RESUMO
Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) and Stevens-Johnson syndrome belong to a family of severe cutaneous adverse reactions that can be life-threatening and carry a risk of significant morbidity and potential mortality in the event of re-exposure. Lifelong avoidance of the culprit agent is mandated, which can lead to the exclusion of multiple medications if the trigger is unclear. This can result in adverse health outcomes analogous to that of a penicillin allergy label. We present a case in which the patient would progress to fatal myeloma in the absence of treatment, however, multiple medications were administered prior to the occurrence of TEN following previous chemotherapy. Available risk stratification tools including human leucocyte antigen assessment and the algorithm of drug causality for epidermal necrolysis scoring system were utilized followed by patch testing which identified a lesser-suspected agent as possibly causative. Further evidence-based in vivo testing and subsequent challenges allowed for the reintroduction of life-saving chemotherapy.
RESUMO
Prophylactic high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) is often used for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients at high risk of central nervous system (CNS) relapse, despite limited evidence demonstrating efficacy or the optimal delivery method. We conducted a retrospective, international analysis of 1384 patients receiving HD-MTX CNS prophylaxis either intercalated (i-HD-MTX) (n = 749) or at the end (n = 635) of R-CHOP/R-CHOP-like therapy (EOT). There were 78 CNS relapses (3-year rate 5.7%), with no difference between i-HD-MTX and EOT: 5.7% vs 5.8%, P = .98; 3-year difference: 0.04% (-2.0% to 3.1%). Conclusions were unchanged on adjusting for baseline prognostic factors or on 6-month landmark analysis (n = 1253). In patients with a high CNS international prognostic index (n = 600), the 3-year CNS relapse rate was 9.1%, with no difference between i-HD-MTX and EOT. On multivariable analysis, increasing age and renal/adrenal involvement were the only independent risk factors for CNS relapse. Concurrent intrathecal prophylaxis was not associated with a reduction in CNS relapse. R-CHOP delays of ≥7 days were significantly increased with i-HD-MTX vs EOT, with 308 of 1573 (19.6%) i-HD-MTX treatments resulting in a delay to subsequent R-CHOP (median 8 days). Increased risk of delay occurred in older patients when delivery was later than day 10 in the R-CHOP cycle. In summary, we found no evidence that EOT delivery increases CNS relapse risk vs i-HD-MTX. Findings in high-risk subgroups were unchanged. Rates of CNS relapse in this HD-MTX-treated cohort were similar to comparable cohorts receiving infrequent CNS prophylaxis. If HD-MTX is still considered for certain high-risk patients, delivery could be deferred until R-CHOP completion.