[A clinical comparative study on treatment of severe newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia by recombinant human thrombopoietin combined with glucocorticoid].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) combined with glucocorticoid in treatment of severe newly diagnosed primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). METHODS: From June 2009 to December 2012, 24 male patients and 38 female patients with the diagnosis of severe primary ITP in our hospital were randomized into trial group (31 cases) or control group (31 cases), the median age was 50 years (range: 21-84 years). Trial group was treated with rhTPO combined with glucocorticoid, and control group was treated with glucocorticoid only. RESULTS: At the day 3, 7 and 14 from the beginning of treatment, the average platelet count (APC) in trial group[(35.5±24.9)×109/L, (135.2±94.9)×109/L and (192.0±109.1)×109/L]were significantly higher than that in control group[(24.5±15.6)×109/L, (78.2±121.9)×109/L and (95.8±60.5)×109/L, P=0.022, 0.009 and 0.001, respectively]. There was no significant difference in APC between the two groups at day 28 and 90 after treatment[(147.8±59.1)×109/L vs (105.1±56.9)×109/L, P=0.243; (137.4±52.3)×109/L vs (104.3±59.8)×109/L, P=0.568, respectively]. At the day 7, 14 and 28, the complete response rates in trial group were 61.3%, 87.1% and 80.6%, which were also significantly higher than that in control group (16.1%, 29.0% and 48.3%, P=0.000, 0.000 and 0.004, respectively). The median time to response in trial group was 3 days while in the control group was 5 days; the median duration of complete response in trial group was 76 days while in the control group was 54 days. In trial group, there were 4 cases treated with platelet transfusion, while in control group there were 11 cases, respectively. CONCLUSION: For patients with severe primary ITP, rhTPO combined with glucocorticoid could rapidly increase the platelet count, significantly improve the complete response rate and prolonged the effect with a low incidence of tolerable adverse events compared to single use of glucocorticoid. rhTPO combined with glucocorticoid could be a new therapeutic choice to those patients.

Vinorelbine and capecitabine in anthracycline- and/or taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer: sequential or combinational?

PURPOSE: The difference between combinational and pre-planned sequential therapies using regimens that include non-anthracycline and taxane in the first-line setting remains unclear. The purpose of this study is to explore the interaction between vinorelbine (N) and capecitabine (X) in breast cancer cells and to compare the simultaneous or sequential administration of the two drugs in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) as first-line treatment. METHODS: First, we explored the effects of vinorelbine on thymidine phosphorylase (TP) and thymidylate synthase (TS) expression in breast cancer cells. Next, we designed a prospective randomized phase II trial of MBC patients comparing the combinational and pre-planned sequential administration of vinorelbine and capecitabine in the first-line metastatic setting. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). The correlation between clinical characteristics and class III ß-tubulin expression and patient survival was also explored. RESULTS: Vinorelbine upregulates TP and downregulates TS in breast cancer cells, thereby further sensitizing tumor cells to capecitabine, which indicated the proper order for sequential therapy should be N → X. Sixty patients were eligible for the phase II trial. No significant difference was observed between the combinational arm and the sequential arm in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and overall survival (OS). Only in the subgroup of patients with liver metastases were median PFS and OS significantly prolonged in the combinational arm (8.5 vs. 6.4 months, P = 0.041 and 23.8 vs. 13.9 months, P = 0.028, respectively). No association between class III ß-tubulin expression and patient outcome was identified. Grade 3/4 adverse events were more common in the combinational arm. CONCLUSIONS: Both the NX regimen and pre-planned sequential N → X regimen are acceptable as first-line treatments with comparable efficacies for MBC patients previously treated with anthracyclines and/or taxanes. Sequential monotherapies are recommended as the preferred approach to first-line chemotherapy for most MBC patients in the absence of an imminent visceral crisis and the need for rapid symptom and/or disease control.

[Clinical analysis of primary gastric diffuse large B-cell lymphoma].

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the clinical features and prognostic factors of primary gastric diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (PG-DLBCL) and to evaluate the staging system and treatment modality of PG-DLBCL. METHODS: The clinicopathological data of 69 patients with PG-DLBCL were retrospectively analyzed. Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were the primary endpoints. RESULTS: The EFS rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 83.8%, 71.1%, and 69.0%, respectively, with a mean EFS of 91.3 months. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 91.3%, 80.3%, and 72.4%, respectively, with a mean OS of 98.8 months. Univariate analysis revealed that either EFS or OS was significantly prolonged by the following factors (P < 0.05): modified Ann Arbor stage I(E) or II(E1) disease; normal lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level; normal hemoglobin level; normal albumin level; International Prognostic Index (IPI) of 0 or 1; tumor size < 5 cm; and less depth of invasion. While gender, age, B symptoms at presentation, performance status and treatment modality were not significantly associated with the prognosis (P > 0.05). Cox regression model revealed that only modified Ann Arbor stage and albumin level were independent prognostic factors for EFS and OS. CONCLUSION: The most accurate staging system and the exact role of different therapeutic options for PG-DLBCL are still debated. Further randomized prospective studies with a large number of patients are still needed to establish an optimal management for this disease.

ERCC2 Lys751Gln polymorphism is associated with lung cancer among Caucasians.

To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship between the excision repair cross-complementing rodent repair deficiency, group 2 (ERCC2) Lys751Gln polymorphism and lung cancer risk, a meta-analysis was performed. A total of 23 studies including 8137 cases and 9824 controls were involved in this meta-analysis. Overall, significantly elevated lung cancer risk was associated with ERCC2 Gln allele when all studies were pooled into the meta-analysis (Lys/Gln versus Lys/Lys: odds ratio (OR)=1.10, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.03-1.19; Gln/Gln versus Lys/Lys: OR=1.20, 95% CI=1.06-1.35; dominant model: OR=1.13, 95% CI=1.05-1.20; and recessive model: OR=1.15, 95% CI=1.03-1.29). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, significantly increased risk was only found for Caucasians (Gln/Gln versus Lys/Lys: OR=1.25, 95% CI=1.08-1.45; dominant model: OR=1.10, 95% CI=1.00-1.22; and recessive model: OR=1.22, 95% CI=1.06-1.40). When stratified by study design, statistically significantly elevated risks were found in hospital-based studies (Lys/Gln versus Lys/Lys: OR=1.12, 95% CI=1.03-1.22; Gln/Gln versus Lys/Lys: OR=1.24, 95% CI=1.06-1.44; dominant model: OR=1.15, 95% CI=1.06-1.24; and recessive model: OR=1.19, 95% CI=1.03-1.37) and population-based studies (Gln/Gln versus Lys/Lys: OR=1.57, 95% CI=1.12-2.20 and recessive model: OR=1.50, 95% CI=1.08-2.07). In the subgroup analysis whether or not the studies were matched on smoking, significantly increased risk was found not in those matched studies but in the unmatched studies (Lys/Gln versus Lys/Lys: OR=1.11, 95% CI=1.03-1.19; Gln/Gln versus Lys/Lys: OR=1.22, 95% CI=1.07-1.40; dominant model: OR=1.13, 95% CI=1.05-1.22; and recessive model: OR=1.18, 95% CI=1.04-1.33). In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that the ERCC2 Lys751Gln polymorphism may contribute to lung cancer susceptibility among Caucasians.