Nutrient Intakes and Gastrointestinal Symptoms Among Esophagogastric Cancer Survivors up to 5 Years Post-Surgery.

A cross-sectional analysis explored nutritional intakes and gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms among esophagogastric cancer survivors up to 12, 13-36, and 37+ months post-surgery. Participants were identified from the Upper GI Cancer Registry at St James' Hospital, Ireland. The Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire, European Prospective Investigation of Cancer Food Frequency Questionnaire, World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR) Score, and Gastrointestinal Symptoms Rating Scale assessed malnutrition risk, nutritional intake, adherence to (secondary) cancer prevention recommendations, and GI symptoms, respectively. Most (82.5%, n33) participants (n40) were male. Mean age was 65.5 ± 9.3 years. Time post-surgery ranged from 6-62 months. Half (50.0%, n20) had a BMI in the healthy range. A quarter (27.5%, n11) were at risk of malnutrition. Intakes of meat and meat products exceeded recommendations and intakes of fruits, vegetables, and fiber were below recommendations, with no significant between-group differences. The mean WCRF/AICR score was 3.6 ± 1.1, indicating adherence to 3.6 of 7 cancer prevention recommendations. It was not significantly different between subgroups. Minor to mild GI discomfort was reported, with no significant between-group differences in symptoms. As rates of long-term survivorship continue to increase, survivors must be supported to sustain behaviors that enhance quality of life and reduce secondary cancer risk.

Interprofessional education focused on medication safety: a systematic review.

Safe medication use necessitates interprofessional working, with calls to enhance interprofessional education (IPE) focusing on medication safety (MS) in healthcare professional (HCP) curricula. Little is known about the design, delivery or evaluation of such activities. This systematic literature review describes MS-focused IPE activities in pre-qualification HCP programmes. MedLine, EMBASE, CINAHL and ERIC were searched, relevant studies identified and data extracted. The McGill Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was employed. The 3P (presage-process-product) theory structured deductive analysis. Thirty-one studies were included, reporting on 30 activities, mostly undertaken in North America or United Kingdom. Presage/Design: Most reported activities involved pharmacy, nursing, medical or physician assistant students learning with one or more other HCP group. Few studies matched student groups' skills or experiences. Few studies reported theoretical underpinnings. Process/Delivery: Multiple pedagogical approaches were employed, mostly social construction, and low- and high-fidelity simulation-based learning. Few studies reported learning outcomes or summative assessment, more reported formative assessment. Product/evaluation: Outcomes measured were learners' opinions, satisfaction or attitudes toward interprofessional working and findings were generally positive. Few studies reported on student development or outcomes specific to medication safety. Lack of integration of qualitative/quantitative components of mixed methods studies and limited outcome measurements' validity or reliability weakened study quality. MS-focused IPE for pre-qualification HCPs is well received by students. Design of future activities could be enhanced by employing theory and ensuring matching of students' and groups' skills, professional identity and learner attributes to enhance learning in an interprofessional setting. Future delivery should embed MS-focused IPE into the standard curricula to optimize constructive alignment, learner engagement, quality and drive development. The required skillset in pre-qualification HCP programmes to facilitate future safe medication practice, together with the associated learning outcomes and assessment approaches, should be defined. The quality of scholarly studies examining these activities needs improvement.

Measuring the impact of oesophagectomy on physical functioning and physical activity participation: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Oesophagectomy remains the only curative intervention for oesophageal cancer, with defined nutritional and health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) consequences. It follows therefore that there is a significant risk of decline in physical wellbeing with oesophagectomy however this has been inadequately quantified. This study prospectively examines change in physical functioning and habitual physical activity participation, from pre-surgery through 6-months post-oesophagectomy. METHODS: Patients scheduled for oesophagectomy with curative intent were recruited. Key domains of physical functioning including exercise tolerance (six-minute walk test (6MWT)) and muscle strength (hand-grip strength), and habitual physical activity participation, including sedentary behaviour (accelerometry) were measured pre-surgery (T0) and repeated at 1-month (T1) and 6-months (T2) post-surgery. HR-QOL was measured using the EORTC-QOL C30. RESULTS: Thirty-six participants were studied (mean age 62.4 (8.8) years, n = 26 male, n = 26 transthoracic oesophagectomy). Mean 6MWT distance decreased significantly from T0 to T1 (p = 0.006) and returned to T0 levels between T1 and T2 (p < 0.001). Percentage time spent sedentary increased throughout recovery (p < 0.001) and remained significantly higher at T2 in comparison to T0 (p = 0.003). In contrast, percentage time spent engaged in either light or moderate-to-vigorous intensity activity, all reduced significantly (p < 0.001 for both) and remained significantly lower at T2 in comparison to T0 (p = 0.009 and p = 0.01 respectively). Patients reported deficits in multiple domains of HR-QOL during recovery including global health status (p = 0.04), physical functioning (p < 0.001) and role functioning (p < 0.001). Role functioning remained a clinically important 33-points lower than pre-operative values at T2. CONCLUSION: Habitual physical activity participation remains significantly impaired at 6-months post-oesophagectomy. Physical activity is a measurable and modifiable target for physical rehabilitation, which is closely aligned with patient-reported deficits in role functioning. Rehabilitation aimed at optimising physical health in oesophageal cancer survivorship is warranted.

Effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiation on preoperative pulmonary physiology, postoperative respiratory complications and quality of life in patients with oesophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: It remains controversial whether neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) for oesophageal cancer influences operative morbidity, in particular pulmonary, and quality of life. This study combined clinical outcome data with systematic evaluation of pulmonary physiology to determine the impact of nCRT on pulmonary physiology and clinical outcomes in locally advanced oesophageal cancer. METHODS: Consecutive patients treated between 2010 and 2016 were included. Three-dimensional conformal radiation was standard, with a lung dose-volume histogram of V20 less than 25 per cent, and total radiation between 40 and 41·4 Gy. Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC) and diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) were assessed at baseline and 1 month after nCRT. Radiation-induced lung injury (grade 2 or greater), comprehensive complications index (CCI) and pulmonary complications were monitored prospectively. Health-related quality of life was assessed among disease-free patients in survivorship. RESULTS: Some 228 patients were studied. Comparing pulmonary physiology values before with those after nCRT, FEV1 decreased from mean(s.d.) 96·8(17·7) to 91·5(20·4) per cent (-3·6(10·6) per cent; P < 0·001), FVC from 104·9(15·6) to 98·1(19·8) per cent (-3·2(11·9) per cent; P = 0·005) and DLCO from 97·6(20·7) to 82·2(20·4) per cent (-14·8(14·0) per cent; P < 0·001). Five patients (2·2 per cent) developed radiation-induced lung injury precluding surgical resection. Smoking (P = 0·005) and increased age (P < 0·001) independently predicted percentage change in DLCO. Carboplatin and paclitaxel with 41·4 Gy resulted in a greater DLCO decline than cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil with 40 Gy (P = 0·001). On multivariable analysis, post-treatment DLCO predicted CCI (P = 0·006), respiratory failure (P = 0·020) and reduced physical function in survivorship (P = 0·047). CONCLUSION: These data indicate that modern nCRT alters pulmonary physiology, in particular diffusion capacity, which is linked to short- and longer-term clinical consequences, highlighting a potentially modifiable index of risk.

ANTECEDENTES: El tema de si en el cáncer de esófago la quimiorradioterapia neoadyuvante (neoadjuvant chemoradiation, nCRT) repercute sobre la morbilidad postoperatoria, especialmente sobre la morbilidad pulmonar y la calidad de vida de los pacientes que sobreviven sigue siendo controvertido. Este estudio combina datos sobre resultados clínicos con una evaluación sistemática de la fisiología pulmonar para determinar el impacto de la nCRT sobre la fisiología pulmonar y los resultados clínicos en el cáncer de esófago localmente avanzado. MÉTODOS: Se incluyeron pacientes consecutivos tratados entre 2010-2016. La radioterapia conformal 3D fue la estándar, con un histograma dosis-volumen del pulmón V20 < 25% y radiación entre 40-41,4 Gy. Se evaluaron el volumen espiratorio forzado (forced expiratory volume, FEV1), la capacidad vital forzada (forced vital capacity, FVC) y la capacidad de difusión del monóxido de carbono (diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide, DLCO) al inicio y un mes tras la nCRT. La lesión pulmonar inducida por la radioterapia (EORTC grado ≥ 2), el índice de complicaciones integral (comprehensive complications index, CCI), grado de Clavien-Dindo, y complicaciones pulmonares fueron analizadas de manera prospectiva. Se evaluó la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud entre los pacientes supervivientes libres de enfermedad (EORTC QLQ-C30, OG25, OES18). RESULTADOS: Se estudiaron un total de 228 pacientes. Al comparar los valores de la fisiología pulmonar antes y después de la nCRT respectivamente, la FEV1 disminuyó de 96,8 ± 17,7% a 91,5 ± 20,4% (-3,6 ± 10,6%, P = 0,0002), la FVC de 104,9 ± 15,6 a 98,1 ± 19,8% (-3,2 ± 11,9%, P = 0,005) y la DLCO de 97,6 ± 20,7 a 82,2 ± 20,4% (-14,8 ± 14,0%, P < 0,0001). Cinco pacientes (2,2%) desarrollaron lesión pulmonar relacionada con la radioterapia impidiendo la resección quirúrgica. Los factores predictores independientes de %ΔDLCO fueron el hábito tabáquico (P = 0,005) y la edad avanzada (P < 0,001). El tratamiento con carboplatino/paclitaxel/41,4Gy determinó un mayor descenso de la DLCO en comparación con cisplatino/5-fluorouracilo/40Gy (P = 0,001). En el análisis multivariable, la DLCO tras el tratamiento fue una variable predictora de CCI (P = 0,006), fracaso respiratorio/intubación prolongada (P = 0,020) y reducción de la función física en los supervivientes (P = 0,047). CONCLUSIÓN: Estos datos indican que la moderna nCRT altera la fisiología pulmonar, especialmente la difusión pulmonar, con consecuencias clínicas a corto y largo plazo. La DLCO podría constituir un factor de riesgo potencialmente modificable.

Changes in gut hormones, glycaemic response and symptoms after oesophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: Oesophagectomy is associated with reduced appetite, weight loss and postprandial hypoglycaemia, the pathophysiological basis of which remains largely unexplored. This study aimed to investigate changes in enteroendocrine function after oesophagectomy. METHODS: In this prospective study, 12 consecutive patients undergoing oesophagectomy were studied before and 10 days, 6, 12 and 52 weeks after surgery. Serial plasma total fasting ghrelin, and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), insulin and glucose release following a standard 400-kcal mixed-meal stimulus were determined. CT body composition and anthropometry were assessed, and symptom scores calculated using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaires. RESULTS: At 1 year, two of the 12 patients exhibited postprandial hypoglycaemia, with reductions in bodyweight (mean(s.e.m.) 17·1(3·2) per cent, P < 0·001), fat mass (21.5(2.5) kg versus 25.5(2.4) kg before surgery; P = 0·014), lean body mass (51.5(2.2) versus 54.0(1.8) kg respectively; P = 0·003) and insulin resistance (HOMA-IR: 0.84(0.17) versus 1.16(0.20); P = 0·022). Mean(s.e.m.) fasting ghrelin levels decreased from postoperative day 10, but had recovered by 1 year (preoperative: 621·5(71·7) pg/ml; 10 days: 415·1(59·80) pg/ml; 6 weeks: 309·0(42·0) pg/ml; 12 weeks: 415·8(52·1) pg/ml; 52 weeks: 547·4(83·2) pg/ml; P < 0·001) and did not predict weight loss (P = 0·198). Postprandial insulin increased progressively at 10 days, 6, 12 and 52 weeks (mean(s.e.m.) insulin AUC0-30 min : fold change 1·7(0·4), 2·0(0·4), 3·5(0·7) and 4·0(0·8) respectively; P = 0·001). Postprandial GLP-1 concentration increased from day 10 after surgery (P < 0·001), with a 3·3(1·8)-fold increase at 1 year (P < 0·001). Peak GLP-1 level was inversely associated with the postprandial glucose nadir (P = 0·041) and symptomatic neuroglycopenia (Sigstad score, P = 0·017, R2 = 0·45). GLP-1 AUC predicted loss of weight (P = 0·008, R2 = 0·52) and fat mass (P = 0·010, R2 = 0·64) at 1 year. CONCLUSION: Altered enteroendocrine physiology is associated with early satiety, weight loss and postprandial hypoglycaemia after oesophagectomy.

