RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Fruit and vegetable (F/V) consumption among school-aged children falls short of current recommendations. The development of public-private partnerships (PPPs) has been suggested as an effective approach to address a number of public health concerns, including inadequate F/V consumption. The US Department of Agriculture's Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program (FFVP) provides F/V as snacks at least twice per week in low-income elementary schools. In addition to increasing F/V consumption behaviors at school, children participating in the FFVP make more requests for F/V in grocery stores and at home, suggesting the impact of the program extends beyond school settings. OBJECTIVE: This study explored the potential for establishing successful PPPs between schools and food retailers to promote the sales of F/V in low-income communities. DESIGN: Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted with participants from 4 groups of stakeholders. PARTICIPANTS/SETTING: Grocery store and produce managers from 10 grocery stores, FFVP personnel from 5 school districts and 12 schools, and parents of children attending 3 different FFVP-participating schools, all in the Phoenix, AZ, metropolitan area participated in interviews and focus groups. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Data were analyzed using a directed content analysis approach to examine benefits, barriers, and strategies for developing a PPP. RESULTS: Key perceived benefits of creating a PPP included the potential to increase store sales, to enhance public relations with the community, and to extend the impact of the FFVP to settings outside of schools. Barriers included offering expensive produce through the FFVP and the potential lack of communication among partners. Strategies for developing a PPP included using seasonal produce and having clear instructions for teachers and staff. Parents reported their children requesting more F/V as a result of FFVP participation. CONCLUSIONS: Stakeholders support forming PPPs. Partnerships between FFVP schools and retailers can be mutually beneficial and have a positive impact on children and their families.
Assuntos
Pessoal de Educação/psicologia , Assistência Alimentar/organização & administração , Pais/psicologia , Parcerias Público-Privadas , Participação dos Interessados/psicologia , Adulto , Arizona , Criança , Feminino , Grupos Focais , Serviços de Alimentação/organização & administração , Frutas , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Serviços de Saúde Escolar/organização & administração , Supermercados , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Agriculture , VerdurasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Consumption of fruits and vegetables (F/V) among elementary school-aged children remains inadequate, especially among low-income children. The US Department of Agriculture's Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program (FFVP) provides F/V as snacks to children during the school day, outside of school meals. School-based initiatives are successful in changing behaviors in school settings; however, their influence on behaviors outside of schools needs investigation. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether FFVP participation is associated with F/V requests at stores, self-efficacy to ask for and choose F/V at home, and F/V consumption. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANT/SETTING: Fourth graders in six classrooms (n=296) from three urban, low-income school districts in Phoenix, AZ, were surveyed during 2015; one FFVP and one non-FFVP school from each district that were similar in school size, percent free/reduced-price meal eligibility, and race/ethnicity of enrolled students were selected. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Children's self-reported F/V requests during shopping, their self-efficacy to ask for and choose F/V at home, and F/V consumption on the previous day (non-FFVP school day) were measured using questions adapted from validated surveys. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Multivariable mixed-effect regression models, adjusting for clustering of students within classes and classes within schools were explored. RESULTS: In models adjusting for individual-level factors (ie, age and sex) only, several significant positive associations were observed between school FFVP participation and healthier F/V outcomes. After additionally adjusting for school-level factors (ie, total enrollment and % Hispanic/Latino students) significant associations were observed between school FFVP participation and more requests for vegetables during shopping (P<0.001), higher scores on self-efficacy to choose vegetables at home (P=0.004), stronger preferences for vegetables (P<0.001), and more frequent consumption of fruit (P=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: School FFVP participation was associated with more requests for vegetables during shopping and higher self-efficacy to make healthy choices at home, suggesting the influence of the FFVP may extend beyond the school day.
Assuntos
Dieta/estatística & dados numéricos , Preferências Alimentares/psicologia , Serviços de Alimentação , Serviços de Saúde Escolar , Estudantes/psicologia , Arizona , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Dieta/psicologia , Feminino , Frutas , Humanos , Masculino , Pobreza/psicologia , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Agriculture , População Urbana/estatística & dados numéricos , VerdurasRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To determine the proportion of restaurants that will be required to post calorie information under the Food and Drug Administration's menu-labeling regulations in 4 New Jersey cities. METHODS: We classified geocoded 2014 data on 1753 restaurant outlets in accordance with the Food and Drug Administration's guidelines, which will require restaurants with 20 or more locations nationwide to post calorie information. We used multivariate logistic regression analyses to assess the association between menu-labeling requirements and census tract characteristics. RESULTS: Only 17.6% of restaurants will be affected by menu labeling; restaurants in higher-income tracts have higher odds than do restaurants in lower-income tracts (odds ratio [OR] = 1.55; P = .02). Restaurants in non-Hispanic Black (OR = 1.62; P = .02) and mixed race/ethnicity (OR = 1.44; P = .05) tracts have higher odds than do restaurants in non-Hispanic White tracts of being affected. CONCLUSIONS: Additional strategies are needed to help consumers make healthy choices at restaurants not affected by the menu-labeling law. These findings have implications for designing implementation strategies for the law and for evaluating its impact.
Assuntos
Rotulagem de Alimentos/legislação & jurisprudência , Regulamentação Governamental , Restaurantes , United States Food and Drug Administration , Ingestão de Energia , Humanos , New Jersey , Obesidade/prevenção & controle , Saúde Pública , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: By May 5, 2017, restaurants with 20 or more locations nationwide will be required to post calorie information on menus and menu boards. Previous research shows that those who use menu labels purchase fewer calories, but how users are saving calories is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To assess food and beverage selection patterns among menu label users and nonusers. DESIGN: Secondary, cross-sectional analysis using data from a study examining sociodemographic disparities in menu label usage at a national fast-food restaurant chain. PARTICIPANTS/SETTING: Participants were recruited outside restaurant locations, using street-intercept survey methodology. Consenting customers submitted receipts and completed a brief oral survey. Receipt data were used to categorize food and beverage purchases. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Side, beverage, and entrée purchases. Sides and beverages were classified as healthier and less-healthy options consistent with the 2015 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Healthier options contained items promoted in the guidelines, such as whole fruits, vegetables, low-fat dairy, and 100% fruit juice; less-healthy options contained solid fat or added sugar. Entrées were categorized as lower-, medium-, and higher-calorie options, based on quartile cutoffs. STATISTICAL ANALYSES: Multinomial logistic regression models were used to estimate prevalence ratios (PRs) for purchases among menu label users and nonusers, controlling for sociodemographic characteristics and total price paid. RESULTS: Healthier sides were selected by 7.5% of users vs 2.5% of nonusers; healthier beverages were selected by 34.0% of users vs 11.6% of nonusers; and lowest-calorie entrées were selected by 28.3% of users vs 30.1% of nonusers. Compared with nonusers (n=276), users (n=53) had a higher probability of purchasing healthier sides (PR=5.44; P=0.034), and healthier beverages (PR=3.37; P=0.005). No significant differences were seen in the purchasing patterns of entrées. CONCLUSIONS: Targeting educational campaigns to side and beverage purchasing behaviors may increase the effectiveness of menu labeling.