Critical Emergency Department Interventions and Clinical Deterioration in Children With Nonsevere Traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage.

OBJECTIVE: Substantial practice variation exists in the management of children with nonsevere traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (tICH). A comprehensive understanding of rates and timing of clinically important tICH, including critical interventions and deterioration, along with associated clinical and neuroradiographic characteristics, will inform accurate risk stratification. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of children aged younger than 18 years evaluated in the emergency department (ED) from May 1, 2014 to February 28, 2020 with tICH and initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of higher than 8. We determined rates of clinically important tICH after injury and within 96 hours of ED arrival, defined as immediate ED interventions (intubation, hyperosmotic agents, or neurosurgery within 4 hours of arrival) or clinically important deterioration (signs/symptoms with change in management). Associations between outcome and clinical and neuroradiographic characteristics were calculated using individual logistic regression models. RESULTS: Our sample included 135 children. Clinically important tICH was observed in 13.3% (n = 18); 9 (6.7%) underwent immediate ED interventions and 9 (6.7%) developed deterioration. Most (93.3%, n = 127) presented with an initial GCS ≥ 14, including all children who later deteriorated. Initial GCS (P = 0.001) and nonaccidental trauma (P = 0.024) mechanism were associated with the outcome. None of the 71 (52.6%) children with initial GCS ≥ 14, isolated, nonepidural hemorrhage after accidental injury developed clinically important tICH. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically important tICH occurred in 13% of children with nonsevere tICH, and 7% of children who did not undergo immediate ED interventions later deteriorated, all of whom had an initial GCS ≥ 14. However, a subgroup of children was identified as low risk based on clinical and neuroradiographic characteristics.

Implications of Tumor Characteristics and Treatment Modality on Local Recurrence and Functional Outcomes in Children With Chest Wall Sarcoma: A Pediatric Surgical Oncology Research Collaborative Study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of tumor characteristics and treatment approach on (1) local recurrence, (2) scoliosis development, and (3) patient-reported quality of life in children with sarcoma of the chest wall. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Children with chest wall sarcoma require multimodal therapy including chemotherapy, surgery, and/or radiation. Despite aggressive therapy which places them at risk for functional impairment and scoliosis, these patients are also at significant risk for local recurrence. METHODS: A multi-institutional review of 175 children (median age 13 years) with chest wall sarcoma treated at seventeen Pediatric Surgical Oncology Research Collaborative institutions between 2008 and 2017 was performed. Patient-reported quality of life was assessed prospectively using PROMIS surveys. RESULTS: The most common diagnoses were Ewing sarcoma (67%) and osteosarcoma (9%). Surgical resection was performed in 85% and radiation in 55%. A median of 2 ribs were resected (interquartile range = 1-3), and number of ribs resected did not correlate with margin status ( P = 0.36). Local recurrence occurred in 23% and margin status was the only predictive factor(HR 2.24, P = 0.039). With a median follow-up of 5 years, 13% developed scoliosis (median Cobb angle 26) and 5% required corrective spine surgery. Scoliosis was associated with posteriorrib resection (HR 8.43; P= 0.003) and increased number of ribs resected (HR 1.78; P = 0.02). Overall, patient-reported quality of life is not impaired after chest wall tumor resection. CONCLUSIONS: Local recurrence occurs in one-quarter of children with chest wall sarcoma and is independent of tumor type. Scoliosis occurs in 13% of patients, but patient-reported quality of life is excellent.

Variation in radiation dosing among pediatric trauma patients undergoing head computed tomography scan.

BACKGROUND: When head injured children undergo head computed tomography (CT), radiation dosing can vary considerably between institutions, potentially exposing children to excess radiation, increasing risk for malignancies later in life. We compared radiation delivery from head CTs at a level 1 pediatric trauma center (PTC) versus scans performed at referring adult general hospitals (AGHs). We hypothesized that children at our PTC receive a significantly lower radiation dose than children who underwent CT at AGHs for similar injury profiles. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of all patients younger than 18 years who underwent CT for head injury at our PTC or at an AGH before transfer between January 1 and December 31, 2019. We analyzed demographic and clinical data. Our primary outcome was head CT radiation dose, as calculated by volumetric CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose-length product (DLP; the product of CTDIvol and scan length). We used unadjusted bivariate and multivariable linear regression (adjusting for age, weight, sex) to compare doses between Children's Hospital Los Angeles and AGHs. RESULTS: Of 429 scans reviewed, 193 were performed at our PTC, while 236 were performed at AGHs. Mean radiation dose administered was significantly lower at our PTC compared with AGHs (CTDIvol 20.3/DLP 408.7 vs. CTDIvol 30.6/DLP 533, p < 0.0001). This was true whether the AGH was a trauma center or not. After adjusting for covariates, findings were similar for both CTDIvol and DLP. Patients who underwent initial CT at an AGH and then underwent a second CT at our PTC received less radiation for the second CT (CTDIvol 25.6 vs. 36.5, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Head-injured children consistently receive a lower radiation dose when undergoing initial head CT at a PTC compared with AGHs. This provides a basis for programs aimed at establishing protocols to deliver only as much radiation as necessary to children undergoing head CT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Care Management/Therapeutic, level IV.

Pneumonectomy for Pediatric Tumors-a Pediatric Surgical Oncology Research Collaborative Study.

OBJECTIVE: To describe utilization and long-term outcomes of pneumonectomy in children and adolescents with cancer. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Pneumonectomy in adults is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Little is known about the indications and outcomes of pneumonectomy for pediatric tumors. METHODS: The Pediatric Surgical Oncology Research Collaborative (PSORC) identified pediatric patients <21 years of age who underwent pneumonectomy from 1990 to 2017 for primary or metastatic tumors at 12 institutions. Clinical information was collected; outcomes included operative complications, long-term function, recurrence, and survival. Univariate log rank, and multivariable Cox analyses determined factors associated with survival. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients (mean 12 ±â€Š6 yrs) were identified; median (IQR) follow-up was 19 (5-38) months. Twenty-six patients (68%) underwent pneumonectomy for primary tumors and 12 (32%) for metastases. The most frequent histologies were osteosarcoma (n = 6), inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors (IMT; n = 6), and pleuropulmonary blastoma (n = 5). Median postoperative ventilator days were 0 (0-1), intensive care 2 (1-3), and hospital 8 (5-16). Early postoperative complications occurred in 10 patients including 1 death. Of 25 (66%) patients alive at 1 year, 15 reported return to preoperative pulmonary status. All IMT patients survived while all osteosarcoma patients died during follow-up. On multivariable analysis, metastatic indications were associated with nonsurvival (HR = 3.37, P = 0.045). CONCLUSION: This is the largest review of children who underwent pneumonectomy for cancer. There is decreased procedure-related morbidity and mortality than reported for adults. Survival is worse with preoperative metastatic disease, especially osteosarcoma.

Impact of simulation-based training on perceived provider confidence in acute multidisciplinary pediatric trauma resuscitation.

PURPOSE: Simulation-based training has the potential to improve team-based care. We hypothesized that implementation of an in situ multidisciplinary simulation-based training program would improve provider confidence in team-based management of severely injured pediatric trauma patients. METHODS: An in situ multidisciplinary pediatric trauma simulation-based training program with structured debriefing was implemented at a free-standing children's hospital. Trauma providers were anonymously surveyed 1 month before (pre-), 1 month after (post-), and 2 years after implementation. RESULTS: Survey response rate was 49% (n = 93/190) pre-simulation, 22% (n = 42/190) post-simulation, and 79% (n = 150/190) at 2-year follow-up. These providers reported more anxiety (p = 0.01) and less confidence (p = 0.02) 1-month post-simulation. At 2-year follow-up, trained providers reported less anxiety (p = 0.02) and greater confidence (p = 0.01), compared to untrained providers. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of an in situ multidisciplinary pediatric trauma simulation-based training program may initially lead to increased anxiety, but long-term exposure may lead to greater confidence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II, Prospective cohort.

Liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy in the diagnosis of biliary atresia in children with hyperbilirubinemia.

