Effectiveness and safety of risankizumab in VEry severe plaque psoriasis: a real-life retrospective study (VESPA-Study).

BACKGROUND: The recent introduction of biological drugs specifically targeting the interleukins involved in psoriasis pathogenesis revolutionized the therapeutic scenario of moderate to severe forms of psoriasis. Among these, risankizumab, an anti-IL-23, was shown to be effective both in clinical trials and real-life experiences. However, data on its use on very severe forms of psoriasis, defined by a Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) of at least 30, are scant. In this context, our study aimed to investigate the outcomes of patients with very severe psoriasis, and the involvement of difficult-to-treat areas treated with risankizumab for up to 2 years. METHODS: A retrospective, observational study enrolled patients with very severe plaque psoriasis and the involvement of difficult-to-treat areas undergoing treatment with risankizumab. Clinical and demographic data were collected at baseline. Moreover, at baseline and each dermatological examination (16, 28, 40 and 104 weeks), clinical improvement was measured using the percentage of patients achieving PASI 75/90/100 response, site-specific Psoriasis Global Assessment and Dermatology Life Quality Index. RESULTS: At baseline, the mean PASI was 35.1 ± 5.1. A significant reduction was observed since week 16 and maintained up to week 104. Moreover, the Psoriasis Global Assessment and Dermatology Life Quality Index improved as well. CONCLUSIONS: Risankizumab showed to be effective and safe in patients affected by very severe forms of psoriasis with the involvement of difficult-to-treat areas.

Effectiveness of risankizumab for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: a multicenter, real-world study.

BACKGROUND: IL-23 inhibitors were recently approved for the treatment of skin psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Risankizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that specifically binds the p19 subunit of IL-23, has proven effective on PsA in two randomized controlled trials. To date, only a few real-world data are available on this topic. METHODS: Our study aimed to prospectively evaluate the effectiveness of risankizumab in patients with PsA in a real-world setting. For this purpose, both rheumatologic and dermatologic assessments were performed at baseline and after 28-40 weeks of continuous risankizumab administration. Moreover, joint and entheses ultrasound assessment was performed at the mentioned time points. The rheumatologic assessment was carried out by means of the following scores: (i) clinical Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (cDAPSA); (ii) Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI); (iii) Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and (iii) Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI). The degree of skin involvement was measured by both the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and Physician Global Assessment (PGA). Quality of life was assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Ultrasound assessment of joints and entheses was performed on the basis of the EULAR-OMERACT score. RESULTS: After treatment, cDAPSA decreased from a mean value of 12.9 ± 7.6 to 7.0 ± 6.1 (P < 0.001), and the median PD score significantly decreased from baseline (3; range 1-8) to TP1 (1; range 0-7) (P < 0.001). PASI score also decreased from 8.4 ± 4.9 to 0.3 ± 0.5 (P < 0.001), and PGA from 3.1 ± 1.0 to 0.4 ± 0.5 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: We can conclude that risankizumab led to substantial improvement in both skin and joint involvement.

Efficacy and safety of tildrakizumab in elderly patients: real-world multicenter study (ESTER - study).

Purpose of the article: Interleukin-23 inhibitors, such as tildrakizumab, have emerged as safe and effective options for the management of psoriasis. Yet their efficacy in elderly patients (aged 65 years or more), particularly in those with difficult-to-treat areas involvement, remains insufficiently explored. We conducted this real-life retrospective multicentric observational study to assess the effectiveness of tildrakizumab in elderly patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis, with involvement of difficult-to-treat areas.Materials and methods: We enrolled forty-nine patients aged 65 years old or more (mean age 73.1 ± 6.0), all treated with tildrakizumab for at least 28 weeks. The effectiveness of tildrakizumab was assessed by Static Physician's Global Assessment of Genitalia (sPGA-G), fingernail-PGA (f-PGA), palmoplantar PGA (pp-PGA), scalp-specific PGA (sc-PGA), and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores.Results: Significant improvements in PASI scores were observed within 28 weeks of treatment, with 77.5%, 60%, and 45.2% of patients achieving PASI75, PASI90, and PASI100, respectively. The mean PASI decreased significantly from baseline (13.6 ± 9.9) to 1.3 ± 1.7 at week 28. More than 90% of patients had clear sPGA-G and pp-PGA scores and over 70% had clear f-PGA and sc-PGA scores after 28 weeks.Conclusions: Our findings suggest that tildrakizumab could be a valuable option for the treatment of elderly patients, including those with difficult-to-treat areas involvement.

A consensus-based approach on the management of patients with both psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis in the dermatological and rheumatological settings in Italy: The ADOI PSO-Amore Project.

Psoriasis is a complex disease often needing a multidisciplinary approach. In particular, the collaboration between dermatologist and rheumatologist is crucial for the management of patients suffering from both psoriasis (PSO) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Here we report a series of recommendations from a group of experts, as a result of a Consensus Conference, defining the circumstances in which it is preferable or even mandatory, depending on the available settings, to rely on the opinion of the two specialists, jointly or in a deferred manner. Indications are given on how to organize a 3rd level joint Dermatology- Rheumatology care unit, in connection with 1st and 2nd level clinicians of both specialties, GPs, and other specialists involved in the management of psoriasis. A potential patient journey is suggested, that can be used as a basis for future design and validation of national and/or local diagnostic therapeutic and assistance pathways.

Immunogenicity of three doses of anti-SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 vaccine in psoriasis patients treated with biologics.

Introduction: Psoriasis has not been directly linked to a poor prognosis for COVID-19, yet immunomodulatory agents used for its management may lead to increased vulnerability to the dangerous complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection, as well as impair the effectiveness of the recently introduced vaccines. The three-dose antibody response trend and the safety of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in psoriasis patients treated with biologic drugs have remained under-researched. Materials and methods: Forty-five psoriatic patients on biologic treatment were enrolled to evaluate their humoral response to three doses of BNT162b2. IgG titers anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein were evaluated at baseline (day 0, first dose), after 3 weeks (second dose), four weeks post-second dose, at the time of the third dose administration and 4 weeks post-third dose. Seropositivity was defined as IgG ≥15 antibody-binding units (BAU)/mL. Data on vaccine safety were also collected by interview at each visit. Results: A statistically significant increase in antibody titers was observed after each dose of vaccine compared with baseline, with no significant differences between patients and controls. Methotrexate used in combination with biologics has been shown to negatively influence the antibody response to the vaccine. On the contrary, increasing body mass index (BMI) positively influenced the antibody response. No adverse effects were reported, and no relapses of psoriasis were observed in the weeks following vaccine administration in our study population. Conclusions: Our data are largely consistent with the recent literature on this topic confirming the substantial efficacy and safety of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine on psoriatic patients treated with biologics of different types and support the recommendation to perform additional doses in this specific subgroup of patients.

Real-world outcomes in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis treated with guselkumab for up to 1 year.

BACKGROUND: Real-world data on guselkumab, especially at times >6 months, are limited. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a longitudinal, retrospective analysis on 307 patients with moderate-severe chronic plaque psoriasis (Psoriasis Area Severity Index [PASI] >10) treated with guselkumab for up to 12 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: PASI 75, PASI 90, and PASI 100 were assessed at baseline and at 4, 12, 20, 28, 36, 44, and 52 weeks. RESULTS: At 12 weeks, PASI 75, PASI 90, and PASI 100 were achieved in 56.4%, 33.6%, and 24.1% of patients, respectively. At 52 weeks, PASI 75, PASI 90, and PASI 100 were achieved in 82.7%, 68.7%, and 51.1% of patients, respectively. Patients without comorbidities and those naïve to previous biological therapy had better responses. The mean Dermatology Life Quality Index score decreased from 14.0 at baseline to 3.1 at 12 weeks and 1.6 at 6 months, which was maintained at later times. Similar improvements were seen in pruritus visual analog scale. CONCLUSIONS: Guselkumab maintains its efficacy for up to 12 months among responders in a real-world cohort of patients with moderate-severe plaque psoriasis, confirming data from prior real-world studies with smaller cohorts and shorter duration of follow-up.

Risankizumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis: A multicenter, retrospective, 1 year real-life study.

Several new biologic agents targeting IL23/Th17 axis, such as risankizumab, have been developed for the treatment of psoriasis. The aim of the present study was to analyze the efficacy and safety of risankizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis over a 52-week period. A multicentric retrospective study was conducted in patients who initiated risankizumab between July 2019 and December 2020. Psoriasis Area and Severity Index-PASI was measured at baseline and after 4, 16, 28 and 52 weeks. Clinical responses were evaluated by PASI75, PASI90 and PASI100 at the same timepoints. Potential safety issues and adverse events (AEs) were collected. Univariable and multivariable logistic regressions were performed for variables predicting clinical response. One hundred and twelve patients with psoriasis were included. PASI90 response was achieved by 17.86% of patients at week 4, 72.22% at week 16, 91.0% at week 28 and 95.24% at week 52 (as observed analysis). No associations between the considered variables and the efficacy endpoints were retrieved, influence of variables such as Body Mass Index (BMI), baseline PASI or previous biologics were not shown. No serious safety issues or discontinuations related to adverse events were reported. Risankizumab showed high efficacy and a favorable safety profile, regardless of patient- and disease-related factors.

The Relationship between Alexithymia and Mental Health Is Fully Mediated by Anxiety and Depression in Patients with Psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is a common skin disease that affects quality of life, especially mental health. Alexithymia has been considered a relevant feature in psoriasis patients. Moreover, psoriasis was found to be associated with negative psychological health, including anxiety and depression. As the pathways linking alexithymia and mental health remain unclear among patients with psoriasis, we aimed to examine the mediating role of anxiety and depression in the relationship between alexithymia and mental health in these patients. METHODS: To explore our variables of interest, we used the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20), the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). RESULTS: Forty-four percent of patients were alexithymic and reported higher anxiety and depression, and lower quality of life compared to non-alexithymic patients. Alexithymic patients also had lower educational attainment. A correlation analysis showed positive associations between alexithymia and both anxiety and depression, whereas mental and physical health were negatively associated with alexithymia. Moreover, anxiety and depression fully mediated the relationship between alexithymia and mental health. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the importance of assessing alexithymia and psychological distress in clinical practice to identify vulnerable patients and to implement interventions aimed at improving negative emotional states.

Effectiveness of Systemic Therapies in Patients with Obesity and Psoriasis: A Single-center Retrospective Study.

This retrospective study included 63 patients with obesity (Body Mass Index; BMI ≥ 30) and psoriasis. Our aim was to verify the effectiveness of different systemic therapies administered to the above cohort of subjects over a period of 1 year. Improvements of 75%, 90%. and 100% compared with the baseline Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI 75, PASI 90, and PASI 100, respectively) were used as clinical outcome measures. In a median time of 16 weeks, 85.7%, 68.2%, and 38.0% of patients achieved PASI 75, PASI 90, and PASI 100, respectively. In parallel, the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and the visual analog score for measuring itch intensity (VAS itch) decreased significantly (P<0.0001 for both parameters). At the achievement of PASI 75, BMI increased as compared to baseline (P=0.02) and did not significantly vary at the attainment of PASI 90 and PASI 100 (P= 0.07 for both outcomes). Logistic multivariate regression analysis showed that treatment with biologic drugs was a positive predictor for achieving PASI 75, PASI 90, and PASI 100. BMI >31.7 and the presence of psoriatic arthritis were negative predictors for the achievement of PASI 90, while having a DLQI >6 was a positive predictor.

Predictive factors of lack of response to adalimumab among bio-naive patients suffering from moderate-to severe psoriasis: analysis of a multicenter data collection in Italy.

