Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Clin Invest ; 2024 Jun 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38833311

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials have suggested antitumor activity from PARP inhibition beyond homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). RNASEH2B loss is unrelated to HRD and preclinically sensitizes to PARP inhibition. The current study reports on RNASEH2B protein loss in advanced prostate cancer and its association with RB1 protein loss, clinical outcome and clonal dynamics during treatment with PARP inhibition in a prospective clinical trial. METHODS: Whole tumor biopsies from multiple cohorts of patients with advanced prostate cancer were interrogated using whole-exome sequencing (WES), RNA sequencing (bulk and single nucleus) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for RNASEH2B and RB1. Biopsies from patients treated with olaparib in the TOPARP-A and TOPARP-B clinical trials were used to evaluate RNASEH2B clonal selection during olaparib treatment. RESULTS: Shallow co-deletion of RNASEH2B and adjacent RB1, co-located at chromosome 13q14, was common, deep co-deletion infrequent, and gene loss associated with lower mRNA expression. In castration-resistant PC (CRPC) biopsies, RNASEH2B and RB1 mRNA expression correlated, but single nucleus RNA sequencing indicated discordant loss of expression. IHC studies showed that loss of the two proteins often occurred independently, arguably due to stochastic second allele loss. Pre- and post-treatment metastatic CRPC (mCRPC) biopsy studies from BRCA1/2 wildtype tumors, treated on the TOPARP phase II trial, indicated that olaparib eradicates RNASEH2B-loss tumor subclones. CONCLUSION: PARP inhibition may benefit men suffering from mCRPC by eradicating tumor subclones with RNASEH2B loss. CLINICALTRIALS: gov NCT01682772FUNDING. AstraZeneca; Cancer Research UK; Medical Research Council; Cancer Research UK; Prostate Cancer UK; Movember Foundation; Prostate Cancer Foundation.

2.
Mastology (Impr.) ; 28(4): 206-211, out.-dez.2018.
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-967954

RESUMO

Introduction: Breast cancer has a good prognosis when treated early. However, the mortality rate in Brazil is still high. The time interval between radiological suspicion and diagnosis/treatment impacts the survival. Methods: This is a retrospective crosssectional study that assessed patients treated at a reference center, with abnormal breast imaging findings and subsequent confirmation of breast cancer, from January 2011 to June 2015. We reviewed variables related to the dates of the abnormal test result, first mastology appointment, biopsy, surgery, and the start of chemotherapy ­ when indicated. Time intervals were compared using the Friedman and Kruskal-Wallis tests with the software SPSS® 23.0. Results: We analyzed 65 patients. The median time between the abnormal test result and first mastology appointment was 35 days; between first mastology appointment and biopsy, 31 days; between biopsy and surgery, 85 days; and between surgery and chemotherapy, 137 days. The last two intervals showed significant differences (p<0.001). Discussion: Breast cancer patients had a significant delay until surgery and the start of chemotherapy. Early integration of the multidisciplinary team involved in this process and internal audits are necessary to optimize time intervals.


Introdução: O câncer de mama apresenta bom prognóstico quando tratado precocemente, entretanto, a mortalidade no Brasil continua elevada. O tempo entre suspeita radiológica e diagnóstico e tratamento tem impacto na sobrevida. Métodos: Foi realizado um estudo transversal e retrospectivo que avaliou pacientes atendidas em centro de referência com imagem mamária alterada e posterior confirmação de câncer de mama de janeiro de 2011 a junho e 2015. Foram revisadas variáveis relacionadas às datas do exame alterado, da primeira consulta, da biópsia, da cirurgia e do início da quimioterapia, quando indicada. Os intervalos de tempo foram comparados pelos testes Friedman e Kruskal-Wallis, pelo programa SPSS® 23.0. Resultados: Foram analisadas 65 pacientes. A mediana de tempo entre exame alterado e primeira consulta foi 35 dias, entre consulta na mastologia e biópsia foi 31 dias, entre biópsia e cirurgia foi 85 dias e entre cirurgia e quimioterapia foi 137 dias. Foram observadas diferenças significativas nos dois últimos intervalos (p<0,001). Discussão: As pacientes com câncer de mama apresentaram atraso significativo até a cirurgia e até o início da quimioterapia. Há necessidade da integração precoce da equipe multidisciplinar implicada nesse processo e auditorias internas a fim de otimizar os intervalos de tempo

3.
Mastology (Impr.) ; 27(3): 199-205, jul.-set.2017.
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-884255

RESUMO

Objective: Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subset of tumors with an aggressive intrinsic biology, resulting in poor prognosis. Androgen receptor (AR) is currently one of the most studied biomarkers in TNBC, playing a role in the genesis and development of breast cancer. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients with TNBC who received care from 2012 to 2014 at a single health center in southern Brazil. Histological material from breast tumors was analyzed by immunohistochemistry for AR expression and related to age, histological grade, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and Ki-67. Results: Of 34 TNBC cases identified, 23 (67.6%) were AR negative and 11 (32.4%) were AR positive. The average age of the patients was 51.9 years (range: 30­82 years). Among positive cases, AR was weakly expressed in 6 and strongly expressed in 5 cases. Most patients (n=28; 82.0%) had poorly differentiated tumors. Mean Ki-67 expression was 65.0% in AR-negative and 43.6% in AR-positive cases (p<0.05). There was a significant association between age and AR expression (p<0.005), which was associated with mean age 70.8 years in the strongly AR-positive group and 42.3 years in the weakly AR-positive group. The mean percentage of TILs was 38.6% in AR-positive and 39.1% in AR-negative cases (p=0.391). Conclusion: There was no significant association between AR expression and histological grade or TILs. AR positivity in TNBC was associated with older age and tumors with lower Ki-67 expression, indicating two subgroups with distinct phenotypes in patients with TNBC.


Objetivo: O câncer de mama negativo triplo (triple negative breast cancer ­ TNBC) é um subtipo de tumores com biologia intrínseca agressiva, resultando em pior prognóstico. O receptor de andrógeno (androgen receptor ­ AR) é atualmente um dos biomarcadores mais estudados em TNBC, desempenhando papel na gênese e no desenvolvimento do câncer de mama. Métodos: Neste estudo transversal, revisamos retrospectivamente os registros médicos de todos os pacientes com TNBC que receberam atendimento de 2012 a 2014 em um único centro no sul do Brasil. O material histológico dos tumores de mama foi analisado por imuno-histoquímica para a expressão de AR e relacionado a idade, grau histológico, linfócitos infiltrantes de tumores (TILs) e Ki-67. Resultados: Dos 34 casos identificados de TNBC, 23 (67,6%) eram AR negativos e 11 (32,4%), AR positivos. A idade média foi de 51,9 anos (30­82 anos). Entre os casos positivos, AR foi fracamente expresso em 6 e fortemente expresso em 5 casos. A maioria dos pacientes (n=28, 82,0%) apresentou tumores pouco diferenciados. A expressão média de Ki-67 foi de 65,0% em AR-negativo e 43,6% em AR-positivo (p<0,05). Houve associação significativa entre a idade e a expressão de AR (p<0,005), associada à idade média de 70,8 anos no grupo com AR fortemente positivo e de 42,3 anos no grupo com AR fracamente positivo. A porcentagem média de TILs foi de 38,6% em AR-positivo e de 39,1% em AR-negativo (p=0,391). Não houve associação significativa entre expressão AR e grau histológico ou TILs. Conclusão: A positividade de AR em TNBC foi associada com idade mais avançada e tumores com menor expressão de Ki-67, indicando dois subgrupos com fenótipos distintos em pacientes com TNBC.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA