Speaker Diversity and Audience Ratings at a National Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Conference.

BACKGROUND: There is a need to improve speaker diversity at gastroenterology conferences, but little public data exist to quantify this. In addition, the perception of diverse speakers by conference audiences is not appreciated. We sought to identify time trends in speaker profiles and audience ratings at a national inflammatory bowel diseases conference. METHODS: Faculty profiles and audience feedback forms from 2014 to 2020 were reviewed for an annual inflammatory bowel diseases meeting. Speaker demographics including gender, race, and years of experience post-training were collected. Continuing medical education surveys were examined for audience ratings of speakers' knowledge level and teaching ability. RESULTS: Six years of data were collected, including 560 main program faculty and 13 905 total feedback forms. The percentage of female speakers increased from 25% in 2016 to 39% in 2020. All-male panels decreased from 47% in 2014 to 2017 to 11% in 2018 to 2020. Racial diversity of speakers remained unchanged (13% Asian, 5% Hispanic/Latinx, 1% Black). In audience feedback forms, female speakers from all sessions were perceived as having equal knowledge base and teaching ability compared with male speakers. However, speakers with <10 years of experience post-training were viewed as less knowledgeable and with poorer teaching abilities compared with more senior faculty. CONCLUSIONS: Gender diversity at inflammatory bowel disease conferences is improving. However, there remain significant gaps, particularly in racial diversity and improving perceptions of early-career speakers. These data should inform program committees for future gastroenterology conferences.

@MondayNightIBD and the Expanding Gastroenterology Twitterverse: A Study on Continuing Medical Education on #GITwitter.

INTRODUCTION: @MondayNightIBD provides weekly continuing medical education (CME) activities focused on inflammatory bowel diseases to clinicians on Twitter. Given its novelty, we assessed whether @MondayNightIBD improves learner knowledge and leads to practice change. We also examined whether inflammatory bowel disease topics addressed in @MondayNightIBD are aligned with entrustable professional activities (EPA) set forth by national gastroenterology societies. METHODS: @MondayNightIBD CME sessions from February 2020 (date the handle was accredited to provide CME) to May 2021 were analyzed. Preactivity and postactivity knowledge was assessed for average score improvement using the Student t test and Cohen d effect size. Postactivity surveys examined for learners' perceptions of whether activities met educational goals and affected willingness to change clinical practice using descriptive percentages. In addition, activities from April 2019 (date of @MondayNightIBD inception) to May 2021 were assessed for whether they address EPA set forth by national gastroenterology societies. RESULTS: Learners' knowledge improved after @MondayNightIBD activities with average preactivity correct answers of 58% to a postactivity average of 79% ( P < 0.001). Greater than 95% of learners found that activities met learning objectives and enhanced knowledge. A total of 92% of learners were committed to practice change because of their @MondayNightIBD participation. Finally, 78% of EPA set forth by a national gastroenterology society have been covered by @MondayNightIBD since its inception. DISCUSSION: @MondayNightIBD is a Twitter-based CME activities platform for gastroenterologists and other clinicians that is embraced by learners, improves knowledge, and encourages practice change. Topics covered during @MondayNightIBD are aligned with EPA set forth by national gastroenterology societies. @MondayNightIBD is a successful model of social media medical education and a novel approach to effectively provide evidence-based CME.

Self-regulated learning and the future of diagnostic reasoning education.

Diagnostic reasoning is a foundational ability of health professionals. The goal of enhancing clinical reasoning education is improved diagnostic accuracy and reduced diagnostic error. In order to do so, health professions educators need not only help learners improve their clinical reasoning, but teach them how to develop expert performance. An evidence-based learning strategy that is strongly associated with expert performance is self-regulated learning (SRL). SRL is the modulation of "self-generated thoughts, feelings, and actions that are planned and cyclically adapted to the attainment of personal goals". At this time, there is little data on the use of SRL to improve diagnostic reasoning. However, there appear to be numerous opportunities to utilize SRL in novel ways to improve diagnostic reasoning given what is already known about this competency. Examples that are discussed include the role SRL can play in simulation, clinical experiences, assessment, and novel technologies such as virtual reality, artificial intelligence, and machine learning. SRL is central to the philosophy that health professionals are life-long learners, as it teaches learners "how to learn". SRL has the potential to help achieve the goal of improved diagnostic accuracy and reduced diagnostic error.

