Sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a prospective study comparing nonanesthesiologist-administered propofol and monitored anesthesia care.

INTRODUCTION: Adequate sedation is one of the cornerstones of good quality gastrointestinal endoscopy (GIE). Propofol sedation has increased significantly but there has been much debate over whether it can be administered by endoscopists. The aim of this prospective trial was to compare nonanesthesiologist-administered propofol (NAAP) and monitored anesthesia care (MAC). METHODS: A total of 2000 outpatients undergoing GIE at Hospital Albert Einstein (São Paulo, Brazil), a tertiary-care private hospital, were divided into two matched groups: NAAP (n = 1000) and MAC (n = 1000). In NAAP, propofol doses were determined by the endoscopist. A second physician stayed in the room during the entire procedure, according to local regulations. In MAC, the anesthesiologist administered propofol. RESULTS: In total, 1427 patients (71.3 %) were ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) class I and 573 were ASA class II. In NAAP, patients received more propofol + fentanyl (61.1 % vs. 50.5 %; P < 0.05) and there were fewer cases of deep sedation (44.7 % vs. 66.1 %; P < 0.05). Hypoxemia rates were similar (12.8 % for NAAP and 11.2 % for MAC; P = 0.3) but these reverted more rapidly in MAC (4.22 seconds vs. 7.26 seconds; P < 0.05). Agitation was more frequent in MAC (14.0 % vs. 5.6 %; P < 0.05). No later complications were observed. Patient satisfaction was very high and similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: In this setting, NAAP was as safe and effective as MAC for healthy patients undergoing GIE. Clinical trial ref. no.: U1111-1134-4430.

Early diagnostic and endoscopic dilatation for the treatment of acquired upper airway stenosis after intubation in children.

BACKGROUND: Upper airway stenosis (UAS) after endotracheal intubation is a common problem in children. Most literature refers to a surgical treatment for these lesions. Laryngotracheal reconstruction and cricotracheal resection are used for low- and high-grade stenosis, but decannulation is not always possible immediately after surgery. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to verify the feasibility and results of endoscopic dilatations for treatment of subglottic stenosis. METHOD: The study encompassed a 12-year retrospective analysis of patients treated for UAS in a tertiary center. All children were symptomatic at the time of the endoscopic diagnosis. The stenosis was graded according to the Myer-Cotton criteria. Endoscopic dilatation was initiated immediately after the diagnosis. Children with grade IV stenosis underwent surgery. RESULTS: Children with tracheal stenosis and no involvement of the subglottic area did not respond to endoscopic dilatations and underwent surgery. There were 45 children with grade I stenosis, 12 with grade II, 7 with grade III, and 4 with grade IV lesions. Patients with grade I, II, and III stenosis were all treated by endoscopic dilatations alone and were decannulated when asymptomatic. The average time for decannulation was 18.90 +/- 26.07 months for grade I, 32.5 +/- 27.08 months for grade II, and 27.57 +/- 20.60 months for grade III stenosis (P < .01, for grade II vs grade III). CONCLUSION: Grade I, II, and III subglottic stenoses can be safely managed by early endoscopic dilatations with a high rate of success and low rate of morbidity but require a significantly long period of treatment.

An exclusively intraabdominal distal esophageal segment prevents primary delayed anastomosis in children with pure esophageal atresia.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of children with pure esophageal atresia (EA) managed by the strategy of delayed primary anastomosis and to find parameters to identify which of these children will have satisfactory esophageal growth to permit a successful primary esophageal anastomosis. METHODS: Sixteen children with pure EA were treated by delayed anastomosis strategy from June 1992 to May 2001 at the Instituto da Criança-University of São Paulo Medical School. The treatment consisted of creating an early feeding gastrostomy, continuous upper pouch suction, and periodic radiologic/endoscopic assessments of the gap between the superior and inferior esophageal pouches. The first assessment was done 4 weeks after the initial gastrostomy. Subsequent assessments were done, when necessary, 4 to 10 weeks after the first one. Children with the gap between the pouches corresponding to 2 vertebral bodies or less were considered for primary repair. RESULTS: The waiting period ranged from 8 to 14 weeks. Five children were considered for primary repair (31.3%). All of them had an end-to-end esophageal anastomosis performed without tension. Eleven children (68.7%) did not show significant esophageal growth after the waiting period and were not considered for primary esophageal anastomosis. Eight of them (50%) showed an entirely intraabdominal distal pouch at the first assessment. CONCLUSIONS: (1) Infants with an exclusively intraabdominal distal pouch at the first evaluation will not reach sufficient elongation of the pouches and should be considered early as a candidate for esophageal replacement. (2) Combined radiologic/endoscopic assessment and the measurement of the gap in terms of vertebral bodies is a practical and reliable method to predict the feasibility of primary anastomosis. (3) Using these criteria, primary anastomosis could be accomplished in less than a third of cases.

Blue rubber bleb nevus syndrome

The blue rubber nevus syndrome consists of multiple venous malformations in the skin and gastrointestinal tract associated with intestinal hemorrhage and iron deficiency anemia. Other organs may be involved. The causes of this syndrome are unknown. Its most common presentation is in the form of sporadic cases, but dominant autosomal inheritance has been described. It is a condition that affects both sexes equally, and its occurrence is rare in the black race. We present a case of this syndrome diagnosed in a 11-year-old patient. He had severe anemia and a venous swelling on the trunk. Similar lesions were found in the stomach, bowel, and on his foot. We emphasize the main clinical aspects: intestine, eyes, nasopharynx, parotids, lungs, liver, spleen, heart, brain, pleura, peritoneum, pericardium, skeletal muscles, bladder, and penis lesions, systemic complications that may occur to these patients which are thrombosis and calcification, as well as consumptive coagulopathy and thrombocytopenia that may occur within the nevi.

Síndrome do canal comum na criança / Common bile duct syndrome in children

Säo apresentadas duas crianças com dilataçäo da via biliar em decorrência de anomalia de junçäo entre o colédoco e Wirsung. Forma-se um ducto comum longo, antes da penetraçäo na aprede duodenal, com a possibilidade de refluxo de suco pancreático para a árvore biliar e conseqüente dilataçäo da via biliar. O quadro clínico consistiu de dor no abdome superior, vômitos ou icterícia. O diagnóstico foi feito pela ultra-sonografia e colangiografia endoscópica ou intra-operatória. O tratamento de eleiçäo, realizado em ambos os casos, foi a anastomose biliodigestiva em Y de Roux. O seguimento revelou que as crianças estäo bem, sem sintomas