 and 2 was significantly higher (p < or = 0.005) in the CABG group than the MIDCABG group just after operation. After 24 hours, a significant increase in interleukin-6 was also found in the MIDCABG group (p = 0.001) compared with preoperative value. Body temperature and fluid balance were significantly higher after CABG (p < or = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting represents a less traumatizing technique of surgical revascularization. The reduction in the inflammatory response may be advantageous for patients with a high degree of comorbidity.

Site of pleural drain insertion and early postoperative pulmonary function following coronary artery bypass grafting with internal mammary artery.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery using the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) impairs postoperative pulmonary function. We studied the changes in pulmonary function and subjective pain relative to the site of chest tube insertion. DESIGN: Thirty patients undergoing CABG surgery using the LIMA were randomized into two groups. Group A (n = 15) received a left chest tube inserted from the midline (subxyphoid). Group B (n = 15) had a tube placed in the sixth intercostal space at the anterior axillary line. All of the patients underwent bedside pulmonary function testing preoperatively and on postoperative days (PODs) 1, 3, and 5. Pain sensation was quantified by a standardized score (1 to 10). RESULTS: A significant impairment of pulmonary function parameters was observed in both groups until POD 5. For group A, the decline in percent predicted (+/-SD) in the vital capacity (VC) from before surgery to POD 5 was, respectively, 92.3+/-30.6% to 56.9+/-12.6% (p < 0.001). For group B, the decline in the VC was from 88.0+/-18.2% to 55.5+/-14.8% (p < 0.001). The FEV1 declined concomitantly in group A from 86.2+/-18.2% to 50.8+/-12.1%, and in group B from 83.5+/-16.4% to 53.9+/-12.5% (p < 0.001). On POD 1, a significantly lower decrease in the VC was measured in group A than in group B, respectively: 45.3+/-15.5% vs 28.6+/-8.7% (p < 0.001). A significantly lower decrease in the FEV1 was also seen in group A than in group B, respectively: 36.9+/-12.9% vs 28.0+/-10.6% (p < 0.05). Pain experienced during deep inspiration was also significantly less in group A than in group B, respectively: 1.2+/-1.1 vs 2.5+/-0.9 (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Subxyphoid insertion of the pleural drain leads to a significantly lower impairment of pulmonary function and less subjective pain than insertion at the intercostal position. The drainage of the left pleural space is equally effective with both techniques.

Early biochemical indicators of the obliterative bronchiolitis syndrome in lung transplantation.

The diagnosis of the obliterative bronchiolitis syndrome in lung transplantation is presently best established by evaluation of postoperative lung function tests. Unfortunately the decline in lung function occurs only when obliteration has progressed significantly and is therefore not an early predictive indicator. To distinguish patients at increased risk for the development of obliterative bronchiolitis, we regularly assessed the chemiluminescence response of polymorphonuclear leukocytes, opsonic capacity, and plasma elastase/beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase in 52 outpatients (25 women and 27 men; mean age 45 +/- 12 years) who underwent transplantation between January 1991 and January 1992. Recent onset bronchiolitis within the described observation period occurred in 16 patients (group obliterative bronchiolitis). A matched cohort of 16 patients was formed according to type of procedure, age and follow-up (control) from the remaining 36 patients. Data obtained from a period 6 months before clinical onset of the syndrome showed a significant drop of the opsonic capacity (group obliterative bronchiolitis = 87% +/- 7%; control = 100% +/- 9%; p < 0.023) and rise of the N-acetyl-D-glucosaminidase (group obliterative bronchiolitis = 7.5 +/- 2 U/L; control = 5.8 +/- 1.8 U/L; p < 0.04). No correlation was found between the number of infectious events or rejection episodes and the incidence of obliterative bronchiolitis. According to these results, it can be concluded that a decrease in the plasma opsonic capacity and a rise in beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase may be early markers before clinical onset of obliterative bronchiolitis. The nonspecific immune system may therefore play an important role in the development of obliterative bronchiolitis.