Effect of air pollutants on ambulatory blood pressure.

BACKGROUND AND METHODOLOGY: Air pollutants have a significant impact on public health. The aim of the study was to find out the relationship between ambulatory blood pressure measured by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and the atmospheric pollutants that are measured regularly (PM10, PM2.5, NO2 and SO2). An observational study of temporal and geographic measurements of individual patients (case-time series design) was carried out in Primary Care Centres and Hypertension Units in the Barcelona metropolitan area. We included 2888 hypertensive patients≥18 years old, untreated, with a first valid ABPM performed between 2005 and 2014 and with at least one air pollution station within a radius of <3km. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The mean age was 54.3 (SD 14.6) years. 50.1% were women and 16.9% of the sample were smokers. Mean 24-h blood pressure (BP) was 128.0 (12.7)/77.4 (9.7) mmHg. After adjusting for mean ambient temperature and different risk factors, a significant association was found between ambulatory diastolic BP (DBP) and PM10 concentrations the day before ABPM. For each increase of 10µg/m3 of PM10, an increase of 1.37mmHg 24-h DBP and 1.48mmHg daytime DBP was observed. No relationship was found between PM2.5, NO2 and SO2 and ambulatory BP, nor between any pollutant and clinical BP. The concentration of PM10 the day before the ABPM is significantly associated with an increase in 24-h DBP and daytime DBP.

[2022 Practice guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension of the Spanish Society of Hypertension]. / Guía práctica sobre el diagnóstico y tratamiento de la hipertensión arterial en España, 2022. Sociedad Española de Hipertensión - Liga Española para la Lucha contra la Hipertensión Arterial (SEH-LELHA).

Hypertension is the most important risk factor for global disease burden. Detection and management of hypertension are considered as key issues for individual and public health, as adequate control of blood pressure levels markedly reduces morbidity and mortality associated with hypertension. Aims of these practice guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension of the Spanish Society of Hypertension include offering simplified schemes for diagnosis and treatment for daily practice, and strategies for public health promotion. The Spanish Society of Hypertension assumes the 2018 European guidelines for management of arterial hypertension developed by the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension, although relevant aspects of the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines and the 2020 International Society of Hypertension guidelines are also commented. Hypertension is defined as a persistent elevation in office systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg, and assessment of out-of-office blood pressure and global cardiovascular risk are considered of key importance for evaluation and management of hypertensive patients. The target for treated blood pressure should be < 130/80 for most patients. The treatment of hypertension involves lifestyle interventions and drug therapy. Most people with hypertension need more than one antihypertensive drug for adequate control, so initial therapy with two drugs, and single pill combinations are recommended for a wide majority of hypertensive patients.

[Statement of the Spanish Interdisciplinary Vascular Prevention Committee on the updated European Guidelines on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention]. / Comentario del CEIPV a las nuevas Guías Europeas de Prevención Cardiovascular 2021.

Statement of the Spanish Interdisciplinary Vascular Prevention Committee on the updated European Guidelines on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention. We present the Spanish adaptation of the 2021 European Guidelines on Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) prevention in clinical practice. The current guidelines besides the individual approach greatly emphasize on the importance of population level approaches to the prevention of cardiovascular diseases. Systematic global CVD risk assessment is recommended in individuals with any major vascular risk factor. Regarding LDL-Cholesterol, blood pressure, and glycemic control in patients with diabetes mellitus, goals and targets remain as recommended in previous guidelines. However, it is proposed a new, stepwise approach (Step 1 and 2) to treatment intensification as a tool to help physicians and patients pursue these targets in a way that fits patient profile. After Step 1, considering proceeding to the intensified goals of Step 2 is mandatory, and this intensification will be based on 10-year CVD risk, lifetime CVD risk and treatment benefit, comorbidities and patient preferences. The updated SCORE algorithm-SCORE2, SCORE-OP- is recommended in these guidelines, which estimates an individual's 10-year risk of fatal and non-fatal CVD events (myocardial infarction, stroke) in healthy men and women aged 40-89 years. Another new and important recommendation is the use of different categories of risk according different age groups (< 50, 50-69 ≥ 70 years). Different flow charts of CVD risk and risk factor treatment in apparently healthy persons, in patients with established atherosclerotic CVD, and in diabetic patients are recommended. Patients with chronic kidney disease are considered high risk or very high-risk patients according to the levels of glomerular filtration rate and albumin-to-creatinine ratio. New lifestyle recommendations adapted to the ones published by the Spanish Ministry of Health as well as recommendations focused on the management of lipids, blood pressure, diabetes and chronic renal failure are included.

