SEOM clinical guideline for the management of cutaneous melanoma (2020).

Melanoma affects about 6000 patients a year in Spain. A group of medical oncologists from Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) and Spanish Multidisciplinary Melanoma Group (GEM) has designed these guidelines to homogenize the management of these patients. The diagnosis must be histological and determination of BRAF status has to be performed in patients with stage ≥ III. Stage I-III resectable melanomas will be treated surgically. In patients with stage III melanoma, adjuvant treatment with immunotherapy or targeted therapy is also recommended. Patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma will receive treatment with immunotherapy or targeted therapy, the optimal sequence of these treatments remains unclear. Brain metastases require a separate consideration, since, in addition to systemic treatment, they may require local treatment. Patients must be followed up closely to receive or change treatment as soon as their previous clinical condition changes, since multiple therapeutic options are available.

Clinical Practice Guideline on Melanoma From the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV). / Guía de práctica clínica de melanoma de la Academia Española de Dermatología y Venereología.

Specialist approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of melanoma have undergone many changes. This guideline aims to provide Spanish dermatologists with evidence-based information for resolving the most common doubts that arise in clinical practice. Members of the Spanish Oncologic Dermatology and Surgery Group (GEDOC) with experience treating melanoma were invited to participate in drafting the guideline. The group developed a new guideline on the basis of existing ones, using the ADAPTE collaboration process, first summarizing the care process and posing relevant clinical questions, then selecting guidelines with the best scores according to the AGREE II (Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation) tool. Finally, the group searched the selected guidelines for answers to the clinical questions, drafted recommendations, and sent them for external review. The guideline is structured around 21 clinical questions chosen for their relevance to issues that make clinical decisions about the management of melanoma difficult. Evidence from existing guidelines was used to answer the questions. A limitation of this guide derives from the scarce evidence available for answering some questions. Moreover, some areas are changing rapidly, so recommendations must be updated often. The present guideline offers answers to clinical questions about the routine management of melanoma in clinical practice and provides dermatologists with a reference to guide decisions, taking into consideration the resources available and patient preferences.

Cancer immunotherapy of patients with HIV infection.

Cancer immunotherapy with antibodies against immune checkpoints has made impressive advances in the last several years. The most relevant drugs target programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) expressed on T cells or its ligand, the programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1), expressed on cancer cells, and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4). Unfortunately, cancer patients with HIV infection are usually excluded from cancer clinical trials, because there are concerns about the safety and the anti-tumoral activity of these novel therapies in patients with HIV infection. Several retrospective studies and some case reports now support the notion that antibodies against immune checkpoints are safe and active in cancer patients with HIV infection, but prospective data in these patients are lacking. In addition, signs of antiviral activity with increase in CD4 T cell counts, plasma viremia reduction or decrease in the viral reservoir have been reported in some of the patients treated, although no patient achieved a complete clearance of the viral reservoir. Here we briefly summarize all clinical cases reported in the literature, as well as ongoing clinical trials testing novel immunotherapy drugs in cancer patients with HIV infection.

Association between PD1 mRNA and response to anti-PD1 monotherapy across multiple cancer types.

Background: We hypothesized that the abundance of PD1 mRNA in tumor samples might explain the differences in overall response rates (ORR) observed following anti-PD1 monotherapy across cancer types. Patients and methods: RNASeqv2 data from 10 078 tumor samples representing 34 different cancer types was analyzed from TCGA. Eighteen immune-related gene signatures and 547 immune-related genes, including PD1, were explored. Correlations between each gene/signature and ORRs reported in the literature following anti-PD1 monotherapy were calculated. To translate the in silico findings to the clinical setting, we analyzed the expression of PD1 mRNA using the nCounter platform in 773 formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tumor samples across 17 cancer types. To test the direct relationship between PD1 mRNA, PDL1 immunohistochemistry (IHC), stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) and ORR, we evaluated an independent FFPE-based dataset of 117 patients with advanced disease treated with anti-PD1 monotherapy. Results: In pan-cancer TCGA, PD1 mRNA expression was found strongly correlated (r > 0.80) with CD8 T-cell genes and signatures and the proportion of PD1 mRNA-high tumors (80th percentile) within a given cancer type was variable (0%-84%). Strikingly, the PD1-high proportions across cancer types were found strongly correlated (r = 0.91) with the ORR following anti-PD1 monotherapy reported in the literature. Lower correlations were found with other immune-related genes/signatures, including PDL1. Using the same population-based cutoff (80th percentile), similar proportions of PD1-high disease in a given cancer type were identified in our in-house 773 tumor dataset as compared with TCGA. Finally, the pre-established PD1 mRNA FFPE-based cutoff was found significantly associated with anti-PD1 response in 117 patients with advanced disease (PD1-high 51.5%, PD1-intermediate 26.6% and PD1-low 15.0%; odds ratio between PD1-high and PD1-intermediate/low = 8.31; P < 0.001). In this same dataset, PDL1 tumor expression by IHC or percentage of sTILs was not found associated with response. Conclusions: Our study provides a clinically applicable assay that links PD1 mRNA abundance, activated CD8 T-cells and anti-PD1 efficacy.

Large scale, prospective screening of EGFR mutations in the blood of advanced NSCLC patients to guide treatment decisions.

BACKGROUND: In a significant percentage of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, tumor tissue is unavailable or insufficient for genetic analyses. We prospectively analyzed if circulating-free DNA (cfDNA) purified from blood can be used as a surrogate in this setting to select patients for treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Blood samples were collected in 119 hospitals from 1138 advanced NSCLC patients at presentation (n = 1033) or at progression to EGFR-TKIs (n = 105) with no biopsy or insufficient tumor tissue. Serum and plasma were sent to a central laboratory, cfDNA purified and EGFR mutations analyzed and quantified using a real-time PCR assay. Response data from a subset of patients (n = 18) were retrospectively collected. RESULTS: Of 1033 NSCLC patients at presentation, 1026 were assessable; with a prevalence of males and former or current smokers. Sensitizing mutations were found in the cfDNA of 113 patients (11%); with a majority of females, never smokers and exon 19 deletions. Thirty-one patients were positive only in plasma and 11 in serum alone and mutation load was higher in plasma and in cases with exon 19 deletions. More than 50% of samples had <10 pg mutated genomes/µl with allelic fractions below 0.25%. Patients treated first line with TKIs based exclusively on EGFR positivity in blood had an ORR of 72% and a median PFS of 11 months. Of 105 patients screened after progression to EGFR-TKIs, sensitizing mutations were found in 56.2% and the p.T790M resistance mutation in 35.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Large-scale EGFR testing in the blood of unselected advanced NSCLC patients is feasible and can be used to select patients for targeted therapy when testing cannot be done in tissue. The characteristics and clinical outcomes to TKI treatment of the EGFR-mutated patients identified are undistinguishable from those positive in tumor.

Pembrolizumab for advanced melanoma: experience from the Spanish Expanded Access Program.

BACKGROUND: The programmed death (PD-1) inhibitor pembrolizumab has been recently approved for the treatment of advanced melanoma. We evaluated the clinical activity of pembrolizumab in melanoma patients treated under the Spanish Expanded Access Program. METHODS: Advanced melanoma patients who failed to previous treatment lines were treated with pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg every three weeks. Patients with brain metastases were not excluded if they were asymptomatic. Data were retrospectively collected from 21 centers in the Spanish Melanoma Group. RESULTS: Sixty-seven advanced melanoma patients were analyzed. Most patients were stage M1c (73.1%), had high LDH levels (55.2%) and had ECOG PS 1 or higher (59.7%). For cutaneous melanoma patients, median overall survival was 14.0 months; the 18-month overall survival rate was 47.1%. Overall response rate was 27%, including three patients with complete responses (6.5%). Median response duration was not reached, with 83.3% of responses ongoing (3.5 m+ to 20.4 m+). From ten patients included with brain metastases, four (40%) had an objective response, two (20%) of them achieved a complete response. Significant prognostic factors for overall survival were LDH level, ECOG PS and objective response. There were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: Although this was a heavily pretreated cohort, pembrolizumab activity at the approved dose and schedule was confirmed in the clinical setting with long-term responders, also including patients with brain metastases.

[Dual antiplatelet therapy and haemoglobin level: An observational study]. / Antiagregación plaquetaria dual y nivel de hemoglobina: un estudio observacional.

INTRODUCTION: To determine the degree of association between dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) (clopidogrel plus acetylsalicylic acid) and haemoglobin (Hb) in clinical practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective longitudinal analysis was conducted on all patients on DAPT for at least 6 months. The required sample size was 63 patients. Hb value was determined before DAPT and at least 6 months after, as well as length of treatment, drugs, and diseases that might reduce the Hb. Changes in Hb after DAPT and the emergence or worsening of pre-existing anaemia was determined. Before and after Hb was compared using the t-test for paired samples. The occurrence of anaemia was considered dependent variable in a logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 122 cases were included. There were 92 (75.4%) males, and the mean age was 74.5 (SD 9.9) years. DAPT duration was 19.3 (11.8) months. The pre-treatment Hb was 14.3 (1.4) g/dl and 12.8 (1.9) g/dl post-treatment. The prevalence of pre-DAPT anaemia was 9.1% (11 cases), and 45.9% post-treatment (56 cases). Comparison of means showed a decrease of 1.5g/dl (1.6) (95% CI; 1.2-1.8, P<.001). Anaemia post-treatment was associated with concomitant causes of anaemia, bleeding in the follow-up, and inversely with pre-treatment Hb level. CONCLUSIONS: DAPT is associated with a decrease in Hb. Anaemia or worsening of previous anaemia appeared in about half of the subjects, and this effect was most likely in patients with bleeding in the follow-up and if other causes of anaemia were present.

Hormone receptor and HER2 status: The only predictive factors of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

We report our experience in neoadjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy in a single centre between 2000 and 2011. We looked for predictive factors for response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the present study. A total of 110 consecutive breast cancer patients were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in our centre. Pathological response was achieved in 24 HR+/HER2- (38.7%), 25 HER2+ (67.6%) and five triple-negative (45.5%) (p = 0.02) patients. No statistically significant differences were found in pathological tumour response according to T stage. The multivariate analysis revealed tumour subtype was the only associated factor for pathological response, with HER2 + tumours the best responders, OR 3.9 (1.5-9.9): 5-year DFS was 40% HER2+/no response; 78% HER2+/response; 65% HR+/HER2-/no response; 82% HR+/HER2-/response; 25% triple-negative/no response and 100% triple-negative/response. HR and HER2 status were the only prognostic factors for pathological response. pCR was correlated with survival in all tumour subtypes.

Prognostic value of tyrosinase reverse transcriptase PCR analysis in melanoma sentinel lymph nodes: long-term follow-up analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prognostic value of detecting tyrosinase transcripts in melanoma sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). METHODS: Reverse transcription (RT) PCR for tyrosinase mRNA was performed on negative SLNs of 76 patients with melanoma. RESULTS: Tyrosinase mRNA was found in 39 patients (51.3%). After a median follow-up period of 51 months, significant differences were found in overall survival (OS) but not in disease-free survival (DFS). The 5-year OS and DFS rates were 97.2% and 80%, respectively, for RT-PCR tyrosinase-negative (TN) patients vs. 78.67% and 66.24% for RT-PCR tyrosinase-positive (TP) patients (P = 0.019 and P = 0.38, respectively). Of four progressing patients in the TN group, three relapsed with subcutaneous, soft-tissue or lymph-node metastases, while seven out of nine progressing patients in the TP group relapsed at visceral sites. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences in DFS were found by RT-PCR tyrosinase expression analysis at melanoma SLNs. Significant differences in OS could be related to a different pattern of relapse and must be confirmed after a longer follow-up time.

Preliminary results of the combination of bevacizumab and weekly Paclitaxel in advanced melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Pretreated advanced melanoma is a poor prognosis scenario with few, if any, active therapeutic options. The antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor, bevacizumab, has demonstrated increased activity in combination with chemotherapy in many tumors. We intended to evaluate the activity of the combination of weekly paclitaxel and bevacizumab in previously treated metastatic melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with previously treated metastatic melanoma received paclitaxel 70 mg/m(2) weekly and bevacizumab 10 mg/kg biweekly for 5 consecutive weeks every 6 weeks. RESULTS: Twelve patients were treated. Two patients (16.6%) achieved a partial response and 7 patients (58.3%) stable disease. Responses were seen in soft tissue, lung and brain metastases. Median disease-free and overall survival times were 3.7 and 7.8 months, respectively. Treatment was well tolerated. Main toxicities were grade 3 asymptomatic lymphopenia in 6 patients, grade 3 leucopenia in 2 patients, and grade 3 thrombocytopenia in 1 patient. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary results suggest that the combination of bevacizumab and weekly paclitaxel is active and safe in patients with metastatic melanoma, warranting further investigation.

Response of resistant melanoma to a combination of weekly paclitaxel and bevacizumab.

We report here a taxol-bevacizumab-responsive metastatic melanoma case. Although the patient had been heavily pretreated for two years, she did not show any stabilisation or objective response of her disease. After treatment with taxol and bevacizumab combination an impressive response was obtained.

Ileal carcinoid tumor with liver metastases and cardiac involvement treated with intraarterial liposomal doxorubicin and valve replacement.

Unless carcinoid are in general slow-growing tumors, some cases could be frankly malignant. The commonest cause of death in patients suffering a carcinoid tumor is liver failure due to tumor progression. When tumors have a fast evolution a multidisciplinary approach must be perform. This case report is an example of this specific situation.

Tumour lymphangiogenesis is a possible predictor of sentinel lymph node status in cutaneous melanoma: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous melanoma spreads preferentially through the lymphatic route and sentinel lymph node (SLN) status is regarded as the most important predictor of survival. AIMS: To evaluate whether tumour lymphangiogenesis and the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGF-C) is related to the risk of SLN metastasis and to clinical outcome in a case-control series of patients with melanoma. METHODS: Forty five invasive melanoma specimens (15 cases and 30 matched controls) were investigated by immunostaining for the lymphatic endothelial marker D2-40 and for VEGF-C. Lymphangiogenesis was measured using computer assisted morphometric analysis. RESULTS: Peritumorous lymphatic vessels were more numerous, had larger average size, and greater relative area than intratumorous lymphatics. The number and area of peritumorous and intratumorous lymphatics was significantly higher in melanomas associated with SLN metastasis than in non-metastatic melanomas. No significant difference in VEGF-C expression by neoplastic cells was shown between metastatic and non-metastatic melanomas. Using logistic regression analysis, intratumorous lymphatic vessel (LV) area was the most significant predictor of SLN metastasis (p = 0.04). Using multivariate analysis, peritumorous LV density was an independent variable affecting overall survival, whereas the intratumorous LV area approached significance (p = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that the presence of high peritumorous and intratumorous lymphatic microvessel density is associated with SLN metastasis and shorter survival. The intratumorous lymphatic vessel area is the most significant factor predicting SLN metastasis. The tumour associated lymphatic network constitutes a potential criterion in the selection of high risk patients for complementary treatment and a new target for antimelanoma therapeutic strategies.

S-100beta and MIA in advanced melanoma in relation to prognostic factors.

We compared the sensitivity and specificity of S-100 and MIA in advanced melanoma, in 96 patients with no evidence of disease (NED) and 86 patients with metastatic melanoma. Abnormal S100 (>0.2 microg/l) and MIA (>14 ng/ml) results were found in 1.1% and 3.2% of NED patients and in 59.3% and 54.6% of the patients with active melanoma (p<0.001). Using both tumor markers simultaneously, the sensitivity increased up to 69.8% with the same specificity 96.8%. S100 serum levels were not related to growth patterns. By contrast, MIA levels seemed to be related to the growth pattern, with higher levels in nodular melanoma (60.6+/-87.1 ng/ml) compared with acral-lentigous melanoma (11.9+/-5.4 ng/ml) (p=0.02). Likewise, S100 was related to the metastases site with significantly higher sensitivity and mean concentrations in patients with brain metastases (p=0.01) with the lowest in those with lung MI. MIA was related to the same metastases locations but without statistical significance. In summary, both S100 and ML4 are useful markers related to prognostic factors, being more effective when used in combination.