Development of an Automatic Rule-Based Algorithm for the Detection of Ovarian Cancer Recurrence From Electronic Health Records.

PURPOSE: As the onset of cancer recurrence is not explicitly recorded in the electronic health record (EHR), a high volume of manual chart review is required to detect the cancer recurrence. This study aims to develop an automatic rule-based algorithm for detecting ovarian cancer (OC) recurrence on the basis of minimally preprocessed EHR data. METHODS: The automatic rule-based recurrence detection algorithm (Auto-Recur), using notes on image reading (positron emission tomography-computed tomography [PET-CT], CT, magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]), biomarker (CA125), and treatment information (surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy), was developed to detect the first OC recurrence. Auto-Recur contains three single algorithms (images, biomarkers, treatments) and hybrid algorithms (combinations of the single algorithms). The performance of Auto-Recur was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the recurrence time detected. The recurrence-free survival probabilities were estimated and compared with the retrospective chart review results. RESULTS: The proposed Auto-Recur considerably reduced human resources and time; it saved approximately 1,340 days when scaled to 100,000 patients compared with the conventional retrospective chart review. The hybrid algorithm on the basis of a combination of image, biomarker, and treatment information was the most efficient (sensitivity: 93.4%, specificity: 97.4%) and precisely captured recurrence time (average time error: 8.5 days). The estimated 3-year recurrence-free survival probability (44%) was close to the estimates by the retrospective chart review (45%, log-rank P value = .894). CONCLUSION: Our rule-based algorithm effectively captured the first OC recurrence from large-scale EHR while closely approximating the recurrence-free survival estimates obtained by conventional retrospective chart reviews. The study findings facilitate large-scale EHR analysis, enhancing clinical research opportunities.

Incidence and treatment outcomes of ovarian carcinosarcoma from the national cancer registry of Korea.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the incidence and survival outcomes of ovarian carcinosarcoma in Korea between 1999 and 2018. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with ovarian carcinosarcoma between 1999 and 2018 were identified from the Korea Central Cancer Registry (KCCR) and their information was collected. Age-standardized incidence rates (ASRs), annual percent changes (APC), and relative survival rates of ovarian carcinosarcoma were calculated and compared to those of epithelial ovarian cancer. RESULTS: According to the KCCR, 458 cases of ovarian carcinosarcoma were detected, and accounted for 1.5% (458/30,679) of all epithelial ovarian cancers in Korea between 1999 and 2018. The ASR of ovarian carcinosarcoma between 1999 and 2018 was 0.064 per 100,000 women. The incidence rate of ovarian carcinosarcoma increased during the study period, with an ASR of 0.029 per 100,000 in 1999 and 0.073 per 100,000 in 2018. The APC of ovarian carcinosarcoma during 1999-2018 was 5.86 (p<0.001). The median overall survival (OS) of patients with ovarian carcinosarcoma was 39 months, and the 5-year OS rate was 42.5%. Among ovarian carcinosarcomas, patients with localized stages showed better clinical outcomes than those with regional or distant stages (5-year OS, 60.8%, 57.9%, and 32.8%, respectively; p<0.001). In addition, younger (<50 years) patients showed better OS than older (≥50 years) patients (5-year OS, 52.6% vs. 40.2%; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Our nationwide registry-based study demonstrated that the incidence of ovarian carcinosarcoma increased from 1999 to 2018 in Korea. Patients with advanced-stage disease and older age (≥50 years) had poorer survival outcomes.

Trends in the incidence and survival outcomes of endometrial cancer in Korea: a nationwide population-based cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate trends in the incidence and survival outcomes of endometrial cancer (EC) based on the year of diagnosis, stage, age, and histologic types. METHODS: Women with primary EC diagnosed between 1999 and 2018, and who were followed up with until 2019, were identified from the Korea Central Cancer Registry using the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision. The age-standardized rates (ASRs) of incidence, annual percent changes (APCs), and survival were estimated according to age, stage, histology, and year of diagnosis. RESULTS: The ASR for EC increased from 2.38 per 100,000 in 1999 to 7.29 per 100,000 in 2018 across all histologic types (APCs of 9.82, 15.97, and 7.73 for endometrioid, serous, and clear cell, respectively, p<0.001). There were significant differences in the 5-year survival rates based on histology (90.9%, 55.0%, and 68.5% for endometrioid, serous, and clear cell, respectively, p<0.001), stage (93.4%, 77.0%, and 31.0% for localized, regional, and distant, respectively, p<0.001), and age (93.0% for <50 years and 80.6% for ≥50 years, p<0.001). The 5-year survival was significantly better in the group diagnosed between 2000 and 2018 (85.9%) than that in the 1999-2008 group (83.3%) (p<0.001). This trend was only observed for endometrioid cancer (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The incidence of EC increased across the all 3 subtypes. Survival of patients with endometrioid histology improved over the past two decades, but remained static for serous or clear cell histology. Healthcare strategies to prevent EC incidence in at-risk populations and apply effective treatments for high-risk histology are needed.

Characteristics of second primary breast cancer after ovarian cancer: a Korea central cancer registry retrospective study.

Background: Second primary cancer has become an important issue among cancer survivors. This study sought to determine the differences in clinicopathologic outcomes between second primary breast cancer (SPBC) after ovarian cancer and primary breast cancer (PBC) in the Republic of Korea. Methods and materials: We searched the Korea Central Cancer Registry and identified 251,244 breast cancer cases that were diagnosed between 1999 and 2017. The incident rate and standardized incidence ratio (SIR) were calculated. Demographic and clinical characteristics and overall survival (OS) rates were estimated according to age, histological type, and cancer stage. Results: Among the 228,329 patients included, 228,148 were patients with PBC, and 181 patients had SPBC diagnosed after ovarian cancer (OC). The mean ages at diagnosis were 56.09 ± 10.81 years for SPBC and 50.65 ± 11.40 years for PBC. Patients with SPBC were significantly less likely than patients with PBC to receive adjuvant radiotherapy (14.92% vs. 21.92%, p = 0.02) or adjuvant chemotherapy (44.75% vs. 55.69%, p < 0.01). Based on the age-standardized rate (ASR), the incidence of SPBC after OC was 293.58 per 100,000 ovarian cancer patients and the incidence of PBC was 39.13 per 100,000 women. The SIR for SPBC was 1.27 (1.09-1.46, 95% Confidence interval) in the patients overall. The 5-year OS rates were 72.88% and 89.37% for SPBC and PBC (p < 0.01). The OS rate in SPBC decreased significantly with advanced stage and older age. Conclusion: The incidence of breast cancer is about 1.27 times higher in ovarian cancer patients than in healthy people. The survival outcomes were worse for SPBC than for PBC and were related to older age and advanced stage. Active screening for breast cancer is necessary in ovarian cancer patients.

Incidence and treatment outcomes of uterine cervical cancer in Korea 1999-2018 from the national cancer registry.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the incidence and survival outcomes of uterine cervical cancer during 1999-2018. METHODS: Patients who were diagnosed with cervical cancer during 1999-2018 were identified in the Korea Central Cancer Registry. Age-standardized incidence rates (ASRs) and annual percent changes (APCs) were calculated. Survival rates by histology, year of diagnosis (1999-2008 vs. 2009-2018), stage, and age at diagnosis were analyzed. RESULTS: The absolute incidence of cervical cancer decreased over 20 years from 4,488 in 1999 to 3,500 in 2018, with an APC of -3.42% (p<0.0001). While ASR of squamous cell carcinoma (SCCA) more than halved from 13.27 per 100,000 in 1999 to 6.16 in 2018 (APC, -4.04%), adenocarcinoma continued to rise (ASR, 1.30 per 100,000 to 1.92; APC, 1.52%; p<0.0001). Patients with adenocarcinoma were younger than those with SCCA (mean, 49.9±12.7 vs. 52.9 ±14.6 years; p<0.0001). Five-year survival rate of cervical cancer patients overall was 78.0%. Adenocarcinoma had poorer survival than SCCA (5-year survival rate, 76.8% vs. 79.8%; p<0.0001). There was no survival difference between patients who were diagnosed between 1999-2008 and 2009-2018. Earlier-stage disease had better survival (5-year survival rate for localized, regional, and distant disease, 90.0% vs. 69.9% vs. 26.5%; p<0.0001). Younger patients aged <50 years had better survival than those aged ≥50 years (87.1% vs. 69.8%; p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: The incidence of SCCA of the uterine cervix declined while adenocarcinoma continued to increase slowly but significantly from 1999 to 2018 in Korea. Adenocarcinoma was diagnosed at a younger age, but had poorer survival outcome than SCCA.

Surgical outcomes of ureteral reconstruction during cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Ureteral reconstruction is required after surgical resection of the tumor invading the urinary tract in ovarian cancer with low incidence. There are no currently reported surgical outcomes of ureteral reconstruction during cytoreductive surgery. The aim of the study is to investigate the clinical features and surgical outcomes of ureteral reconstruction during primary, interval and secondary cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer.  METHODS: A total of 3226 patients who underwent primary, interval or secondary cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer between January 2000 and May 2021 were reviewed. Fifty-six patients who underwent ureteral reconstruction during cytoreductive surgery were included in the analysis.  RESULTS: Ureteral reconstruction was required in 1.7% (56/3226) of ovarian cancer patients. Of the 56 patients who underwent ureteral reconstruction during cytoreductive surgery, 35 (62.5%) had primary ovarian cancer, and 21 (37.5%) had recurrent ovarian cancer. The median tumor size invading the lower urinary tract was 2.0 cm (range, 0.4-9.5 cm). Ureteroneocystostomy with direct implantation (51.8%) and psoas hitch (8.9%), transureteroureterostomy (7.1%), and ureteroureterostomy (32.1%) were required as part of cytoreductive surgery. Complete cytoreduction with ureteral reconstruction was achieved in 83.9% (47/56) and the rest of the patient population (16.1%) achieved a gross residual tumor size of less than 1 cm. All complications, including hydronephrosis (33.9%), were managed, none resulting in long-term sequelae. In primary ovarian cancer, the 5-year disease-free survival and overall survival were 50.0% and 89.5%, respectively. In patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, the 5-year disease-free survival and overall survival were 23.6% and 64.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Ureteral reconstruction as a part of cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer could be performed with acceptable morbidities. Complete cytoreduction by a multidisciplinary surgical team, including urologic oncologists, should be pursued for the surgical management of ovarian cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered.

Quality of life outcomes from the randomized trial of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy following cytoreductive surgery for primary ovarian cancer (KOV-HIPEC-01).

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) related to hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) following primary or interval cytoreductive surgery for primary ovarian cancer. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2016, a total of 184 patients were randomly assigned to receive cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC (n=92) or without HIPEC (n=92). Quality of life (QOL) assessment was evaluated at baseline (before surgery); on postoperative day 7; after the 3rd and 6th cycle of adjuvant chemotherapy; and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after randomization. Patient-reported QOL was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) core questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30), ovarian cancer questionnaire modules (QLQ-OV28), and the MD Anderson Symptoms Inventory (MDASI). RESULTS: Of the 184 patients enrolled, 165 (83/92 in the HIPEC group and 82/92 in the control group) participated in the baseline QOL assessment. There were no statistically significant differences in functional scales and symptom scales in QLQ-C30; symptom scales, including gastrointestinal symptoms QLQ-OV28; and severity and impact score in MDASI between the 2 treatment groups until 12 months after randomization. CONCLUSION: HIPEC with cytoreductive surgery showed no statistically significant difference in HRQOL outcomes. Thus, implementation of HIPEC during either primary or interval cytoreductive surgery does not impair HRQOL. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01091636.

Learning curve analysis of multiport robot-assisted hysterectomy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes and learning curve of multiport robot-assisted hysterectomy. METHODS: Eighty-eight patients were identified who underwent multiport robot-assisted surgery for hysterectomy. A retrospective analysis was performed. The cumulative summation technique (CUSUM) was used to investigate the learning curve in surgical proficiency by analyzing total operative, docking, and console times. RESULTS: The patients' median age was 51 years. In addition, the median operative time was 120.5 min (range 56-344 min). The most common indication for surgery was myoma (33.0%). The median estimated blood loss was 30 mL (range 5-200 mL). There was no conversion to laparoscopic or open surgery. No transfusion was required, and only one complication including umbilical incisional hernia was reported. A tendency of decline in total operative time following the first 23 cases was found. The CUSUM graph for total operative time indicated the generation of three distinct performance phases: learning (n = 23), competence (n = 36), and mastery (n = 29). The median docking time was 3 min (range 1-10 min) and median console time was 70 min (range 24-298 min). CONCLUSION: The multiport robot-assisted surgery is an easy and safe procedure with minimal postoperative complications and can be quickly learned. The learning curve was 23 cases to significantly decrease the operative time.

Trends in the Incidence and Survival Rates of Primary Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma Compared to Ovarian Serous Carcinoma in Korea.

Objective: To compare the incidence and survival rates of primary ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) and ovarian serous carcinoma (OSC) from a nationwide collected database. Methods: We extracted information of patients with primary OCCC and OSC from the Korea Central Cancer Registry recorded between 1999 and 2018, including age at diagnosis and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results summary stage. Age-standardized incidence rates (ASRs) and annual percent changes (APCs) were calculated. Baseline characteristics and overall survival (OS) were compared between the OCCC and OSC groups. Results: Overall, the incidence rate of primary OCCC increased markedly from 1999 (ASR, 0.16/100,000) to 2018 (0.76/100,000) (APC, 7.85%; P<0.0001). Patients with OCCC were significantly younger and had early-stage disease more frequently than those with OSC. Patients diagnosed with OCCC before the age of 50 showed better OS than those diagnosed after the age of 50 (P=0.0048). The 5-year OS of the OCCC group did not differ by study period [73.5% (1999-2008) vs. 75.4% (2009-2018), P=0.3187], whereas the 5-year OS of the OSC group improved from 54.4% to 58% (P=0.0003). Conclusions: Our nationwide registry-based study demonstrated that the incidence of OCCC in Korea increased significantly from 1999 to 2018. Early-stage OCCC had a relatively good prognosis, but advanced-stage OCCC had a worse OS than advanced-stage OSC. Therefore, the development of optimal treatment strategies for OCCC is warranted.

Learning Curve Analysis of Single-Site Robot-Assisted Hysterectomy.

We aim to analyze the surgical outcomes and learning curve of single-site robot-assisted hysterectomy. This was a retrospective cohort study from a single academic medical center. A total of 123 patients who underwent single-site robotic surgery for gynecologic disease were enrolled. Gynecologic surgeries were performed by a single surgeon using single-site robot-assisted hysterectomy. The median age of enrolled patients was 49 years (range: 30-74 years). The median operation time was 131 min (range: 59-502 min) and the median docking time was 3 min (range: 1-10 min). In addition, the median console time was 76 min (range: 29-465 min). The cumulative sum (CUSUM) graph for total operation time indicated an initial decrease at case 41, generating 3 distinct performance phases: learning (n = 41 initial cases), competence (n = 54 middle cases), and mastery (n = 28 final cases). There was one case conversion to open surgery due to the difficulty in securing the field of view because of a 16-cm bulky mass protruding from the left pelvic wall. No patients required a transfusion and two complications including vaginal cuff dehiscence were identified. The single-site robot-assisted hysterectomy is a safe and feasible procedure. The learning curve consisted of 41 cases to significantly decrease the total operation time.

Secondary Cytoreductive Surgery in Platinum-Sensitive Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: The survival impact of secondary cytoreductive surgery in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer was studied. METHODS: We identified published studies from 1983 to 2021 following our inclusion criteria from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane library. To integrate the effect size of single-arm studies, meta-analysis was performed using death rate as a primary outcome. The effect of complete cytoreduction and optimal cytoreduction on survival was evaluated using meta-regression. The pooled death rate was presented with a 95% CI. The publication bias was evaluated with the funnel plot and Egger's test, and sensitivity analysis was performed. To overcome missing death rates, the linear regression model was performed on log-transformed median overall survival (OS) time using study size as a weight. RESULTS: Thirty-six studies with 2,805 patients reporting death rates were used for this meta-analysis of the 80 eligible studies. There was strong heterogeneity, with the P value of the Cochrane Q test of < 0.0001 and Higgins's I2 statistics of 86%; thus, we considered a random effect model. The pooled death rate was 44.2% (95% CI, 39.0 to 49.5), and both the complete and optimal cytoreductions were associated with better survival outcomes as significant moderators in the meta-regression model (P < .001 and P = .005, respectively). Although 14 studies were located outside the funnel plot, Egger's test indicated no publication bias (P = .327). A sensitivity analysis excluding 14 studies showed similar results. In the linear regression model on the basis of 57 studies, the median OS time increased by 8.97% and 7.04% when the complete and optimal cytoreduction proportion increased by 10%, respectively, after adjusting other variables. CONCLUSION: Secondary cytoreductive surgery, resulting in maximal tumor resection, significantly prolongs OS in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.

Cause-specific mortality rate of ovarian cancer in the presence of competing risks of death: a nationwide population-based cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: This nationwide cohort study aimed to evaluate the cause-specific mortality (probability of death by ovarian cancer, probability of death by other causes) under the competing risks of death in women with ovarian cancer. METHODS: The Korea Central Cancer Registry was searched to identify women with primary ovarian cancer diagnosed between 2006 and 2016. Epithelial ovarian cancer cases were identified using the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology 3rd edition. We estimated the cause-specific mortality according to age (<65 years, ≥65 years), stage (local, regional, and distant), and histology (serous, mucinous, endometrioid, clear cell, and others) under the competing risks framework; moreover, cumulative incidences were estimated. RESULTS: We included 21,446 cases. Cause-specific mortality continuously increased throughout 10 year follow-up. Compared with women aged <65 years, ovarian cancer-specific mortality (5-year, 28.9% vs. 61.9%; 10-year, 39.0% vs. 68.6%, p<0.001) and other cause mortality (5-year, 1.7% vs. 4.8%; 10-year, 2.8% vs. 8.2%, p<0.001) increased in women aged ≥65 years. This trend was consistent across all the stages and histological types. There was a substantial increase in competing risks from 1.1% in women aged <65 years to 8.0% in women aged ≥65 years in patients with early-stage (p<0.001) non-serous ovarian cancer (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Older age at diagnosis is associated with increasing ovarian cancer-specific mortality and competing risks. Given the substantial effect of competing risks on elderly patients, there is a need for assessment tools to balance the beneficial and harmful effects to provide optimal treatment.

Clinical outcomes of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants in ovarian cancer cluster region in patients with primary peritoneal, epithelial ovarian, and fallopian tube cancer.

OBJECTIVE: An "ovarian cancer cluster region" (OCCR) has been reported in both BRCA1 and BRCA2. However, the clinical significance of the OCCR of BRCA1/2 has not yet been investigated. METHODS: The medical records of 991 patients with epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, and fallopian tube cancer who underwent genetic testing for BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 from January 1, 2006, to August 31, 2019, were retrospectively reviewed. Sanger and next-generation sequencing analyses were used to test the BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation status. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared according to the mutation location (OCCR vs. non-OCCR region). Survival outcomes were determined using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. RESULTS: A total of 162 patients had BRCA1 pathogenic variants (PVs), and 76 had BRCA2 PVs. Patients with BRCA1 PV that in the OCCR region showed shorter PFS than those with BRCA1 PV outside the OCCR (22.6 months vs. 27.6 months, P = 0.038). In the platinum-sensitive subgroup of BRCA1, patients with BRCA1 PV in the OCCR region showed shorter PFS than those in the non-OCCR group (P = 0.0197). On the other hand, BRCA2 variants did not exhibit any particular trend (32.8 months vs. 27.9 months, P = 0.468). However, no significant differences were detected in OS between patients with BRCA1/2 PVs, regardless of the location of the variants. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with BRCA1 PV in the OCCR had shorter PFS than those outside the OCCR. This tendency was more pronounced in the platinum-sensitive subgroup. To our knowledge, this is the first study of BRCA1/2 mutations based on the OCCR.

A Modified Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Regimen for Ovarian Cancer: Technique and Treatment Outcomes.

This study aimed to investigate treatment outcomes concerning three institutional modifications to intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy for patients with ovarian cancer. The medical records of 27 patients treated with IP chemotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. All patients had three IP chemotherapy institutional modifications; modified Gynecologic Oncology Group 172 regimen was used for the chemotherapy regimen. With institutional modifications, 63.0% (17/27) completed all six cycles of IP chemotherapy. Of the 17 and 10 patients with primary and recurrent ovarian cancer, respectively, 55.6% (15/27) underwent left colonic surgery, including low anterior resection. In patients with primary ovarian cancer, the IP chemotherapy completion rate was 76.5% (13/17). In patients with and without left colonic surgery, the IP chemotherapy completion rates were 53.3% (8/15) and 75.0% (9/12), respectively. No complications related to left colonic surgery during IP chemotherapy were identified. The most frequent grade 3-4 toxicities were gastrointestinal toxicities (33.3%) and neutropenia (29.6%). The median progression-free survival was 19.5 months in all patients and 25.2 months in patients with primary ovarian cancer. Three institutional modifications to IP chemotherapy increased the completion rate for planned IP chemotherapy, even after left colonic surgery. Further studies involving a larger study cohort are required to confirm survival outcomes using these modifications.

Incidence and treatment outcomes of ovarian sarcoma compared to epithelial ovarian cancer from the national cancer registry.

PURPOSE: To investigate the incidence and survival outcomes of primary ovarian sarcoma compared to those of epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS: Data on primary ovarian sarcoma patients (n = 1361) and epithelial ovarian cancer patients (n = 30,366) between 1999 and 2017 were obtained from the Korea Central Cancer Registry, and their respective age-standardized incidence rate (ASR) and relative survival rate were calculated and compared. RESULTS: Based on the ASR, the incidence of epithelial ovarian cancer was 4.75 per 100,000 women, while that of primary ovarian sarcoma was 0.22 per 100,000 women. The ASR ratio was 21.94 without significant change of ASR during the study period. Primary ovarian sarcoma had a better survival curve compared with epithelial ovarian cancer, though the difference was not statistically significant (5 yr overall survival 64.0% vs. 61.5%; p = 0.6030). In addition, among the pure sarcomas, the fibrosarcoma histologic subtype showed the best overall survival, and that of liposarcomas and stromal cell sarcoma were behind that (5 yr overall survival 85.0%, 76.7%, and 72.7%; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of primary ovarian sarcoma is quite low, with an ASR of 0.22/100,000 during the last 20 years. There were no significant differences between survival rates of primary ovarian sarcoma and epithelial ovarian cancer.

The incidence and survival of cervical, ovarian, and endometrial cancer in Korea, 1999-2017: Korea Central Cancer Registry.

OBJECTIVE: The three major gynecologic cancers are cervical, endometrial, and ovarian cancer. This study aimed to describe the 19-year trends and survival rates in cervical, endometrial, and ovarian cancer in a Korean female population. METHODS: We searched the Korea Central Cancer Registry to identify patients with gynecologic cancer between 1999 and 2017. Age-standardized rates and annual percent changes were calculated. The relative survival rate (RSR) was reported by histology, age, and stage for each gynecological cancer. RESULTS: The total number of cervical, endometrial, primary peritoneal, ovarian epithelial, fallopian tube (POFT) cancer was 134,863, with the number of cases increasing every year: 6,077 in 1999 to 8,011 in 2017. The incidence of cervical cancer has decreased; however, that of POFT and endometrial cancer has increased. The 5-year RSR of cervical, POFT, and endometrial cancer was reported to be 80.8%, 61.4%, and 88.1%, respectively. In the case of cervical cancer, squamous cell carcinoma showed better survival than other histology (82.8% vs. 73.5%). Furthermore, in the case of endometrial cancer, endometrioid histology had substantially better 5-year RSR than the others (93.2% vs. 76.5%). Contrastingly, in the case of ovarian cancer, serous carcinoma had worse 5-year RSR than other types of histology. CONCLUSION: The incidence rates for gynecologic cancers increased from 2005 to 2017, with an annual increase of 2.76 per year until 2017. Endometrial cancer had the highest RSR, while ovarian cancer had the lowest. Active cancer screening and the introduction of effective treatments might have contributed to the improved RSRs of gynecologic cancers.

The preventive effect of breastfeeding against ovarian cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: A recent study showed that even a few months of breastfeeding is associated with a significant decrease in the risk of ovarian cancer in the general population. This study aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the significance of the length of the breastfeeding period on ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched up to June 1, 2021. We included case-control and cohort studies that contained information on breastfeeding and the risk of ovarian cancer in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Odds ratios (OR) were meta-analytically pooled using a fixed-effects model.dd RESULTS: Five studies, including one cohort study and four case-control studies, were included in this meta-analysis. Of the 14,601 BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, the overall pooled OR of ever having performed breastfeeding in patients who had ovarian cancer was 0.767 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.688-0.856) and 0.817 (95% CI, 0.650-1.028) for patients with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation, respectively. Breastfeeding for >1 year acted as a protective factor in both BRCA1 [OR: 0.787 (95% CI, 0.682-0.907)] and BRCA2 [OR: 0.567 (95% CI, 0.400-0.802)] mutation carriers. No significant heterogeneity was present (I2 = 0%), and the funnel plot was also properly distributed, showing no publication bias. CONCLUSIONS: Breastfeeding is a preventive, modifiable factor for ovarian cancer in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Ever having performed breastfeeding was significantly preventive for ovarian cancer in the BRCA1 mutation carriers, however a period of 1 year or more of breastfeeding is required for a reduced ovarian cancer risk in BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy as consolidation treatment of advanced stage ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the therapeutic efficacy of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) as consolidation treatment after completing first-line treatment in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients treated at the Comprehensive Gynecologic Cancer Center between January 2014 and 2019. Based on the inclusion criteria, 24 eligible patients who received HIPEC (paclitaxel 175 mg/m2, for 90 minutes, at 42°C) (HIPEC group) as consolidation treatment after terminating the adjuvant chemotherapy were identified. Another 24 patients who met the inclusion criteria and did not receive HIPEC were matched, representing the non-HIPEC group. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were examined between the two groups. RESULTS: The median DFS was 28.7 and 24.2 months in the HIPEC and non-HIPEC groups, respectively (P=0.688). The 3-year DFS rates in the HIPEC and non-HPEC groups were 39.5% and 32.6%, respectively. However, the median OS was not determined. The 5-year OS rates in the HIPEC and non-HIPEC groups were 86.2% and 81.3%, respectively (P=0.850). One patient developed grade 3 neutropenia. Other patients experienced mild adverse events after HIPEC. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that consolidation HIPEC could not support the survival benefit after completing the first-line treatment for patients with advanced ovarian cancer, although no severe specific safety issues were found. Therefore, randomized trials evaluating consolidation HIPEC for the management of ovarian cancer are warranted.

How do we perform hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in ovarian cancer? -a narrative review.

Ovarian malignancy is a leading cause of death caused by gynecologic cancer worldwide because it is mainly found in the advanced stage and recurs in most patients even after cytoreductive surgery and intravenous (IV) chemotherapy. Prevention of recurrence of primary disease and treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer are still remained as major interest and lots of researchers investigate novel treatment to find optimal method. Even though intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy turns out to increase the overall survival, it is not widely used because of adverse event. As an alternative treatment for IP chemotherapy, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is emerging a new way. Thanks to much research and use in other cancer species, such as the colorectal cancer cytoreductive surgery followed by HIPEC is becoming a promising treatment. However, randomized controlled trials and unbiased data in ovarian cancer patients are still needed for the establishment of therapy. Moreover, among the current situation in which treatments such as bevacizumab or PARP inhibitor have been found to be effective and have been widely used, it may be necessary to establish the role in the combination of HIPEC. This article is a comprehensive review of the HIPEC in ovarian cancer to introduce techniques, treatment results, and clinical trials of HIPEC.