2021 Spanish Society of Hypertension position statement about telemedicine.

The pandemic caused by coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) has forced, in many cases, to replace face-to-face consultation with the telematic consultation, in order to reduce the risk of contagion associated with the presence of patients in health centres. This change may represent an opportunity for a different and more effective communication between professionals and patients, allowing better accessibility to medical care and more systematic and comprehensive approach to patients with hypertension and cardiovascular risk. However, organisational tools are needed to facilitate communication between patients and professionals, specifically with the exchange of clinical data by remote monitoring of variables associated with hypertension and cardiovascular risk (blood pressure, weight, height, blood tests…), and allow monitoring of adherence to treatments, lifestyles and risk factors. It would be desirable for this to be carried out by multidisciplinary teams, both from primary care, hospital and community pharmacy, with an adequate coordination of care. This document of the Spanish Society of Hypertension (SEH-LELHA) tries to give the keys to improve the quality of care of telematic consultations of patients with hypertension and cardiovascular risk, provide basic criteria of telematic or face to face attention and systematise their content. Likewise, the follow-up criteria are proposed by the different professionals.

[Position statement on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) by the Spanish Society of Hypertension (2019)]. / Documento de la Sociedad Española de Hipertensión-Liga Española para la Lucha contra la Hipertensión Arterial (SEH-LELHA) sobre monitorización ambulatoria de la presión arterial (MAPA) 2019.

Conventional blood pressure (BP) measurement in clinical practice is the most used procedure for the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension (HT), but is subject to considerable inaccuracies due to, on the one hand, the inherent variability of the BP itself and, on the other hand biases arising from the measurement technique and conditions, Some studies have demonstrated the prognosis superiority in the development of cardiovascular disease using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). It can also detect "white coat" hypertension, avoiding over-diagnosis and over-treatment in many cases, as well detecting of masked hypertension, avoiding under-detection and under-treatment. ABPM is recognised in the diagnosis and management of HT in most of international guidelines on hypertension. The present document, taking the recommendations of the European Society of Hypertension as a reference, aims to review the more recent evidence on ABPM, and to serve as guidelines for health professionals in their clinical practice and to encourage ABPM use in the diagnosis and follow-up of hypertensive subjects. Requirements, procedure, and clinical indications for using ABPM are provided. An analysis is also made of the main contributions of ABPM in the diagnosis of "white coat" and masked HT phenotypes, short term BP variability patterns, its use in high risk and resistant hypertension, as well as its the role in special population groups like children, pregnancy and elderly. Finally, some aspects about the current situation of the Spanish ABPM Registry and future perspectives in research and potential ABPM generalisation in clinical practice are also discussed.

[Spanish Society of Hypertension position statement on the 2017 ACC/AHA hypertension guidelines]. / Documento de la Sociedad Española de Hipertensión-Liga Española para la Lucha contra la Hipertensión Arterial (SEH-LELHA) sobre las guías ACC/AHA 2017 de hipertensión arterial.

The American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA) have recently published their guidelines for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of hypertension in adults. The most controversial issue is the classification threshold at 130/80mmHg, which will allow a large number of patients to be diagnosed as hypertensive who were previously considered normotensive. Blood pressure (BP) is considered normal (<120mmHg systolic and <80mmHg diastolic), elevated (120-129 and <80mmHg), stage 1 (130-139 or 80-89mmHg), and stage 2 (≥140 or ≥90mmHg). Out-of-office BP measurements are recommended to confirm the diagnosis of hypertension and for titration of BP-lowering medication. In management, cardiovascular risk would be determinant since those with grade 1 hypertension and an estimated 10-year risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease ≥10%, and those with cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease and/or diabetes will require pharmacological treatment, the rest being susceptible to non-pharmacological treatment up to the 140/90mmHg threshold. These recommendations would allow patients with level 1 hypertension and high atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease to benefit from pharmacological therapies and all patients could also benefit from improved non-pharmacological therapies. However, this approach should be cautious because inadequate BP measurement and/or lack of systematic atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease calculation could lead to overestimation in diagnosing hypertension and to overtreatment. Guidelines are recommendations, not impositions, and the management of hypertension should be individualized, based on clinical decisions, preferences of the patients, and an adequate balance between benefits and risks.

