Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
1.
Psychosomatics ; 52(4): 367-74, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21777720

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Compassion is an attribute central to professionalism and modern clinical care, yet little is known about how compassion is acquired and preserved in medical training. We sought to understand whether personal illness experiences are thought by residents to foster compassion. METHODS: The authors surveyed 155 (71% response rate) second- and third-year residents at the University of New Mexico School of Medicine regarding their views of the relationship of personal life experience with illness to compassion and empathy for patients. RESULTS: Residents believe that experience with personal health issues enhances physician compassion for patients. Residents who report more personal health concerns, such as physical or mental health problems and family health problems, endorse the connection between direct experience with illness and empathy. CONCLUSION: Health care trainees' own illness experiences may increase compassionate patient care practices and foster empathy.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Empatia , Internato e Residência , Adulto , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Saúde Mental , Médicos/psicologia , Fatores Sexuais , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
Acad Med ; 84(2): 242-50, 2009 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19174679

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The authors sought to understand the health issues and care-seeking practices reported by residents and explored the extent to which fear of academic jeopardy, stigma, and being the subject of discussion by colleagues may affect residents' care-seeking. METHOD: Residents at the University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center were surveyed in 2000-2001 regarding avoidance or postponement of obtaining necessary health care, responses of others to absences, and perceptions of jeopardy to training status if a supervisor learned of a specific condition. Responses were analyzed via repeated-measures MANOVA. RESULTS: Of 217 surveys, 155 were returned (71% response rate). Concerns with mental health, pain, minor infections, or relationship, sleep-related, fatigue, or gynecological/urological problems were expressed by 26% to 43% of residents. Concerns of potential jeopardy if a director or supervisor learned about personal health issues were strongest for problems with drugs/alcohol, moderately high for HIV, and moderate for mental health, eating-related problems, cancer, and STDs. Residents had sometimes avoided seeking care, and 18% had often avoided or delayed care-seeking; women delayed or avoided care more often than men. More frequent avoidance of seeking care was associated with poorer self-rated mental and physical health and greater health concerns. CONCLUSIONS: Residents at times postpone or avoid seeking care. Time and scheduling difficulties influence the ability to obtain care. Perceptions of potential academic jeopardy, stigma, and reactions of colleagues may affect residents' attitudes and care-seeking. Further inquiry is essential to understand how extensively these factors may influence the well-being of residents.


Assuntos
Internato e Residência , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Estudos de Coortes , Coleta de Dados , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , New Mexico , Preconceito
3.
Genet Test ; 12(2): 245-52, 2008 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18452395

RESUMO

AIMS: A probability sample of U.S. psychiatrists (n = 93) was invited to complete a mail survey regarding the likely impact of genetic testing on psychiatry; the clinical utility of pharmacogenetic, diagnostic, and susceptibility genetic testing; and 14 proposed ethical and legal safeguards for clinical genetic testing. RESULTS: Forty-five psychiatrists participated in the survey (response rate = 48%). The majority (80% and 60%, respectively) believed that genetic testing would benefit many psychiatric patients and would dramatically change the way psychiatry is practiced. Many psychiatrists (73-85%) also stated that pharmacogenetic, diagnostic, and susceptibility tests for common psychiatric disorders would be somewhat useful or extremely useful in the clinical setting. Nearly all (98-100%) believed that psychiatrists should obtain informed consent before genetic testing, should keep test results confidential, should provide pre- and posttest counseling, and should demonstrate competence in interpreting test results. Nearly all (96-100%) supported laws and regulations to prevent discrimination based on genetic test results and to protect consumers from misleading advertisements for testing. Ninety-one percent endorsed restrictions on the sale of genetic tests directly to consumers. CONCLUSIONS: This probability sample of U.S. psychiatrists expressed a strongly positive view of genetic testing in psychiatry, while voicing nearly unanimous support for seven ethical and legal safeguards.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Testes Genéticos/legislação & jurisprudência , Testes Genéticos/psicologia , Médicos/psicologia , Psiquiatria , Confidencialidade , Ética Médica , Privacidade Genética , Humanos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido , Prontuários Médicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Inquéritos e Questionários
4.
Acad Psychiatry ; 32(1): 20-30, 2008.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18270277

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The personal health care issues of residents are important but have received minimal study. Available evidence suggests that residents experience difficulties obtaining care, partly related to both the demands of medical training and concerns about confidentiality and privacy. METHODS: A self-report survey was distributed in 2000-2001 to advanced residents at the University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center. Questions related to personal health and health care attitudes, behaviors, preferences, and experiences, and vignettes related to personal illness and treatment. Here the authors report findings regarding preferences for obtaining health care "at" versus "outside" of one's training institution. RESULTS: Data from 141 residents are presented. A substantial minority of residents had obtained care outside of their institution in the preceding year. Residents expressed concerns about their medical privacy and confidentiality related to obtaining care within their own institution, including concerns about being seen by other residents or by past or future attendings. Women expressed more concern than did men on numerous issues, as did residents in primary care versus specialty training. Residents expressed a preference for care outside the training institution when taking into account confidentiality and prevention of embarrassment; care at their own institution was preferred when considering expense and scheduling. Outside care was more strongly preferred for more stigmatizing illnesses (e.g., mental health-related). Most residents felt poorly informed regarding their personal health care confidentiality rights and did not know whether their institution had confidentiality policies regarding residents who develop physical or mental health problems. CONCLUSION: Residents worry about confidentiality and privacy when deciding where to obtain personal medical care. Trainees' concerns are relevant to crafting policies on resident health care. Programs should strive to inform residents thoroughly about policies and rights pertaining to personal health care.


Assuntos
Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Comportamento de Escolha , Educação/estatística & dados numéricos , Internato e Residência/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Saúde para Estudantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Inquéritos e Questionários
5.
Schizophr Bull ; 32(1): 153-8, 2006 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16166609

RESUMO

Federal regulations governing human research suggest that potential harms and discomforts of research be considered in relation to the risks normally encountered in daily life or in routine examinations. No data regarding relative risks of research exist for persons with schizophrenia. We surveyed psychiatrists (N = 68) to assess their perceptions of the risk associated with 12 research procedures in 2 categories, that is, evaluation- and intervention-type procedures. Psychiatrists were asked to rate "risks compared to usual daily risks" for people with schizophrenia and, separately, for healthy people. For healthy research volunteers, psychiatrists rated 2 of 5 evaluation procedures and none of the intervention procedures as posing fewer risks than daily life. One evaluation procedure and 2 intervention procedures were rated as similar to daily risks for healthy research volunteers. For volunteers with schizophrenia, psychiatrists rated 4 of the 5 evaluation procedures and 1 intervention procedure as conferring less risk than everyday life. For 1 of 5 evaluation procedures and 5 of 7 intervention procedures, the risks associated with the procedures were centered close to the benchmark for those faced every day by persons with schizophrenia. Psychiatrists in this study viewed research procedure risks as closer to the daily risks encountered by persons with schizophrenia than by healthy persons. Because federal regulations benchmark research studies as "minimal risk" if they are analogous to the usual risks of everyday life, this finding may have important implications for the evaluation of psychiatric protocols.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica/normas , Nível de Saúde , Experimentação Humana/legislação & jurisprudência , Experimentação Humana/normas , Esquizofrenia/terapia , Adulto , Pesquisa Biomédica/ética , Feminino , Humanos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido , Masculino , Esquizofrenia/tratamento farmacológico
6.
Schizophr Bull ; 32(2): 360-5, 2006 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16254063

RESUMO

Ethical issues in research on serious physical and mental illnesses have received great attention, and yet little is known about how the perspectives of clinical research participants with different diagnoses may compare. We conducted a preliminary study to examine the attitudes of men enrolled in schizophrenia-related protocols and in HIV-related protocols regarding the importance of medical research, key aspects of research participation, and the acceptability of research involvement by various groups. A total of 33 men enrolled in schizophrenia protocols and 15 men enrolled in HIV-related protocols volunteered for our study. Respondents affirmed the importance of medical research and endorsed many positive things about participation. Autonomy and altruism were identified as motivators for research involvement. Participation by diverse groups was seen as acceptable. Respondents expressed comfort and little stress with the interview process. Men in different diagnostic groups largely saw the issues the same. Our findings thus suggest that people with schizophrenia and HIV/AIDS who are enrolled in protocols may share a number of core attitudes or beliefs related to ethical aspects of research participation. Further study is needed to explore how research involvement may influence perspectives and whether differences in views exist across people with diverse physical and mental illnesses.


Assuntos
Síndrome da Imunodeficiência Adquirida/epidemiologia , Pesquisa Biomédica/normas , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Entrevista Psicológica , Esquizofrenia/diagnóstico , Esquizofrenia/epidemiologia , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
7.
Acad Med ; 80(10): 925-30, 2005 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16186612

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Investigators and institutional review boards are entrusted with ensuring the conduct of ethically sound human studies. Assessing ethical aspects of research protocols is a key skill in fulfilling this duty, yet no empirically validated method exists for preparing professionals to attain this skill. METHOD: The authors performed a randomized controlled educational intervention, comparing a criteria-based learning method, a clinical-research- and experience-based learning method, and a control group. All 300 medical students enrolled at the University of New Mexico School of Medicine in 2001 were invited to participate. After a single half-hour educational session, a written posttest of ability to detect ethical problems in hypothetical protocol vignettes was administered. The authors analyzed responses to ten protocol vignettes that had been evaluated independently by experts. For each vignette, a global assessment of the perceived significance of ethical problems and the identification of specific ethical problems were evaluated. RESULTS: Eighty-three medical students (27%) volunteered: 50 (60%) were women and 55 (66%) were first- and second-year students. On global assessments, the criteria-focused group perceived ethical problems as more significant than did the other two groups (p < .02). Students in the criteria-focused group were better able than students in the control group (p < .03) to discern specific ethical problems, more closely resembling expert assessments. Unexpectedly, the group focused on clinical research participants identified fewer problems than did the control group (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The criteria-focused intervention produced enhanced ethical evaluation skills. This work supports the potential value of empirically derived methods for preparing professionals to discern ethical aspects of human studies.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica/ética , Ética Médica/educação , Estudantes de Medicina , Ensino/ética , Adulto , Pesquisa Biomédica/educação , Educação de Graduação em Medicina/ética , Reações Falso-Positivas , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , New Mexico , Aprendizagem Baseada em Problemas/ética , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
8.
Psychosomatics ; 46(5): 440-50, 2005.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16145189

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Physicians-in-training today are learning in an ethical environment that is unprecedented in its complexity. There is a call for new approaches in preparing medical students and residents for the ethical and professional issues they will encounter. The perspectives of physicians-in-training at different levels regarding the level of curricular attention needed for emerging bioethics concepts, practical informed consent considerations, and the care of special populations are unknown. METHOD: The authors performed a hypothesis-driven, confidential survey study to assess perceived needs and preferences among medical students and residents related to medical ethics education at the University of New Mexico School of Medicine. RESULTS: A total of 336 physicians-in-training volunteered (62% response rate). Overall, strong interest was expressed for increased curricular attention to the domains of bioethics principles, informed consent, and care of special populations. Women students expressed greater interest generally. For certain domains, clinical students expressed relatively less curricular need and psychiatry and primary care residents expressed relatively greater curricular need. Two of the four hypotheses were supported, a third received partial support, and a fourth was not supported by the findings. DISCUSSION: To be valuable and effective, new ethics curricular approaches must be responsive to the current complex ethical environment and attentive to the preferences of medical students and residents of both genders, at different stages of training, with different patient care responsibilities. This hypothesis-driven study provides guidance for the inclusion of novel and important ethics domains in training curricula across medical school and diverse residency programs.


Assuntos
Temas Bioéticos , Currículo , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/ética , Internato e Residência , Populações Vulneráveis/psicologia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , New Mexico
9.
Soc Sci Med ; 60(8): 1855-8, 2005 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15686815

RESUMO

The societal use of genetic information raises ethical concerns, and the views of working persons regarding genetic information have received little attention. We performed an empirical project to characterize perspectives of 63 employees at two sites who expressed strong interest in learning about and protecting their personal genetic information. Genetic data were seen as more sensitive than other health data, and disclosure of genetic susceptibility was perceived as having negative consequences. This study suggests the value of exploring the perspectives of key stakeholders most directly affected by genetic applications across diverse societal settings.


Assuntos
Privacidade Genética/psicologia , Local de Trabalho , Adulto , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Revelação , Feminino , Testes Genéticos/psicologia , Humanos , Seguradoras , Masculino , Sistemas Computadorizados de Registros Médicos , Inquéritos e Questionários
10.
Compr Psychiatry ; 46(1): 27-33, 2005.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15714191

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Insights from genetic research may greatly improve our understanding of physical and mental illnesses and assist in the prevention of disease. Early experience with genetic information suggests that it may lead to stigma, discrimination, and other psychosocial harms, however, and this may be particularly salient in some settings, such as the workplace. Despite the importance of these issues, little is known about how healthy adults, including workers, perceive and understand ethically important issues in genetic research pertaining to physical and mental illness. METHOD: We developed, pilot tested, and administered a written survey and structured interview to 63 healthy working adults in 2 settings. For this paper, we analyzed a subset of items that assessed attitudes toward ethically relevant issues related to participation in genetic research on physical and mental illness, such as its perceived importance, its acceptability for various populations, and appropriate motivations for participation. RESULTS: Our respondents strongly endorsed the importance of physical and mental illness genetic research. They viewed participation as somewhat to very acceptable for all 12 special population groups we asked about, including persons with mental illness. They perceived more positives than negatives in genetic research participation, giving neutral responses regarding potential risks. They affirmed many motivations for participation to varying degrees. Men tended to affirm genetic research participation importance, acceptability, and motivations more strongly than women. CONCLUSION: Healthy working persons may be willing partners in genetic research related to physical and mental illnesses in coming years. This project suggests the feasibility and value of evidence-based ethics inquiry, although further study is necessary. Evidence regarding stakeholders' perspectives on ethically important issues in science may help in the development of research practices and policy.


Assuntos
Atitude , Participação da Comunidade , Emprego , Pesquisa em Genética/ética , Local de Trabalho/psicologia , Adulto , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Motivação , Projetos Piloto , Preconceito , Psicologia , Fatores Sexuais , Estereotipagem , Inquéritos e Questionários
11.
Acad Psychiatry ; 28(3): 170-82, 2004.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15507551

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the perspectives and preferences of medical students and residents regarding professionalism and ethics education. METHODS: A new written survey with 124 items (scale: "strongly disagree" = 1, "strongly agree" = 9) was sent to all medical students (n=308) and PGY 1-3 residents (n=233) at one academic center. RESULTS: Of the 336 participants (200 students, 65% response; 136 residents 58% response), only 18% found current professionalism and ethics preparation sufficient. Respondents endorsed professionalism (means=7.48 to 8.11) and ethics topics (means=6.56 to 6.87), women more so than men (p<0.05). Respondents preferred clinically- and expert-oriented learning over formal, nontraditional, or independent approaches (p<0.0001). They preferred clinically-oriented assessment methods (p<0.0001), residents more so than medical students (p<0.0001). On several items, psychiatry residents expressed greater receptiveness to professionalism and ethics preparation. CONCLUSIONS: Medical students and residents indicate support for professionalism and ethics educational initiatives, including diverse curricular topics and clinically-attuned assessments.


Assuntos
Educação Médica/normas , Ética , Internato e Residência , Competência Profissional , Papel Profissional , Psiquiatria/educação , Estudantes de Medicina , Ensino , Adulto , Atitude , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA