Jumping into recovery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of discriminatory and responsive force plate parameters in individuals following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction during countermovement and drop jumps.

Purpose: Comprehensive understanding of force plate parameters distinguishing individuals postprimary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) from healthy controls during countermovement jumps (CMJ) and/or drop jumps (DJ) is lacking. This review addresses this gap by identifying discriminative force plate parameters and examining changes over time in individuals post-ACLR during CMJ and/or DJ. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta analyses following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Nine databases were searched from inception to March 2022. We included cross-sectional papers comparing post-ACLR with healthy controls or longitudinal studies of individuals at least 6 months postprimary ACLR while performing CMJ and/or DJ on force plates. The methodological quality was appraised using the Modified Downs and Black Checklist. Results: Thirty-three studies including 1185 (50.38%) participants post-ACLR, and 1167 (49.62%) healthy controls, were included. Data were categorised into single-leg CMJ, double-leg CMJ, single-leg DJ, and double-leg DJ. Jump height was reduced in both single (mean difference [MD] = -3.13; p < 0.01; 95% confidence interval [CI]: [-4.12, -2.15]) and double-leg (MD = -4.24; p < 0.01; 95% CI: [-5.14, -3.34]) CMJs amongst individuals with ACLR. Similarly, concentric impulse and eccentric/concentric impulse asymmetry could distinguish between ACLR (MD = 3.42; p < 0.01; 95% CI: [2.19, 4.64]) and non-ACLR (MD = 5.82; p < 0.01; 95% CI: [4.80, 6.80]) individuals. In double-leg DJs, peak vertical ground reaction forces were lower in the involved side (MD = -0.10; p = 0.03; 95% CI: [-0.18, -0.01]) but higher in the uninvolved side (MD = 0.15; p < 0.01; 95% CI: [0.10, 0.20]) when compared to controls and demonstrated significant changes between 6 months and 3 years post-ACLR. Conclusion: This study identified discriminative kinetic parameters when comparing individuals with and without ACLR and also monitored neuromuscular function post-ACLR. Due to heterogeneity, a combination of parameters may be required to better identify functional deficits post-ACLR. Level of Evidence: Level III.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Return-to-Sport Decision-Making: A Scoping Review.

CONTEXT: Clinical guidelines support the use of testing batteries to assess athlete readiness for return to sport (RTS) and risk of reinjury after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACL-R). There is no consensus on the composition of the testing batteries. Test selection is based mainly on commonality in research, personal preference, and equipment availability. Including athletic performance assessments (APA) used in the athlete's sport may assist RTS decision-making for stakeholders. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether APA for speed, agility, strength, or cardiovascular endurance are (1) used in ACL-R RTS literature and (2) indicative of RTS or reinjury rates. DATA SOURCES: A systematic search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, Scopus, Web of Science, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. STUDY SELECTION: Eligibility criteria were as follows: (1) athletes between 6 months and 2 years post-ACL-R, (2) commonly used APA, (3) peer-reviewed primary study with original published data. STUDY DESIGN: Scoping Review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4. DATA EXTRACTION: A total of 17 studies included 24 instances of APA with a high degree of heterogeneity for both tests and protocols. RESULTS: Agility makes up 75% of the APA. Only 17.6% of studies reported RTS or reinjury rates, none of which reported a significant relationship between these rates and APA outcomes. CONCLUSION: Speed, strength, and cardiovascular endurance tests are underrepresented in ACL-R RTS literature. Compared with healthy controls, deficits in APA results for ACL-R athletes were common; however, many studies reported significant improvements in results for ACL-R athletes over time. There is some evidence that well-trained ACL-R athletes can match the performance of uninjured athletes in high-level sports.

Monitoring External Workload With Wearable Technology After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Scoping Review.

Background: Current sports medicine and rehabilitation trends indicate an increasing use of wearable technology. The ability of these devices to collect, transmit, and process physiological, biomechanical, bioenergy, and environmental data may aid in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) workload monitoring and return-to-sport decision-making. In addition, their ease of use allows assessments to occur outside the clinical or laboratory settings and across a broader timeline. Purpose: To (1) determine how wearable technology can assess external workload deficits between limbs (involved and uninvolved) and between groups (healthy controls vs patients with ACLR) during physical activity (PA) or sport and (2) describe the types of sensors, sensor specifications, assessment protocols, outcomes of interest, and participant characteristics from the included studies. Study Design: Scoping review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: In February 2023, a systematic search was performed in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, Compendex, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global databases. Eligible studies included assessments of PA or sports workloads via wearable technology after ACLR. Results: Twenty articles met eligibility criteria and were included. The primary activity assessed was activities of daily living, although rehabilitation, training, and competition were also represented. Accelerometers, global positioning system units, pedometers, and pressure sensor insoles were worn to collect external workload data, which was quantified as kinetic, kinematic, and temporospatial data. Daily steps (count) and moderate to vigorous PA (min/day or week) were the most common units of measurement. A limited number of studies included outcomes related to between-limb asymmetries. Conclusion: The findings of this scoping review highlight the versatility of wearable technologies to collect patients' kinetic, kinematic, and temporospatial data and assess external workload outcomes after ACLR. In addition, some wearable technologies identified deficits in workload compared with healthy controls and between reconstructed and unaffected limbs.