Correction to: SEOM clinical guidelines for endometrial cancer (2017).

In the original version of this article Figure 1 was shown incorrectly. The correct Figure 1 is shown here.

SEOM clinical guidelines for endometrial cancer (2017).

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecological cancer in developed countries. Most patients are diagnosed at an early stage with a low risk of relapse. However, there is a group of patients with a high risk of relapse and poor prognosis. Despite the recent publication of randomized trials, the adjuvant treatment of high-risk EC is still to be defined and there are many open questions about the best approach and the right timing. Unfortunately, the survival of metastatic or recurrent EC is short, due to the poor results of chemotherapy and the lack of a second line of treatment. Advances in the knowledge of the molecular abnormalities in EC have permitted the development of promising targeted therapies.

Technique for precaval and laterocaval nodes excision at extraperitoneal paraaortic lymphadenectomy.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To describe our technique for excision of the pre-caval and laterocaval nodes using an extraperitoneal approach. This technique was developed to make the dissection and excision of the less accessible nodes in an easier and safer way by minimizing the risk of great vessels injury and bleeding. DESIGN: Step-by-step description of the surgical procedure using video (Canadian Task Force classification III). SETTING: The procedure was performed at a teaching hospital, Hospital Universitario Donostia (Spain). PATIENTS: A 52-year-old woman with a body mass index of 33 underwent endoscopic extraperitoneal paraaortic lymphadenectomy for advanced high grade cervical adenocarcinoma FIGO IIB. INTERVENTIONS: The patient underwent an endoscopic extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy. An anatomical dissection is being performed being the upper limit of the dissection the left renal vein. Focus of the video involves the challenging dissection of the right nodes. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Firstly we complete a dissection of all the anatomical aortic limits until the renal vein and exeresis of aortic nodes. A plane just above the cava vein is carefully developed by pushing all the lymph nodes to the roof of the dissection. Special care must be taken close to the aortic bifurcation due to the perforating vessels that can be found more frequently in this location. Once all this space is dissected, nodes attached to the roof are easily pushed down. It is useful to use a clip in the upper part, close to the renal vein, to prevent lymphorrhea. Nodes are excised in four blocks, supramesenteric and inframesenteric aortic and precaval nodes. The proximity to the peritoneal roof and the chance for a peritoneal hole and loss of pneumoperitoneum can be less problematic if the right dissection is performed at the end of the procedure. CONCLUSION: A complete para-aortic retroperitoneal dissection can be achieved with this extraperitoneal approach. Benefits of this technique are based on the absence of the bowel or other intraperitoneal structures invading the operative field given the barrier-free nature of the retroperitoneal space. Despite the challenge of the access to the right nodes in a retroperitoneal paraaortic lymphadenectomy they can be successfully excised reaching the renal vein including obese patients.

[Hypertensive urgencies and emergencies]. / Urgencias y emergencias hipertensivas.

Hypertensive urgencies and emergencies are common situations in clinical practice. Hypertensive urgencies are characterized by acute elevation of blood pressure without target organ damage. Hypertensive emergencies are life-threatening situations characterized by acute elevation of blood pressure and target organ damage. The aims of blood pressure control, antihypertensive drugs to use and route of administration will depend on the presence or absence of target organ damage and individual patient characteristics. The correct diagnosis and treatment of these situations are essential for patient prognosis. © 2017 SEHLELHA. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.

[Combination for initial therapy in hypertension, is it useful?] / ¿Es útil el inicio de tratamiento con combinaciones antihipertensivas?

