Surgical Correction of Distal Junctional Kyphosis.

Distal junctional kyphosis (DJK) is defined as the development of a kyphotic angulation over 10 degrees below a fusion construct and has been described as a complication of the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, Scheuermann kyphosis, adult spinal deformity, and cervical deformity. There are some inherent risk factors to DJK: multilevel fusions, damage to the midline soft tissues including interspinous/supraspinous ligaments, T5-T12 thoracic kyphosis, T11-L2 thoracolumbar kyphosis, and increased mismatch between cervical lordosis and T1 slope. A 53-year-old male presented with cervicalgia, inability to sustain horizontal gaze, and kyphosis-enabled forward head posture. He underwent C3-T1 posterior decompression and fusion as treatment for cervical myelopathy 18 months prior. Neurologic examination was normal, with appreciable protrusion of the T1 vertebral spinous process. Surgery was initiated through subperiosteal exposure of C2-T6, followed by removal of previously set instrumentation, placement of new screws, and posterior column osteotomies of selected segments. Final steps involved compression across excised portions, locking pedicle screws, and a multirod insertion after closure of the posterior column osteotomies by compression maneuvers. Correction for DJK encompasses sagittal alignment restoration, a stable construct, and a good biological environment for healing. Failure of DJK realignment can occur if the patient's ligaments deteriorate distal to the construct or fractures develop in vertebral bodies at the lowest instrumented vertebra or lowest instrumented vertebra +1. One year after surgery, the patient's condition improved, evidenced from both patient self-report and a standing posture radiograph.

Is Indirect Decompression and Fusion More Effective than Direct Decompression and Fusion for Treating Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Instability? A Systematic Review and meta-Analysis.

Study design: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Objective: Surgical alternatives to treat lumbar spinal stenosis and instability include indirect (ALIF, OLIF, and LLIF) and direct (TLIF or posterior lumbar interbody fusion) decompression and fusion interventions. Although both approaches have proven to be effective in reducing symptoms, it is unknown if there is any difference in effectiveness between them. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate postoperative pain and disability in patients treated whit indirect vs direct decompression and fusion approaches.Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the literature consulting several databases and identified studies that enrolled patients diagnosed with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis and instability treated with indirect or direct decompression and fusion techniques. Our primary endpoints were the visual analogue scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and the Japanese Orthopedics Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire 1 year after the procedure. Secondary outcomes included complication rate, blood loss, and surgical time.Results: Nine retrospective and comparative studies were included enrolling a total of 1004 participants. Both surgical strategies had satisfactory clinical outcomes with no significant difference at 1 year. Although the complication rate was similar for both groups, the profile of the adverse events was different. In addition, patients treated with indirect decompression and fusion had significantly less blood loss and operative times.Conclusions: Indirect and direct decompression and fusion techniques are similarly effective in treating patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and instability. The ID group had significantly lower intraoperative blood loss and surgical time values.

Clipado parcial de vaso receptor asociado a sutura microvascular: modelo experimental en ratas / Partial clipping of receptor Wessel associated to microvascular suture: experimental model in rats

Objetive: to determine the possibility of partial clamping and maintaining small arteries flow within a modified clip. To perform an end to side anastomosis in an artery partially clamped and demonstrate its permeability. Method: partial carotid clamping in rats and intraluminal flow measurement. End to side anastomosis suture of the vessels clamped. Histopathologic study of the brains. Results: the persistence of flow during partial clamping of the vessel. Anastomosis remained permeable after the procedures. Eas confirmed no signs of ischemia in brains fixed were reported. Conclusion: this modification in the clip allows an end to side anastomosis with partial clamping of the recipient vessel, keeping the flow within in, in small vessels.