Homeworking and Employee Job Stress and Work Engagement: A Multilevel Analysis from 34 European Countries.

Working from home (WFH) has had both positive and negative impacts on the work conduct. To maximise the benefits of homeworking, previous literature mainly focuses on creating self-help strategies for homeworkers to reduce work stress and maintain work engagement. However, fewer studies take on the policymaker perspective and evaluate optimal working conditions in the homeworking context. Using the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model, this study evaluates the effects of various work characteristics (job demands and resources) on the stress and engagement of infrequent and frequent homeworkers. Using the sixth European Working Conditions Survey 2015 which contains 5090 participants from 34 European countries, we studied 6 job demands and 5 job resources via Exploratory Factor Analysis. After testing the model's fitness using Confirmatory Factor Analysis, multiple mixed-effects models were used to test the job demands and resource effects on worker stress and engagement. Dominance Analysis was then used to identify the relative importance of each job demand and resource when explaining employee stress and engagement. We found emotional demands, time pressure, and workload to be the top three demand factors that cause work stress across the groups. Other than daily homeworkers, a positive and fair social climate is the most prominent resource able to boost job engagement across all of the other groups. By identifying the homeworkers' most influential demands and resources, this study will help managers better understand the steps to take to provide healthy job conditions for homeworkers.

Association of body mass index and season with histamine skin reactivity in Chinese children with allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the association between histamine skin reactivity and body mass index (BMI) and other clinical factors, 526 children (3-6 years old) who underwent a skin-prick test (SPT) to diagnose allergic rhinitis were enrolled. METHODS: The SPT was carried out using 43 common allergens (commercial kit). The wheal size was analyzed. The associations between histamine reactivity and age, gender, BMI, atopy, parental smoking history, and testing season were examined. RESULTS: Mean age was 4.6 ± 1.1 years. Among all 526 children, 202 (38.4%) had intermittent allergic rhinitis (IAR), 164 (32.1%) had IAR + persistent allergic rhinitis (PER), and 160 (30.4%) had PER. The size of the histamine skin wheal and maximum diameter for positive allergens showed significant seasonal differences (P = 0.001 and P = 0.02, respectively). Children with biparental allergy history had a higher BMI (P = 0.006). BMI (P < 0.001), summer testing (P = 0.001), and autumn testing (P < 0.001) were independently associated with the size of the histamine skin wheal. Only winter testing was independently associated with the maximal diameter for positive allergens (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Higher histamine skin reactivity was associated with higher BMI and summer or autumn testing. Subject BMI and season should be considered for better interpretation of the SPT. The mechanisms underlying these associations require further study.