Occupational Therapy Task Observation Scale (OTTOS) and Comprehensive Occupational Therapy Evaluation Scale (CO-TES): Italian translation, adaptation, and validation.

Background: In literature there is a lack of specific evaluation tools for behavior in intellectual disabilities in general and during an activity, this is one of the most important field of the Occupational Therapy intervention. Objective: Authors developed an Italian version of the Occupational Therapy Task Observation Scale (OTTOS) and an Italian version of the Comprehensive Occupational Therapy Evaluation Scale (COTES) and examined their reliability and validity. Methods: The original scales were translated from English to Italian using the "Translation and Cultural Adaptation of Patient Reported Outcomes Measures-Principles of Good Practice" guidelines. Both scales were administered to adults with mild and moderate intellectual disabilities. People under eighteen years, with severe and profound intellectual disabilities and deaf people were excluded from the study. Their reliability and validity have been examined. Relia-bility was analyzed via internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and stability (intra/inter-rater coefficient), while validity was investigated via construct validity (p-value) and criterion validity using Pearson's correlation coefficients between them and with the Mini Mental State Examination and the Barthel Index Scale. Results: The OTTOS and the COTES were administered to 30 subjects. Cronbach's α for the COTES was 0,91 and Cronbach's α for the OTTOS was 0,92. Regarding the criterion of validity, the two scales have numerous statistically positive correlations, particularly with the Mini Mental State Examination in the Orientation and total part. Furthermore, the correlation with the Barthel scale is present in the total scores, the COTES's third subscale, and the OTTOS's first. Conclusions: The OTTOS and the COTES were reliable and valid outcome measures for assessing behavior in the Italian population.

Italian translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the Intermittent Catheterization Acceptance Test (I-CAT).

Aims: The purpose of the present study was to translate and culturally adapt the Intermittent Catheterization Acceptance Test (I-CAT) for Italian individuals with spinal cord injury and spina bifida and to measure its psychometric properties. Methods: Consent from the authors of I-CAT was received, and then, following international guidelines, it was culturally adapted to Italian. The included participants adults who practice self-catheteri-zation. In order to evaluate criterion validity, the Qualiveen-30, Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM-self reported), and the Moorong self-efficacy scale (MSES) were administered together. Test-retest reliability was assessed administering the I-CAT a second time within a week. Following the COSMIN checklist, psychometric properties were evaluated. Results: All translated items resulted identical or similar to the original versions. Internal consistency, evaluated on 34 individuals, showed values of Cronbach's alpha of 0.889, test-retest reliability was evaluated through the intraclass correlation coefficient with values of 0.96. Statistically significant correlation between the I-ICAT and Qualiveen were found through Pearson's correlation coefficient and Spearman's Correlation Coefficient for criterion validity. Conclusions: The Italian validation of I-CAT allows Italian professionals to investigate psychological barriers linked with self-catheterization in people with urinary tract dysfunction before learning about aseptic Intermittent Self Catheterization (IC) and improving patients' acceptance of it. This tool can also be used as follow-up after the training of intermittent self-catheterization techniques. Finally, it is an important tool for medical research.

Seizure prophylaxis in meningiomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: No formal indication currently exists for seizure prophylaxis in neurosurgical oncology patients. Neither have specific recommendations been made on the use of antiepileptic drugs (AED) in seizure-free patients with meningiomas scheduled for surgery. AEDs are generally prescribed on a discretionary basis, taking into consideration a range of clinical and radiological risk factors. We present a systematic review and meta-analysis exploring the effectiveness of antiepileptic prophylaxis in patients with meningioma and no history of seizures. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and clinicaltrials.gov databases. Of a total of 4368 studies initially identified, 12 were selected for extraction of data and qualitative analysis. Based on the clinical data presented, we were only able to include 6 studies in the meta-analysis. We performed heterogeneity studies, calculated a combined odds ratio, evaluated publication bias, and conducted a sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: AED prophylaxis in patients with meningioma and no history of seizures did not significantly reduce the incidence of post-operative seizures in comparison to controls (Mantel-Haenszel combined odds ratio, random effects model: 1.26 [95% confidence interval, 0.60-2.78]; 2041 patients). However, we are unable to establish a robust recommendation against this treatment due to the lack of prospective studies, the presence of selection bias in the studies reviewed, the likelihood of underestimation of seizure frequency during follow-up, and the strong influence of one study on the overall effect. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the limitations of this review, the results of the meta-analysis do not support the routine use of seizure prophylaxis in patients with meningioma and no history of seizures.

