A Retrospective Case Series of a Novel Spinal Cord Stimulator Trial Technique with Less Displacement and Migration of the Trial Leads.

Background: Spinal cord stimulation is an established treatment option for certain chronic pain conditions which have been previously unresponsive to conservative therapies or potentially for a subset of patients who have not improved following spine surgery. Prior to permanent lead implantation, stimulator lead trials are performed to ensure adequate patient benefit. During these trials, one of the most common complications and reasons for failure is the displacement and migration of the trial leads, resulting in lost therapeutic coverage. Other complications include infection and dislodged bulky dressings. There is a paucity of literature describing an adequate procedural method to prevent these common complications. Objective: This study utilizes a series of 19 patients to evaluate a new technique for securing percutaneous spinal cord simulator trial leads, which may minimize dislodgement and migration complications and improve the rate of trial success. Study Design: Retrospective case series. Setting: New Jersey Medical School, Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Management Division. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on 19 consecutive patients undergoing placement of the percutaneous thoracic spinal cord stimulator trial leads for pain associated with lumbar spine pathology over a two-year period (2010-2012). Results: Of the 19 patients in our cohort, there was one trial lead displacement, no lead migrations, and no site infections. Thirteen patients went on to permanent lead implantation. This improved trial lead placement technique had a high success rate with a low number of complications. Limitations: Small sample size, retrospective case series, and no control group for comparison. Conclusion: This case series was able to demonstrate that our described novel spinal cord stimulator trial lead placement and dressing technique can decrease the incidence of lead displacement and migration, thus improving trial success.

New Chronic Pain Treatments in the Outpatient Setting: Review Article.

Chronic pain is an issue encountered by many health care providers in their routine clinical practice. In addition to generalized patient suffering, this condition has significant clinical, psychological, and socioeconomic impact due to its widespread occurrence. The landscape of chronic pain management has been changing rapidly with an array of treatment innovations, better understanding of established therapies, and care coordination across specialties. In this article, we have reviewed emerging new modalities as well as transformation of established therapies by interventional, pharmacologic, rehabilitative, psychological, complimentary, and interdisciplinary approaches.

Meningitis or epidural abscesses after neuraxial block for removal of infected hip or knee prostheses.

BACKGROUND: Infection, whether localized or systemic, can be a relative contraindication to neuraxial anaesthesia. Data correlating neuraxial anaesthesia and the development of meningitis or epidural abscess in this setting are limited. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed on 710 medical records of patients admitted between 1998 and 2009 for removal of potentially infected total hip and total knee prostheses. Ultimately, 474 patients were identified as being infected. Factors that predisposed a patient to an immunocompromised state, and signs and symptoms of infection in the pre-, intra-, and postoperative stages were documented. Bacteraemic patients were reviewed for signs of neuraxial infection. The endpoint of follow-up was development of complications before hospital discharge. RESULTS: All 474 patients had removal of the infected prosthesis under neuraxial anaesthesia. Mean patient age was 65.5 yr (58% >65 yr) and mean length of hospital stay was 21 days. Patient characteristics included concurrent disease (65%), steroid use (5.3%), preoperative antibiotic use (50.8%), signs of inflammatory process (84%), bacteraemia (4.2%), and documented positive intraoperative joint cultures (88%). Using clinical standards for diagnosis of central neuraxial infection, patients developed infectious complications (incidence of 0.6% on 95% confidence interval), although three patients had findings attributable to anaesthesia, including epidural haematoma, psoas abscess, and back pain. CONCLUSIONS: Based on clinical criteria, our findings suggest that the incidence of central nervous system infection after neuraxial anaesthesia in patients with infected hip and knee prostheses is low after neuraxial block.