Venetoclax in combination with hypomethylating agents or low dose cytarabine for relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukemia.

Limited treatment options exist for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Venetoclax (VEN) in combination with a hypomethylating agent (HMA) or low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) has been recently approved for treatment-naïve patients unfit for intensive induction. Limited data are available to characterize the efficacy of VEN combinations in R/R AML. We retrospectively analyzed 77 patients with a median of 1 prior therapy (range 0-5) treated with VEN combinations for R/R AML or AML secondary to myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) progressing after HMA monotherapy. The median overall survival (OS) was 13.1 months (95% CI 9.2-15.1). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12 months (95% CI 8.2-15.4) with a median duration of response of 8.9 months (95% CI 5.7-13.9). Overall response rate (ORR) was 68% with a composite complete response (CR) and CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) rate of 53%. VEN combination therapy is efficacious in R/R AML and further prospective studies are warranted.

The impact of clinical pharmacy services on pneumococcal vaccine frequency and appropriateness in a family medicine clinic.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of an ambulatory clinical pharmacy service (inclusive of immunization needs assessments) on the frequency and appropriateness of pneumococcal vaccine administration in a family medicine clinic. METHODS: This cohort study had an observational and retrospective design and included patients who received pneumococcal vaccines at a family medicine clinic in a medically underserved area in Southwestern Pennsylvania across a 42-month period from January 1, 2015, to June 30, 2018. The outcome measures included the administration and appropriateness of pneumococcal 13-valent conjugate (PCV13) and pneumococcal 23-valent polysaccharide (PPSV23) vaccines across 3 time cohorts including before, during, and after the establishment of a clinical pharmacy service. RESULTS: A total of 457 pneumococcal vaccines were administered, including 198 (43.3%) PCV13 and 259 (56.7%) PPSV23, across all time cohorts. Overall vaccine administration per month increased by 143% with the introduction of a dedicated clinical pharmacy service, including a 270% increase for PCV13 and an 87% increase for PPSV23. A strong correlation was found between recommendations made and doses administered for both pneumococcal vaccines (r = 0.89; P < 0.003). Across the entire time frame, PPSV23 administrations were appropriate in more than 96% of instances, whereas the appropriateness of PCV13 administrations were statistically significantly improved after the introduction of a fully dedicated clinical pharmacy service (58.5% vs. 90.8%; P < 0.05). The appropriateness of vaccine administration remained high even after the reduction of clinical pharmacy services. CONCLUSION: Clinical pharmacy service implementation in a family medicine clinic was associated with increased pneumococcal vaccine administration and increased appropriateness of PCV13 administrations.

Geriatric Assessment in a Primary Care Environment: A Standardized Patient Case Activity for Interprofessional Students.

Introduction: Given the aging population and the benefits of comprehensive geriatric assessment to this subset of patients, an interprofessional education training approach may be advantageous for learners from a number of different health professions. Methods: Through intercollegiate collaborations involving seven different colleges, an interprofessional simulation using standardized patients was developed and instituted for learners in medicine, nursing, pharmacy, occupational therapy, physical therapy, dental hygiene, and dietitian programs. Herein, we describe the design of the simulation experience and examine its impact on students, as assessed primarily via written reflective comments provided via exit slips at the conclusion of the activity. Results: Of the 340 student participants, 83% submitted exit slips describing something gained from the interprofessional session that would not have occurred if students had completed the activity with only students from their own discipline. Three key themes were identified from these reflections: new understanding of roles and responsibilities of other disciplines, new knowledge or skills pertaining to geriatric assessments, and the value of teamwork. Discussion: Reflective comments from students regarding the interprofessional experience are evidence of this initiative's benefits, which include increasing knowledge of geriatric medical and allied health-provided care and attainment of interprofessional competencies.