BACKGROUND: Biliary atresia (BA) is difficult to distinguish from other causes of cholestasis. We evaluated the use of liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy (LC-MS) and bile acid profiles in the rapid, noninvasive diagnosis of BA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and Institutional Review Board approval, we used LC-MS to measure 26 bile acids in serum and stool samples from experimental models of BA and in urine, stool, and serum samples from non-cholestatic and cholestatic human infants. RESULTS: We first evaluated the utility of LC-MS to distinguish bile acid profiles between sham, bile duct ligation, and 3,5-diethoxycarbonyl-1,4-dihydrocollidine mouse models of BA. Serum bile acids were significantly higher and stool bile acids were significantly lower in experimental BA. Next, we evaluated samples from non-cholestatic, cholestatic non-BA, and BA infants. There was no significant difference between cholestatic non-BA and BA stool and urine samples. However, primary bile acids were significantly higher in BA versus cholestatic non-BA samples (128.1 ± 14.2 versus 61.2 ± 20.5 µM). In addition, the primary, conjugated bile acids glycochenodeoxycholic acid and taurochenodeoxycholic acid were significantly elevated in BA compared with cholestatic non-BA serum samples. Using a receiver operating characteristic curve, we found that a serum glycochenodeoxycholic acid concentration of 30 µM had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 83.3%, positive predictive value of 88.9%, and negative predictive value of 100% in the diagnosis of BA. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that bile acid patterns can be used to distinguish experimental and human BA from non-cholestatic and, more importantly, cholestatic disease. This suggests that LC-MS may be useful in the accurate, rapid, and non-invasive diagnosis of BA.

Improving Disaster Preparedness of Families With a Parenteral Nutrition-dependent Child.

OBJECTIVES: Disruption in the care of special healthcare needs children may lead to life-threatening situations or preventable secondary conditions. California averages more than 100 earthquakes per week. Subsequent power outages, damage to utility systems, and road damage after an earthquake can have grave consequences for families with parenteral nutrition (PN)-dependent children. The purpose of the study was to demonstrate that we could improve disaster preparedness of families with PN-dependent children utilizing individualized family education and distribution of personalized disaster survival toolkits. METHODS: We administered a baseline survey to assess disaster preparedness of our families with PN-dependent children followed by individualized disaster survival toolkit distribution and education. We followed up with these families with phone call surveys at 2 and 4 months. A generalized estimating equation with both logistic and linear regression was used to analyze data over the follow-up period. RESULTS: We found statistically significant improvements in developing a family emergency plan (P < 0.0001), having a basic emergency supply kit (P < 0.0001), having a completed emergency information form from the child's provider (P < 0.0001), and the confidence level or readiness for a disaster (P < 0.0001). All participants had extra batteries for PN infusion pumps. Having alternative power sources, such as a generator, did not significantly change over time. CONCLUSIONS: Individualized disaster education helped families with PN-dependent children not only to prepare for a possible earthquake, but also to feel more confident in their ability to handle a natural disaster.

Self-assessment of team performance using T-NOTECHS in simulated pediatric trauma resuscitation is not consistent with expert assessment.

BACKGROUND: The Trauma NOn-TECHnical Skills (T-NOTECHS) tool has been used to assess teamwork in trauma resuscitation, but its reliability and validity for self-assessment is unknown. Our purpose was to determine the reliability and validity of self-administered T-NOTECHS in pediatric trauma resuscitation. METHODS: Simulated in situ resuscitations were evaluated using T-NOTECHS in real time by experts and immediately afterwards by team members. Reliability was analyzed with linear-weighted kappa and intra-class correlation. T-NOTECHS scores were compared between expert (gold-standard) and self-assessment. RESULTS: Fifteen simulations were examined. T-NOTECHS scores were similar between self- and expert assessment for leadership. Self-assessment scores were higher than expert for the other domains and total composite score. Inter-rater reliability for total score was similar between the two groups, but differences were observed in the domains. CONCLUSIONS: Self-assessment is not interchangeable with expert rating when using T-NOTECHS. Future studies need to determine how self-assessment can be best utilized. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Studies of diagnostic accuracy - Level 2.

Re-evaluation of liver transaminase cutoff for CT after pediatric blunt abdominal trauma.

