Retinal small vessel dilatation in the systemic inflammatory response to surgery.

Retinal microvascular calibre has been proposed as a predictor of cardiac events. Surgery is a major stimulus for inflammation which potentially affects small vessel calibre. This study examined the effects of surgery on retinal, and thus systemic, small vessel size, and the potentially confounding effect of surgery when retinal vessel calibre is used to predict cardiac risk in hospital patients. Consecutive participants were recruited from a preoperative assessment clinic at a teaching hospital. They provided demographic and clinical details, and underwent retinal imaging before and again, within 3 days after surgery, with a non-mydriatic retinal camera. Images were graded for vessel calibre using semi-automated software based on the Parr-Hubbard formula with Knudtson's modification (IVAN, U Wisconsin). Differences were examined using Fisher's exact test or a paired t-test, and calibre determinants identified from univariate and multiple linear regression analysis (STATA version 11.2). Sixty-eight participants (23 men, 34%) with a mean age of 55 ± 14.5 years, were recruited. Fourteen (21%) underwent a laparotomy which was considered major surgery and 54 (79%) had Other surgery. Mean C-reactive protein (CRP) levels increased post-operatively from 7.8 ± 20.2 mg/L to 43.9 ± 55.1 mg/L (p < 0.01), and mean serum albumin decreased from 38.9 ± 4.4 g/L to 33.9 ± 5.5 g/L (p < 0.01). Mean central retinal arteriole and venular equivalent calibre (CRAE, CRVE) increased post-operatively (142.4 ± 13.3 µm to 146.4 ± 13.0 µm, p < 0.01 and 213.1 ± 16.8 µm to 217.9 ± 18.3 µm, p < 0.01, respectively). The systemic microvasculature dilates post-operatively possibly secondary to inflammation and endothelial dysfunction. These changes were present within 3 days of surgery and may confound the use of small vessel calibre to predict cardiac risk in surgical inpatients. Microvascular dilatation in response to other inflammatory stimuli such as pneumonia is a known potential confounder in hospital patients.

Real-world staging computed tomography scanning technique and important reporting discrepancies in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) is the first-line staging imaging modality for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) which determines resectability and treatment pathways. METHODS: Between January 2016 and December 2019, prospectively collated data from two Australian cancer centres was extracted from the PURPLE Pancreatic Cancer registry. Real-world staging CTs and corresponding reports were blindly reviewed by a sub-specialist radiologist and compared to initial reports. RESULTS: Of 131 patients assessed, 117 (89.3%) presented with symptoms, 74 (56.5%) CTs included slices ≤3 mm thickness and CT pancreas protocol was applied in 69 (52.7%) patients. Initial reports lacked synoptic reporting in 131 (100%), tumour identification in 2 (1.6%) and tumour measurement in 13 (9.9%) cases. Tumour-vascular relationship reporting was missing in 69-109 (52.7-83.2%) for regarding the key arterial and venous structures that is required to assess resectability. Initial reports had no comment on venous thrombus or venous collaterals in 80 (61.1%) and 109 (83.2%) and lacked locoregional lymphadenopathy interpretation in 13 (9.9%) cases. Complete initial staging report was present in 72 (55.0%) patients. Sub-specialist radiological review resulted in down-staging in 16 (22.2%) and up-staging in 1 (1.4%) patient. Staging discrepancies were mainly regarding metastatic disease (12, 70.6%) and tumour-vascular relationship (5, 29.4%). CONCLUSION: Real-world staging imaging in PDAC patients show low proportion of dedicated CT pancreas protocol, high proportion of incomplete staging reports and no synoptic reporting. The most common discrepancy between initial and sub-specialist reporting was regarding metastases and tumour-vascular relationship assessment resulting in sub-specialist down-staging in almost every fifth case.