Prognostic Factors and Primary Healing on Root Perforation Repaired with MTA: A 14-year Longitudinal Study.

INTRODUCTION: Few data are available on the long-term efficacy of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) in treating root canal perforations. This prospective cohort study builds on a previously reported trial to determine the outcome for teeth with root perforations treated with orthograde MTA after longer follow-up and identify potential prognostic factors. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed, enrolling (1999-2009) patients with a single dental perforation treated with MTA. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative information was evaluated, and the outcomes were dichotomized as healed or nonhealing. Patients were followed up yearly until 2018 for a maximum of 17 years after treatment, with controls carried out until 14 years. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were evaluated using standardized follow-up protocols. RESULTS: Of the 124 entrolled patients (median age = 36.5 years, 53.2% male), 115 were healed at the first (n = 110, 89%) or second (n = 5, 4%) annual posttreatment checkup, while 9 subjects (7%, 4 females, 18-65 years old) did not heal. Characteristics significantly associated with nonhealing were gender, positive probing, size, and perforation site. Perforations recurred in 48 teeth during the follow-up with the estimated probability of reversal at 5, 10, and 14 years of 6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2%-10%), 30% (95% CI, 20%-38%), and 62% (95% CI, 46%-73%), respectively. Positive probing had a higher reversal risk (hazard ratio = 3.3, P ≤ .001), and perforations >3 mm were more likely to have a reversal (hazard ratio = 4.1, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of reversal for healed MTA-treated root canal perforations, initially relatively low, vastly increases over time.

Treatment planning of damaged teeth: to recover or to extract?

BACKGROUND: Planning the treatment of a compromised tooth is challenging but the choice should refer to evidence-based criteria. The literature proved that patient-related factors influence the treatment plan, but what happens when the patient is a dentist? Aim of the study was to observe whether the dentist goes for the same option suggested to a patient in a hypothetical scenario. METHODS: One hundred volunteers were interviewed singularly in a quiet ambient. Radiographs of 15 compromised teeth were shown and were identified as belonging to a hypothetical patient with non-contributory medical history asking for the best treatment. For each clinical case, the dentist could decide between: extraction (E), endorestorative recovery (R); referral to a specialist (S) to save the tooth. After a 15-minute wash-out, the same radiographs were shown again with the question: if this was your tooth, what would you do? The alternatives could be E or R. Statistical analysis was performed in order to evaluate the discordance between the choice taken for the patient and for the dentist's teeth. RESULTS: A constant increase in recovered teeth was observed in group D with the only exception of case 12. Concordance ranged from scarce to substantial, while symmetry showed that, when changing their mind, the dentists recovered their own teeth. CONCLUSIONS: The dentists were more conservative on their teeth: this shows the absence of a coherent decision-making pattern and stresses the need for an improvement in the formation of dental practitioners.

Patient and Clinical Characteristics Associated with Primary Healing of Iatrogenic Perforations after Root Canal Treatment: Results of a Long-term Italian Study.

INTRODUCTION: There are few data on the long-term efficacy of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) in treating root canal perforations. We investigated the extent of primary healing after perforation repair with MTA and non-healing as a result of repair. We also investigated patient/clinical characteristics affecting treatment outcomes and long-term prognosis. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study that enrolled consecutive patients with a single dental perforation treated with MTA (January 1999-June 2009). Patients were followed up until December 2012 for a maximum of 13 years after treatment, with analyses carried out at 8 years. RESULTS: Of the 110 patients (median age, 36 years; 54.5% male) eligible for inclusion, 101 were judged to have started to heal at the first (n = 98, 89%) or second (n = 3, 3%) annual post-treatment checkup, and 9 (8%, 4 women and 5 men, aged between 18 and 65 years) did not show any sign of healing. Patients >50 years had a higher percentage of non-healing perforations compared with those ≤ 50 years (12% versus 7%). The percentages of perforations at post-treatment analysis that failed to heal were 13% (intermediate/middle), 4% (coronal), and 0% (apical). The percentages of non-healing perforations according to size were 16% for >3 mm, 6% for 2-3 mm, and 0% for smaller perforations. Characteristics associated with probability of progressing after initial healing were gender, positive probing, size, and site of perforation. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that having obtained primary healing with MTA, the likelihood of progressing is very low. They provide good evidence of the combined effectiveness of experienced operators and use of state-of-the-art materials.

The outcome of endodontic retreatment: a 2-yr follow-up.

Retreatment is common in endodontics. The purpose of this article was to classify the different clinical situations encountered in retreatment cases and relate them to the outcome after an observation period of 24 months. A total of 425 patients (452 teeth) from 451 patients, consecutively admitted for root-canal retreatment, were monitored during a 24-month period. All teeth (254 molars, 107 premolars, and 91 single-root anterior teeth) were divided into two major categories: teeth with modified anatomy from previous endodontic treatment (root-canal-morphology altered) and teeth in which no significant anatomical changes were made by the former endodontic treatment (root-canal-morphology respected). Although the overall success was 69.03%, the success in the root-canal-morphology-respected group was 86.8% and in the root-canal-morphology-altered group 47% (Mann-Whitney U test p < 0.0001). The clinical success of an endodontic retreatment seems to depend on whether alterations in the natural course of the root canals were caused by previous root-canal treatment.