PURPOSE: Current guidelines for computed tomography (CT) after blunt trauma were developed to capture all intra-abdominal injuries (IAI). We hypothesize that current AST/ALT guidelines are too low leading to unnecessary CT scans for children after blunt abdominal trauma (BAT). METHODS: Patients who received CT of the abdomen after blunt trauma at our Level I Pediatric Trauma Center were stratified into a high risk (HR) (liver/spleen/kidney grade ≥III, hollow viscous, or pancreatic injuries) and low risk (LR) (liver/kidney/spleen injuries grade ≤II, or no IAI) groups. RESULTS: 247 patients were included. Of the 18 patients in the HR group, two required surgery (splenectomy and sigmoidectomy). Transfusion was required in 30% of grade III and 50% of grade IV injuries. Eleven (5%) patients in LR group were transfused for indications other than IAI, and none were explored surgically. Both AST (r = 0.44, p < 0.001) and ALT (r = 0.43, p < 0.001) correlated with grade of liver injury. Using an increased threshold of AST/ALT, 400/200 had a negative predictive value of 96% in predicting the presence of HR liver injuries. CONCLUSION: The current cutoff of liver enzymes leads to over-identification of LR injuries. Consideration should be given to an approach that aims to utilize CT in pediatric BAT that identifies clinically HR injury.

Qualitative assessment of simulation-based training for pediatric trauma resuscitation.

BACKGROUND: Effective teamwork is critical in the trauma bay, although there is a lack of consensus related to optimal training for these skills. We implemented in situ trauma simulations with debriefing as a possible training methodology to improve team-oriented skills. METHODS: Focus groups were conducted with multidisciplinary clinicians who respond to trauma activations. The focus group questions were intended to elicit discussion on the clinicians' experiences during trauma activations and simulations with an emphasis on confidence, leadership, cooperation, communication, and opportunities for improvement. Thematic content analysis was conducted using Atlas.ti analytical software. RESULTS: Ten focus groups were held with a total of 55 clinicians. Qualitative analysis of focus group feedback revealed the following selected themes: characteristics of a strong leader during a trauma, factors impacting trauma team members' confidence, and effective communication as a key component during trauma response. Participants recommended continued simulations to enhance trauma team trust and efficiency. CONCLUSION: Clinicians responding to pediatric trauma resuscitations valued the practice they received during trauma simulations and supported the continuation of the simulations to improve trauma activation teamwork and communication. Findings will inform the development of future simulation-based training programs to improve teamwork, confidence, and communication between trauma team members.

Limiting chest computed tomography in the evaluation of pediatric thoracic trauma.

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) of the chest (chest CT) is overused in blunt pediatric thoracic trauma. Chest CT adds to the diagnosis of thoracic injury but rarely changes patient management. We sought to identify a subset of blunt pediatric trauma patients who would benefit from a screening chest CT based on their admission chest x-ray (CXR) findings. We hypothesize that limiting chest CT to patients with an abnormal mediastinal silhouette identifies intrathoracic vascular injuries not otherwise seen on CXR. METHODS: All blunt trauma activations that underwent an admission CXR at our Level 1 pediatric trauma center from 2005 to 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who had a chest CT were evaluated for added diagnoses and change in management after CT. RESULTS: An admission CXR was performed in 1,035 patients. One hundred thirty-nine patients had a CT, and the diagnosis of intra-thoracic injury was added in 42% of patients. Chest CT significantly increased the diagnosis of contusion or atelectasis (30.3% vs 60.4%; p < 0.05), pneumothorax (7.2% vs 18.7%; p < 0.05), and other fractures (4.3% vs 10.8%; p < 0.05) on CXR compared to chest CT. Chest CT changed the management of only 4 patients (2.9%). Two patients underwent further radiologic evaluation that was negative for injury, one had a chest tube placed for an occult pneumothorax before exploratory laparotomy, and one patient had a thoracotomy for repair of aortic injury. Chest CT for select patients with an abnormal mediastinal silhouette on CXR would have decreased CT scans by 80% yet still identified patients with an intrathoracic vascular injury. CONCLUSIONS: The use of chest CT should be limited to the identification of intrathoracic vascular injuries in the setting of an abnormal mediastinal silhouette on CXR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level IV; diagnostic study, level III.

Mixed-Methods Pilot Study: Disaster Preparedness of Families With Children Followed in an Intestinal Rehabilitation Clinic.

BACKGROUND: Children with special healthcare needs are a vulnerable population in disasters. Special-needs families tend to be less prepared for a disaster than the general public. The purpose of this pilot project was to examine the disaster preparedness levels of families in an intestinal rehabilitation (IR) clinic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We administered an anonymous survey to a convenience sample of IR clinic families and conducted 2 focus groups. Descriptive analyses were used for survey data; Atlas.ti was used to analyze focus group data. RESULTS: Survey findings revealed that 69% of families lacked an emergency supply kit, and 93% did not have a clinician-completed emergency information form. On a scale of 1-10, the mean confidence in their family's disaster preparations was 4.9. The overarching theme from focus group discussions was challenges and/or barriers to disaster preparedness. CONCLUSION: IR clinic families are generally unprepared for a disaster. These findings are highly relevant to our goal of developing a disaster survival toolkit for the IR families. Toolkits are being distributed in the IR clinic.

Admission hematocrit predicts the need for transfusion secondary to hemorrhage in pediatric blunt trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric trauma uses a substantial amount of resources. Quick and cost-effective measures that can be used to identify children with clinically relevant injuries are essential to resource allocation and optimization of patient care. Admission hematocrit is rapid and inexpensive, causes minimal harm, and can potentially aid in critical decision making. We hypothesize that admission hematocrit predicts the need for transfusion in pediatric blunt trauma patients. METHODS: Records of trauma patients age 0 year to 17 years (2005-2013) who presented to a pediatric Level 1 trauma center were retrospectively reviewed. Data collected include demographics, computed tomographic scan findings, need for an intervention secondary to bleeding (blood transfusion, angioembolization, or operation), and admission hematocrit. RESULTS: We found a significant decrease in admission hematocrit between patients requiring a transfusion and patients who did not (27% vs. 36%, p < 0.01). We evaluated a subset of patients who had an abdominal computed tomographic scan and found a significant decrease in admission hemocrit between those who required a transfusion for an intra-abdominal injury and those who did not (29% vs 37%, p < 0.01). In this subset, serial hematocrit values remained significantly lower in the patients requiring a transfusion up to 67 hours after admission (p = 0.04). A cutoff admission hematocrit of 35% or less has a sensitivity of 94% and a negative predictive value of 99.9% in identifying children who need a transfusion after blunt trauma. CONCLUSION: An admission hematocrit of 35% or less provides a reliable screening test because of its low false negative rate and high specificity for identifying patients at an increased risk of bleeding after injury. Admission hematocrit could be widely implemented to identify patients who may need a transfusion with low expense and minimal harm for our pediatric patients and may be able to alter the entire course of their trauma resuscitation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiologic/prognostic study, level III.

Academic-Community Partnership to Develop a Novel Disaster Training Tool for School Nurses: Emergency Triage Drill Kit.

As children spend approximately 28% of their day in school and disasters may strike at any time, it is important for school officials to conduct emergency preparedness activities. School nurses, teachers, and staff should be prepared to respond and provide support and first aid treatment. This article describes a collaborative effort within the Los Angeles Unified School District to enhance disaster preparedness. Specifically, the article outlines the program steps and tools developed to prepare staff in mass triage through an earthquake disaster training exercise.

On-Q ® pain pump versus epidural for postoperative analgesia in children.

PURPOSE: The On-Q(®) pain pump provides a continuous infusion of local anesthesia for management of postoperative pain. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and outcomes of the On-Q(®) pump compared to continuous epidural in children postoperatively. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients in our hospital who received a postoperative epidural or On-Q(®) pump from 2005 to 2008. Patients were sub-categorized by incision type. RESULTS: Seventy patients received epidural and 66 On-Q(®). On-Q(®) therapy was longer by 1 day (p < 0.0001), but did not affect postoperative length of stay. Patients with On-Q(®) pumps had a decreased rate of Foley catheter placement (p = 0.002) and shorter duration of catheter use by more than a day (p < 0.001). Moderate to severe pain was similar in the two groups on postoperative days 0-5. Supplemental narcotic use was higher in the On-Q(®) group only on postoperative day 1 (p = 0.005) and in patients with midline and transverse abdominal incisions. No differences were seen in time to ambulation or recovery of postoperative ileus. CONCLUSION: The On-Q(®) pain pump is an effective method for postoperative pain control, without the inherent risks of epidural catheters.