Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Assunto principal
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Environ Manage ; 331: 117263, 2023 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36669315

RESUMO

Livestock farming, and in particular slurry management, is a major contributor to ammonia (NH3) and methane (CH4) emissions in Europe. Furthermore, reduced NH3 and CH4 emissions are also relevant in licensing procedures and the management of livestock buildings. Therefore, the aim is to keep emissions from the barn as low as possible. Acidification of slurry in the barn can reduce these environmental and climate-relevant emissions by a pH value of 5.5. In this study, an acidification technology was retrofitted in an existing fattening pig barn equipped with a partially slatted floor. The slurry in a compartment with 32 animals was acidified. An identical compartment was used for reference investigations (case-control approach). Several times a week slurry was pumped for acidification in a process tank outside the barn compartment in a central corridor, where sulphuric acid (H2SO4) was added. Then the slurry was pumped back into the barn. In contrast to other systems, where acidified slurry was stored mainly in external storage tanks, in this study the slurry was completely stored in the slurry channels under the slatted floor, during the entire fattening period. The emission mass flow of NH3 and CH4 was measured continuously over three fattening periods, with one period in spring and two periods in summer. On average 17.1 kg H2SO4 (96%) (m³ slurry)-1 were used for acidification during the three fattening periods. NH3 and CH4 emissions were reduced by 39 and 67%, respectively. The hydrogen sulphide (H2S) concentration in the barn air of the acidification compartment was harmlessly low (0.02 ppm). Thus, despite the storage of the acidified slurry in the barn, the system leads to a lower concentration of detrimental gases, which is beneficial for the animals' as well as for the workers' health. The study shows that it is possible to retrofit acidification technology into existing pig barns. Further investigations shall identify possible measures to reduce the amount of H2SO4 used and thus minimise the sulphur input into the slurry.


Assuntos
Amônia , Metano , Animais , Suínos , Amônia/análise , Esterco , Gases , Concentração de Íons de Hidrogênio
2.
Animals (Basel) ; 10(3)2020 Mar 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32188133

RESUMO

The feeding of fattening pigs and its associated ammonia emissions are current core problems in social debate that affects climate change and sustainability. Feeding methods offer great potential to increase animal welfare and sustainability, and negative impacts on the environment can be reduced. Fattening pigs differ in their performance potential and in their nutrient requirements. A high feed intake capacity can lead to luxury consumption. Diets rich in crude fiber should prevent excess feed intake and cause better nitrogen fixation by microorganisms in the animals' large intestines. In a pig fattening farm, it was investigated whether and how diets rich in crude fiber can influence feed intake and ammonia emissions. The animals were divided into feeding groups according to their presumed performance potential by ultrasound examinations. Therein, body compositions were evaluated, and feed intake capacity and body weight were automatically recorded. The aim of the study was to enable adapted feeding of the animals by regarding their individual differences in body composition and performance potential. Roughage-based diets had significant influence on feed intake and did not increase ammonia emissions. Based on the results of this study a performance-based control of the feed intake should be made possible.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA