Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 12 de 12
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ultrasound ; 32(3): 139, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39100798
2.
Ultrasound ; 32(2): 75, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38694828
3.
Ultrasound ; 32(1): 3, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38314024
4.
Ultrasound ; 31(4): 243, 2023 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37929244
5.
Ultrasound ; 31(3): 163, 2023 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37538970
6.
Acta Radiol Open ; 12(6): 20584601231183131, 2023 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37346968

RESUMO

Background: Focal liver lesions (FLL) are abnormal growths that require timely identification. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a cost-effective imaging modality for characterising FLL with similar sensitivity to computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Despite being recommended by NICE, its adoption within the national health service (NHS) is limited due to low clinical demand, limited referral, and lack of knowledge. Purpose: To evaluate the impact of CEUS on patients with incidental FLL and assess the resource implications of introducing CEUS as a diagnostic service within the NHS. Material and methods: A patient flow review and cost-minimisation analysis were conducted. This involved a targeted literature review, NHS Trust stakeholder consultations, and development of a Microsoft Excel cost-minimisation model to explore potential value of CEUS use versus CT and MRI by episode. A scenario analysis of the base-case explored increasing CEUS use to 50% and 90%. A sensitivity analysis was performed to assess how changes in assumptions impacted the model and the resulting cost estimates. Results: The model, comparing a world with and without CEUS, showed that current use (base-case: 5%) resulted in cost savings of £224,790/year. The sensitivity analysis indicated that regardless of changes to the assumptions, CEUS still resulted in cost savings to the NHS. By increasing CEUS use to 50% and 90%, cost savings of up to £2,247,894/year and £4,046,208/year could be achieved, respectively. Conclusion: By standardising CEUS use for characterising FLL, substantial cost savings could be realised, whilst reducing wait times and expanding diagnostic capacity, thus preserving limited CT and MRI capacity for high-priority cases.

7.
Ultrasound ; 31(2): 83, 2023 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37144230
8.
Ultrasound ; 31(1): 3, 2023 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36794118
9.
Ultrasound ; 30(3): 183, 2022 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35936966
10.
Ultrasound ; 30(2): 103, 2022 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35509299
11.
Ultrasound ; 30(1): 3, 2022 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35173773
12.
Ultrasound ; 30(4): 263, 2022 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36969533
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA