Influenza vaccine uptake among youth with sickle cell disease who are seen in clinic before and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Influenza vaccination is critical for children with sickle cell disease (SCD) due to risks of severe influenza infections. Despite declining influenza vaccination among children since the COVID-19 pandemic, less is known about influenza vaccine coverage among youth with SCD during this same period. We compared influenza vaccine uptake among youth with SCD seen by a SCD provider in clinic during the 2019-2020 and 2022-2023 influenza seasons and described infection characteristics. Overall, 85% (n = 220) of children received their influenza vaccine during 2019-2020 compared to 75% (n = 245) in 2022-2023 (p = 0.059). Participants seen during both seasons were more likely to shift from vaccinated in 2019-2020 to unvaccinated in 2022-2023 than vice versa (McNemar's OR = 3.0; p = 0.008). Among 66 documented infections, 25.8% resulted in hospitalization. We found high influenza vaccine uptake but those seen during both seasons were more likely to become unvaccinated. More research is needed to understand influenza vaccine decision-making in this population.

Using the consolidated framework for implementation research to identify challenges and opportunities for implementing a reproductive health education program into sickle cell disease care.

BACKGROUND: As survival rates for individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD) increase, calls have been made to improve their reproductive healthcare and outcomes. The research team created a web-based program entitled Fertility edUcaTion to Understand ReproductivE health in Sickle cell disease (FUTURES). The study aim was to use the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) during pre-implementation to identify challenges and opportunities from the individual to systems level of implementation to ultimately optimize the integration of FUTURES into clinical practice. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with clinicians, research team members, and adolescent and young adult (AYA) males with SCD and their caregivers who participated in pilot testing. Interviews (N = 31) were coded inductively and then mapped onto CFIR domains (i.e., outer setting, inner setting, characteristics of individuals, and intervention characteristics). RESULTS: Research team interviews indicated the lack of universal guidelines for reproductive care in this population and gaps in reproductive health knowledge as key reasons for developing FUTURES, also highlighting the importance of collaboration with community members during development. Clinicians reported intraorganizational communication as essential to implementing FUTURES and discussed challenges in addressing reproductive health due to competing priorities. Clinicians, AYAs, and caregivers reported positive views of FUTURES regarding length, engagement, accessibility, and content. Suggestions for the best setting and timing for implementation varied. CONCLUSIONS: Using CFIR during the pre-implementation phase highlighted challenges and opportunities regarding integrating this program into SCD care. These findings will inform adaptation and further testing of FUTURES to ensure effective implementation of this novel education program.