Disparities in the Operative Experience Between Female and Male General Surgery Residents: A Multi-institutional Study From the US ROPE Consortium.

OBJECTIVE: To examine differences in resident operative experience between male and female general surgery residents. BACKGROUND: Despite increasing female representation in surgery, sex and gender disparities in residency experience continue to exist. The operative volume of male and female general surgery residents has not been compared on a multi-institutional level. METHODS: Demographic characteristics and case logs were obtained for categorical general surgery graduates between 2010 and 2020 from the US Resident OPerative Experience Consortium database. Univariable, multivariable, and linear regression analyses were performed to compare differences in operative experience between male and female residents. RESULTS: There were 1343 graduates from 20 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited programs, and 476 (35%) were females. There were no differences in age, race/ethnicity, or proportion pursuing fellowship between groups. Female graduates were less likely to be high-volume residents (27% vs 36%, P < 0.01). On univariable analysis, female graduates performed fewer total cases than male graduates (1140 vs 1177, P < 0.01), largely due to a diminished surgeon junior experience (829 vs 863, P < 0.01). On adjusted multivariable analysis, female sex was negatively associated with being a high-volume resident (OR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.56 to 0.98, P = 0.03). Over the 11-year study period, the annual total number of cases increased significantly for both groups, but female graduates (+16 cases/year) outpaced male graduates (+13 cases/year, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Female general surgery graduates performed significantly fewer cases than male graduates. Reassuringly, this gap in operative experience may be narrowing. Further interventions are warranted to promote equitable training opportunities that support and engage female residents.

A multi-institutional study from the US ROPE Consortium examining factors associated with directly entering practice upon residency graduation.

BACKGROUND: There is concern regarding the competency of today's general surgery graduates as a large proportion defer independent practice in favor of additional fellowship training. Little is known about the graduates who directly enter general surgery practice and if their operative experiences during residency differ from graduates who pursue fellowship. METHODS: Nineteen Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited general surgery programs from the US Resident OPerative Experience Consortium were included. Demographics, career choice, and case logs from graduates between 2010 to 2020 were analyzed. RESULTS: There were 1,264 general surgery residents who graduated over the 11-year period. A total of 248 (19.6%) went directly into practice and 1,016 (80.4%) pursued fellowship. Graduates directly entering practice were more likely to be a high-volume resident (43.1% vs 30.5%, P < .01) and graduate from a high-volume program (49.2% vs 33.0%, P < .01). Direct-to-practice graduates performed 53 more cases compared with fellowship-bound graduates (1,203 vs 1,150, P < .01). On multivariable analysis, entering directly into practice was positively associated with total surgeon chief case volume (odds ratio = 1.47, 95% confidence interval 1.18-1.84, P < .01) and graduating from a US medical school (odds ratio = 2.54, 95% confidence interval 1.45-4.44, P < .01) while negatively associated with completing a dedicated research experience (odds ratio = 0.31, 95% confidence interval 0.22-0.45, P < .01). CONCLUSION: This is the first multi-institutional study exploring resident operative experience and career choice. These data suggest residents who desire immediate practice can tailor their experience with less research time and increased operative volume. These data may be helpful for programs when designing their experience for residents with different career goals.

Complete pathologic response rate to neoadjuvant chemotherapy increases with increasing HER2/CEP17 ratio in HER2 overexpressing breast cancer: analysis of the National Cancer Database (NCDB).

BACKGROUND: HER2-positive breast cancer is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer that overexpresses human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 promoting cancer cell growth. Monoclonal antibodies targeting the HER2 receptor have improved survival for this patient population. Achieving pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has correlated with disease-free survival in multiple trials, but we do not know why some HER2-positive tumors respond better to these therapies. We evaluated the correlation between HER2/CEP17 ratio and partial versus complete response following NAC. We evaluated whether patients with higher HER2/CEP17 ratios would have higher rates of pCR after NAC. METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we performed a retrospective review comparing pCR rates after NAC based on HER2 ratio between 2005 and 2014. Patients were excluded if they were HER2 negative, did not undergo NAC, or if the HER2 ratio was not recorded. Trends in percentage of pCR versus partial response were analyzed using SPSS. RESULTS: The NCDB included 237,118 patients with HER2 equivocal or HER2-positive breast tumors. 29,291 of these patients underwent NAC, and HER2/CEP17 ratios were recorded in 14,597 of the NAC cases. A pCR was noted in 9752 patients and 11,402 patients had a partial response. The ratios were significantly different between complete vs. partial response groups (include ratios), P < 0.001. Using linear regression analysis, we identified a direct relationship between increasing the ratio and response to NAC. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates a linear relationship between HER2/CEP17 ratio and pCR to NAC in patients included in the NCDB. The NCDB reflects current clinical practices across the country, and in this patient population, higher HER2 ratio is predictive of pCR to NAC and thus may be used in guiding decisions regarding the therapies that a patient receives in order to enhance pCR.

A rural pathways program for high school students: reinforcing a sense of place.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The affinity model predicts that students from rural areas who train in smaller towns will be more likely to choose rural practice. Most pipeline programs based on this model begin in college or medical school. Many rural students first encounter academic and career planning challenges prior to college, and a few programs are focused on high school students. METHODS: We report pre- and post-program opinions and American College Testing (ACT) practice scores from 151 participants in a high school rural scholar program over the first 10 years of the program. RESULTS: After participation, the students showed significantly more positive opinions about their county's health care resources and their knowledge of career options, and they knew more names of the providers in their county. Their practice ACT scores increased slightly, and their assessment that they were well prepared to take the ACT improved. Seventy-five percent have pursued a health career, and 10% have entered medical school. CONCLUSIONS: A summer program that allows high school students to shadow health professionals in their hometown and study in a virtual classroom can accomplish modest academic gains while producing more positive opinions about the health care in their county. They also report better understanding of the career options available to them.