Inadequate Metadiaphyseal Fill of a Modern Taper-Wedge Stem Increases Subsidence and Risk of Aseptic Loosening: Technique and Distal Canal Fill Matter!

BACKGROUND: Adequate interference fit and mechanical stability through optimal surgical technique are essential to prevent subsidence and loosening in cementless total hip arthroplasty. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of surgical technique on radiographic subsidence and subsequent stability of a modern taper-wedge cementless stem. METHODS: A retrospective review of 250 consecutive cementless primary total hip arthroplasties performed by 2 surgeons was completed. Surgeon A vigorously broached, maximizing the mediolateral stem dimension and confirmed final broach stability with a torsional test, whereas Surgeon B did not. All patients received identical taper-wedge stems. Preoperative bone morphology (canal flare index), postoperative subsidence, and canal fill were radiographically assessed. RESULTS: Canal flare index was not different between groups (P = .747). There was significantly less subsidence at 1 month for Surgeon A (0.3 vs 1.3 mm, P < .001). Additional subsidence at 1 year occurred in only 0.8% of Surgeon A (1/119) compared to 51.6% of Surgeon B stems (33/64, P < .001). Surgeon technique and canal fill measured at 60 mm below the lesser trochanter were the only variables predictive for subsidence, where Surgeon A and B had a mean canal fill of 95% and 86%, respectively. Surgeon B had 2 cases of aseptic loosening (2%) at 2 and 3 years postoperatively. CONCLUSION: These observations support that maximizing mediolateral canal fill and avoiding under-sizing the femoral implant with meticulous broaching technique minimizes subsidence and optimizes stability of modern cementless taper-wedge stems. Failure to optimize canal fill with appropriate broaching and surgical technique may predispose femoral components to failure from aseptic loosening.

Leaving Residual Varus Alignment After Total Knee Arthroplasty Does Not Improve Patient Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Recent popularity of kinematic alignment and constitutional varus has caused some surgeons to leave varus limbs in residual varus after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study assessed whether if patients left in residual varus have improved outcomes compared with those fully corrected to neutral alignment. METHODS: A retrospective review of 361 consecutive primary TKAs was performed. Anatomic tibiofemoral alignment was measured and knees were categorized as neutral, varus, or valgus. Modern Knee Society scores and University of California Los Angeles Activity Level scores were collected at minimum 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: After exclusions for confounds and loss to follow-up, 262 knees were available for analysis, 67% (176) of which were preoperatively varus. Sixty-six percent of varus knees were corrected to neutral, 25.6% were left in residual varus, and 8.5% were corrected to valgus. Median Knee Society objective scores at latest follow-up were greater in knees corrected to neutral (97), followed by knees corrected to varus (95), and valgus (93; P = .025), but post hoc comparisons between pairs of medians were not significant. There was no difference between groups in any other outcome measure (P ≥ .245) or the amount of improvement from baseline (P ≥ .423). Sixty percent of native varus patients corrected to neutral, 64% of those corrected to varus, and 40% of those corrected to valgus reported that their knee felt normal (P = .193). CONCLUSION: Findings fail to support the notion that leaving varus knees in residual varus will improve outcomes and pain. Caution is advised when leaving limbs in residual varus after TKA.

Cementless Tapered Wedge Femoral Stems Decrease Subsidence in Obese Patients Compared to Traditional Fit-and-Fill Stems.

BACKGROUND: Femoral component stability and resistance to subsidence is critical for osseointegration and clinical success in cementless total hip arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to radiographically evaluate the anatomic fit and subsidence of 2 different proximally tapered, porous-coated modern cementless femoral component designs. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 126 consecutive cementless total hip arthroplasties was performed. Traditional fit-and-fill stems were implanted in the first 61 hips with the remaining 65 receiving morphometric tapered wedge stems. Preoperative bone morphology was radiographically assessed by the canal flare index. Canal fill in the coronal plane, subsidence, and the sagittal alignment of stems was measured digitally on immediate and 1-month postoperative radiographs. RESULTS: Demographics and canal flare indices were similar between groups. The percentage of femoral canal fill was greater in the tapered wedge compared to the fit-and-fill stem (P = .001). There was significantly less subsidence in the tapered wedge design (0.3 mm) compared to the fit-and-fill design (1.1 mm) (P = .001). Subsidence significantly increased as body mass index (BMI) increased in the fit-and-fill stems, a finding not observed in the tapered wedge design (P = .013). CONCLUSION: An anatomically designed morphometric tapered wedge femoral stem demonstrated greater axial stability and decreased subsidence with increasing BMI than a traditional fit-and-fill stem. The resistance to subsidence, irrespective of BMI, is likely due to the inherent axial stability of a tapered wedge design and may be the optimal stem design for obese patients.