Novel multiplex assay platforms to detect influenza A hemagglutinin subtype-specific antibody responses for high-throughput and in-field applications.

BACKGROUND: Detections of influenza A subtype-specific antibody responses are often complicated by the presence of cross-reactive antibodies. We developed two novel multiplex platforms for antibody detection. The multiplexed magnetic fluorescence microsphere immunoassay (MAGPIX) is a high-throughput laboratory-based assay. Chembio Dual Path Platform (DPP) is a portable and rapid test that could be used in the field. METHODS: Twelve recombinant globular head domain hemagglutinin (GH HA1) antigens from A(H1N1)pdm09 (pH1N1), A(H2N2), A(H3N2), A(H5N1), A(H7N9), A(H9N2), A(H13N9), B/Victoria lineage, B/Yamagata lineage viruses, and protein A control were used. Human sera from U.S. residents either vaccinated (with H5N1 or pH1N1) or infected with pH1N1 influenza viruses and sera from live bird market workers in Bangladesh (BDPW) were evaluated. GH HA1 antigens and serum adsorption using full ectodomain recombinant hemagglutinins from A(pH1N1) and A(H3N2) were introduced into the platforms to reduce cross-reactivity. RESULTS: Serum adsorption reduced cross-reactivity to novel subtype HAs. Compared to traditional hemagglutination inhibition or microneutralization assays, when serum adsorption and the highest fold rise in signals were used to determine positivity, the correct subtype-specific responses were identified in 86%-100% of U.S. residents exposed to influenza antigens through vaccination or infection (N=49). For detection of H5N1-specific antibodies in sera collected from BDPW, H5 sensitivity was 100% (six of six) for MAGPIX, 83% (five of six) for DPP, H5 specificity was 100% (15/15), and cross-reactivity against other subtype was 0% (zero of six) for both platforms. CONCLUSION: MAGPIX and DPP platforms can be utilized for high-throughput and in-field detection of novel influenza virus infections.

Chk1 mediates S and G2 arrests through Cdc25A degradation in response to DNA-damaging agents.

UV and ionizing radiation (IR) activate DNA damage checkpoints and induce Cdc25A degradation (Mailand, N., Falck, J., Lukas, C., Syljuasen, R. G., Welcker, M., Bartek, J., and Lukas, J. (2000) Science 288, 1425-1429; Falck, J., Mailand, N., Syljuasen, R. G., Bartek, J., and Lukas J. (2001) Nature 410, 842-847). The degradation of Cdc25A is abrogated by caffeine, which implicates Chk1 as the potential mediator (Mailand, N., Falck, J., Lukas, C., Syljuasen, R. G., Welcker, M., Bartek, J., and Lukas, J. (2000) Science 288, 1425-1429). However, the involvement of Chk1 is far from clear, because caffeine is a rather nonspecific inhibitor of the ATR/Chk1 signaling pathway. Additionally, it is not known whether DNA-damaging drugs commonly used in chemotherapy, which may activate different signal transduction pathways than UV or IR, also confer Cdc25A degradation. Herein, we show that camptothecin and doxorubicin, two widely used topoisomerase inhibitors conferring S and G2 arrest, respectively, cause the degradation of Cdc25A. Using a small interfering RNA that enables the specific elimination of Chk1 expression, we show that the observed proteolysis of Cdc25A is mediated through Chk1. Moreover, Cdc25A overexpression abrogates the Chk1-mediated degradation and overcomes the doxorubicin-induced G2 arrest through dephosphorylation and activation of Cdc2/Cdk1 in a dose-dependent manner. These results suggest that: (a) Cdc25A is involved in the G2/M transition in addition to its commonly accepted effect on G1/S progression, and (b) Chk1 mediates both S and G2 checkpoint and is thus a more ubiquitous cell cycle checkpoint mediator than previously thought.