Do Physicians Overestimate Radiographic Findings in Patients Undergoing Knee Arthroplasty?

Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is 1 of the top 2 most common and expensive surgical procedures among Medicare beneficiaries. Due to the procedure's high annual cost, overdiagnosis and subsequent overutilization of TKA has substantial health-policy implications. Concerns regarding the overexaggeration of radiographic findings and overutilization of TKA have been expressed by medical insurers. Currently, the standard of care for assessing potential knee arthroplasty candidates includes assigning a Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) radiographic score. Our study investigated the accuracy of reported preoperative KL scores in patients undergoing TKA. Material and methods: Records of 277 patients who had underwent TKA at our institution for knee osteoarthritis were randomly selected from a large patient data registry and retrospectively reviewed. Two blinded raters assigned KL scores to the radiographs obtained during the preoperative assessment, which were compared to the scores reported by the operative surgeon. An intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to determine inter-rater reliability. Results: Between blinded raters, ICC3k = 0.88 (95% confidence interval: 0.86-0.90, P < .001), demonstrating good reliability. Between all raters, ICC2k = 0.89 (95% confidence interval: 0.86-0.90, P < .001), also demonstrating good agreement. Raters fully agreed on the KL classification for 196 patients (70.76%). Compared with blinded raters, the operative surgeon assigned lower KL scores. Conclusion: Reporting of KL score is consistent between operative surgeons and independent reviewers. In cases of disagreement between reviewers, the operative surgeon was generally more conservative in their estimation of the extent of osteoarthritis present radiographically. Concerns regarding inflation of radiographic findings to support surgical preauthorization are unwarranted.

Trajectory of Recovery in PROMIS Global Physical Health After Surgical Fracture Fixation.

INTRODUCTION: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) provide data on the effect of conditions and treatments on patients' lives without third party interpretation. Mounting evidence suggests that PROs may be useful in elective procedure decision making, but its utility in trauma remains unclear. Longitudinally collected PROs may prove effective in identifying patients recovering below the norm. We sought to document recovery trajectory in patients with and without complication and to evaluate the sources of variability in functional recovery after injury. METHODS: This retrospective study included 831 patients with trauma, identified via Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for surgical extremity and/or pelvic/acetabular fracture management between 2014 and 2018. Global Physical Health (GPH) scores collected via the PROMIS Global Health in a 14-month window after injury were analyzed using mixed-effects modeling. RESULTS: A curvilinear GPH recovery trajectory was observed where patients demonstrated an initial positive recovery trajectory (B = 1.28, P < 0.001) gradually decelerating over time (B = -0.07, P < 0.001). Patients who experienced complications requiring revision surgery demonstrated markedly lower GPH scores. Several notable predictors of postoperative physical health recovery were identified, including both between-person (B = 0.52, 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.56) and within-person (B = 0.41, 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.46) Global Mental Health (GMH) score, Body Mass Index (BMI) (B = -0.07, 95% CI, -0.12 to -0.02), two or more psychiatric diagnoses (B = -0.97, 95% CI, -1.84 to 0.09), Injury Severity Score 10 to 15 and 16+ (B = -2.62, 95% CI, -4.81 to 0.42 and B = -2.17, 95% CI, -3.60 to 0.74, respectively), readmission for complication (B = -2.64, 95% CI, -3.60 to 1.68), and lower extremity or multiextremity fracture (relative to upper extremity) (B = -3.61, 95% CI, 4.45 to 2.78, B = -4.11, 95% CI, -5.77 to 2.44, respectively). Additional analysis suggests that GMH scores are related to the presence of psychiatric diagnoses. DISCUSSION: This study establishes a normal course of recovery as reflected by PROMIS GPH score to serve as an index for monitoring individual postoperative course. Patients who experienced a complication demonstrated markedly lower GPH across all time points, potentially allowing earlier identification of at-risk patients. Furthermore, GMH may represent a modifiable risk factor that could profoundly affect physical recovery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III (Prognostic Study = Retrospective Cohort).

Does Preoperative Opioid Consumption Increase the Risk of Chronic Postoperative Opioid Use After Total Joint Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: Risk-factor identification related to chronic opioid use after surgery may facilitate interventions mitigating postoperative opioid consumption. We evaluated the relationship between opioid use preceding total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and chronic use postoperatively, and the risk of chronic opioid use after total joint arthroplasty. METHODS: All primary THAs and TKAs performed during a 6-month period were identified. Opioid prescription and utilization data (in oxycodone equivalents) were determined via survey and electronic records. Relationship between preoperative opioid use and continued use >90 days after surgery was assessed via Chi-square, with significance set at P < .05. RESULTS: A total of 415 patients met inclusion criteria (240 THAs and 175 TKAs). Of the 240 THAs, 199 (82.9%) patients and of the 175 TKAs, 144 (82.3%) patients agreed to participate. Forty-three of 199 (21.6%) THA patients and 22 of 144 (15.3%) TKA patients used opioids within 30 days preoperatively. Nine of 199 (4.5%) THA and 10 of 144 (6.9%) TKA patients had continued use of opioids for >90 days postoperatively. Preoperative opioid consumption was significantly associated with chronic use postoperatively for THA (P = .011) and TKA (P = .024). Five of 43 (11.6%) THA and 4 of 22 (18.2%) TKA patients with preoperative opioid use had continued use for >90 days postoperatively. For opioid naïve patients, 2.6% (4/156) of THA and 4.9% (6/122) of TKA patients had chronic use postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative opioid use was associated with nearly 5-fold and 4-fold increase in percentage of patients with chronic opioid use after THA and TKA, respectively. Surgeons should counsel patients regarding this risk and consider strategies to eliminate preoperative opioid use.

Cross-specialty PROMIS-global health differential item functioning.

PURPOSE: To investigate the functioning of the PROMIS-Global Health (PROMIS-GH) across clinical setting, patient age, and medical complexity by evaluating differential item functioning (DIF) within the Global Physical Health (GPH) and Global Mental Health (GMH) domains. To our knowledge, no study demonstrates lack of differential item functioning (DIF) for PROMIS-GH across these populations. We hypothesize that the PROMIS-GH domains of GMH and GPH will perform similarly when compared across these populations. METHODS: Seven thousand nine hundred and seventy four complete PROMIS Global Health measures were retrospectively analyzed using the 'Lordif' package on the R platform. DIF was investigated for both GMH and GPH across clinical environment (Orthopedic Surgery, Family Medicine, & Internal Medicine), age group (≤ 53, > 53-66, > 66), and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI:0, CCI:1, CCI:2 +) using quasi Monte Carlo estimation. To assess the significance of DIF, Wald tests were used with the Benjamini & Hochberg procedure. RESULTS: No items contained in the GMH or GPH demonstrated DIF across age groups, medical complexity, or clinical environment. CONCLUSION: Items assessing the domains of GMH and GPH within the PROMIS-GH function comparably across treatment setting, age category, and medical comorbidities. The PROMIS-Global Health holds potential to facilitate interdisciplinary patient care and patient optimization prior to surgical intervention.