Effect of preoperative inspiratory muscle training on physical functioning following esophagectomy.

This study aims to examine the effect of preoperative inspiratory muscle training (IMT) on pre- and postoperative functional exercise performance in patients undergoing esophagectomy. A subcohort of patients recruited to the PREPARE randomized control trial were studied. Following evaluation of respiratory muscle function (spirometry, maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), and inspiratory muscle endurance), postoperative mobilization (accelerometry) and postoperative physical functioning (6-minute walk test (6MWT)), participants scheduled for esophagectomy were randomly assigned to either 2 weeks of preoperative IMT or a control group. Measures were repeated on the day before surgery and postoperatively. Sixty participants (mean (standard deviation) age 64.13 (7.8) years; n = 42 male; n = 43 transthoracic esophagectomy; n = 17 transhiatial esophagectomy) were included in the final analysis (n = 28 IMT; n = 32 control). There was a significant improvement in preoperative MIP (P = 0.03) and inspiratory muscle endurance (P = 0.04); however preoperative 6MWT distance did not change. Postoperatively, control participants were more active on postoperative day (POD)1, and from POD1-POD5 (P = 0.04). Predischarge, 6MWT distance was significantly lower in the IMT group (305.61 (116.3) m) compared to controls (380.2 (47.1) m, P = 0.03). Despite an increase in preoperative respiratory muscle function, preoperative IMT does not improve pre- or postoperative physical functioning or postoperative mobilization following esophagectomy.

Quantifying postoperative mobilisation following oesophagectomy.

OBJECTIVE: Early mobilisation is in integral component of postoperative recovery following complex surgical procedures such as oesophageal cancer resections, however evidence to guide early mobilisation protocols in critical care settings is limited. Furthermore, little is known about actual mobilisation levels postoperatively. This study quantified postoperative mobilisation post- oesophagectomy and investigated barriers to mobility. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Postoperative critical care setting in a tertiary care referral centre for oesophagectomy. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty participants (mean age 65 (SD 7) years, n=19 males) scheduled for oesophagectomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome, postoperative physical activity, was measured objectively using the Actigraph GT3X+. Medical records were examined for a range of outcomes including medical status, pain scores and physiotherapy comments to identify factors which may have influenced mobility. RESULTS: During postoperative day (POD) 1-5, participants spent the majority of time (>96%) sedentary. Participation in light intensity activity was low but did increase daily from a median of 12 (IQR 19) minutes/day on POD1 to a median of 53 (IQR 73.25) minutes/day on POD5 p<0.001), with a corresponding increase in daily step count. Haemodynamic instability was the most common reason reported by physiotherapists for either not attempting mobility or limiting postoperative mobilisation levels. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that despite daily physiotherapy, there are multiple challenges to postoperative mobilisation. Haemodynamic instability, likely related to thoracic epidurals, was the key limitation to early mobilisation. Goal-directed mobilisation in collaboration with the multidisciplinary team may play a considerable role in overcoming modifiable barriers to postoperative mobilisation.

Exercise Rehabilitation Services Provided by Physiotherapy Departments in Cancer Care in Ireland

Aims This study aimed to identify the physiotherapy exercise rehabilitation services available to patients with cancer in Ireland and to identify barriers to the provision of services. Methods Physiotherapy department managers in specialised cancer centres, public and private hospitals and palliative care settings were surveyed to establish the availability of exercise rehabilitation services for patients with cancer. Results Of 40 managers contacted, 24 responded providing information about 26 services. Ten services employed a dedicated oncology physiotherapist. Exercise classes were offered to patients with cancer by five services, primarily within the palliative care setting. In the 17 hospitals which provided surgery, ten provided oncology specific post-operative exercise rehabilitation and one offered a prehabilitation programme. Limited human and physical resources and absence of established physiotherapy pathways were cited barriers to service provision. Conclusion Exercise rehabilitation is not an element of standard care for patients with cancer in Ireland.

Multicentre randomized clinical trial of inspiratory muscle training versus usual care before surgery for oesophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Up to 40 per cent of patients undergoing oesophagectomy develop pneumonia. The aim of this study was to assess whether preoperative inspiratory muscle training (IMT) reduces the rate of pneumonia after oesophagectomy. METHODS: Patients with oesophageal cancer were randomized to a home-based IMT programme before surgery or usual care. IMT included the use of a flow-resistive inspiratory loading device, and patients were instructed to train twice a day at high intensity (more than 60 per cent of maximum inspiratory muscle strength) for 2 weeks or longer until surgery. The primary outcome was postoperative pneumonia; secondary outcomes were inspiratory muscle function, lung function, postoperative complications, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of hospital stay and physical functioning. RESULTS: Postoperative pneumonia was diagnosed in 47 (39·2 per cent) of 120 patients in the IMT group and in 43 (35·5 per cent) of 121 patients in the control group (relative risk 1·10, 95 per cent c.i. 0·79 to 1·53; P = 0·561). There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative outcomes between the groups. Mean(s.d.) maximal inspiratory muscle strength increased from 76·2(26·4) to 89·0(29·4) cmH2 O (P < 0·001) in the intervention group and from 74·0(30·2) to 80·0(30·1) cmH2 O in the control group (P < 0·001). Preoperative inspiratory muscle endurance increased from 4 min 14 s to 7 min 17 s in the intervention group (P < 0·001) and from 4 min 20 s to 5 min 5 s in the control group (P = 0·007). The increases were highest in the intervention group (P < 0·050). CONCLUSION: Despite an increase in preoperative inspiratory muscle function, home-based preoperative IMT did not lead to a decreased rate of pneumonia after oesophagectomy. Registration number: NCT01893008 (https://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Patient experiences of a physiotherapy-led multidisciplinary rehabilitative intervention after successful treatment for oesophago-gastric cancer.

PURPOSE: To qualitatively explore the perceived impact of a 12-week rehabilitative intervention for oesophago-gastric cancer survivors on their physical, mental and social wellbeing. METHODS: Of the 21 participants who completed the intervention, 19 took part in a semi-structured focus group interview. Four audio-taped focus groups were held, ranging in size from two to eight participants. Focus groups were transcribed and analysed using a descriptive qualitative approach. RESULTS: At recruitment, participants were 23.5 ± 15.2 months post-surgery and all had suboptimal fitness levels. Participants reported improvements in their physical capacity and ability to carry out activities of daily living during the intervention. These improvements led to increased confidence and social connectivity. Other participants were a valuable source of information and reassurance, while support from family members was variable. Future interventions should educate participants on how to maintain gains achieved during the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Participating in an exercise-based multidisciplinary rehabilitative intervention reduces isolation and helps oesophago-gastric cancer survivors to safely negotiate their physical, emotional and social needs as they move further down the path of recovery.

Reduced fitness and physical functioning are long-term sequelae after curative treatment for esophageal cancer: a matched control study.

Reduced physical functioning is common following resections for esophageal cancer; however, objective data on physical performance outcomes in this cohort are rare. The aim of this study was to assess the physical performance and health related quality of life (HRQOL) of disease free survivors and compare findings in a case matched noncancer control group. Twenty-five males (mean (±SD) aged 63 (±6) years) who were over 6 months postesophagectomy and disease-free were compared with 25 controls (60 ± 6 years). Physical functioning was assessed through hand grip strength (dynamometry), exercise capacity (incremental shuttle walk test), physical activity levels (RT3 accelerometer), and body composition (bio-electrical impedance analysis). Health-related quality of life was measured using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Esophageal cancer survivors demonstrated significantly lower fitness (P < 0.001) and time spent in moderate (P < 0.001) and vigorous (P < 0.001) intensity physical activity compared with controls. Global health status and quality of life were similar in both groups (P = 0.245); however, physical and role functioning domains were lower in the cancer survivors (P < 0.001, and P = 0.001, respectively). These data show that disease-free survivors of curative esophageal cancer treatment demonstrate a significant compromise in physical functioning compared with controls, thus highlighting the multiple, complex rehabilitative needs of this cohort.

The physiotherapist and the esophageal cancer patient: from prehabilitation to rehabilitation.

Esophageal cancer is a serious malignancy often treated with multimodal interventions and complex surgical resection. As treatment moves to centers of excellence with emphasis on enhanced recovery approaches, the role of the physiotherapist has expanded. The aim of this review is to discuss the rationale behind both the evolving prehabilitative role of the physiotherapist and more established postoperative interventions for patients with esophageal cancer. While a weak association between preoperative cardiopulmonary fitness and post-esophagectomy outcome is reported, cardiotoxicity during neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy may heighten postoperative risk. Preliminary studies suggest that prehabilitative inspiratory muscle training may improve postoperative outcome. Weight and muscle loss are a recognized sequelae of esophageal cancer and the functional consequences of this should be assessed. Postoperative physiotherapy priorities include effective airway clearance and early mobilization. The benefits of respiratory physiotherapy post-esophagectomy are described by a small number of studies, however, practice increasingly recognizes the importance of early mobilization as a key component of postoperative recovery. The benefits of exercise training in patients with contraindications to mobilization remain to be explored. While there is a strong basis for tailored physiotherapy interventions in the management of patients with esophageal cancer, this review highlights the need for studies to inform prehabilitative and postoperative interventions.

Cognitive effects of pituitary tumours and their treatments: two case studies and an investigation of 90 patients.

OBJECTIVES: Two case studies are reported of patients with pituitary adenomas who had been treated with trans-sphenoidal surgery, one with and one without adjunctive radiotherapy, in whom memory impairment was found. Further to this, neuropsychological investigations of 90 patients were carried out (1) to establish the prevalence of such deficits, and (2) to try to determine their cause. METHODS: Two case studies are described. For the expanded study, patients were recruited from the data base of the endocrinology department of St Thomas's Hospital, London, if they had previously been treated for a pituitary adenoma in the past 30 years. Ninety patients were contacted and assessed with a wide range of neuropsychological tests. They were divided into five treatment groups: those who had received transfrontal surgery with radiotherapy, trans-sphenoidal surgery with or without radiotherapy, radiotherapy only, and a bromocriptine therapy group, as well as a group of 19 healthy control subjects matched for age and sex. RESULTS: In the two patients presented, both showed severe memory impairments compared with their intact intellectual ability. The more severely affected patient had received adjunctive radiotherapy, and superimposition of the 90% isodose fields on a postoperative MRI examination suggested involvement of the diencephalic structures. In the group study, significant deficits in anterograde memory were also obtained on two measures (WMS-R, RMT) for all patient groups when compared with the healthy controls, although these impairments varied in degree and were less in the bromocriptine group. However, the individual surgical and radiotherapy treatment groups did not differ significantly from one another. By contrast, general intellectual function (IQ) remained intact for all groups, as did performance on supplementary cognitive tests, including measures of frontal lobe or "executive" function, language comprehension, and speed of mental processing. Psychiatric morbidity and tumour aetiology did not seem to relate to the presence of memory deficits. CONCLUSIONS: Anterograde memory deficits were seen in the two case studies and in all our treatment groups when compared with the healthy controls, and these occurred in the context of preserved intellectual function. The present findings suggest that these memory deficits result from treatment rather than from the underlying tumour, but there was no difference between the effects of surgery and radiotherapy. It is suggested that they result from damage to diencephalic structures implicated in memory.

The case of the amnesic intelligence officer.

This paper describes a patient whose amnesia for an offence (fraud) and two fugue episodes occurred against the background of an underlying organic amnesia. The fugue states conformed in their duration and precipitating factors to previous accounts in the literature. The organic, anterograde memory impairment was attributed to multiple small infarcts and a larger infarction in the left medial temporal lobe, which were evident on MRI and PET scans after the patient had developed transient neurological signs. At follow-up, the anterograde amnesia had persisted, and the patient also showed some difficulty in retrieving autobiographical memories of past incidents or events, although other aspects of his retrograde memory were intact (including his knowledge of facts about his past life and his general knowledge of public events). The difficulty in retrieving autobiological incidents may have resulted from the presence of a moderate degree of frontal lobe dysfunction or, just possibly, from ischaemia in the left anterior temporal lobe. The persistence of the organic memory impairment and the importance of both the clinical history and neuropsychological testing in assessment are discussed, as well as the need to examine for possible organic factors in patients who may initially appear to manifest purely 'psychogenic' memory loss.