Quantitative myocardial perfusion in liver transplantation candidates: Poorly metabolized caffeine inhibition of vasodilatory stress.

BACKGROUND: Data on cardiac positron emission tomography (PET) in liver transplantation (LT) candidates are limited with no prior study accounting for poorly metabolized caffeine reducing stress perfusion. METHOD: Consecutive LT candidates (n = 114) undergoing cardiac rest/stress PET were instructed to abstain from caffeine for 2 days extended to 5 and 7 days. Due to persistently high prevalence of measurable blood caffeine after 5-day caffeine abstinence, dipyridamole (n = 41) initially used was changed to dobutamine (n = 73). Associations of absolute flow, coronary flow reserve (CFR), detectable blood caffeine, and Modified End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score for liver failure severity were evaluated. Coronary flow data of LT candidates were compared to non-LT control group (n = 102 for dipyridamole, n = 29 for dobutamine). RESULTS: Prevalence of patients with detectable blood caffeine was 63.3%, 36.7% and 33.3% after 2-, 5- and 7-day of caffeine abstinence, respectively. MELD score was associated with detectable caffeine (odd ratio 1.18,P < 0.001). CFR was higher during dipyridamole stress without-caffeine versus with-caffeine (2.22 ± 0.80 vs 1.55 ± 0.37,P = 0.048) but lower than dobutamine stress (2.22 ± 0.80 vs 2.82 ± 1.02,P = 0.026). Mediation analysis suggested that the dominant association between CFR and MELD score in dipyridamole group derived from caffeine-impaired CFR and liver failure/caffeine interaction. CFR in LT candidates was lower than non-LT control population in both dipyridamole and dobutamine group. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate exceptionally high prevalence of detectable blood caffeine in LT candidates undergoing stress PET myocardial perfusion imaging resulting in reduced CFR with dipyridamole compared to dobutamine. The delayed caffeine clearance in LT candidates makes dobutamine a preferred stress agent in this population.

Coronary flow capacity and survival prediction after revascularization: physiological basis and clinical implications.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Coronary flow capacity (CFC) is associated with an observed 10-year survival probability for individual patients before and after actual revascularization for comparison to virtual hypothetical ideal complete revascularization. METHODS: Stress myocardial perfusion (mL/min/g) and coronary flow reserve (CFR) per pixel were quantified in 6979 coronary artery disease (CAD) subjects using Rb-82 positron emission tomography (PET) for CFC maps of artery-specific size-severity abnormalities expressed as percent left ventricle with prospective follow-up to define survival probability per-decade as fraction of 1.0. RESULTS: Severely reduced CFC in 6979 subjects predicted low survival probability that improved by 42% after revascularization compared with no revascularization for comparable severity (P = .0015). For 283 pre-and-post-procedure PET pairs, severely reduced regional CFC-associated survival probability improved heterogeneously after revascularization (P < .001), more so after bypass surgery than percutaneous coronary interventions (P < .001) but normalized in only 5.7%; non-severe baseline CFC or survival probability did not improve compared with severe CFC (P = .00001). Observed CFC-associated survival probability after actual revascularization was lower than virtual ideal hypothetical complete post-revascularization survival probability due to residual CAD or failed revascularization (P < .001) unrelated to gender or microvascular dysfunction. Severely reduced CFC in 2552 post-revascularization subjects associated with low survival probability also improved after repeat revascularization compared with no repeat procedures (P = .025). CONCLUSIONS: Severely reduced CFC and associated observed survival probability improved after first and repeat revascularization compared with no revascularization for comparable CFC severity. Non-severe CFC showed no benefit. Discordance between observed actual and virtual hypothetical post-revascularization survival probability revealed residual CAD or failed revascularization.

Does financial hardship associate with abnormal quantitative myocardial perfusion and major adverse cardiovascular event?

BACKGROUND: Data on impact of financial hardship on coronary artery disease (CAD) remain incomplete. METHODS: Consecutive subjects referred for clinical rest/stress cardiac positron emission tomography (PET) were enrolled. Financial hardship is defined as patients' inability to pay for their out-of-pocket expense for cardiac PET. Abnormal cardiac PET is defined as at least moderate relative perfusion defects at stress involving > 10% of the left ventricle or global coronary flow reserve ≤ 2.0. Patients were followed for major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) comprised of all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and late coronary revascularization. RESULTS: We analyzed a total of 4173 patients with mean age 65.6 ± 11.3 years, 72.2% men, and 93.6% reported as having medical insurance. Of these, 504 (12.1%) patients had financial hardship. On multivariable analysis, financial hardship associated with abnormal cardiac PET (odds ratio 1.377, p = 0.004) and MACE (hazard ratio 1.432, p = 0.010) and its association with MACE was mostly through direct effect with small proportion mediated by abnormal cardiac PET or known CAD. CONCLUSION: Among patients referred for cardiac rest/stress PET, financial hardship independently associates with myocardial perfusion abnormalities and MACE; however, its effect on MACE is largely not mediated by abnormal myocardial perfusion or known CAD suggesting distinct impact of financial hardship beyond traditional risk factors and CAD that deserves attention and intervention to effectively reduced adverse outcomes. Having medical insurance does not consistently protect from financial hardship and a more preventive-oriented restructuring may provide better outcomes at lower cost.

Subendocardial and Transmural Myocardial Ischemia: Clinical Characteristics, Prevalence, and Outcomes With and Without Revascularization.

BACKGROUND: Subendocardial ischemia is commonly diagnosed but not quantified by imaging. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to define size and severity of subendocardial and transmural stress perfusion deficits, clinical associations, and outcomes. METHODS: Regional rest-stress perfusion in mL/min/g, coronary flow reserve, coronary flow capacity (CFC), relative stress flow, subendocardial stress-to-rest ratio and stress subendocardial-to-subepicardial ratio as percentage of left ventricle were measured by positron emission tomography (PET) with rubidium Rb 82 and dipyridamole stress in serial 6,331 diagnostic PETs with prospective 10-year follow-up for major adverse cardiac events with and without revascularization. RESULTS: Of 6,331 diagnostic PETs, 1,316 (20.7%) had severely reduced CFC with 41.4% having angina or ST-segment depression (STΔ) >1 mm during hyperemic stress, increasing with size. For 5,015 PETs with no severe CFC abnormality, 402 (8%) had angina or STΔ during stress, and 82% had abnormal subendocardial perfusion with 8.7% having angina or STΔ >1 mm during dipyridamole stress. Of 947 cases with stress-induced angina or STΔ >1 mm, 945 (99.8%) had reduced transmural or subendocardial perfusion reflecting sufficient microvascular function to increase coronary blood flow and reduce intracoronary pressure, causing reduced subendocardial perfusion; only 2 (0.2%) had normal subendocardial perfusion, suggesting microvascular disease as the cause of the angina. Over 10-year follow-up (mean 5 years), severely reduced CFC associated with major adverse cardiac events of 44.4% compared to 8.8% for no severe CFC (unadjusted P < 0.00001) and mortality of 15.2% without and 6.9% with revascularization (P < 0.00002) confirmed by multivariable Cox regression modeling. For no severe CFC, mortality was 3% with and without revascularization (P = 0.90). CONCLUSIONS: Reduced subendocardial perfusion on dipyridamole PET without regional stress perfusion defects is common without angina, has low risk of major adverse cardiac events, reflecting asymptomatic nonobstructive diffuse coronary artery disease, or angina without stenosis. Severely reduced CFC causes angina in fewer than one-half of cases but incurs high mortality risk that is significantly reduced after revascularization.

Use of a Pressure Wire for Automatically Correcting Artifacts in Phasic Pressure Tracings From a Fluid-Filled Catheter.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Matching phasic pressure tracings between a fluid-filled catheter and high-fidelity pressure wire has received limited attention, although each part contributes half of the information to clinical decisions. We aimed to study the impact of a novel and automated method for improving the phasic calibration of a fluid-filled catheter by accounting for its oscillatory behavior. METHODS/MATERIALS: Retrospective analysis of drift check tracings was performed using our algorithm that corrects for mean difference (offset), temporal delays (timing), differential sensitivity of the manifold transducer and pressure wire sensor (gain), and the oscillatory behavior of the fluid-filled catheter described by its resonant frequency and damping factor (how quickly oscillations disappear after a change in pressure). RESULTS: Among 2886 cases, correcting for oscillations showed a large improvement in 28 % and a medium improvement in 41 % (decrease in root mean square error >0.5 mmHg to <1 or 1-2 mmHg, respectively). 96 % of oscillators were underdamped with median damping factor 0.27 and frequency 10.6 Hz. Fractional flow reserve or baseline Pd/Pa demonstrated no clinically important bias when ignoring oscillations. However, uncorrected subcycle non-hyperemic pressure ratios (NHPR) displayed both bias and scatter. CONCLUSIONS: By automatically accounting for the oscillatory behavior of a fluid-filled catheter system, phasic matching against a high-fidelity pressure wire can be improved compared to standard equalization methods. The majority of tracings contain artifacts, mainly due to underdamped oscillations, and neglecting them leads to biased estimates of equalization parameters. No clinically important bias exists for whole-cycle metrics, in contrast to significant effects on subcycle NHPR.

Prognostic value of microvascular resistance and its association to fractional flow reserve: a DEFINE-FLOW substudy.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of hyperemic microvascular resistance (HMR) and its relationship with hyperemic stenosis resistance (HSR) index and fractional flow reserve (FFR) in stable coronary artery disease. METHODS: This is a substudy of the DEFINE-FLOW cohort (NCT02328820), which evaluated the prognosis of lesions (n=456) after combined FFR and coronary flow reserve (CFR) assessment in a prospective, non-blinded, non-randomised, multicentre study in 12 centres in Europe and Japan. Participants (n=430) were evaluated by wire-based measurement of coronary pressure, flow and vascular resistance (ComboWire XT, Phillips Volcano, San Diego, California, USA). RESULTS: Mean FFR and CFR were 0.82±0.10 and 2.2±0.6, respectively. When divided according to FFR and CFR thresholds (above and below 0.80 and 2.0, respectively), HMR was highest in lesions with FFR>0.80 and CFR<2.0 (n=99) compared with lesions with FFR≤0.80 and CFR≥2.0 (n=68) (2.92±1.2 vs 1.91±0.64 mm Hg/cm/s, p<0.001). The FFR value was proportional to the ratio between HMR and the HMR+HSR (total resistance), 95% limits of agreement (-0.032; 0.019), bias (-0.003±0.02) and correlation (r2=0.98, p<0.0001). Cox regression model using HMR as continuous parameter for target vessel failure showed an HR of 1.51, 95% CI (0.9 to 2.4), p=0.10. CONCLUSIONS: Increased HMR was not associated with a higher rate of adverse clinical events, in this population of mainly stable patients. FFR can be equally well expressed as HMR/HMR+HSR, thereby providing an alternative conceptual formulation linking epicardial severity with microvascular resistance. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02328820.

Combined Pressure and Flow Measurements to Guide Treatment of Coronary Stenoses.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess clinical outcomes after combined pressure and flow assessment of coronary lesions. BACKGROUND: Although fractional flow reserve (FFR) remains the invasive reference standard for revascularization, approximately 40% of stenoses have discordant coronary flow reserve (CFR). Optimal treatment for these disagreements remains unclear. METHODS: A total of 455 subjects with 668 lesions were enrolled from 12 sites in 6 countries. Only lesions with reduced FFR and CFR underwent revascularization; all other combinations received initial medical therapy. RESULTS: Fourteen percent of lesions had FFR ≤0.8 but CFR ≥2.0 while 23% of lesions had FFR >0.8 but CFR <2.0. During 2-year follow-up, the primary endpoint of composite all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization in lesions with FFR ≤0.8 but CFR ≥2.0 (10.8% event rate) compared with lesions with FFR >0.8 and CFR ≥2.0 (6.2% event rate) exceeded the prespecified +10% noninferiority margin (P = 0.090). Target vessel failure models using both continuous FFR and continuous CFR found that only higher FFR was associated with reduced target vessel failure (Cox P = 0.007) after initial medical treatment. Central core laboratory review accepted 69.8% of all tracings with mean differences of <0.01 for FFR and <0.02 for CFR, indicating no material impact on clinical measurements or outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: All-cause death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization after 2 years was not noninferior between lesions with FFR ≤0.8 but CFR ≥2.0 and lesions with FFR >0.8 and CFR ≥2.0. These results do not support using invasive CFR ≥2.0 to defer revascularization for lesions with reduced FFR if the patient would otherwise be a candidate on the basis of the entire clinical scenario and treatment preference.

Autoregulation of Coronary Blood Supply in Response to Demand: JACC Review Topic of the Week.

Although our coronary circulation evolved to meet demands during marked physical exertion for "fight or flight" survival, complex and multilayered control mechanisms reduce flow during other periods. Understanding homeostasis of resting flow provides essential insights into clinical pathophysiology. Several homeostatic mechanisms (myogenic, metabolic, endothelial, and neural) maintain sufficient baseline flow regardless of driving pressure (in aggregate, "autoregulation"). As a result, ventricular dysfunction does not arise until coronary perfusion pressure decreases to ∼40 mm Hg. Straightforward clinical parameters explain approximately one-half of observed absolute resting perfusion but with wide imprecision. Resting perfusion does not associate with clinical outcomes and remains unaffected by revascularization, recovery after myocardial infarction, and treating severe aortic stenosis, thereby supporting the notion that the heart was designed for peak performance.

Stenting "Vulnerable" But Fractional Flow Reserve-Negative Lesions: Potential Statistical Limitations of Ongoing and Future Trials.

Can imaging provide sufficient risk stratification to warrant revascularization of a stable plaque with negative fractional flow reserve (FFR)? Prophylactic stenting could at best be applied selectively since the composite group of FFR-negative lesions has a death or myocardial infarction rate of approximately 1%/year or less but modern stents have a rate of 2% to 3.5%/year. Because vulnerable features exist in a minority of lesions, at least 9,000 patients must be screened in order to enroll a cohort with sufficient risk. While several ongoing randomized trials are testing the concept of plaque sealing in FFR-negative lesions, preventive stenting depends on such a small effect that sample sizes to validate or refute its benefit become prohibitive. Since FFR provides a quantitative, straightforward, and reproducible metric of plaque vulnerability and burden without the need for or expense of additional catheter devices, intracoronary imaging cannot meaningfully guide prophylactic stenting when faced with a negative FFR.