Is there a standardized practice for the development of international ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease treatment guidelines?

BACKGROUND: Guidelines are published by international gastroenterology societies regarding the management of ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) to help clinicians to provide high-quality patient care. We examined the guidelines for the quality and strength of evidence used to develop the recommendations, methods for grading evidence, differences in disease-specific recommendations, conflicts of interest, and plans for guideline updates. METHODS: A systematic search was performed on PubMed using "ulcerative colitis," "Crohn's disease," and "guidelines" in April 2019. International gastroenterology society websites were searched for UC- and CD-specific guidelines. Guidelines from 12 societies were examined by two authors. Chi-squared tests were used for comparing evidence-level grades, strength of recommendations, and reported conflicts of interest. Linear-regression modeling was used to evaluate the relationship between the number of authors and the number of recommendations in a given guideline. RESULTS: Of 28 guidelines reviewed, 25 (89%) used a total of three different systems to grade the level of evidence and 2 (7%) used an unknown system. Three (11%) reviewed guidelines did not provide a conflict-of-interest statement, while three (11%) provided a timeline for guideline updates. Of 1,265 total statements examined, 246 (19%) reported no grade of evidence quality or explicitly stated that the recommendation was based on "expert opinion." One hundred and thirty-five (22%) UC recommendations were noted to be "weak/conditional" and 95 (16%) did not have a recommendation strength. Two hundred and forty-two (37%) CD recommendations were noted to be "weak/conditional" and 151 (23%) did not have a recommendation strength. CONCLUSION: The majority of UC and CD guidelines are based on a low/very low quality of evidence and are further weakened due to the lack of homogeneity in specific aspects of management recommendations as well as conflicts of interest.

Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines Are Primarily Based on Low-Moderate-Quality Evidence.

BACKGROUND: Owning to colorectal cancer's (CRC) high mortality, multiple societies developed screening guidelines. AIMS: We aimed to assess the overall quality of CRC screening guidelines. METHODS: A systematic search was performed to review CRC screening guidelines for conflicts of interest (COI), recommendation quality and strength, external document review, use of patient representative, and recommendation age-as per Institute of Medicine (IOM) standards. In addition, recommendations were compared between guidelines/societies. Statistical analysis was conducted using R. RESULTS: Twelve manuscripts were included in final analysis. Not all guidelines reported on COI, provided a grading method, underwent external review, or included patient representation. 14.5%, 34.2%, and 51.3% of recommendations were based on high-, moderate-, and low-quality evidence, respectively. 27.8%, 54.6%, and 17.5% of recommendations were strong, weak/conditional, and did not provide a strength, respectively. The proportion of high-quality evidence and strong recommendations did not significantly differ across societies, nor were significant associations between publication year and evidence quality seen (P = 0.4). CONCLUSIONS: While the majority of the CRC guidelines contain aspects of the standards set forth by the IOM, there is an overall lack of adherence. As over 85% of recommendations are based on low-moderate quality evidence, further studies on CRC screening are warranted to improve the overall quality of evidence.

P033 Moving the Needle on Speaker Diversity at AIBD.

BACKGROUND: Diversity of invited speakers at academic conferences is a topic of increased focus in recent years. While there have been efforts to improve speaker diversity, an evaluation of this in the IBD field has not been undertaken to date. We aimed to address gaps in knowledge of speaker gender, race, and experience at a major annual IBD conference over time. METHODS: AIBD program brochures from 2014 to 2020 were reviewed by two providers to evaluate speaker demographic information including gender, race, topic of discussion, institutional affiliation, and, for those trained in gastroenterology, years post-fellowship. In addition, the proportion of all-male panels was calculated. As a comparator, the proportion of female speakers and all-male panels was then compared to a control conference run by the same CME organization (Personalized Therapies in Thoracic Oncology). RESULTS: The percentage of female speakers of any specialty at AIBD increased from 25% in 2016 to 39% in 2020. Female adult gastroenterologist speakers increased from 12% in 2015 to 27% in 2020. The percentage of all gastroenterologists that are female in the US is 19%. All-male panels also decreased from an average of 47% in 2014-2017, to 11% in 2018-2020. As a comparator, 47% of speakers at the control conference were female and there were no all-male panels in 2020. For race, in any given year an average of 13% of speakers were Asian, 5% Hispanic/Latinx, and 1% Black. This remained static over time. The percentage of Asian, Hispanic/Latinx, and Black gastroenterologists in the US is 29%, 5%, and 6%, respectively. Average years of experience of speakers at AIBD appeared relatively static, with a mean of 15 years since fellowship training per speaker. CONCLUSION: From 2014-2020, the proportion of female speakers at AIBD has increased to over one third in main programming. There remains room for improvement, particularly in increasing the racial and ethnic diversity of speakers and inviting more gastroenterologists in the early stages of their careers.

Are Quality Metrics in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Rooted on Substantial Quality Evidence? A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Quality metrics were established to develop standards to help assess quality of care, yet variation in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) clinical practice exists. We performed a systematic review to assess the overall quality of evidence cited in formulating IBD quality metrics. METHODS: A systematic search was performed on PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE. All major national and international IBD societies were included. Quality metrics were assessed for evidence quality and categorized as category A (guideline based), category B (primarily retrospective and observational studies) or category C (expert opinion). Quality metrics were examined for the type of metric, the quality, measurability, review, existing conflicts of interest (COI), and patient participation of the metric. Statistical analysis was conducted in R. RESULTS: A total of 143 distinct, and an aggregate total of 217 quality metrics were included and analyzed. 68%, 3.2%, and 28.6% of IBD quality metrics were based on low, moderate, and high quality of evidence, respectively. The proportion of high quality evidence across societies was significantly different (P <0.01). Five organizations included patients in quality metric development, three reported external review, not all reported measurable outcomes or stated the presence of a COI. Finally, 43% of quality metrics were published more than 5 years ago. CONCLUSIONS: Quality metrics are important to standardize practice. As more than two-thirds of the quality metrics in IBD are based on low quality evidence, further studies are needed to improve the overall quality of evidence supporting the development of quality measures.

Is Therapeutic Drug Monitoring for Anti-tumour Necrosis Factor Agents in Adults With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Ready for Standard of Care? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Using therapeutic drug monitoring [TDM] in adult patients with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] remains controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to answer four clinical PICO [Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome] questions. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central from inception to June 30, 2019. Remission was defined by the manuscripts' definitions of clinical remission. Data were analysed using RevMan 5.3. Quality of evidence was assessed with GRADE methodology. RESULTS: We identified and screened 3365 abstracts and 11 articles. PICO 1 Reactive vs No TDM: six studies pooled showed 57.1% [257/450] failed to achieve remission following reactive TDM vs 44.7% [268/600] in the no TDM group (risk ratio [RR]: 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88-1.47). PICO 2 Proactive vs no TDM: five studies pooled showed 19.5% [75/384] failed to maintain remission in the proactive TDM group vs 33.4% [248/742] in the no TDM group [RR: 0.60; 95% CI 0.35-1.04]. PICO 3 Proactive vs Reactive TDM: two retrospective studies pooled showed 14.2% [26/183] failure to maintain remission in the proactive TDM group and 64.7% [119/184] in the reactive TDM group [RR: 0.22; 95% CI 0.15-0.32]. PICO 4 TDM [proactive/reactive] vs No TDM: we pooled 10 studies showing 39.7% [332/837] failed to achieve remission in the TDM [proactive/reactive] cohort vs 40.3% [428/1063] in the no TDM cohort [RR: 0.94; 95% CI 0.77-1.14]. Overall, the quality of evidence in each PICO was very low when using GRADE. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis shows that data supporting use of TDM in adults are limited and of very low quality. Further well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the place of TDM in clinical practice.

A Quality Improvement Educational Intervention to Increase Knowledge of Cardiogastroenterology Amongst Medical Trainees and Nursing Staff.

Introduction: The American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy recommends continuing aspirin prior to routine endoscopy. National data show that few endoscopists follow the current guidelines due to concern about bleeding and perceived minimal downside to stopping aspirin. Utilizing the Kern model, we implemented an educational quality improvement initiative aimed at increasing knowledge of antithrombotic management periendoscopy and during acute gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Methods: We implemented an interactive lecture incorporating a large-group discussion to help residents learn to define low- versus high-risk procedures, distinguish thrombotic risk in medical conditions, present the procedural risks associated with use of antiplatelets, and list current practice guidelines. Nursing staff received a tailored lecture with the goal of learning proper management of current antiplatelets and holding parameters for anticoagulants prior to endoscopy. Both groups received pre-and posttest questionnaires evaluating their knowledge. Results: Eighteen nurses and 75 medical trainees received this intervention. Significant score improvement was noted in both groups. The greatest change was seen in aspirin management (30.5% vs. 95.0% for group 1, 43.7% vs. 91.9% for group 2; p < .0001). For management of antiplatelets after aspirin-induced GI bleed, the medical trainees improved from 50.7% to 93.3%. Chi-square analysis showed a statistically significant difference in knowledge across all areas among medical trainees pre-and posttest (p < .001). Discussion: This quality-based educational intervention significantly increased the knowledge of nurses and medical trainees in management guidelines that directly impact patient care. Similar educational programs may be very effective in improving quality and safety.

Brain imaging of cognitively normal individuals with 2 parents affected by late-onset AD.

OBJECTIVES: This brain imaging study examines whether cognitively normal (NL) individuals with 2 parents affected by late-onset Alzheimer disease (LOAD) show evidence of more extensive Alzheimer disease pathology compared with those who have a single parent affected by LOAD. METHODS: Fifty-two NL individuals received MRI, (11)C-Pittsburgh compound B (PiB)-PET, and (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG)-PET. These included 4 demographically balanced groups (n = 13/group, aged 32-72 years, 60% female, 30% APOE ε4 carriers) of NL individuals with maternal (FHm), paternal (FHp), and maternal and paternal (FHmp) family history of LOAD, and with negative family history (FH-). Statistical parametric mapping, voxel-based morphometry, and z-score mapping were used to compare MRI gray matter volumes (GMVs), partial volume-corrected PiB retention, and FDG metabolism across FH groups and vs FH-. RESULTS: NL FHmp showed more severe abnormalities in all 3 biomarkers vs the other groups regarding the number of regions affected and magnitude of impairment. PiB retention and hypometabolism were most pronounced in FHmp, intermediate in FHm, and lowest in FHp and FH-. GMV reductions were highest in FHmp and intermediate in FHm and FHp vs FH-. In all FH+ groups, amyloid-ß deposition exceeded GMV loss and hypometabolism exceeded GMV loss (p < 0.001), while amyloid-ß deposition exceeded hypometabolism in FHmp and FHp but not in FHm. CONCLUSIONS: These biomarker findings show a "LOAD parent-dose effect" in NL individuals several years, if not decades, before possible clinical symptoms.

Framingham cardiovascular risk profile correlates with impaired hippocampal and cortical vasoreactivity to hypercapnia.

Vascular risk factors affect cerebral blood flow (CBF) and cerebral vascular reactivity, contributing to cognitive decline. Hippocampus is vulnerable to both Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology and ischemia; nonetheless, the information about the impact of vascular risk on hippocampal perfusion is minimal. Cognitively, healthy elderly (NL=18, 69.9±6.7 years) and subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI=15, 74.9±8.1 years) were evaluated for the Framingham cardiovascular risk profile (FCRP). All underwent structural imaging and resting CBF assessment with arterial spin labeling (ASL) at 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In 24 subjects (NL=17, MCI=7), CBF was measured after a carbon dioxide rebreathing challenge. Across all subjects, FCRP negatively correlated with hippocampal (ρ=-0.41, P=0.049) and global cortical (ρ=-0.46, P=0.02) vasoreactivity to hypercapnia (VR(h)). The FCRP-VR(h) relationships were most pronounced in the MCI group: hippocampus (ρ=-0.77, P=0.04); global cortex (ρ=-0.83, P=0.02). The FCRP did not correlate with either volume or resting CBF. The hippocampal VR(h) was lower in MCI than in NL subjects (Z=-2.0, P=0.047). This difference persisted after age and FCRP correction (F([3,20])=4.6, P=0.05). An elevated risk for vascular pathology is associated with a reduced response to hypercapnia in both hippocampal and cortical tissue. The VR(h) is more sensitive to vascular burden than either resting CBF or brain volume.