Prophylactic bypassing agent use before and during immune tolerance induction in patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors to FVIII.

The development of high-titre inhibitory antibodies (inhibitors) against factor VIII (FVIII) remains a challenge in the management of patients with haemophilia A (HA). Patients with high-titre inhibitors are more likely to experience uncontrolled bleeding, physical disability from chronic arthropathy and premature death compared with those without this complication. Immune tolerance induction (ITI), utilizing repeated infusions of FVIII, is an effective therapeutic approach to eliminating inhibitory antibodies. This strategy can eradicate FVIII inhibitors, so that FVIII-specific tolerance is induced. However, patients undergoing ITI are still vulnerable to the development of serious and/or repeated bleeding events. The efficacy of bypassing agents in preventing bleeding episodes has been widely proven in patients with HA and inhibitors to FVIII. Evidence suggests that reducing bleeding during ITI can also shorten the time to tolerance. There are concerns with the use of bypassing agents, including the cost of treatment, short half-life, management of non-responders and the risk of thrombosis. Despite these concerns, and the still limited evidence from prospective studies and consensus reports, the use of prophylaxis with bypassing agents during ITI has been gaining support. This review presents a rationale and current data supporting the use of prophylactic bypassing agents as effective and safe therapies to reduce the incidence of joint bleeding due to inhibitors and improve quality of life in patients with HA undergoing ITI.

Comparative analysis of marketed factor VIII products: recombinant products are not alike vis-a-vis soluble protein aggregates and subvisible particles.

Essentials Aggregation is a critical quality attribute of protein therapeutics influencing immunogenicity. Aggregates and subvisible particles in 9 recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) products were analyzed. Major differences in aggregate and particle concentrations were detected after reconstitution. rFVIII product quality determined aggregation propensity under use-relevant stress. SUMMARY: Background Recombinant protein technologies have facilitated the development of novel factor VIII (FVIII) therapeutics with improved production efficiency, potency and half-live, and a low risk of viral transmission. The increasing number of recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) products and information on their efficacy, safety and cost allow patients and healthcare professionals to adjust treatment to individual needs. Nonetheless, 20-32% of previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A develop inhibitory antibodies to rFVIII following treatment. The root cause of the immunogenicity of rFVIII products is not well understood. Data for human interferon and human insulin products suggest that critical quality parameters such as soluble protein aggregates (SPAs) and subvisible particles (SVPs) influence the immunogenicity of protein therapeutics. Therefore, we analyzed SPA and SVP concentrations in commercially available rFVIII products and determined how these parameters change upon exposure of rFVIII products to relevant stress conditions. Objectives Compare critical quality parameters such as SPA and SVP concentrations in rFVIII products under intended use and use-relevant stress conditions. Methods Nine rFVIII products (≥ 3 lots each) were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography-size exclusion chromatography (HPLC-SEC) and flow cytometry-based particle analysis. Results/conclusions SPAs and SVPs were present at different concentrations in all freshly reconstituted rFVIII products: SPA concentrations ranged from 0.2% to 11.6%; SVPs were 0.7 × 106 to 114.0 × 106 / 1000 IU. Under use-relevant stress conditions (agitation and shear stress) the products formed additional SPAs and SVPs to different degrees. The collected data indicate that product quality determines its propensity to form SVPs and SPAs, and highlights differences between marketed rFVIII products.

Pattern of bleeding in a large prospective cohort of haemophilia A patients: A three-year follow-up of the AHEAD (Advate in HaEmophilia A outcome Database) study.

INTRODUCTION: Outcome data on treatment of patients with haemophilia A spanning several years of real-world evidence collection are currently very limited. AIM AND METHODS: The global prospective long-term Advate® Haemophilia A Outcome Database (AHEAD) cohort study collects real-world data from patients with severe and moderate haemophilia. We report an interim data read-out after three years of observation. RESULTS: A total of 522 patients were enrolled from 21 countries: 334 completed year 1 follow-up, 238 completed year 2 and 136 completed year 3, with an overall follow-up of 811 patient-years. Median annual bleeding rates (ABR) were 1.7 in the prophylaxis group and 8.9 in the on-demand group at year 1 visit, 1.6 and 13.0, respectively, at year 2 visit and 2.2 and 10.3, respectively, at year 3 visit. Moreover, about 42% of patients on prophylaxis vs 12% of patients on on-demand had zero annual joint bleeding rates (AJBR). Effectiveness of prophylaxis and on-demand treatment was deemed excellent/good in the majority of cases. Octocog alfa (Advate® ) was well tolerated. The inhibitors that developed in nine patients all disappeared spontaneously. Three patients had been previously exposed to FVIII for ≤50 exposure days (EDs), 3 for >50 EDs and 3 showed a borderline positive inhibitory activity (≤0.6 BU/mL). CONCLUSIONS: These data confirm that the goal of zero bleeds is achievable, although not yet achieved in all patients. Understanding reasons behind the lower response to standard prophylaxis regimens in some patients and personalizing prophylactic treatment may further improve outcome in patients with haemophilia A.

Target plasma factor levels for personalized treatment in haemophilia: a Delphi consensus statement.

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic replacement with factor concentrate is the optimal treatment for persons with severe haemophilia to avoid or minimize bleeding. This ultimately prevents or reduces joint disease and improves life expectancy and quality of life towards values matching those in the normal population. However, uncertainty still exists around the optimal regimens to be prescribed for prophylaxis. An increasing number of treating physicians and patients are showing interest in patient-tailored approaches to prophylaxis, which aim to harmonize the prophylaxis regimen with the patients' bleeding phenotype, levels of physical activity and a variety of other variables. METHODS: A modified Delphi technique was adopted to generate consensus. The expert panel met in person to set the objectives, be trained on the Delphi technique and agree on the desired level of consensus. Three iterations were used to identify the targets, the scenarios and their combinations. RESULTS: Twenty-eight scenarios and eight target levels were identified and used to issue recommendations. The panel reached the desired level of consensus on positive or negative recommendations. Areas where consensus was not reached were identified and proposed as areas for future research. Prospective assessment of the validity of most of the proposed targets is recommended. CONCLUSIONS: We have generated, by expert consensus, target plasma levels of factor concentrate to be used to tailor treatment for persons with haemophilia.

Immune tolerance induction in patients with haemophilia a and inhibitors: effectiveness and cost analysis in an European Cohort (The ITER Study).

INTRODUCTION: Although immune tolerance induction (ITI) is considered the first choice treatment to eradicate inhibitors in haemophilia A patients, little is known about outcomes determinants and cost magnitude. AIM AND METHODS: A retrospective, multicentre study was conducted to assess the relationship between ITI outcome, clinical and treatment characteristics and cost of ITI treatment in haemophilia A patients. Data from 12 months before inhibitor diagnosis to 12 months after ITI completion were collected. Treatment cost was calculated in the third-party perspective and expressed as mean € per patient-month. Cox regression models were used to identify predictors of better outcome and the time taken to achieve tolerance. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients, aged 0.4-41 years (median: 3.8 years) at ITI start, were enrolled. Undetectable inhibitor was achieved in 84.5% of patients and inhibitor eradication with normal factor VIII (FVIII) pharmacokinetics in 74.2%. Median time to successful tolerance was 10.7 months (range 2.0-90.0 months). Peak inhibitor level on ITI was a significant predictor of ITI success. Breakthrough bleeding event incidence during ITI was associated with time to success. The mean cost of treatment for the time period between inhibitor diagnosis and ITI start was €3188 per patient-month (92.1% for bypassing agents), and €60 078 during ITI (76.8% for FVIII use in ITI). CONCLUSION: Immune tolerance induction in this patient cohort was successful in 84.5% of patients with a mean cost of €60 000 per patient-month. This high cost is dwarfed by comparison with the prospect of lifelong care of an inhibitor patient, in addition to gains in life expectancy and health-related quality of life.

Health-related quality of life assessment in haemophilia patients on prophylaxis therapy: a systematic review of results from prospective clinical trials.

INTRODUCTION: Prophylaxis is effective in reducing the number of bleeding episodes in patients with severe or moderately severe haemophilia A and B, including those with inhibitors. However, data, predominantly from observational studies, suggest more equivocal effects on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). AIM: To examine the impact of prophylaxis on HRQoL from prospective clinical trials. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature review of clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of prophylaxis with factor VIII, FIX or bypassing agents. Trials assessing HRQoL via validated instruments were selected and summarized. RESULTS: Thirteen trials (haemophilia A [n = 8]; haemophilia B [n = 2]; inhibitors [n = 3]) met all inclusion criteria. HRQoL instruments included the EQ-5D, SF-36, Haem-QoL-A, Haem-A-QoL, Haemo-QoL and CHO-KLAT. Improvements in HRQoL following prophylaxis were observed with the EQ-VAS, SF-36 and haemophilia-specific instruments in adult patients and were associated with reduced pain, fewer restrictions in physical activities and better general health. Prophylaxis led to statistically significant or clinically meaningful HRQoL improvement in six trials and non-significant improvement in four trials; two trials found no improvement and one reported no data. Despite study differences, consistent trends suggested that patients previously treated solely on-demand and those who experienced marked reductions in the frequency of bleeding with prophylaxis had a greater improvement in HRQoL. CONCLUSION: Contrary to findings of observational studies, the results from the majority of prospective trials using validated instruments showed positive trends for improved HRQoL with prophylaxis in adults.

Recombinant full-length factor VIII (FVIII) and extended half-life FVIII products in prophylaxis--new insight provided by pharmacokinetic modelling.

The pharmacokinetics (PK) of extended half-life factor VIII (FVIII) products might allow longer dosing intervals in prophylaxis, potentially affecting its efficacy. We used published population PK models of a recombinant full-length FVIII (rAHF-PFM) and a recombinant B-domain-deleted FVIII Fc fusion product (rFVIIIFc) to assess the time spent weekly with FVIII levels below 3 IU dL(-1) or above 10 IU dL(-1) . These FVIII levels were chosen based on the observation that trough levels of 1 IU dL(-1) may not be sufficient in all patients. This approach was applied to a simulated population of 1000 severe haemophilia A subjects with dosing regimens included in the prescribing information or evaluated in clinical trials. FVIII levels remained ≥3 IU dL(-1) in 57% of patients treated with rAHF-PFM 30 IU kg(-1) every 48 h compared with 41.1%, 18.3%, 0.9% and 0% of patients treated with rFVIIIFc 30 IU kg(-1) every 72 h, 50 IU kg(-1) every 96 h or 120 h and 65 IU kg(-1) every 168 h respectively. Patients on rAHF-PFM 30 IU kg(-1) every 48 h spent more time weekly with FVIII levels above 10 IU dL(-1) than those on rFVIIIFc 50 IU kg(-1) every 96 h or 120 h, and 65 IU kg(-1) every 168 h. In conclusion, PK modelling indicates that choice and dosing intervals of standard and extended half-life FVIII products require careful evaluation of individual PK to allow more time at protective levels, especially in patients with active lifestyles.

The burden of bleeding in haemophilia: is one bleed too many?

Joint bleeding is the hallmark of haemophilia. Increasingly, the pain, restricted movement and anxiety provoked by even a single haemarthrosis are concerns for patients, families and treating physicians. The aims of this study were to determine whether the current paradigm for prophylaxis requires a shift in focus from reducing the frequency of bleeding episodes to a goal of zero bleeding and to review and discuss the published data from in vitro and animal experiments and clinical studies in patients with haemophilia that describe the impact of joint bleeding. More than two to three bleeding into the same joint may cause irreversible and progressive structural damage that compromise health-related quality of life (HRQoL). A goal of zero bleeding episodes - or as close to zero as possible - is key to enhancing joint health and HRQoL in children and adults with haemophilia. Achieving this goal requires individualized, outcome-based, multidisciplinary care to maximize prophylactic efficacy without increasing overall health care costs.

Development of novel treatment options for patients with haemophilia.

UNLABELLED: Treatment of haemophilia has vastly improved over the last years, but many needs are still unmet. Baxter is continuously pursuing the aim to provide new therapeutic options to patients with haemophilia and to their treating physicians. In fact, there are several opportunities to improve existing therapies, e.g., by new indications for existing products, the introduction of new products, and by novel therapeutic approaches other than factor replacement. Among these, Baxter is working on a number of innovations, such as pharmacokinetics-tailored factor VIII prophylaxis, bypassing agent prophylaxis with FEIBA in inhibitor patients, development of a longer acting pegylated recombinant FVIII, a new recombinant factor IX, a new recombinant factor FVIIa, the first recombinant von Willebrand factor, recombinant ADAMTS13 (a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13) as well as gene therapy to cure haemophilia B. CONCLUSION: Baxter is truly committed to the benefit for the patient, and therefore engaged in providing a more and more individualized treatment, in increasing efficiency of current products, in developing new products and new approaches with added value.

