HIV Screening Among Young Black Men Who Have Sex with Women in New Orleans, LA.

There are significant disparities in HIV acquisition, with Black individuals facing disproportionately more new diagnoses. Per Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), all people aged 13-64 should be tested at least once in their lifetime, and men at increased risk (e.g., those who have male sexual contact, multiple partners, have partners with multiple partners, or share drug injection equipment) should be tested annually. The study included young Black men who have sex with women (MSW), aged 15-26, and who live in New Orleans, LA. Survey data was used to elicit the frequency and factors associated with three self-reported outcomes: (1) history of ever HIV testing, (2) HIV screening in the last year among those who were recommended per CDC, and (3) HIV positivity. Of the 1321 men included, 694/1321 men (52.5%) reported ever having been HIV tested. There were 708/1321 (54.2%) men who met the recommendation for annual screening and 321/708 (45.3%) of these eligible men reported being tested in the previous year. Of those ever tested, 44/694 (6.3%) self-reported testing positive. In logistic regression analysis, older age (OR: 1.27, p < 0.001), prior STI testing (OR: 6.45, p < 0.001), and prior incarceration (OR:1.70, p = 0.006) were positively associated with having ever received an HIV test, and ever having a male partner (OR: 3.63, p = 0.014) was associated with HIV positivity. Initiatives to improve HIV testing rates among young Black men who have sex with women are needed to reduce the burden of HIV and help the End the Epidemic initiative.

Syphilis Screening Among Young Black Men Who Have Sex With Women in New Orleans, LA.

BACKGROUND: Current US syphilis screening focuses on men who have sex with men (MSM), because of the increased risk of infection in their sexual networks, and on pregnant people, because of complications associated with congenital syphilis. However, screening for men who have sex with women (MSW) who are at increased risk of syphilis is also recommended. Factors associated with syphilis testing and positivity were assessed among young, Black MSW. METHODS: Data from the Check It study-a seek, test, and treat study for chlamydia in New Orleans, LA, among Black MSW aged 15 to 26 years-were used. Survey data were used to elicit self-reported syphilis testing, self-reported testing results, and sociodemographic and behavioral factors associated with these 2 outcomes. RESULTS: Per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, all men in the study were recommended for syphilis screening because of their age, race, and geographic location. Of the 1458 men included, 272 (18.7%) reported ever having been syphilis tested, 267 men reported their results, and 23 (8.6%) reported testing positive. In logistic regression, older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.21 per year older; P < 0.001), prior Chlamydia trachomatis , Neisseria gonorrhoeae , and/or HIV testing (OR, 50.32; P < 0.001), and younger age at sexual debut (0.90 per year older, P = 0.005) were significantly associated with prior syphilis testing. In addition, testing positive for C. trachomatis and/or N. gonorrhoeae during the study was significantly associated with a history of syphilis positivity (OR, 3.08; P = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: Although syphilis testing was associated with factors that might increase the risk of acquisition, only 19% of individuals meeting Centers for Disease Control and Prevention testing recommendations had ever been screened.

Are Prior Sexual Risk Behaviors Associated With Adherence to COVID-19 Preventative Behaviors Among Young Black Men?

BACKGROUND: Behavioral clustering is a phenomenon in which several risk or protective behaviors co-occur in an individual. We sought to determine if prior sexual risk behaviors among young Black men who have sex with women could predict subsequent nonadherence to COVID-19 prevention behaviors. METHODS: Young Black men who have sex with women aged 15 to 24 years previously enrolled in a community-based Chlamydia trachomatis (Ct) screening program were enrolled in a substudy between May and June 2020 and asked about adherence to 4 COVID-19 recommended nonpharmaceutical prevention behaviors (handwashing, mask wearing, social distancing, and following stay at home orders). Data from the original study were used to elicit the follow prepandemic behaviors including having multiple sex partners, inconsistent condom use, prior sexually transmitted infection testing behaviors, and substance use. Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to assess the association between historic risk behaviors and COVID-19 behavior score. RESULTS: There were 109 men included in the analysis, with a mean (SD) age of 20.5 (2.0) years. Inconsistent condom use, multiple sex partners, and prior HIV/sexually transmitted infection testing status were not associated with fewer COVID-19 preventive behaviors, but men who used any nonprescription drugs ( P = 0.001) or marijuana only ( P = 0.028) had a lower median COVID-19 preventative score compared with those who did not engage in those activities. CONCLUSIONS: Although none of the sexual risk behavior variables were associated, self-reported nonprescription drug and marijuana use were both significant predictors of lower adherence to COVID-19 preventative behaviors among young Black men. Young men who use drugs may need additional support to promote COVID-19 preventative behavior uptake.

Past incarceration and chlamydia infection among young Black men in New Orleans.

Background: Young Black men are disproportionately and adversely affected by incarceration and sexually transmitted infections (STIs), both of which share common social and structural determinants. It is well documented that incarcerated individuals, including youth, are more likely to acquire STIs in the carceral setting compared to the general population. However, the effects of imprisonment on sexual health outcomes after imprisonment are not well-understood. The relationship between incarceration history (having ever spent time in a correctional institution such as prison, jail, or juvenile detention) and chlamydia positivity was examined in this study. Methods: A secondary analysis of the Check it Program, a Chlamydia trachomatis (Ct) community-based seek, test, and treat screening program for Black men aged 15-24 who have sex with women in New Orleans was conducted. Participants completed a computer-assisted self-administered questionnaire on relevant sexual and social histories and provided a urine specimen for a Ct urine nucleic acid amplification test. Bivariate and multivariable regressions were used to estimate the association between incarceration history and chlamydia positivity. Results: Participants (N = 1,907) were enrolled from May 2017 to March 2020. Of those, 351/1,816 (19.3%) reported past incarceration and 203/1,888 (10.8%) tested positive for Ct. When adjusted for age, insurance status, and condom use, having a history of incarceration was positively associated with a positive Ct test (adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval):1.61 (1.12, 2.31), p = 0.0095). Conclusions: Interacting with the carceral system is associated with a positive Ct test post-incarceration. Incarceration may be an important marker for Ct acquisition in young Black men who have sex with women and those with a history of incarceration should be prioritized for Ct screening after release.

Effectiveness of Incentivized Peer Referral to Increase Enrollment in a Community-Based Chlamydia Screening and Treatment Study Among Young Black Men.

OBJECTIVES: Young Black men are under-represented in sexual health services and research, a condition likely magnified during COVID-19 shutdowns due to disruption of STI screening and treatment services. We examined the effect of incentivized peer referral (IPR) increasing peer referral among young Black men in a community-based chlamydia screening program. METHODS: Young Black men in New Orleans, LA, age 15-26 years enrolled in a chlamydia screening program between 3/2018 and 5/2021 were included. Enrollees were provided with recruitment materials to distribute to peers. Starting July 28, 2020, enrollees were also offered a $5 incentive for each peer enrolled. Enrollment was compared before and after the incentivize peer referral program (IPR) was implemented using multiple time series analysis (MTSA). RESULTS: The percentage of men referred by a peer was higher during IPR compared to pre-IPR (45.7% vs. 19.7%, p < 0.001). After the COVID-19 shutdown was lifted, there were 2.007 more recruitments per week (p = 0.044, 95% CI (0.0515, 3.964)) for IPR, compared to pre-IPR. Overall, there was a trending increase in recruitments in the IPR era relative to the pre-IPR era (0.0174 recruitments/week, p = 0.285, 95% CI (- 0.0146, 0.0493)) with less recruitment decay during IPR compared to pre-IPR. CONCLUSIONS: IPR may be an effective means of engaging young Black men in community-based STI research and prevention programs, particularly when clinic access is limited. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY SITE AND NUMBER: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT03098329.

A framework for using real-time evaluative interview feedback for health promotion program and evaluation improvement: The Check It case study.

Formative evaluation is a crucial strategy for health promotion program improvement. Early and ongoing formative evaluation can make a major impact on program outcomes; however, there are few frameworks that provide actual guidance on how programmatic or research teams can systematically perform this kind of important work. In this article we describe the use of an iterative real-time interview feedback framework we developed for Check It, a community-wide chlamydia screening and treatment program for young African American men in New Orleans, Louisiana. The framework considers the diverse and needed perspectives of multiple stakeholders, including participants, interviewers, transcribers, program staff, and lead researchers and/or administrators. Interviews were conducted with N = 15 Check It participants utilizing this approach. Employing the framework led to critical insights that resulted in several vital programmatic and evaluation improvements. Lessons learned, including strengths and challenges of utilizing the framework, are also shared so that this model can be replicated or adapted by program planning and evaluation professionals for other kinds of programs.

Anal and Oral Sex Behaviors Among Young Black Men Who Have Vaginal Sex: Evidence of the Need for Extragenital Testing for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea.

BACKGROUND: Unprotected oral and anal sex may result in extragenital sexually transmitted infections. The purposes of this study were to describe sexual behaviors, barrier use, and chlamydia/gonorrhea (Ct/GC) positivity among young Black men who have sex with women, and to examine the potential influence of extragenital infections on genital infections. METHODS: Young Black men who had vaginal sex were screened for Ct/GC in New Orleans, LA, from August 14, 2019, to February 29, 2020. Audio/computer-assisted self-interviews were used to collect data on demographics and sexual behaviors. χ2 /Fisher exact or t test/Wilcoxon rank tests were used to assess differences in behaviors by Ct/GC positivity. RESULTS: Among 373 men studied, 619 female partnerships were reported in the past 2 months. Vaginal sex was reported in all partnerships per study protocol, receiving fellatio in 42.7%, performing cunnilingus in 35.7%, and penile-anal sex in 5.9%. Although 31.4% of the men consistently used condoms for vaginal sex with all partners, consistent barrier use was low during cunnilingus (0.5%) and fellatio (5.1%). Urethral infection rates among all men in the sample were 12.6% for Ct and 1.6% for GC. There was no significant difference in Ct/GC rates between those using and not using condoms consistently during vaginal sex ( P = 0.38). CONCLUSIONS: Unprotected oral sex with female partners was common. The high rate of genital infection among men who used condoms consistently for vaginal sex suggests that oral infections could be serving as a reservoir of genital infection. Testing at all sites of exposure for youth who engage in heterosexual sex is merited.

Check It: A Community-Based Chlamydia Seek, Test, and Treat Program for Young Black Men Who Have Sex With Women in New Orleans, Louisiana.

BACKGROUND: Check It is a novel, bundled, community-based seek, test, and treat Chlamydia trachomatis (Ct) screening program for 15- to 24-year-old Black men in New Orleans who have sex with women. The program design addressed barriers and facilitators to Ct screening/treatment by enlisting trusted community partners, incorporating participant input, providing free index/partner expedited treatment, developing relatable marketing materials and an educational Web site, encouraging peer referral, and providing a modest monetary incentive. METHODS: Areas of high poverty were identified using census data; ethnographic/key informant interviews identified sites in those areas where the target population congregated. Black youth informed Web site design and social marketing. Content was inspirational/educational/amusing and endorsed recruitment and brand awareness. A community advisory board, participant interviews, community partner feedback, and recruitment staff involvement in the process evaluation helped refine the program in an ongoing manner. RESULTS: During formative stages, 41 key informant/community advisory board members informed program refinement. Community partners provided venue locations (n = 65) and participant referrals. Between May 22, 2017, and February 28, 2020, 1890 men were enrolled (acceptance rate, 96.0%) with Ct infection rate of 10.2%. Overall study treatment was provided to 86.1% (71.4%-90.9%) of participants who tested positive and 28.5% (14.5%-41.5%) of their partners. Findings from in-depth interviews with participants (n = 43) led to increased treatment uptake. CONCLUSIONS: C. trachomatis community screening of young Black men was successful through collaboration with trusted community partners, by tailoring implements/marketing with participant input, reducing barriers to treatment, and providing modest monetary incentives. The Check It program can serve as a roadmap for reducing health disparities in this population.

Sex education and STI fatalism, testing and infection among young African American men who have sex with women.

The purpose of this study was to examine the association between institution-delivered sex education given under real-world conditions and sexually transmitted infection (STI) rates, STI fatalism, and prior STI testing among African American men aged 15-24 who have sex with women. Participants were tested at community venues for Chlamydia and gonorrhoea and undertook a survey to elicit history of sex education and sexual health information. Among 1196 participants, 73.0% reported having received institution-delivered sex education topics including STI information (90.5%), condoms (89.2%), pregnancy/birth (72.1%) and birth control (67.1%). Among a subset of participants asked about the quality of sex education, 85.7% reported it was 'very good' or 'OK'. Prevalence rate for Chlamydia and/or gonorrhoea was 10.5%. Those who received sex education were more likely to have lower STI fatalism (51.0% vs. 42.4%, p=0.01) and more likely to report previous Chlamydia screening (44.1% vs. 31.6%, p<0.01), but did not have a significantly lower rate of Chlamydia and/or gonorrhoea (9.9% vs. 12.4%, p=0.20) compared to those who did not receive sex education. These findings suggest that institution-delivered sex education given under real-world conditions has beneficial effects on STI risk factors among young African American men.

Facilitators and Barriers to Patient-Delivered Partner Therapy Acceptance for Chlamydia trachomatis Among Young African American Men Who Have Sex With Women in a Southern Urban Epicenter.

BACKGROUND: Chlamydia trachomatis (Ct) disproportionately affects African American young people living in the Southern United States and can have negative consequences if left untreated. Patient-delivered partner therapy (PDPT) is an evidence-based practice in which individuals diagnosed with Ct can provide treatment directly to their sex partners. However, PDPT acceptance rates need improvement. Although reasons for PDPT acceptance have been explored previously, the facilitators and barriers to expedited partner therapy acceptance among young southern African American men who have sex with women have not yet been examined. METHODS: Twenty semistructured interviews were conducted as part of a community-based Ct screening and treatment intervention among African American men aged 15 to 25 years who had female sex partners. Participants were asked about why they did or did not accept PDPT for their sex partners. Data were transcribed and analyzed in NVivo qualitative software using an inductive thematic approach. RESULTS: Participants' decision making was multifaceted. Facilitators for PDPT acceptance included being able to cure their partner, convenient access to treatment, believing it was the right thing to do, having a close relationship with a partner, concern for the partner's well-being, and the perceived severity of Ct. Barriers to PDPT acceptance were the belief that a partner did not need treatment, not having a close relationship with the partner, being unable to contact the partner, and fear of conflict. CONCLUSIONS: Findings had similarities to other studies, indicating some universal messaging may be warranted alongside culturally tailored interventions for specific patient populations to increase PDPT acceptance. Implications for patient-provider communication are provided.

Changes in Sexual Behavior Related to the COVID-19 Stay-at-Home Orders Among Young Black Men Who Have Sex With Women in New Orleans, LA.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 stay-at-home orders enacted in New Orleans, LA on March 16, 2020, may have caused changes in the way young men interacted with sex partners. METHODS: An online substudy was conducted (May 21, 2020 to June 9, 2020) among Black men who have sex with women, 18 years and older, and who had previously enrolled in the parent study Check It (May 17, 2017 to March 6, 2020) to assess changes in sexual behavior during the stay-at-home orders. RESULTS: Among 111 participants, from enrollment in Check It to during stay-at-home orders, recent vaginal sex declined from 96.4% to 47.8% (P < 0.0001), reports of multiple female sex partners declined from 45.0% to 14.4% (P < 0.0001), and sexual abstinence increased from 3.6% to 38.7% (P < 0.0001). Among those who did have vaginal sex, condomless sex rates did not change between enrollment in Check It and the substudy (64.5% vs 67.9%, P = 0.68). During stay-at-home orders oral sex, virtual sex, and pornography viewing were 40.5%, 42.3%, and 76.6%, respectively. Some (17.1%) acquired a new sex partner during stay-at-home orders, and 44.1% left their home to meet a partner for sex. Only 27.9% had seen information about safe sex during the pandemic. Income was diminished for 62.2% and 23.4% moved away from New Orleans when stay-at-home orders were enacted. CONCLUSIONS: Although there was an overall reduction in physical sex, half of participants reported physical sex, with many leaving their home to have sex during stay-at-home orders and many not using condoms. Others adopted sexual abstinence, increased virtual sex, and/or pornography viewing, which may have protected them from both sexually transmitted infections and COVID-19.

Adapting Index/Partner Services for the Treatment of Chlamydia Among Young African American Men in a Community Screening Program.

BACKGROUND: Screening for asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis (Ct) among men has not been recommended because feasibility and efficacy are unknown. Check It is a seek-test-treat community-based Ct screening program for African American men who have sex with women and who are 15 to 24 years of age. This is an evaluation of adaptations made to the program aimed at improving index/partner notification and treatment rates. METHODS: The original Check It intervention included free testing and treatment, contact tracing performed by a third party, expedited index therapy, and expedited partner therapy via pharmacy pickup. The intervention was adapted after a series of in-depth interviews eliciting information to refine the program. Changes included continuity of testing, notification, and treatment by the same staff; expanded hours; and patient-delivered partner therapy with a medication mail-delivery option. Rates of index male and partner treatment were compared using log-binomial models and generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: Men in the adapted intervention (n = 85) were more likely than men in the original intervention (n = 99) to be contacted (relative risk [RR], 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.27), make a treatment plan (RR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.01-1.27), and complete treatment (RR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.20-1.75). Female sexual partners were significantly more likely to complete treatment in postadaptation (n = 153) compared with preadaptation (n = 161; RR, 3.02; 95% CI, 1.81-5.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with third-party notification and expedited index therapy/expedited partner therapy available by pharmacy pickup only, patient-delivered partner therapy with mail-delivery option, staff available at nontraditional hours, and staff continuity across testing, notification, and treatment significantly improved index and partner treatment completion.