Neurometabolic and Brain Functional Alterations Associated with Cognitive Impairment in Patients with Myasthenia Gravis: A Combined 1H-MRS and fMRI Study.

Whether patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) exhibit cognitive impairment is controversial. Also the underlying mechanisms are unknown. We aimed to investigate alterations in cognitive function, neurometabolite levels, and brain function in patients with MG and to explore the associations between abnormal regional brain functional activity, neurometabolite concentrations in the MPFC and left thalamus, and cognitive activity in patients with MG. Neuropsychological tests, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging were performed on 41 patients with MG and 45 race-, sex-, age-, and education-matched healthy controls (HCs). The results suggest that MG is accompanied by cognitive decline, as indicated by global cognitive function, visual-spatial function, language, memory, abnormalities in regional brain functional activity, and neurometabolite alterations (including GABA, NAA, and Cho) in the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) and left thalamus. Cognitive impairment in patients with MG may be related to abnormal regional brain functional activity and changes in neurometabolites, and regional brain functional activity may be modulated by specific neurometabolites.

Association between myasthenia gravis and cognitive disorders: a PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis assessed the association between myasthenia gravis (MG) and cognitive disorders. METHODS: The PubMed, Web of Science, OVID, EMBASE, CNKI and Wanfang electronic databases were comprehensively searched from inception to October 2020 for relevant studies. The primary outcomes were scores of the cognitive function battery. A random effects model was used to evaluate the cognitive function of patients with MG. RESULTS: Eight cross-sectional studies containing 381 patients and 220 healthy controls were included in this meta-analysis. In relation to global cognitive function, patients with MG performed significantly worse than healthy individuals (SMD = -0.4, 95% CI = -0.63 to -0.16, p < 0.001, I2 = 10%). Specifically, the impaired cognitive domains included language, visuospatial function, information processing, verbal immediate and delayed recall memory, visual immediate recall memory, and response fluency, while attention, executive function, and visual delayed recall memory were unimpaired. The patients with early-onset (SMD= -0.527, 95% CI = -0.855 to -0.199, p = 0.002) and generalized MG (SMD= -0.577, 95% CI = -1.047 to -0.107, p = 0.016) had poorer global cognitive performance than the healthy population. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MG may have cognitive disorders, including those associated with the domains of language, visuospatial function, information processing, verbal immediate and delayed recall memory, visual immediate recall memory and response fluency. Furthermore, the age of onset and disease severity may be associated with cognitive disorders in patients with MG.

Different dosage regimens of erenumab for the treatment of migraine: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Migraine is a worldwide epidemic neurological disorder that has a significant influence on the quality of life. Migraine attacks are considered to be related to a calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) signaling molecule, and anti-CGRP medications are used to abort and prevent migraine attacks. Erenumab, a monoclonal antibody that targets the CGRP receptor, is the first migraine preventive medication approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. In the present study, we evaluate the efficacy and safety of erenumab. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to systematically assess the efficacy and safety of erenumab as a migraine preventive treatment compared to a placebo. METHODS: Randomized, placebo-controlled, single or double-blind trials were searched through MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov up to May 2022. The efficacy outcomes we collected include changes from baseline on monthly migraine days, monthly acute migraine-specific medication days, ≥50% responder rate, ≥75% responder rate, and 100% responder rate at week 12. Safety outcomes include treatment emergent adverse events, serious adverse events, and any adverse event that leads to discontinuation of treatment. The study was registered with PROSPERO (Registry number: CRD42022338861). RESULT: In all eight included trials, we found that erenumab (28, 70, and 140 mg) is very effective and has a significantly greater reduction in baseline monthly migraine days (28 mg: mean difference [MD] = -1.1, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.0 to -0.2, p = 0.020; 70 mg: MD = -1.4, 95% CI: -1.8 to -1.1, p < 0.001, I2  = 26%; 140 mg: MD = -1.8, 95% CI: -2.1 to -1.4, p < 0.001, I2  = 0%) than placebo at week 12, especially with 140 mg. Otherwise, we found that there were no statistical differences in the occurrence of adverse events (7 mg: risk ratio [RR] = 0.9, 95% CI: 0.7 to 1.2, p = 0.570; 21 mg: RR = 1.0, 95% CI: 0.8 to 1.2, p = 0.730; 28 mg: RR = 0.9, 95% CI: 0.7 to 1.1, p = 0.340; 70 mg: RR = 1.0, 95% CI: 0.9 to 1.0, p = 0.230, I2  = 0%; 140 mg: RR = 1.0, 95% CI: 0.9 to 1.1, p = 0.880, I2  = 40%) between the erenumab and placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, we found that erenumab, especially at the dose of 140 mg, is an effective and well-tolerated preventive treatment for migraine.