Health-related quality of life in patients with haemophilia and inhibitors on prophylaxis with anti-inhibitor complex concentrate: results from the Pro-FEIBA study.

Patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors are at high risk for severe bleeding, progression of joint disease and deterioration of health-related quality of life (HRQoL). To determine the impact of prophylaxis with an activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) on HRQoL, HRQoL was assessed using the Short-Form (SF)-36 Health Survey and the EQ-5D questionnaire in subjects ≥ 14 years participating in a prospective, randomized, crossover study comparing 6 months of aPCC prophylaxis with 6 months of on-demand therapy. Eighteen of 19 patients completed the survey or questionnaire before and after the on-demand therapy and prophylaxis periods. A general trend towards improved HRQoL after prophylaxis was observed for the 18 evaluable patients in all SF-36 dimensions except for vitality/energy and physical functioning. After prophylaxis, 'good responders,' defined as patients experiencing ≥ 50% reduction in bleeding, exhibited statistically and clinically significant differences in the physical component score (P = 0.021), role - physical (P = 0.042), bodily pain (P = 0.015), and social functioning (P = 0.036). Similarly, the EQ-5D health profile showed a trend towards improvement after prophylaxis in all evaluable patients. Among the good responders, improvements did not differ from those observed after on-demand treatment. EQ visual analogue scale values were slightly improved following prophylaxis for all evaluable patients and the EQ-5D utility index improved in the good responders only. During prophylaxis, patients missed significantly fewer days from school or work because of bleeding than during on-demand treatment (P = 0.01). In conclusion, by significantly reducing bleeding frequency in good responders, aPCC prophylaxis improved HRQoL compared with on-demand treatment.

How I treat inhibitors in haemophilia.

The management of patients with inhibitors is the greatest challenge facing haemophilia health professionals. Immune tolerance induction (ITI) can be successful in eliminating the inhibitor in the majority of patients, provided it is started soon after the inhibitor develops and the titre of the inhibitor is <10 BU at commencement of ITI. Acute bleeding is treated using one of two bypassing agents, which exhibit similar efficacy and safety. Surgery in inhibitor patients is challenging and should only be carried out in experienced centres.

Tertiary prophylaxis in adults: is there a rationale?

There is lack of evidence-based recommendations or clear-cut consensus regarding the clinical and economic utility of regular prophylaxis started in adulthood, with the aim of keeping the clinical situation from getting worse by prevention of further bleeds contributing to increasing musculo-skeletal or other morbidity in haemophilia. Such a prophylaxis program has been shown in relatively small cohorts to be effective in reducing bleeding occurrence, with a variable effect on the joint status, but with significantly higher factor consumption and consequently higher costs than on-demand therapy. There has been no attempt to identify subsets of patients who may benefit from "tertiary" prophylaxis more than others, for example, due to their bleeding phenotype and/or requirements for product issued on-demand or to identify the dosage that provides the optimal balance of clinical benefit and cost effectiveness. This article reviews the published literature on prophylaxis started beyond the age of 18 years, the barriers to the uptake of prophylaxis programs particularly in adults and highlights areas in need of further research.

Haemophilia care in Europe: the ESCHQoL study.

The aim of this study was to determine the clinical conditions of patients with haemophilia within Europe as recommended by the European Commission. In this multicentre, cross-sectional, ambispective study, conducted within 21 European countries patients' clinical data were collected, amongst others haemophilia type, severity, treatment pattern, use of factor products, bleeding, orthopaedic joint scores and infections. A total of 1400 patients, 84.3% with haemophilia A and 15.7% with haemophilia B were enrolled by 42 centres between 2004 and 2006. Thereof, 417 were children (30.0%) and 983 were adults (70.0%). About 70% of patients had severe factor deficiency (<1%). More than half of the adults were carriers of chronic infections (12.6% HIV, 55.8% HCV), compared to only 3.8% children (no HIV, 2.9% HCV). Patients were grouped according to per capita amount of clotting factor used in patients' region of residence in 2005: region 1: >5 IU; region 2: 2-5 IU; region 3: <2 IU. Paediatric and adult patients in region 3 had median numbers of three and eight joint bleeds, respectively, with worse joint scores compared to region 1 with zero and one bleed. Prophylactic therapy was used in only 31.3% children and 8.9% adults with severe haemophilia in region 3 compared to 93.7% and 54.1%, respectively, in region 1. Statistical analysis revealed that residence in areas with low factor consumption/availability is the most prominent risk factor for joint disease. Access of European patients with haemophilia to optimal care with safe factor VIII concentrates is limited and depends on the region of residence.

Management of bleeding disorders in children.

Haemophilia, if not properly managed, can lead to chronic disease and lifelong disabilities. The challenges and issues in infants/young children are different from those in older children and adults although episodes of bleeding still predominate as the diagnostic trigger. Awareness of clinical manifestations and treatment complications are crucial in instituting appropriate management and implementing preventive strategies. Currently, inhibitor development is a challenging complication of paediatric haemophilia and prophylaxis is emerging as the optimal preventive care strategy. In this section we will review some important aspects of haemophilia in children including early prophylaxis, current evidence relating to inhibitor development, including the aims of the SIPPET study which is already ongoing and involves boys <6 years, and the potential of immune tolerance therapy for eradicating the inhibitor and permitting a resumption of standard dosing schedules.

Pain management in patients with haemophilia: a European survey.

There are no evidence-based guidelines on pain management in people with haemophilia (PWH), who may suffer acute, disabling pain from haemarthroses and chronic arthropathic pain. To review evidence and to investigate current clinical practice in pain assessment and management in PWH the European Haemophilia Therapy Standardisation Board undertook a literature review and a survey in 22 Haemophilia Treatment Centres (HTC), using a questionnaire and seven clinical scenarios. Consensus was sought on pain assessment and management in PWH. Few clinical studies on pain management in PWH were identified. The HTCs care for 1678 children (47% severe haemophilia, 84% on prophylaxis, 17% with arthropathy and 8% with chronic pain) and 5103 adults (44% severe haemophilia, 40% on prophylaxis, 67% with arthropathy and 35% with chronic pain). Analgesics are prescribed by HTCs in 80% of cases (median; range 0-100%) and in 10% (median; range 0-80%) are bought over the counter. Pain and analgesic use are assessed when reported by patients and at check-ups. Only eight centres use a specific pain scale and/or have specific pain guidelines. Two HTCs arrange regular consultations with pain specialists. For acute pain, the preferred first-line drug is paracetamol for children, and paracetamol or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for adults. Children with chronic pain are treated with paracetamol or NSAIDs, whereas adults usually receive Cox-2 inhibitors. Second-line therapy is heterogeneous. There is little published evidence to guide pain assessment and management in PWH, and clinical practice varies considerably across Europe. General and specific recommendations are needed.

Continuous infusion in haemophilia: current practice in Europe.

Summary. Continuous infusion (CI) of factor VIII (FVIII) is an effective method for replacement therapy in haemophilia. Recently, concerns have been raised regarding association of CI with the development of inhibitors. The aim of this study was to gain information on the current practices in Europe regarding CI and the true inhibitor incidence after this mode of therapy. In a cross sectional study performed in 22 Comprehensive Care Centres (CCCs), we evaluated CI techniques, treatment protocols, efficacy, safety and complications of CI including inhibitors. Thirteen (59%) CCCs reported a total of 1079 CI treatments, given peri-operatively or for major bleeds, in 742 patients. Most centres used 'adjusted dose' CI aimed at median target FVIII level of 0.8 IU mL(-1). CI was haemostatically very effective with a low incidence of complications: median incidence of postoperative bleeding was 1.8%, six centres observed phlebitis in 2-11% of CI treatments. Only nine (1.2%) patients developed inhibitors (0.45% of 659 severe and 7.2% of 83 mild haemophilia patients). Additional analysis of inhibitor patients revealed several confounding factors (low number of prior FVIII exposure days, high steady-state factor levels during CI, high-risk genotype). In this unprecedentedly large cohort, CI treatment appears to be an effective and safe treatment that does not increase the risk of inhibitor development in patients with severe haemophilia. Thus, previous small case series reports suggesting that CI may increase inhibitors cannot be confirmed. Inhibitor risk in mild haemophilia could not be evaluated as the influence of other, potentially confounding, risk factors could not be excluded.

Haemophilia prophylaxis: how can we justify the costs?

Severe haemophilia results in increased mortality and poorer quality of life. Factor prophylaxis leads to a more normal life, but is very costly; most of the cost is due to the high cost of replacement factor. Despite its high cost, factor prophylaxis has been adopted throughout the developed world--even in different health care systems. We argue that there are at least five possible reasons why societies may value factor prophylaxis despite its cost: (i) it is directed towards an inherited disease, (ii) the treatment is largely directed towards children, (iii) the disease is rare and the overall cost to society is small, (iv) the treatment is preventative, and v) the high cost is largely the result of providing safe products. In an era of rising health care costs, there is a strong research agenda to establish the factors that determine the value of expensive therapies for rare diseases like haemophilia.

Understanding FVIII/VWF complex--report from a symposium of XXIX WFH meeting 2010.

von Willebrand factor (VWF) has the capacity to form a complex with factor VIII (FVIII) which may modulate the immunogenicity of FVIII. It has been proposed that a significant fraction of recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) is unable to bind VWF. In an experimental model studied at the McMaster University in Canada, this VWF-unbound rFVIII fraction showed no coagulant function. Sulphation of FVIII tyrosine (Tyr) 1680 has been reported as essential for the interaction with VWF. In a study performed at the Grifols and CNS-CSIC in Spain, Tyr1680 sulphation was observed to be incomplete in rFVIII and complete in plasma-derived FVIII (pdFVIII). This could explain the incapability of some rFVIII molecules to bind VWF. Experience with immune tolerance induction (ITI) at the Bonn Haemophilia Centre indicates that only eradication of FVIII inhibitors allows safe haemostasis control and the option of prophylactic treatment. Various clinical trials were planned to evaluate the clinical role VWF-containing FVIII concentrates (FVIII/VWF). RES.I.ST (an acronym for REScue Immunotolerance STudy) is an international, prospective study aimed at assessing whether FVIII/VWF can induce ITI in high-risk haemophilia patients (RES.I.ST naïve) and whether patients who previously failed ITI with FVIII alone can be rescued with FVIII/VWF (RES.I.ST experienced). Enrolment started in November 2009. In the FAIReSt.Will (Fanhdi and Alphanate Italian Retrospective Study in Willebrand disease) study, 120 von Willebrand disease (VWD) patients treated with Fanhdi(®) or Alphanate(®) were retrospectively analysed. Efficacy was excellent and no side effects were reported. The ongoing PRO.Will study is a prospective, multicenter trial aimed at assessing the efficacy, safety and pharmacoeconomics of secondary long-term prophylaxis in patients with severe inherited VWD.

Ultrasonography of haemophilic arthropathy.

Imaging is an essential tool for evaluation and monitoring of haemophilic arthropathy. Ultrasonography is increasingly used for joint assessment, due to its great sensitivity for soft tissue and relatively low cost. To assess the joint status and the role of ultrasonography in routine diagnosis and monitoring of joint disease in cohort haemophilic patients. Findings of patients with haemophilia, who routinely underwent ultrasonography were retrospectively evaluated to assess their joint status and the role of ultrasonography in routine diagnosis and monitoring of joint disease. Out of 325 joints examined (115 ankles, 210 knees), ultrasonography identified damages in 50% of ankles and 33% of knees in overall 111 patients, aged 7-80 years (median = 29 years). Synovial hypertrophy and cartilage abnormalities were the most frequent observations (88% and 76% in affected knees, respectively). Pristine joints were more frequently found in patients on primary prophylaxis, young age or no bleeding in the year prior to examination. Furthermore, no concordance was found between presence of joint changes at ultrasonography, and clinical joint status. Ultrasonography was shown to be able to detect joint damage involving soft tissues and bone surface. Its use might allow frequent monitoring of patients with haemophilia and early detection of arthropathy. For these reasons it might represent a valid tool in the routine management of haemophilia.