RESUMO
BACKGROUND: In critically ill children, detection of intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH > 10 mmHg) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS = IAH + organ dysfunction) is paramount and usually monitored through intra-vesical pressures (IVP) as current standard. IVP, however, carries important disadvantages, being time-consuming, discontinuous, with infection risk through observer-dependent manipulation, and ill-defined for catheter sizes. Therefore, we sought to validate air-capsule-based measurement of intra-gastric pressure (ACM-IGP). METHODS: We prospectively compared ACM-IGP with IVP both in vivo and in vitro (water column), according to Abdominal-Compartment-Society validation criteria. We controlled for patient age, admission diagnosis, gastric filling/propulsive medication, respiratory status, sedation levels and transurethral catheters, all influencing intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). RESULTS: In tertiary care PICU setting, finally, n = 97 children were enrolled (median age, 1.3 years [range 0 days-17 years], LOS-PICU 8.0 [1-332] days, PRISM-III-Score 13 [0-35]). In n = 2.770 measurements pairs, median IAP was 6.7 [0.9-23.0] mmHg, n = 38 (39%) children suffered from IAH > 10 mmHg, n = 4 from ACS. In vitro against water column, ACM-IGP correlated perfectly (r2 0.99, mean bias - 0.1 ± 0.5 mmHg, limits of agreement (LOA) - 1.1/+ 0.9, percentage error [PE] 12%) as compared with IVP (r2 0.98, bias + 0.7 ± 0.6 mmHg, LOA - 0.5/+ 1.9, PE 15%). With larger IVP catheters at higher pressure levels, IVP underestimated pressures against water column. In vivo, agreement between either technique was strong (r2 0.95, bias 0.3 ± 0.8 mmHg, LOA - 1.3/+ 1.9 mmHg, PE 23%). No impact of predefined control variables on measurement agreement was observed. CONCLUSIONS: In a large PICU population with high IAH prevalence, ACM-IGP agreed favourably with IVP. More widespread usage of ACM-IGP may improve detection rates of ACS in critically ill children. Trial registration WHO-ICTRP-No. DRKS00006556 (German Clinical Trial Register). Registered 12th September 2014, URL: https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00006556.
RESUMO
Dopexamine hydrochloride (Dopacard) is a new synthetic catecholamine compound, which possesses potent beta 2-adrenergic and DA1-dopaminergic agonistic properties. It is free of alpha-adrenergic activity, has no beta 1-adrenergic activity and is less potent at DA2-dopaminergic receptors than dopamine. In the present study the acute haemodynamic effects of dopexamine hydrochloride were compared to those of dobutamine and nitroprusside in 12 patients with idiopathic congestive cardiomyopathy in an open crossover study. With dopexamine hydrochloride, there were dose-dependent increases from control in cardiac output and stroke volume, decreases in blood pressure, right and left atrial pressure, systemic vascular resistance and pulmonary vascular resistance and little change in heart rate. Similar effects were seen with nitroprusside, apart from a marked increase in heart rate, and with dobutamine, except that systolic aortic blood pressure increased and there was no change in diastolic or mean pressure or pulmonary artery systolic pressure. In general, dopexamine hydrochloride produced effects between those produced by the other two treatments. This suggests that dopexamine with its combined vasodilator and inotropic action has a desirable cardiovascular profile with advantages over the beta 1-receptor agonist dobutamine and the pure vasodilator sodium nitroprusside.