18F-FDG PET/CT is a prognostic biomarker in patients affected by bone metastases from breast cancer in comparison with 18F-NaF PET/CT.

AIM: To compare 18F-FDG PET/CT and 18F-NaF PET/CT with respect to disease prognostication and outcome in patients affected by bone metastases from breast cancer (BC). PATIENTS, METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 32 women with BC and documented bone metastases. Semi-quantitative parameters were applied to 18F-FDG PET/CT and 18F-Na PET/CT in order to evaluate disease extent and tumour metabolism. We used time-to-event analyses (Kaplan Meier and COX proportional hazard methods) to estimate progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in order to assess the independent prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 18F-Na PET/CT. RESULTS: The sensitivity of 18F-NaF PET/CT (100%) was higher (p < 0.05) than that of 18F-FDG PET/CT (72% and 72%). None of the 18F-FDG PET/CT-negative patients showed disease progression at the end of follow-up. After adjustment for age, Ki-67 levels, presence of visceral metastases, hormone therapy, duration of bone disease and response to first-line therapy, only 18F-FDG SUV mean [HR 15.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15-214.5] and 18F-FDG whole-body bone metabolic burden (WB-B-MB) (HR 16.9; 95%CI 1.87-152.2) were independently and significantly associated with OS. None of the 18F-NaF PET/CT parameters were associated with OS. None of the conventional clinical prognostic parameters remained significantly associated with OS after the inclusion of PET/CT parameters in the model. CONCLUSION: 18F-FDG PET/CT is independently associated with OS in BC patients with bone metastases and its prognostic impact seems to be higher than conventional clinical and biological prognostic factors. Although 18F-NaF PET/CT has a higher diagnostic sensitivity than 18F-FDG PET/CT, it is not independently associated with OS.

Reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction of the maspin gene in the detection of bone marrow breast carcinoma cell contamination.

BACKGROUND: Maspin is a molecular marker used for the detection of contaminating breast carcinoma (BC) cells in peripheral blood and lymph nodes. However, its specificity has been questioned recently. The objective of this study was to verify the specificity of this marker and to determine the incidence of positive bone marrow results in patients with BC who are eligible for high-dose chemotherapy (HDT) both in early and advanced disease stages and before and after treatment. METHODS: Bone marrow specimens from 41 patients with BC as well as from 35 normal volunteers and 17 patients with hematologic tumors were examined for maspin transcript expression by a modified nested reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction technique. RESULTS: Maspin transcript was found in all normal and neoplastic breast tissues and in none of the 35 normal bone marrow specimens (specificity, 100%; 95% confidence interval, 90-100%). However, the transcript was found in 40% of the bone marrow samples from patients with hematologic malignancies. Thus, this marker appears very specific for discriminating between normal controls and patients with BC, but it cannot be considered disease specific. Among patients with BC, bone marrow was positive for the maspin transcript in 32% of patients with early-stage disease and in 75% of patients with metastatic disease before chemotherapy. After treatment, in 75% of patients with early-stage disease and in 50% of patients with metastatic disease, the bone marrow results became maspin negative. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of the current data, although it is not disease specific, maspin is a reliable marker for detecting bone marrow molecular disease in patients with BC and should be considered for prospective studies as a prognostic indicator and as an assay for monitoring residual disease.

High-dose chemotherapy with tandem autologous transplantation as part of the initial therapy for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the feasibility and the efficacy of employing a high-dose chemotherapy (HDT) regimen with tandem peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) supported transplantation in the initial treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). HDT was preceded by a standard course of conventional dose chemotherapy in 17 out of the 25 patients treated, while in 8 cases it was delivered after only one or two cycles. HDT was a three-step procedure which included high-dose (6-7 g/m2) cyclophosphamide (CY) supported by haematopoietic growth factors, the first myeloablative course with mitoxantrone (NOV) 60, 75 or 90 mg/m2 plus melphalan (L-PAM) 140-180 mg/m2 with haematopoietic rescue, and the second myeloablative course with etoposide (VP) and carboplatin (CARBO) given at 1.5 g/m2 each with haematopoietic rescue. PBPC were collected after CY administration. Twenty-two patients (88%) completed the HDT, haematological reconstitution was rapid and complete at each step and there were no toxic deaths. The activity of the treatment was high with a CR rate over 90% in the entire patient population. The 2-year overall survival (OS) and failure-free survival (FFS) rates of patients in both Age-Adjusted International Prognostic Index (A-AIPI) groups 2 and 3 are 79% and the disease-free survival (DFS) rate for the CRs is 85%. In A-AIPI group 1 the 2-year OS and FFS rates are both 91%.

Effects of three cytokine regimens on hematologic recovery and progenitor cell mobilization after high-dose cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin.

The aim of this study was to compare both the effects on hematologic recovery and circulating progenitor cell mobilization and the toxicity of three cytokine regimens administered after high-dose non-myeloablative chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide 5 g/m(2), etoposide 1.5 g/m(2) and cisplatin 150 mg/m(2). Thirty-five consecutive patients were non-random sequentially allocated to one of three treatment groups: (1) granulocyte colony-stimulating factor alone (n = 15); (2) granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor alone (n = 10), and (3) sequential interleukin-3 and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (n = 10). Neutrophil recovery in group 1 was significantly hastened as compared to the two other groups (median 2 days, p < 0.005), while no significant differences were observed between groups 2 and 3. CD34+ cells peaked about 2 days earlier in group 1 compared to the other groups (p = 0.0001), whereas the median peak value of CD34+ cells was similar in the three groups. In all patients, the toxicity related to cytokine administration was low and easily manageable with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Comparative effects of three cytokine regimens after high-dose cyclophosphamide: granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and sequential interleukin-3 and GM-CSF.

PURPOSE: To compare the toxicity and effects on hematologic recovery and circulating progenitor cell mobilization of three cytokine regimens administered after high-dose cyclophosphamide (HD-CTX; 6 g/m(2)), given as the first step of a high-dose sequential chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients with breast cancer or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were randomized to receive granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone (arm 1), granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) alone (arm 2), or sequential interleukin-3 (IL-3) and GM-CSF (arm 3). Cytokines were administered as a single daily subcutaneous injection at a dose of 5 to 6 microg/kg/d. Progenitor cells were evaluated in peripheral blood as well as in apheretic product as both CD34(+) cells and granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming units (CFU-GM). RESULTS: Neutrophil recovery was faster in arm 1 as compared with arms 2 and 3 (P <.0001); no significant differences were observed between arms 2 and 3. In arm 3, a moderate acceleration of platelet recovery was observed, but it was statistically significant only as compared with arm 1 (P =.028). The peak of CD34(+) cells was hastened in a median of 2 days in arm 1 compared with arms 2 and 3 (P =.0002), whereas the median peak value of CD34(+) cells and CFU-GM was similar in the three patient groups. Administration of IL-3 and GM-CSF resulted in more significant toxicity requiring pharmacologic treatment in 90% of patients. CONCLUSION: The three cytokine regimens administered after HD-CTX are comparably effective in reducing hematologic toxicity and mobilizing the hematopoietic progenitor cells. G-CSF accelerates leukocyte recovery and progenitor mobilization. Although G-CSF-treated patients have somewhat slower platelet recovery, they definitely have fewer side effects.

Prostaglandin E2 inhibits apoptosis in human neutrophilic polymorphonuclear leukocytes: role of intracellular cyclic AMP levels.

Human neutrophilic polymorphonuclear leukocytes (neutrophils) are terminally differentiated cells that die by undergoing apoptosis. At present, the intracellular pathways governing this process are only partially known. In particular, although the adenylate cyclase-dependent generation of cyclic AMP (cAMP) has been implicated in the triggering of apoptosis in lymphoid cells, the role of the intracellular cAMP pathway in neutrophil apoptosis remains controversial. In the present study, we found that two cAMP-elevating agents, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and the phosphodiesterase type IV inhibitor RO 20-1724, inhibit neutrophil apoptosis without inducing cell necrosis. When administered in combination, PGE2 and RO 20-1724 displayed additive effects. Moreover, neutrophil apoptosis was inhibited by a membrane-permeable analog of cAMP, dibutyryl-cAMP, in a dose-dependent manner. Finally, treatment of neutrophils with the protein kinase A inhibitor H-89 prevented PGE2- and RO 20-1724-induced inhibition of cell apoptosis. In conclusion, taking into account that PGE2 and other cAMP-elevating agents are well known downregulators of neutrophil functions, our results suggest that conditions favoring a state of functional rest, such as intracellular cAMP elevation, prolong the life span of neutrophils by delaying apoptosis.

High-dose mitoxantrone with peripheral blood progenitor cell rescue: toxicity, pharmacokinetics and implications for dosage and schedule.

The optimal use of mitoxantrone (NOV) in the high-dose range requires elucidation of its maximum tolerated dose with peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) support and the time interval needed between drug administration and PBPC reinfusion in order to avoid graft toxicity. The aims of this study were: (1) to verify the feasibility and haematological toxicity of escalating NOV up to 90 mg m(-2) with PBPC support; and (2) to verify the safeness of a short (96 h) interval between NOV administration and PBPC reinfusion. Three cohorts of ten patients with breast cancer (BC) or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) received escalating doses of NOV, 60, 75 and 90 mg m(-2) plus melphalan (L-PAM), 140-180 mg m(-2), with PBPC rescue 96 h after NOV. Haematological toxicity was evaluated daily (WHO criteria). NOV plasma pharmacokinetics was also evaluated, as well as NOV cytotoxicity against PBPCs. Haematological recovery was rapid and complete at each NOV dose level without statistically significant differences, and there were no major toxicities. NOV plasma concentrations at the time of PBPC reinfusion were below the toxicity threshold against haemopoietic progenitors. It is concluded that, when adequately supported with PBPCs, NOV can be escalated up to 90 mg m(-2) with acceptable haematological toxicity. PBPCs can be safely reinfused as early as 96 h after NOV administration.