Reciprocal associations between beliefs about medicines, health locus of control and adherence to immunosuppressive medication in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant patients: Findings from the ADE-TRAM study.

PURPOSE: Patients undergoing allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) are required to strictly adhere to immunosuppressive medications to avoid rejection and infective complications. Since medication adherence is among the most important modifiable behaviors to achieve better outcomes, the aims of this study were to measure the baseline and longitudinal trends of medication adherence and investigate the psychological factors associated with medication adherence in allo-HSCT patients. METHODS: This was a single-center, longitudinal study of patients who underwent allo-HSCT to treat hematological malignancies at the University hospital of Florence (Italy). Adherence was measured with the Immunosuppressive Medication Self-Management Scale; psychological factors (i.e., beliefs about medicines and health locus of control) were measured with the Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire and Multidimensional Health locus of Control Scale. Data were collected 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after discharge. A mixed effects model was performed after adjusting for demographic characteristics. RESULTS: 50 adult patients were included in this study. Adherence to immunosuppressant was optimal and increased significantly 3 months after bone marrow transplantation (B = 0.23, p = 0.041). Patients with lower concerns about immunosuppressive medications were more likely to be adherent (B = 0.02, p = 0.040), while those having beliefs that their disease was due to external factors were less likely to be adherent (B = -0.02, p = 0.026) than their counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: These results underline the importance of psychological factors in affecting adherence to immunosuppressants of allo-HSCT patients. Healthcare providers and researchers should target medication beliefs and reorient locus of control with appropriate interventions, in order to improve adherence.

Concordance between the Hysteroscopic Diagnosis of Endometrial Hyperplasia and Histopathological Examination.

The goal of this paper is to assess the concordance between the clinical diagnosis of Endometrial Hyperplasia (EH), suspected by senior gynecologists throughout outpatient office hysteroscopy, and the results from histopathological examination, in order to evaluate hysteroscopic accuracy for EH. A prospective cohort study was done at a Tertiary University Hospital. From January to December 2018, we enrolled women with the following criteria: abnormal uterine bleeding in post-menopause and endometrial thickening in pre-or post-menopause. Patients underwent office hysteroscopy with a 5 mm continuous-flow hysteroscope, and endometrial biopsies were taken using miniaturized instruments. Senior operators had to foresee histopathological diagnosis using a questionnaire. Histopathological examination was conducted to confirm the diagnosis. This study was approved by the local ethical and registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov registry (ID no. NCT03917147). In 424 cases, 283 clinical diagnoses of EH were determined by senior surgeons. A histopathological diagnosis was then confirmed in 165 cases (58.3%; p = 0.0001). Furthermore, 14 endometrial carcinoma and atypical hyperplasia were found. The sensitivity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values for EH were, respectively, 90.4, 58.4, and 86.6%. Subdivided by clinical indication, the sensitivity was higher in patients with post-menopause endometrial thickening. The diagnostic accuracy of office hysteroscopy in the diagnosis and prediction of endometrial hyperplasia was high. Senior operators could foresee EHs in more than half the cases.