Hypertension represents the first cause of mortality worldwide because a leading role in development of cardiovascular and renal diseases. Evidence about the benefits of controlling hypertension is overwhelming, but adequate control of blood pressure is still poor even in high-income countries. At least one of 2 hypertensive patients suffers from uncontrolled blood pressure. Nearly 75% of hypertensive patients do not achieve adequate control with monotherapy. Strategies to improve control include avoiding inertia in initiating pharmacological treatment, prompt shift to combined therapy from monotherapy, initial treatment with a 2-drug combination, and use of fixed-dose combinations in a single pill. This review focuses in benefits of initiating treatment combining antihypertensive drugs.

[Medical expert consensus in AH on the clinical use of triple fixed-dose antihypertensive therapy in Spain]. / Consenso de médicos expertos en HTA sobre el uso clínico de la triple terapia antihipertensiva a dosis fija en España.

INTRODUCTION: The opinion of experts (different specialties) on the triple fixed-dose antihypertensive therapy in clinical practice may differ. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Online questionnaire with controversial aspects of the triple therapy answered by panel of experts in hypertension (HT) using two-round modified Delphi method. RESULTS: The questionnaire was completed by 158 experts: Internal Medicine (49), Nephrology (26), Cardiology (83). Consensus was reached (agreement) on 27/45 items (60%); 7 items showed differences statistically significant. Consensus was reached regarding: Predictive factors in the need for combination therapy and its efficacy vs. increasing the dose of a pretreatment, and advantage of triple therapy (prescription/adherence/cost/pressure control) vs. free combination. CONCLUSIONS: This consensus provides an overview of the clinical use of triple therapy in moderate-severe and resistant/difficult to control HT.

Heart rate and heart rate variability in resistant versus controlled hypertension and in true versus white-coat resistance.

Sympathetic nervous system has an important role in resistant hypertension. Heart rate (HR) is a marker of sympathetic activity, but its association with resistant hypertension has not been assessed. We aimed to evaluate differences in HR values and variability between resistant and controlled patients and between true and white-coat resistant hypertensives (RHs). We compared office and ambulatory HR, nocturnal dip and s.d. in 14,627 RHs versus 11,951 controlled patients (on ⩽ 3 drugs) and in 8730 true (24 h blood pressure (BP) ⩾ 130 and/or 80 mm Hg) versus 4825 white-coat (24-h BP < 130/80 mm Hg) RHs. After adjusting for age, gender, body mass index, diabetes status and beta blocker use, HR values and variability were significantly elevated in resistant versus controlled patients and in true versus white-coat RHs. In logistic regression models, after adjustment for confounders, office HR (odds ratio for each increase in tertile: 1.337; 95% confidence interval: 1.287-1.388; P < 0.001), nocturnal dip (0.958; 0.918-0.999; P = 0.035) and night time s.d. (1.115; 1.057-1.177; P = 0.013) were all significantly associated with the presence of resistant hypertension. Moreover, night time HR (1.160; 1.065-1.265; P < 0.001), nocturnal dip (0.876; 0.830-0.925; P < 0.001) and 24-h s.d. (1.148; 1.092-1.207; P < 0.001) were all significantly associated with true resistant hypertension. In conclusion, both increased HR and variability are associated with resistant hypertension and with true resistance. These suggest the involvement of the sympathetic nervous system in the development of resistance to antihypertensive treatment.

[Clinical and genetic basis of hypertensive nephrosclerosis. NEFROSEN Study]. / Bases clínicas y genéticas de la nefroesclerosis hipertensiva. Estudio NEFROSEN.

BACKGROUND: Hypertensive nephrosclerosis is a chronic kidney disease (CKD) associated with essential hypertension. The lack of correlation between hypertension control and progression to end-stage CKD suggests an intrinsic and primitive disease. New evidence suggests that MYH9 gene alterations are associated with polymorphisms in African Americans. The aim of this study is to investigate whether a polymorphism of MYH9 in Caucasians is linked to essential hypertension and nephrosclerosis. The secondary objective is to identify the clinical risk factors of progression to end-stage CKD. This is a retrospective study that will compare patients with nephrosclerosis and essential hypertensives without renal disease, and also patients with nephrosclerosis and impaired renal function with those that are stable. METHOD: Between October 2009 and October 2010, 500 patients with stages 3-5 CKD attributed to nephrosclerosis according to usual clinical criteria, and 300 essential hypertensives (eGFR>60 mL/min/1.73 m2; microalbuminuria <300 mg/g) are to be recruited. A total of 200 healthy controls from the general population are also to be included for the genetic study. There are two study sections, being the first and final visits to the clinic (for stage 5 cases, the start of replacement therapy will be the end of follow-up). Clinical and laboratory data will be recorded, and blood samples will be collected. DISCUSSION: Our study will aim to determine if there is a relationship between the diagnosis of nephrosclerosis and the MYH9 gene in Caucasians, and to study possible risk factors for progression to end-stage CKD, on both clinical and genetic bases.

[Treating high blood pressure in kidney patients: evidence and implications]. / Tratamiento de la hipertensión arterial en pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica. Evidencias e implicaciones.

The main aim delaying progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) are tight control of blood pressure to levels below 130/80 mmHg and reductioner 24-h urine protein to <0.5 g or microalbuminuria to <300 mg/g. First-line agents for renoprotection are angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers at the highest tolerated dose. The combination of these types of drugs, the so-called dual blockade, further reduces an elevated urinary albumin or protein excretion but, at least in patients at high cardiovascular risk, does not delay progression of renal failure. An intensified multifactorial intervention is necessary for renal patients because 35 to 50% of cases with grade 3 or 4 CKD are prone to premature complications such as end-stage renal disease and/or cardiovascular events. New strategies to block the renin-angiotensin system could be of help in improving of outcomes in CKD patients.

Control of hypertension in coronary heart disease.

This observational study investigates, for the first time, the actual or out-of-office control of hypertension among coronary heart disease (CHD) patients, by using 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). We used the Spanish Society of Hypertension ABPM Registry, based on a large-scale network of primary-care physicians consecutively recruiting hypertensive patients with conventional clinical indications for ABPM. The average of two office BP measurements was used for analyses. Thereafter, 24-h ABPM was performed, using a SpaceLabs 90207 device. Out-of-office control of hypertension among 2434 treated essential hypertensive patients with clinically documented CHD was much higher (46.4%) than in-office BP control (28.7%). This considerable difference was partly due to the presence of 25.2% of patients with "office resistance", i.e., normal ambulatory BP but with high office BP despite treatment. Although further efforts in controlling BP are needed in CHD patients, physicians should be also comforted by BP results better than previously believed based on office data.

[Renal function and cardiovascular risk in patients with essential hypertension. The "FRESHA" study]. / Función renal y riesgo cardiovascular en pacientes con hipertensión arterial esencial. Estudio FRESHA.

BACKGROUND: In the past few years there has been a growing amount of information about renal dysfunction and cardiovascular risk. The objectives of this study were to assess the prevalence of renal dysfunction and evaluate the relation between renal function and cardiovascular risk in patients with essential hypertension. METHODS: A multicenter, cross-sectional survey of unselected patients with essential hypertension attending primary care settings in Spain was performed between june and november 2004. Renal function was evaluated with the abbreviated equation of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease study. Renal insufficiency was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min/1.73 m2. RESULTS: Eighty-eight investigators from 50 centers recruited 2130 patients being mean age 65.6 +/- 11 years and female 53%. Prevalence of diabetes, lipid abnormalities, and previous cardiovascular disease were 30.3%, 45.9%, and 42.1% respectively. Prevalence of renal insufficiency was 32.4% (95% CI 30.4-34.4). Patients suffering from renal insufficiency showed a higher prevalence of cardiovascular disease when comparing with those with an estimated glomerular filtration rate = or >60 ml/min/1.73 m2 (56.2% vs. 35.3%, OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.95-2.82, p < 0.001). A logistic regression analysis showed that the relation of renal dysfunction with cardiovascular disease was independent of other variables or classical cardiovascular risk factors as age, female sex, diabetes, smoking, hypercholesterolemia, and systolic blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Renal insufficiency was present in 32.4% of patients with essential hypertension attending primary care settings. Cases with renal dysfunction showed a higher cardiovascular risk. Hypertensive patients with renal insufficiency should be considered as candidates for an aggressive approach of cardiovascular risk management.