Seizure prophylaxis in meningiomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis. / Profilaxis antiepiléptica en meningiomas: revisión sistemática y metaanálisis.

INTRODUCTION: No formal indication currently exists for seizure prophylaxis in neurosurgical oncology patients. Neither have specific recommendations been made on the use of antiepileptic drugs (AED) in seizure-free patients with meningiomas scheduled for surgery. AEDs are generally prescribed on a discretionary basis, taking into consideration a range of clinical and radiological risk factors. We present a systematic review and meta-analysis exploring the effectiveness of antiepileptic prophylaxis in patients with meningioma and no history of seizures. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and clinicaltrials.gov databases. Of a total of 4368 studies initially identified, 12 were selected for extraction of data and qualitative analysis. Based on the clinical data presented, we were only able to include 6 studies in the meta-analysis. We performed heterogeneity studies, calculated a combined odds ratio, evaluated publication bias, and conducted a sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: AED prophylaxis in patients with meningioma and no history of seizures did not significantly reduce the incidence of post-operative seizures in comparison to controls (Mantel-Haenszel combined odds ratio, random effects model: 1.26 [95% confidence interval, 0.60-2.78]; 2041 patients). However, we are unable to establish a robust recommendation against this treatment due to the lack of prospective studies, the presence of selection bias in the studies reviewed, the likelihood of underestimation of seizure frequency during follow-up, and the strong influence of one study on the overall effect. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the limitations of this review, the results of the meta-analysis do not support the routine use of seizure prophylaxis in patients with meningioma and no history of seizures.

[Efficacy of a dynamic orthosis on the upper limbs in the chronic phase of strokes. A longitudinal study]. / Eficacia de la ortesis dinamica del miembro superior en la fase cronica del ictus. Estudio longitudinal.

AIMS: Stroke is the most important medical condition leading to permanent disability in adults. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of dynamic orthoses in the rehabilitation of the upper limbs in patients who have had a stroke. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a longitudinal case-control study. The sample used in the study consisted of patients from rehabilitation centres who presented hemiparesis secondary to an ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke. The patients were randomly distributed into a study group, whose members received a dynamic orthosis on an upper limb for a six-month period, and a control group. Appraisals were performed pre- and post-treatment with the orthosis with Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale and with Wolf Motor Function to measure their command over body functions and activities. Differences between pre- and post-test were compared using ANCOVA and Student's t. RESULTS: The sample included 40 patients (65% males) who presented chronic hemiparesis secondary to ischaemic (n = 28) or haemorrhagic stroke (n = 12), with a mean age of 58.43 ± 8.67 years. After the six-month follow-up, improved motor function was observed in both groups, according to both scales. The use of a dynamic orthosis was associated with a tendency towards improved strength in the upper limb. CONCLUSIONS: Rehabilitation following a stroke improves strength and body activities in the upper limb. The use of a dynamic orthosis can further improve the strength in this limb, but additional research is needed to confirm our results.

TITLE: Eficacia de la ortesis dinamica del miembro superior en la fase cronica del ictus. Estudio longitudinal.Objetivo. El ictus es la condicion medica mas importante que origina discapacidad permanente en el adulto. El objetivo es valorar la eficacia de ortesis dinamicas en la rehabilitacion del miembro superior en pacientes que han presentado un ictus. Pacientes y metodos. Estudio longitudinal de casos y controles. Se incluyo una muestra de pacientes procedentes de centros de rehabilitacion que presentaban hemiparesia secundaria a ictus isquemico o hemorragico. De forma aleatoria, los pacientes fueron distribuidos en un grupo de estudio, cuyos miembros recibieron una ortesis dinamica en el miembro superior durante seis meses, y un grupo control. Se realizaron valoraciones pre y postratamiento con la ortesis con la Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale y con la Wolf Motor Function para medir los dominios de las funciones y actividades corporales. Se compararon las diferencias entre pre y postest usando ANCOVA y t de Student. Resultados. Se incluyo a 40 pacientes (65% hombres) que presentaban una hemiparesia cronica secundaria a ictus isquemico (n = 28) o hemorragico (n = 12), con una edad media de 58,43 ± 8,67 años. Tras el seguimiento de seis meses, se observo una mejoria en ambos grupos en la funcion motora segun ambas escalas. El uso de la ortesis dinamica se asocio a una tendencia hacia la mejoria en la fuerza de la extremidad superior. Conclusiones. La rehabilitacion tras el ictus mejora la fuerza y las actividades corporales en el miembro superior. El uso de una ortesis dinamica puede adicionalmente mejorar la fuerza en este miembro, pero se necesitan mas estudios para confirmar nuestros resultados.