Why Do Men Reject Adjuvant Radiotherapy following Radical Prostatectomy? A Systematic Survey.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to investigate non-adherence rates to adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT) after radical prostatectomy (RP) and to obtain patient reported reasons for rejecting aRT despite recommendation by a multidisciplinary team discussion (MTD). METHODS: In a retrospective monocentric analysis, we identified 1,197 prostate cancer patients who underwent RP between 2014 and 2022 at our institution, of which 735 received a postoperative MTD recommendation. Patients with a recommendation for aRT underwent a structured phone interview with predefined standardised qualitative and quantitative questions and were stratified into "adherent" (aRT performed) and "non-adherent" groups (aRT not performed). RESULTS: Of 55 patients receiving a recommendation for aRT (7.5% of all RP patients), 24 (44%) were non-adherent. Baseline tumour characteristics were comparable among the groups. "Fear of radiation damage" was the most common reason for rejection, followed by "lack of information," "feeling that the treating physician does not support the recommendation" and "the impression that aRT is not associated with improved oncological outcome." Salvage radiotherapy was performed in 25% of non-adherent patients. CONCLUSION: High rates of non-adherence to aRT after RP were observed, and reasons for this phenomenon are most likely multifactorial. Multidisciplinary and individualized patient counselling might be a key for increasing adherence rates.

Prevalence of reported penicillin allergy and associations with perioperative complications, length of stay, and cost in patients undergoing elective cancer surgery.

Objective: Up to 10% of patients report penicillin allergy (PA), although only 1% are truly affected by Ig-E-mediated allergies. PA has been associated with worse postoperative outcomes, but studies on the impact of reported PA in cancer patients are lacking, and especially in these multimorbid patients, a non-complicated course is of utmost importance. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing elective oncological surgery at a tertiary reference center. Data on surgical site infections (SSI), postoperative complications (measured by Clavien-Dindo classification and Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI)), hospitalization duration, and treatment costs were collected. Results: Between 09/2019 and 03/2020, 152 patients were identified. 16/152 patients (11%) reported PA, while 136/152 (89%) did not. There were no differences in age, BMI, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and smoking status between groups (p > 0.4). Perioperative beta-lactam antibiotics were used in 122 (89.7%) and 15 (93.8%) patients without and with reported PA, respectively. SSI and mean numbers of infections occurred non-significantly more often in patients with PA (p = 0.2 and p = 0.47). The median CCI was significantly higher in PA group (26 vs. 51; p = 0.035). The median hospitalization duration and treatment costs were similar between non-PA and PA groups (4 vs 3 days, p = 0.8; 16'818 vs 17'444 CHF, p = 0.4). Conclusions: In patients undergoing cancer surgery, reported PA is common. Failure to question the unproven PA may impair perioperative outcomes. For this reason, patient and provider education on which reactions constitute a true allergy would also assist in allergy de-labeling. In addition, skin testing and oral antibiotic challenges can be performed to identify the safe antibiotics and to de-label appropriate patients.

Tumor Stent for Chronic Ureteral Obstruction: Which Are Predictors of Stent Failure?

Purpose: To identify predictors of UROSOFT® tumor stent failure. According to the manufacturer, this reinforced ureteral stent has a maximal dwell time of 6 months. Nonetheless, stent failure may reduce this maximal dwell time. Methods: All patients undergoing first-time UROSOFT tumor stent insertion in our institution between 2010 and 2018 were considered for this retrospective analysis. Primary endpoint was stent failure and defined as premature stent exchange or percutaneous nephrostomy insertion. The local ethics committee approved the study protocol (study ID: BASEC 2020-00175). Results: In total, 182 patients were available for analysis. Median age was 68 years. Causes for tumor stent placement were extrinsic ureteral obstruction in 144 patients (79%) and intrinsic obstruction in 38 patients (21%). Tumor stent failure-free survival estimates at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 months were 89%, 83%, 76%, 65%, and 52%, respectively. Patients with stent failure had significantly higher grade of hydronephrosis, higher urinary culture bacterial growth, higher serum white blood cell count, higher C-reactive protein, and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate at the time of reintervention, compared with patients who underwent regular stent exchange. Of all baseline and perioperative parameters, we found bilateral insertion, intrinsic ureteral obstruction, and urinary tract infection (UTI) at time of tumor stent insertion to be significant and independent predictors of stent failure (all p < 0.05). Conclusion: Despite a theoretical maximal dwell time of 6 months, ∼50% of all cases are subject to premature stent failure. Predictors of stent failure are bilateral insertion, intrinsic ureteral obstruction, and UTI at the time of tumor stent insertion. Preoperative antibiotic therapy may impact on stent failure rate.

