Increasing intensity of therapies assigned at diagnosis does not improve survival of adults with acute myeloid leukemia.

We randomized 3375 adults with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome to test whether increasingly intensive chemotherapies assigned at study-entry and analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis improved outcomes. In total, 1529 subjects <60 years were randomized to receive: (1) a first course of induction therapy with high-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone (HAM) or with standard-dose cytarabine, daunorubicin and 6-thioguanine (TAD) followed by a second course of HAM; (2) granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) or no G-CSF before induction and consolidation courses; and (3) high-dose therapy and an autotransplant or maintenance chemotherapy. In total, 1846 subjects ⩾60 years were randomized to receive: (1) a first induction course of HAM or TAD and second induction course of HAM (if they had bone marrow blasts ⩾5% after the first course); and (2) G-CSF or no G-CSF as above. Median follow-up was 7.4 years (range, 1 day to 14.7 years). Five-year event-free survivals (EFSs) for subjects receiving a first induction course of HAM vs TAD were 17% (95% confidence interval, 15, 18%) vs 16% (95% confidence interval 14, 18%; P=0.719). Five-year EFSs for subjects randomized to receive or not receive G-CSF were 19% (95% confidence interval 16, 21%) vs 16% (95% confidence interval 14, 19%; P=0.266). Five-year relapse-free survivals (RFSs) for subjects <60 years receiving an autotransplant vs maintenance therapy were 43% (95% confidence interval 40, 47%) vs 40 (95% confidence interval 35, 44%; P=0.535). Many subjects never achieved pre-specified landmarks and consequently did not receive their assigned therapies. These data indicate the limited impact of more intensive therapies on outcomes of adults with AML. Moreover, none of the more intensive therapies we tested improved 5-year EFS, RFS or any other outcomes.

Chemomodulation of sequential high-dose cytarabine by fludarabine in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia: a randomized trial of the AMLCG.

Chemomodulation of cytarabine by fludarabine has been attributed with a higher antileukemic efficacy, but randomized trials to address this question are rare. We therefore conducted a multicenter, randomized phase III study to evaluate the antileukemic efficacy of adding fludarabine to sequential high-dose cytarabine+idarubicin (SHAI) re-induction chemotherapy in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Patients (n=326, of which 281 were evaluable) were randomly assigned to SHAI (cytarabine, 1 g/m(2) bid, days 1-2 and 8-9 (3 g/m(2) for patients ≤ 60 years with refractory AML or ≥ 2nd relapse); idarubicin 10 mg/m(2) daily, days 3-4 and 10-11) or F-SHAI (SHAI with fludarabine, 15 mg/m(2), 4 h before cytarabine). Although complete remission (CR) rates (35% SHAI and 44% F-SHAI) and overall survival did not differ between both regimens, fludarabine prolonged time to treatment failure from 2.04 to 3.38 months (median, P<0.05). Twenty-seven percent of patients proceeded to allogeneic stem cell transplantation, with a significantly higher number of patients in CR or incomplete remission in the F-SHAI group (22 vs 10%, P<0.01). In conclusion, fludarabine has a beneficial, although moderate, impact on the antileukemic efficacy of high-dose cytarabine-based salvage therapy for relapsed and refractory AML.

High dose ara-C in the treatment of newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia: long-term results of the German AMLCG.

The objective of this study for newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) was to evaluate the efficacy of an intensified double induction chemotherapy including high dose ara-C (HD) and all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) followed by consolidation and 3 years maintenance therapy. In contrast to APL studies stratifying therapy according to pretreatment white blood cell (WBC) count < and > or =10 x 10(9)/l (low/intermediate and high risk according to the Sanz score), our patients received uniform therapy. From 1994 to 2005, 142 patients (age, 16-60 years) were enrolled. In the low/intermediate (n=105) vs high (n=37) WBC group, the rates of complete remission were 95.2 vs 83.8%, of induction death were 4.8 vs 16.2% (P=0.05) and of molecular remission were 87.5 vs 91.3% (P=1). Long-term overall survival was 84.4 vs 73.0% (P=0.12), event free survival was 78.3 vs 67.3% (P=0.11), relapse free survival was 82.1 vs 80.0% (P=0.83) and the cumulative incidence of relapse was 7.4 vs 11.4% (P=0.46). No relapse or death occurred after 4.7 years. ATRA and intensified chemotherapy including HD ara-C followed by prolonged maintenance therapy reduced the relapse risk in high risk patients. Pretreatment WBC count > or =10 x 10(9)/l count was no relevant prognostic factor for relapse.

Remission induction therapy: the more intensive the better?

Intensive induction therapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) as in some other systemic malignancies is a strategy fundamentally different from post-remission strategies. Approaches such as consolidation treatment, prolonged maintenance, and autologous or allogeneic transplantation in first remission are directed against the minimal residual disease in which a malignant cell population has survived induction treatment and shows resistance due to special genetic or kinetic features. In contrast, induction therapy deals with naive tumor cells possibly different from their counterparts in remission in terms of their kinetic status and sensitivity. Therefore, in AML the introduction of intensification strategies into the induction phase of treatment has been suggested as a new step in addition to intensification in the postremission phase. As expected from the dose effects observed in post-remission treatment with high-dose cytarabine (AraC) or longer treatment, similar dose effects have been found in induction treatment both from the incorporation of high-dose AraC and from the double-induction strategy used in patients up to 60 years of age. As a particular effect, patients with poor-risk AML according to an unfavorable karyotype, high LDH in serum, or a delayed response show longer survival following double induction containing high-dose AraC as compared to standard-dose AraC. A corresponding dose effect in the induction treatment of patients aged 60 years and older has been found with daunorubicin 60 vs 30 mg/m2 as part of the thioguanine/ AraC/daunorubicin (TAD) regimen with the higher dosage significantly increasing the response rate and survival in these older patients who represent a poor-risk group as a whole. Thus we have been able to demonstrate both in younger and older patients that a poor prognosis can be improved by a more intensive induction therapy. High-dose AraC in induction, however, exhibits cumulative toxicity in that repeated courses containing high-dose AraC in the post-remission period lead to long-lasting aplasias of about 6 weeks. Thus after intensive induction treatment, high-dose chemotherapy in remission may be practicable using stem-cell rescue and may contribute to a further improvement in the outcome in poor-risk as well as average-risk patients with AML. These approaches are currently under investigation by the German AML Cooperative Group (AMLCG). "The more intensive the better" is certainly not the way to go in the management of AML and other systemic malignancies but some increase in intensity may be possible and better.

Acute myeloid leukemia in adults: is postconsolidation maintenance therapy necessary?

Maintenance treatment for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in remission has recently been controversially discussed and even abandoned by several groups. An analysis of 14 recently published multicenter trials, however, revealed the highest probabilities of relapse-free survival (RFS), in the range of 35% to 42% at 4 to 5 years, only in patients assigned to maintenance treatment as far as adult age and intent-to-treat conditions were considered. After having demonstrated a superior RFS rate from 3 years of maintenance after standard-dose consolidation compared with that from consolidation alone (P = .00004), the German AMLCG requestioned the effect of maintenance randomly compared with sequential high-dose cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C) and mitoxantrone in patients who received intensified induction treatment. The results show an advantage for maintenance treatment (RFS rate of 32%) versus the sequential Ara-C and mitoxantrone treatment (RFS rate of 25%) (P = .021). We conclude that maintenance treatment continues to substantially contribute to the management of adult patients with AML, even as part of recent strategies using intensified induction treatment, and thus appears necessary in these settings.

Lymphoplasmacytic/lymphoplasmacytoid lymphoma: a clinical entity distinct from chronic lymphocytic leukaemia?

Clinical data of 116 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) and of 114 patients with lymphoplasmacytic/lymphoplasmacytoid lymphoma (synonym: LP immunocytoma, IC) as diagnosed according to the Kiel classification were compared. This interim evaluation of a prospective multicenter study of the Kiel Lymphoma Study Group characterizes IC the less favorable lymphoma entity as evidenced by a more rapid lymph node enlargement, by a higher incidence of constitutional symptoms and of marked anaemia, and by a higher percentage of patients requiring early treatment. In addition, in IC autoimmune haemolytic anaemia was detected in 11.2% of investigated patients as compared to none of the patients with CLL, and monoclonal gammopathy was disclosed in 34.2% of investigated patients as compared to only three patients with CLL who could be, however, unrecognized cases of IC. Actuarial survival data after a follow-up period of 40 months are in favor of an overall better prognosis of patients with CLL than of patients with IC.