Surgery for constipation in patients with prior spinal cord injury: the Department of Veterans Affairs experience.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) typically have difficulty with constipation. Some undergo surgery for bowel management. We predicted that SCI patients would have higher mortality and/or morbidity rates following such surgery than neurally intact patients receiving the same procedures. We sought to evaluate this using a large population-based data set. METHODS: Patients receiving care at Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (DVAMCs) with computer codes for SCI and constipation who later underwent colectomy, colostomy, or ileostomy during fiscal years 1993-2002 were identified. Charts were requested from the VAMCs where the surgery had been performed and a retrospective chart review of these charts was done. We collected data on patient demographics, six specific pre-operative co-morbidities, surgical complications, and post-operative mortality. Comparisons were made to current literature evaluating a population receiving total abdominal colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis for constipation but not selected for SCI. RESULTS: Of 299 patients identified by computer search, 43 (14%) had codes for SCI and 10 of 43 (24%) met our inclusion criteria. All were symptomatic and had received appropriate medical management. Co-morbid conditions were present in 9 of 10 patients (90%). There were no deaths within 30 days. The complication rate was zero. The mean post-operative length of stay was 17 days. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with SCI comprise about 14% of the population who receive surgery for severe constipation in the Department of Veterans Affairs system. The mortality and morbidity rates in these patients are similar to those reported in other constipated patients who have surgery for intractable constipation. Our data suggest that stoma formation ± bowel resection in patients with SCI is a safe and effective treatment for chronic constipation.

Proctectomy for rectal cancer in patients with prior spinal cord injury.

INTRODUCTION: Limited published information is available concerning the clinical course of spinal cord injured (SCI) patients who later develop rectal cancer and undergo proctectomy. We hypothesized that such patients would have poorer outcomes than comparable neurally-intact patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of all SCI veterans receiving care at all Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) Medical Centers who subsequently underwent proctectomy for rectal cancer during fiscal years 1993-2002. Only patients with SCI due to trauma who met American Spinal Injury Association type A criteria (complete cord injury) were analyzed. The search strategy utilized DVA datasets plus data extracted from medical records. RESULTS: There were 33,758 patients with ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes for SCI and 5246 patients with ICD-9-CM procedure codes for proctectomy due to rectal cancer; 72 patients were in both datasets. We received records for 72 patients and excluded 67 after chart review. Incorrect coding (44) and incomplete spinal cord lesions (9) were the most common exclusion criteria. Five patients were considered evaluable. The mean age at diagnosis was 65 (range 49-80). All five had symptomatic cancers and two (40%) had major comorbidities at admission. Postoperative complications occurred in four (80%). The winsorized mean length of stay was 28 days. CONCLUSIONS: The complication rate and length of stay for SCI patients undergoing proctectomy for rectal cancer were higher than those reported for otherwise comparable neurally-intact patients. SCI should be considered a risk factor for adverse outcomes in operations for rectal cancer as in other major surgery.

Risk factors for adverse outcomes following surgery for small bowel obstruction.

OBJECTIVE: To construct risk indices predicting adverse outcomes following surgery for small bowel obstruction (SBO). METHODS: The VA National Surgical Quality Improvement Program contains prospectively collected data on more than 1 million patients. Patients undergoing adhesiolysis only or small bowel resection for SBO from 1991 to 2002 were selected. Independent variables included 68 presurgical and 12 intraoperative risk factors; dependent variables were 21 adverse outcomes including death. Stepwise logistic regression was used to construct models predicting 30-day morbidity and mortality and to derive risk index values. Patients were then divided into risk classes. RESULTS: Of the 2002 patients, 1650 underwent adhesiolysis only and 352 underwent small bowel resection. Thirty-seven percent undergoing adhesiolysis only and 47% undergoing small bowel resection had more than 1 complication (P < 0.001). The overall 30-day mortality was 7.7% and did not differ significantly between the groups. Odds of death were highest for dirty or infected wounds, ASA class 4 or 5, age >80 years, and dyspnea at rest. Morbidity ranged from 22%, among patients with 0 to 7 risk points, to 62% for those with >19 risk points. Mortality ranged from 2% among patients with 0 to 12 risk points to 28% for those with >31 risk points. CONCLUSIONS: Morbidity and mortality after surgery for SBO in VA hospitals are comparable with those in other large series. The morbidity rate, but not the mortality rate, is significantly higher in patients requiring small bowel resection compared with those requiring adhesiolysis only (P < 0.001). The risk indices presented provide an easy-to-use tool for clinicians to predict outcomes for patients undergoing surgery for SBO.

Patient surveillance after curative-intent surgery for rectal cancer.

The follow-up of patients with rectal cancer after potentially curative resection has significant financial and clinical implications for patients and society. The ideal regimen for monitoring patients is unknown. We evaluated the self-reported practice patterns of a large, diverse group of experts. There is little information available describing the actual practice of clinicians who perform potentially curative surgery on rectal cancer patients and follow them after recovery. The 1795 members of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons were asked, via a detailed questionnaire, how often they request 14 discrete follow-up modalities in their patients treated for cure with TNM stage I, II, or III rectal cancer over the first five post-treatment years. 566/1782 (32%) responded and 347 of the respondents (61%) provided evaluable data. Members of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons typically follow their own patients postoperatively rather than sending them back to their referral source. Office visit and serum CEA level are the most frequently requested items for each of the first five postoperative years. Endoscopy and imaging tests are also used regularly. Considerable variation exists among these highly experienced, highly credentialed experts. The surveillance strategies reported here rely most heavily on relatively simple and inexpensive tests. Endoscopy is employed frequently; imaging tests are employed less often. The observed variation in the intensity of postoperative monitoring is of concern.

Follow-up of colorectal cancer patients after resection with curative intent-the GILDA trial.

PURPOSE: Surgery remains the primary treatment of colorectal cancer. Data are lacking to delineate the optimal surveillance strategy following resection. A large-scale multi-center European study is underway to address this issue (Gruppo Italiano di Lavoro per la Diagnosi Anticipata-GILDA). METHODS: Following primary surgery with curative intent, stratification, and randomization at GILDA headquarters, colon cancer patients are then assigned to a more intensive or less intensive surveillance regimen. Rectal cancer patients undergoing curative resection are similarly randomized, with their follow-up regimens placing more emphasis on detection of local recurrence. Target recruitment for the study will be 1500 patients to achieve a statistical power of 80% (assuming an alpha of 0.05 and a hazard-rate reduction of >24%). RESULTS: Since the trial opened in 1998, 985 patients have been randomized from 41 centers as of February 2004. There were 496 patients randomized to the less intensive regimens, and 489 randomized to the more intensive regimens. The mean duration of follow-up is 14 months. 75 relapses (15%) and 32 deaths (7%) had been observed in the two more intensive follow-up arms, while 64 relapses (13%) and 24 deaths (5%) had been observed in the two less intensive arms as of February 2004. CONCLUSIONS: This trial should provide the first evidence based on an adequately powered randomized trial to determine the optimal follow-up strategy for colorectal cancer patients. This trial is open to US centers, and recruitment continues.

Morbidity and mortality of gastrectomy for cancer in Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to define risk factors that predict 30-day morbidity and mortality after gastrectomy for cancer in Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Centers. METHODS: The VA National Surgical Quality Improvement Program prospectively collected data on 708 patients undergoing gastrectomy for cancer in 123 participating VA medical centers from 1991 to 1998. Independent variables included 68 preoperative patient characteristics and 12 intraoperative variables; the dependent variables were 21 defined adverse outcomes and death. Predictive models for 30-day morbidity and mortality were constructed by using stepwise logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The 30-day morbidity rate was 33.3% (236 of 708). The overall 30-day mortality rate was 7.6% (54 of 708). Significant positive predictors of morbidity (P <.05) included current pneumonia, American Society of Anesthesiologists class IV (threat to life), partially dependent functional status, dyspnea on minimal exertion, preoperative transfusion, extended operative time, and increasing age. Significant positive predictors of mortality (P <.05) included do not resuscitate status, prior stroke, intraoperative transfusion, preoperative weight loss, preoperative transfusion, and elevated preoperative alkaline phosphatase level. CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors predicting morbidity and mortality rates at VA hospitals after gastrectomy for gastric cancer are reported by using a prospectively collected, multi-institutional database. Assigning relative weights to factors associated with adverse outcomes may help improve patient care.