Treatment Options and Outcomes for Men with Penile Intraepithelial Neoplasia: A Systematic Review.

Penile intraepithelial neoplasia (PeIN) is a rare skin condition with potential to progress to invasive penile cancer. We performed a systematic review of treatment options and outcomes for PeIN. Topical agents showed response and recurrence rates of 40-100% and 20% for imiquimod, and 48-74% and 11% for 5-fluorouracil, respectively. Discontinuation of topical agents because of side effects was observed in 12% of cases. Response rates for laser therapies were 52-100%, with recurrence in 7-48% of cases and a change in penile sensitivity in 50%. Circumcision cleared preputial PeIN. Rates of recurrence after surgical treatment of glans PeIN were 25% for wide local excision, 4% for Mohs surgery, 5% for total glans resurfacing, and 10% for glansectomy. There are limited data on factors predictive of treatment response and on sequencing of treatment options. PATIENT SUMMARY: Several treatment options are available for men with precancerous lesions of the foreskin or glans. Close follow-up is necessary as lesions can recur or progress to invasive penile cancer.

En Bloc Resection of Bladder Tumor-Is It the Way Forward?

Transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT) represents the cornerstone in diagnosis and treatment of bladder cancer but recurrence is observed in up to 80% and over- or understaging with TURBT is common. A more recent development to overcome these limitations represents en-bloc resection of bladder tumors (ERBT) which offers several advantages over TURBT. In this report, we briefly review studies assessing outcomes of bladder cancer patients undergoing ERBT. Most randomized and non-randomized trial demonstrate improvement in clinical outcomes for ERBT over TURBT, however more pathological and translational studies are warranted.

CXCL12 expression is an adverse predictor for disease recurrence in patients with metastatic non-seminomatous testicular germ cell tumors.

BACKGROUND: To validate the utility of the chemokine ligand 12 (CXCL12) as prognostic marker in patients with localized and metastatic germ cell tumors (GCT). METHODS: CXCL12 expression was analyzed on a tissue microarray consisting of 750 tissue cores of different histological tumor components, Germ cell neoplasia in situ (GCNIS) and adjacent normal tissue of 263 testicular cancer patients using a semi-quantitative score. The association between CXCL12 expression and recurrence-free survival (RFS) as well as overall survival (OS) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank tests. RESULTS: CXCL12 expression was absent in all seminomas but was found in 52 of 99 (52.5%) non-seminomas. Follow-up was available for 260 patients of which 36 (13.8%) recurred. In patients with stage 1 non-seminoma GCT, CXCL12 expression was not associated with higher risk of disease recurrence (p = 0.270). In contrast, post chemotherapy RFS of patients with metastatic non-seminoma and positive CXCL12 expression was significantly shorter compared to CXCL12 negative patients (p = 0.003). OS differences were not statistically different between patients with CXCL12 positive or negative tumors for either localized or metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: CXCL12 is almost exclusively expressed in non-seminoma. Pure seminoma, GCNIS and adjacent normal testicular tissue are CXCL12 negative. Our analysis suggests that patients with metastatic disease and a CXCL12-positive non-seminoma are at higher risk for disease recurrence after first-line chemotherapy and might thus be candidates for more intensive treatment and/or closer follow-up.

Pre-orchiectomy tumor marker levels should not be used for International Germ Cell Consensus Classification (IGCCCG) risk group assignment.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether the use of pre-orchiectomy instead of pre-chemotherapy tumor marker (TM) levels has an impact on the International Germ Cell Consensus Classification (IGCCCG) risk group assignment in patients with metastatic germ cell tumors (GCT). METHODS: Demographic and clinical information of all patients treated for primary metastatic testicular non-seminomatous GCT in our tertiary care academic center were extracted from medical charts. IGCCCG risk group assignment was correctly performed with pre-chemotherapy marker levels and additionally with pre-orchiectomy marker levels. Agreement between pre-chemotherapy and pre-orchiectomy risk group assignments was assessed using Cohen's kappa. RESULTS: Our cohort consisted of 83 patients. The use of pre-orchiectomy TMs resulted in an IGCCCG risk group upstaging in 12 patients (16%, 8 patients from good to intermediate risk and 4 patients from intermediate to poor risk) and a downstaging in 1 patient (1.2%, from intermediate- to good-risk). The agreement between pre-orchiectomy and pre-chemotherapy IGCCCG risk groups resulted in a Cohen's kappa of 0.888 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Using pre-orchiectomy TMs can result in incorrect IGCCCG risk group assignment, which in turn can impact on the clinical management and follow-up of patients with metastatic GCT. Thus, adherence to the IGCCCG standard using pre-chemotherapy TMs levels is recommended.