RESUMO
6-Nitrodopamine (6-ND) is released from human vas deferens and plays a modulatory role in the male ejaculation. Therapeutical use of α1-adrenoceptor antagonists is associated with ejaculatory abnormalities. To evaluate the effect of α1-adrenoceptor antagonists on the contractions induced by 6-ND, dopamine, noradrenaline, and adrenaline in the human epididymal vas deferens (HEVD). HEVD strips were suspended in glass chambers containing heated and oxygenated Krebs-Henseleit's solution. Cumulative concentration-response curves to catecholamines (10 nM-300 µM) were constructed in HEVD strips pre-incubated (30 min) with doxazosin (0.1-1 nM), tamsulosin (1-10 nM), prazosin (10-100 nM) and/or silodosin (0.1-10 nM). The effects of these α1-adrenoceptor antagonists were also evaluated in the electric-field stimulation (EFS, 2-32 Hz)-induced contractions. Doxazosin (0.1 nM) caused significant reductions in 6-ND-induced HEVD contractions without affecting the contractions induced by dopamine, noradrenaline, and adrenaline. Similar results were observed with tamsulosin (1 nM) and prazosin (10 nM). At these concentrations, these α1-adrenoceptor antagonists largely reduced the EFS-induced contractions. Silodosin (1 nM) caused concentration-dependent rightward shifts of the concentration-response curves to 6-ND but had no effect on the contractions induced by dopamine and adrenaline. Silodosin (0.1 nM) only inhibited the contractions induced by noradrenaline. Silodosin at 1 nM, but not at 0.1 nM, caused significant reductions in the EFS-induced contractions. The results reinforce the concept that 6-ND plays a major role in the human vas deferens contractility and indicate that the ejaculation disorders caused by doxazosin, tamsulosin, prazosin and silodosin cause in man, may be due to inhibition of the contractions induced by 6-ND rather than by the classical catecholamines dopamine, noradrenaline, and adrenaline.
RESUMO
Resumo Resultados nulos, negativos ou inesperados são ocorrências possíveis para pesquisadores em todo o mundo. Não publicar tais resultados representa desperdício de recursos (de tempo, dinheiro e esforços). O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar, mediante aplicação de questionário, o que estudantes de medicina e médicos pensam sobre a publicação de resultados inesperados ou negativos em pesquisa e discutir os aspectos éticos da questão. As questões foram respondidas por 40 alunos e 30 médicos de uma faculdade privada de medicina. Conclui-se que ainda é pouco discutida e aceita a publicação de resultados negativos ou inesperados, persistindo a crença que publicar tais resultados pode prejudicar a reputação dos pesquisadores. Quase todos os participantes acreditam ser importante a publicação desse tipo de resultados, mas apenas cerca de 60% os publicariam. Torna-se, então, importante e necessário ampliar a discussão sobre o assunto nas escolas médicas para se criar nova mentalidade acadêmica.
Abstract Null, negative or unexpected results are possible occurrences for researchers around the world. Not publishing such results is a waste of resources (time, money, and effort). The objective of this study was to evaluate, through a questionnaire, what medical students and physicians thought about the publication of unexpected or negative results in research and to discuss the ethical aspects of the matter. The questions were answered by 40 students and 30 physicians from a private medical school. It is concluded that the publication of negative or unexpected results is still insufficiently discussed and accepted, perpetuating the belief that publishing such results may harm the researchers' reputation. Almost all participants believe it is important to publish these kind of results, but only about 60% of them would publish such results. It is therefore important and necessary to broaden the discussion on this subject in medical schools to create a new academic mindset.
Resumen Los resultados nulos, negativos o inesperados son acontecimientos posibles para los investigadores en todo el mundo. No publicar tales resultados representa un desperdicio de recursos (de tiempo, dinero y esfuerzos). El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar, a través de la aplicación de un cuestionario, qué piensan los estudiantes de medicina y los médicos sobre la publicación de resultados inesperados o negativos en la investigación y discutir los aspectos éticos de la cuestión. 40 alumnos y 30 médicos de una facultad privada de medicina respondieron al cuestionario. Se concluye que aún es poco discutida y aceptada la publicación de resultados negativos o inesperados, persistiendo la creencia de que publicar tales resultados puede perjudicar la reputación de los investigadores. Casi todos los participantes creen que es importante la publicación de este tipo de resultados, pero solo el 60% de ellos los publicaría. Se hace importante y necesario, entonces, ampliar la discusión sobre este tema en las facultades médicas para crear una nueva mentalidad académica.