INTRODUCTION: Efficacy of anti-TNF-a agents seems inferior to IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors. Nevertheless, after biosimilars approval, anti TNF-a agents are recommended as first-line for psoriatic patients, for economic reasons. METHODS: Predictive factors of response or non-response to adalimumab in bionaive patients who started adalimumab (originator or biosimilar) over 12 years in 9 dermatologic centers in Italy. Effectiveness was assessed with Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI75 and PASI90) at weeks 12, 24 and 48. Multiple logistic regressions were used for variables predicting clinical response; Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox regression for drug survival. RESULTS: The drug survival analysis showed reduced hazard ratio of overall discontinuation with male gender and scalp localization. In contrast, baseline PASI and genital psoriasis were significantly associated with increased risk of overall discontinuation. Predictive factors of non-response seemed elevated in patients with baseline PASI, older age groups, previously treated patients with phototherapy, females or patients with palmo-plantar while scalp psoriasis, previous cyclosporine and acitretin appeared as a positive predictive factor. CONCLUSIONS: This real-life analysis might be useful for clinicians in case of bio-naive patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis and various comorbidities.

Effectiveness of anti-interleukin 23 biologic drugs in psoriasis patients who failed anti-interleukin 17 regimens. A real-life experience.

Among the most recent biologic drugs available for psoriasis therapy, those targeting interleukin-17 (secukinumab and ixekizumab) or its receptor (brodalumab) have been shown to be quickly effective. However, in those patients who failed one or more of the above-cited drugs, real-life data on the effectiveness of switching to one anti-interleukin-23 biologic (guselkumab, risankizumab, or tildrakizumab) are very scarce. Here, we report our experience in treating 12 multi-failure psoriatic patients, prospectively followed-up over 6 months, who showed a significant improvement in their psoriasis after switching from an anti-interleukn-17 to an anti-interleukin-23 drug.

Management of psoriatic arthritis in rheumatology and dermatology settings: sub-analysis of the Italian population from the international LOOP study.

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients are often treated by dermatology and rheumatology specialities and may receive different treatments. To evaluate the impact of dermatology/rheumatology specialist settings on diagnosis and therapeutic approach in PsA patients. This cross-sectional multicounty study in Italy involved twenty-eight rheumatology or dermatology clinics. Patients with suspected or confirmed PsA were examined by both a dermatologist and a rheumatologist. A total of 413 patients were enrolled and 347 (84%) were diagnosed with PsA. The majority of patients were enrolled from a rheumatology setting (N = 224, 64.6%). Patients with PsA in the dermatology settings had significantly higher disease activity, including skin involvement and musculoskeletal symptoms. Time from PsA onset to diagnosis was 22.3 ± 53.8 vs. 39.4 ± 77.5 months (p = 0.63) in rheumatology and dermatology settings; time from diagnosis to initiation of csDMARD was 7.3 ± 27.5 vs. 19.5 ± 50.6 months, respectively (p < 0.001). In contrast, time from diagnosis to bDMARD use was shorter in dermatology settings (54.9 ± 69 vs. 44.2 ± 65.6 months, p = 0.09, rheumatology vs. dermatology), similar to the time taken from first csDMARDs and bDMARDs (48.7 ± 67.9 vs. 35.3 ± 51.9 months, p = 0.34). The choice to visit a rheumatologist over a dermatologist was positively associated with female gender and swollen joints and negatively associated with delay in time from musculoskeletal symptom onset to PsA diagnosis. This study highlights a diagnostic delay emerging from both settings with significantly different therapeutic approaches. Our data reinforce the importance of implementing efficient strategies to improve early identification of PsA that can benefit from the integrated management of PsA patients. Key Points • A diagnostic delay was observed from both dermatology and rheumatology settings with significantly different therapeutic approaches. • Shared dermatology and rheumatology clinics offer the combined expertise to improve in the early identification and management of PsA.

Transplantation during the COVID-19 pandemic: nothing noble is accomplished without danger.

The global health crisis due to the fast spread of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has caused major disruption in all aspects of healthcare. Transplantation is one of the most affected sectors, as it relies on a variety of services that have been drastically occupied to treat patients affected by COVID-19. With this report from two transplant centers in Italy, we aim to reflect on resource organization, organ allocation, virus testing and transplant service provision during the course of the pandemic and to provide actionable information highlighting advantages and drawbacks.To what extent can we preserve the noble purpose of transplantation in times of increased danger? Strategies to minimize risk exposure to the transplant population and health- workers include systematic virus screening, protection devices, social distancing and reduction of patients visits to the transplant center. While resources for the transplant activity are inevitably reduced, new dilemmas arise to the transplant community: further optimization of time constraints during organ retrievals and implantation, less organs and blood products donated, limited space in the intensive care unit and the duty to maintain safety and outcomes.

SARS-CoV2 and immunosuppression: A double-edged sword.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-Cov2) outbreak has caused a pandemic rapidly impacting on the way of life of the entire world. This impact in the specific setting of transplantation and immunosuppression has been poorly explored to date. Discordant data exist on the impact of previous coronavirus outbreaks on immunosuppressed patients. Overall, only a very limited number of cases have been reported in literature, suggesting that transplanted patients not necessarily present an increased risk of severe SARS-Cov2-related disease compared to the general population. We conducted a literature review related to the impact of immunosuppression on coronavirus infections including case reports and series describing immunosuppression management in transplant recipients. The role of steroids, calcineurin inhibitors, and mycophenolic acid has been explored more in detail. A point-in-time snapshot of the yet released literature and some considerations in relation to the use of immunosuppression in SARS-Cov2 infected transplant recipients are provided here for the physicians dealing with immunocompromised patients.

PsA-Disk, a novel visual instrument to evaluate psoriatic arthritis in psoriatic patients: an Italian derma-rheuma multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: Consensus among dermatologists and rheumatologists in the diagnosis and assessment of musculoskeletal diseases in psoriasis (PsO) patients is needed. This study assesses characteristics of musculoskeletal pain in patients with PsO for the presence of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and evaluation of a novel 16-item visual instrument (PsA-Disk). METHODS: Data were collected from eight dermatological/rheumatological centres across Italy. Patients with PsO completed PEST (Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool) and PsA-Disk questionnaires during the first visit. A rheumatological visit was performed to confirm the presence of PsA. Both validity and reliability of PsA-Disk were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 573 patients with PsO were examined at the first visit, and 120 (21%) were diagnosed with PsA. Patients with PsA compared with patients with PsO (n = 119) presented statistically significant differences for: nail involvement, PEST score ⩾3, higher erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI)-feet, NAPSI-(hands + feet) and PsA-Disk scores (73.9 ± 32.1 versus 58.1 ± 39.8, p < 0.001). Patients with PsA with knee arthritis had higher PsA-Disk scores (98.4 ± 26 versus 71.5 ± 31.9, p = 0.006) that were also correlated with number of swollen (r = 0.2, p < 0.05) and tender joints (r = 0.24, p = 0.021), patient (r = 0.4, p < 0.001) and physician-pain-visual analogue scale (VAS; r = 0.33, p < 0.001), patient global assessment (PGA)-VAS (r = 0.23, p = 0.025), physician-health assessment questionnaire (HAQ; r = 0.38, p = 0.011), Disease Activity Score (DAS)-44 (r = 0.25, p = 0.023) and Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA; r = 0.31, p = 0.005). The instrument had excellent reliability in terms of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.90) and stability (intraclass correlation = 0.98). Moderate agreement between PsA-Disk and PEST (Cohen's kappa = 0.46) was observed, while construct validity appeared appropriate [PsA + patients: PsA-Disk score (interquartile range; IQR) =71 (50-96); PsA-patients: PsA-Disk score (IQR)=50 (20-90); p < 0.001]. CONCLUSION: PsA-Disk may be considered a valid novel instrument aiding both dermatologists and rheumatologists in the rapid detection and assessment of musculoskeletal disease characteristics.

Treatment of severe psoriasis with ixekizumab in a liver transplant recipient with concomitant hepatitis B virus infection.

Treatment of severe psoriasis (PsO) in organ transplant (OT) patients is difficult. In fact, systemic drugs used for PsO therapy can be detrimental to transplanted organs and/or can increase the risk of serious infections in subjects already taking antireject medicines. Current guidelines fail to give indications on how to manage PsO OT subjects. Moreover, only a few cases of patients with the above-cited characteristics treated with systemic therapies have been published so far. Here, we report our experience concerning a liver transplant patient successfully treated with ixekizumab for his psoriasis throughout 1 year.