Evaluating the design of the Integrated Care for Older People: a theory of change approach.

Introduction: Given the progressive aging of the population, there is an urgent need at the health system level to implement effective models to care for older people (OP). Healthy aging is imperative to reach the Sustainable Development Goals. The World Health Organization (WHO) developed the Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE) strategy to address this challenge. Implementing ICOPE requires its adaption to a specific context. We propose a pathway for such adaptation through an evaluation of the design of ICOPE; thus, we aim to describe the Theory of Change (ToC) of ICOPE and evaluate it for its implementation in Mexico City. Methods: Based on the WHO and published literature documentation, we drafted an initial ToC for ICOPE. Then, we validated the ToC with experts in ICOPE, after which we evaluated and refined it by discussing the causal pathway, intervention required to activate it, rationale, and assumptions in consecutive workshops with 91 stakeholders and healthcare workers, using the nominal group technique to reach a consensus. Results: The resulting ToC has the potential to contribute to healthy aging by three expected impacts: (1) prevention, reversal, or delaying of the decline of intrinsic capacity (IC) in OP; (2) improvement of the quality of life of OP; and (3) increase of disability-free life expectancy. The ICOPE causal pathway had ten preconditions, including the availability of resources, identifying at-risk individuals, available treatments, and evaluating results. Discussion: We adapted ICOPE to a specific implementation context by evaluating its ToC in a participatory process that allows us to identify challenges and address them, at least in terms of the guidelines to operate the strategy. As ICOPE is an approach for a primary healthcare system, its adoption in a community healthcare program is promising and feasible. Evaluation as a tool could contribute to the design of effective interventions. The evaluation of the design of ICOPE for its implementation contributes to the strength of its potential to improve care for OP. This design for implementing ICOPE has the potential to be applied to similar contexts, for example, in other lower-middle-income countries.

Instructional Design and Its Usability for Branching Model as an Educational Strategy.

INTRODUCTION: Serious Games (SG) are an educational strategy used in the health professions with positive results in teaching diagnosis and facilitating the application of concepts and knowledge transfer. A type of SG is the branching scenario, which has the potential for a linear story or multiple options to achieve learning goals. There must be evidence for this type of SG's instructional design (InD) and usability. OBJECTIVE: Propose an InD for the branching scenario and rate its usability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a two-phase study. In the first phase, we drafted an InD based on the literature review, and then, we applied an expert validation process through a modified Delphi technique. With the consent of InD, we built five branching scenarios. In the second phase, we apply an instrument to measure the SG usability of the branching scenarios in a cross-sectional study with 216 undergraduate medical students. RESULTS: A proposal for an InD for branching scenarios was elaborated. This InD has five dimensions with steps and definitions that help the designer fulfill the requirements for the SG. With the InD, we developed five branching scenarios for undergraduate medical students. Finally, the rates for the usability of the branchings had high scores. The branching SG with multiple options offers different outcomes for the same clinical problem in a single activity. DISCUSSION: The proposal of a specific InD for branching scenarios considered SG theory and was tested, at least in user usability. The steps proposed include the specificity of the requirements of an SG, such as levels, checkpoints, avatars, and gameplay characteristics, among others, in contrast to the other InD that do not explicitly consider them. One of the limitations of this study is that we applied it only using the H5P software to develop branching scenarios with no other evidence of the performance of the InD in different contexts or platforms. CONCLUSIONS: We propose using an InD to construct branching scenarios. This kind of SG has specific characteristics for its correct operation. Using structured steps in developing SG improves the probability of developing decision-making skills. Using an instrument to assess the usability of at least one dimension of the SG is also recommended to identify opportunity areas.

Readiness for Integrated Care of Older People: A Cross-Sectional Study in Mexico.

AIM: To evaluate the readiness of the Mexican healthcare system to implement the integrated care for older people (ICOPE) approach into an existing healthcare model. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study with data from 2473 healthcare workers analyzed using the model for understanding success in quality (MUSIQ) framework to gather data from healthcare professionals. Their perceptions regarding the readiness for ICOPE were assessed across five dimensions: team, microsystem, infrastructure, organization, and external environment. RESULTS: Only 717 (29%) of the participants believed ICOPE could be successfully implemented in Mexico without any modifications. A total of 1261 (51%) participants rated the readiness of ICOPE with some barriers. The main barriers were reallocating resources and the external environment. OBSERVATION: Mexico's healthcare system faces barriers to innovation that could hinder the successful integration of the ICOPE approach. A systematic identification of these barriers provides an opportunity to suggest adaptations and refinements to increase the probability of success. Using the contextual factors identified as facilitators and the proposal of interventions such as the ICOPE app could improve the chances of success. CONCLUSION: The participants of this study evaluated ICOPE as ready to implement, with some contextual barriers. The readiness evaluation supports the stakeholders' and policymakers' decisions in implementing and monitoring the program in a natural setting. Evaluating the readiness of the intervention increases the possibility of aligning the innovation with contextual factors, increasing the chances of its successful adoption and implementation.

Who Can Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare? Different Perspectives on Teledebriefing Assessments.

INTRODUCTION: Virtual debriefing is a cardinal element to achieve the effectiveness of telesimulation. There are different instruments to assess face-to-face debriefing to determine the degree of effectiveness of debriefing; Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare (DASH) instrument is one of them. This study aims to describe and compare the evaluation of raters, instructors, and students during a virtual debriefing using the DASH. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed evaluating the virtual debriefing of 30 instructors after a heart failure telesimulation scenario. The evaluation was conducted by 30 instructors, 338 undergraduate students in the seventh semester, and 7 simulation raters. The 3 versions of the DASH instrument in Spanish were applied, respectively. RESULTS: Two comparisons were made, student versus instructor and rater versus instructor. Cronbach α was 0.97 for each version. The averages of the results on the DASH instrument were: 6.61 (3.34-7.0), 5.95 (4.65-7.0), and 4.84 (2.68-6.02) for student, rater, and instructor versions, respectively. The size effect between student and debriefer perspectives was 0.42. In contrast, the size effect between instructor and rater was 0.72. All differences were significant. CONCLUSIONS: There are different rates between the persons who use the DASH. In this study, from the perspective of the instructor and rater, the difference was 1 point with a wide range, in contrast with the difference between instructor and student, which is relatively minor. It is necessary to consider the perspectives of experts in the subject to achieve a virtual debriefing of high quality and improve a debriefing by using the DASH.

Implementation Barriers in Telesimulation as an Educational Strategy: An Interpretative Description.

Introduction Telesimulation is one of the different methodologies for distance learning to promote competency in medical trainees. This methodology needs to have professors, students, and standardized patients in one session to perform a teleconsultation. Telesimulation could lead to multiple implementation barriers. This study aims to describe the implementation barriers through the perspective of the professors, students, and standardized patients in a telesimulation scenario in undergraduate medical education. Method We designed and applied a telesimulation scenario in undergraduate medical students. Then we conducted an online questionnaire with the critical incidents technique. The study sample was 18 professors, 26 standardized patients, and 407 students Results We describe a taxonomy with five categories and each one with different subcategories: knowledge (clinical simulation, theoretical over the clinical case, and use of simulators), facilities (access, time of use, and functionality), financing (payment to staff and purchase of equipment), attitude (acceptance and emotion), and participants (communication, collaborative work, and debriefing). Conclusion The description of the implementation barriers through multiple perspectives generates a taxonomy that could improve the quality of the telesimulation. This taxonomy is a proposal to consider the design, implementation, and evaluation when a telesimulation is implemented. The taxonomy could generate a structured plan when the educators implement the telesimulations at their own institutions considering all the barriers proposed.