RESUMO
Background and Aims: Gallstone disease (GSD) associates with significant morbidity and mortality. Decreased secretion of bile acids has been suggested as a driving factor for GSD. Recently, we linked the protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 3 beta (PPP1R3B) rs4240624 genotype to decreased bile acid levels in bile. In this study, we investigated whether these individuals had an increased risk for GSD as well as the differences in the lipid composition of the gallbladder bile of these individuals compared to controls and patients with GSD. Methods: Bile acids, cholesterol, and phospholipid levels in gallbladder bile samples were enzymatically measured in 46 patients (34 female, age 45.7 ± 9.8 years, BMI 41.3 ± 4.4 kg/m2) who underwent elective laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The lipidome of gallbladder bile was analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Gallstone status was evaluated using abdominal ultrasonography before the surgery. Results: The G allele of PPP1R3B rs4240624 was significantly associated with GSD in patients with obesity. We validated this association in the UK Biobank. Bile lipidomics demonstrated that 13 of the 17 minor lipid classes measured were higher in individuals with the G allele. The concentrations of bile acids, cholesterol, and phospholipids, as well as the cholesterol saturation index, were lower in patients with GSD than in those without gallstones. GSD had an effect similar to that of PPP1R3B genotype on minor lipids. Conclusion: The PPP1R3B rs4240624 genotype is associated with gallstones and with changes in gallbladder bile similar to those observed in patients with gallstones, suggesting that the PPP1R3B genotype contributes to the risk of gallstones by altering the bile lipidome.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: In addition to the reduction of symptomatic gallstone disease, ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) might also have beneficial metabolic effects after bariatric surgery. We examined the impact of UDCA on liver enzymes, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), lipids, and inflammation markers. METHODS: Patients in the UPGRADE trial (placebo-controlled, double-blind) were randomized between UDCA 900 mg daily or placebo pills for 6 months after bariatric surgery. Patients without blood measurements pre- or 6 months postoperatively were excluded. The change in liver enzymes, Hba1c, lipids, and inflammation markers after surgery were compared between the UDCA and placebo group, followed by a postoperative cross-sectional comparison. RESULTS: In total, 513 patients were included (age [mean ± SD] 45.6 ± 10.7 years; 79% female). Preoperative blood values did not differ between UDCA (n = 266) and placebo (n = 247) groups. Increase of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) was greater in the UDCA group (mean difference 3.81 U/l [95%CI 0.50 7.12]). Change in other liver enzymes, HbA1c, lipids, and CRP levels did not differ. Postoperative cross-sectional comparison in 316 adherent patients also revealed a higher total cholesterol (mean difference 0.25 mg/dl [95%CI 0.07-0.42]), lower aspartate aminotransferase (mean difference -3.12 U/l [-5.16 - -1.08]), and lower alanine aminotransferase level (mean difference -5.89 U/l [-9.41 - -2.37]) in the UDCA group. CONCLUSION: UDCA treatment leads to a higher, but clinically irrelevant increase in ALP level in patients 6 months after bariatric surgery. No other changes in metabolic or inflammatory markers were observed. Except for the reduction of gallstone formation, UDCA has no effects after bariatric surgery.
Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica , Cálculos Biliares , Obesidade Mórbida , Humanos , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Ácido Ursodesoxicólico/uso terapêutico , Estudos Transversais , Hemoglobinas Glicadas , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Cálculos Biliares/cirurgia , Inflamação , LipídeosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The aim was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) prophylaxis for the prevention of symptomatic gallstone disease after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in patients without gallstones before surgery. METHODS: Data from a multicentre, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled superiority trial were used. Patients scheduled for laparoscopic RYGB or sleeve gastrectomy were randomized to receive 900â mg UDCA or placebo for 6 months. Indicated by the clinical report, prophylactic prescription of UDCA was evaluated economically against placebo from a healthcare and societal perspective for the subgroup of patients without gallstones before surgery who underwent RYGB. Volumes and costs of in-hospital care, out-of-hospital care, out-of-pocket expenses, and productivity loss were assessed. Main outcomes were the costs per patient free from symptomatic gallstone disease and the costs per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). RESULTS: Patients receiving UDCA prophylaxis were more likely to remain free from symptomatic gallstone disease (relative risk 1.06, 95 per cent c.i. 1.02 to 1.11; P = 0.002) compared with patients in the placebo group. The gain in QALYs, corrected for a baseline difference in health utility, was 0.047 (95 per cent bias-corrected and accelerated (Bca) c.i. 0.007 to 0.088) higher (P = 0.022). Differences in costs were -356 (95 per cent Bca c.i. -1573 to 761) from a healthcare perspective and -1392 (-3807 to 917) from a societal perspective including out-of-pocket expenses and productivity loss, both statistically non-significant, in favour of UDCA prophylaxis. The probability of UDCA prophylaxis being cost-effective was at least 0.872. CONCLUSION: UDCA prophylaxis after RYGB in patients without gallstones before surgery was cost-effective.
Assuntos
Cálculos Biliares , Derivação Gástrica , Obesidade Mórbida , Análise Custo-Benefício , Cálculos Biliares/prevenção & controle , Cálculos Biliares/cirurgia , Gastrectomia , Humanos , Obesidade Mórbida/complicações , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Ácido Ursodesoxicólico/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) reduces symptomatic gallstone disease after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). The beneficial effect of UDCA is reduced by poor adherence. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to identify factors associated with poor adherence to UDCA or placebo after bariatric surgery. SETTING: Outpatient clinic and department for bariatric surgery in three hospitals in the Netherlands. METHODS: Patients in the multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled UPGRADE trial were assessed for adherence to 900 mg UDCA or placebo for 6 months through a pill count, inquiries during follow-up, and a questionnaire. Poor adherence was defined as the usage of <300 of 364 pills within a maximum of 8 months postoperatively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors contributing to poor adherence. RESULTS: In total, 967 patients were included (mean age [standard deviation (SD)]: 45.1 [11.1] years; female: 772 [80%]; RYGB: 889 [92%]; sleeve gastrectomy: 78 [8%]), of whom 357 (37%) were poor adherers. Factors associated with poor adherence were age (OR .97; 95% confidence interval [CI] .96-.98, a decrease in age increases the odds for poor adherence), foreign origin (odds ratio [OR] 2.07; 95%CI 1.50-2.84), unemployment (OR 1.73; 95%CI 1.28-2.34), and sleeve gastrectomy (OR 1.79; 95%CI 1.06-3.01). Furthermore, a difference in adherence status was also noted for the centers of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The adherence rate to UDCA and placebo in the UPGRADE trial was suboptimal. Several factors were independently associated with poor adherence. Our findings can help to identify patients who may benefit from extra guidance to improve adherence.
Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica , Derivação Gástrica , Obesidade Mórbida , Feminino , Gastrectomia , Humanos , Obesidade Mórbida/complicações , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Ácido Ursodesoxicólico/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
PURPOSE: Patients who undergo bariatric surgery are at risk for developing cholesterol gallstones. We aimed to identify risk factors that are associated with symptomatic gallstone disease and gallstone formation after bariatric surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included participants of the UPGRADE trial, a multicenter randomized placebo-controlled trial on the prevention of symptomatic gallstone disease with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) after bariatric surgery. The association between patient characteristics and symptomatic gallstone disease, and gallstone formation was evaluated using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Of 959 patients, 78 (8%) developed symptomatic gallstone disease within 24 months. Risk factors were the presence of a pain syndrome (OR 2.07; 95% CI 1.03 to 4.17) and asymptomatic gallstones before surgery (OR 3.15; 95% CI 1.87 to 5.33). Advanced age (OR 0.95; 95% CI 0.93 to 0.97) was protective, and UDCA prophylaxis did not reach statistical significance (OR 0.64; 95% CI 0.39 to 1.03). No risk factors were identified for gallstone formation, whereas advanced age (OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.96 to 1.00), statin use (OR 0.42; 95% CI 0.20 to 0.90), and UDCA prophylaxis (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.73) all reduced the risk. CONCLUSION: Young patients with a preoperative pain syndrome and/or asymptomatic gallstones before bariatric surgery are at increased risk for symptomatic gallstone disease after surgery. Whether statins, either alone or in combination with UDCA prophylaxis, can further reduce the burden of gallstones after bariatric surgery should be investigated prospectively.
Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica , Cálculos Biliares , Obesidade Mórbida , Cirurgia Bariátrica/efeitos adversos , Cálculos Biliares/epidemiologia , Cálculos Biliares/etiologia , Cálculos Biliares/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Fatores de Risco , Ácido Ursodesoxicólico/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Since obese patients form cholesterol gallstones very rapidly after bariatric surgery, in patients who did not form gallstones during preceding years, we hypothesized that gallstone formation follows a different trajectory in bariatric patients compared to nonbariatric patients. We therefore analyzed the lipid composition of gallbladder bile derived from 18 bariatric gallstone patients and 17 nonbariatric gallstone patients (median (IQR) age, 46.0 (28.0-54.0) years; 33 (94%) female) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy using an enzymatic and lipidomics approach. We observed a higher concentration of total lipids (9.9 vs. 5.8 g/dL), bile acids (157.7 vs. 81.5 mM), cholesterol (10.6 vs. 5.4 mM), and phospholipids (30.4 vs. 21.8 mM) in bariatric gallstone patients compared to nonbariatric gallstone patients. The cholesterol saturation index did not significantly differ between the two groups. Lipidomics analysis revealed an interesting pattern. Enhanced amounts of a number of lipid species were found in the gallbladder bile of nonbariatric gallstone patients. Most striking was a fivefold higher amount of triglyceride. A concomitant ninefold increase of apolipoprotein B was found, suggesting secretion of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRLs) at the canalicular pole of the hepatocyte in livers from nonbariatric gallstone patients. These findings suggest that gallstone formation follows a different trajectory in bariatric patients compared to nonbariatric patients. Impaired gallbladder emptying might explain the rapid gallstone formation after bariatric surgery, while biliary TRL secretion might contribute to gallstone formation in nonbariatric patients.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Rapid weight loss is a major risk factor for the formation of cholesterol gallstones. Consequently, patients with morbid obesity undergoing bariatric surgery frequently develop symptomatic gallstone disease. This trial assessed the efficacy of ursodeoxycholic acid versus placebo for the prevention of symptomatic gallstone disease after bariatric surgery. METHODS: This multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled superiority trial enrolled patients with an intact gallbladder scheduled for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy in three hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by a web-based randomisation module to receive 900 mg ursodeoxycholic acid daily for 6 months or matched placebo. Randomisation was stratified by the presence of asymptomatic gallstones at baseline and type of surgery. Patients, clinicians, and study staff were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was symptomatic gallstone disease within 24 months, assessed in the modified intention-to-treat population (all randomly assigned eligible patients with any post-randomisation measurement). Prespecified subgroup analyses were done based on the stratification groups. Safety was assessed in all patients who took at least one dose of the study drug. This trial is registered with the Netherlands Trial Register, NL5954. FINDINGS: Between Jan 11, 2017, and Oct 22, 2018, 985 patients were randomly assigned to receive either ursodeoxycholic acid (n=492) or placebo (n=493). 967 patients were included in the modified intention-to-treat population, of whom 959 had data available for primary endpoint assessment. 189 (20%) patients had asymptomatic gallstones at baseline and 78 (8%) received a sleeve gastrectomy. Symptomatic gallstone disease occurred in 31 (6·5%) of 475 patients in the ursodeoxycholic acid group and in 47 (9·7%) of 484 patients in the placebo group (relative risk 0·67, 95% CI 0·43-1·04, p=0·071). Logistic regression showed a significant interaction between ursodeoxycholic acid and the presence of asymptomatic gallstones at baseline (p=0·046), with an effect of ursodeoxycholic acid in patients without (0·47, 0·27-0·84, p=0·0081), and no effect in patients with asymptomatic gallstones at baseline (1·22, 0·61-2·47, p=0·57). The effect was stronger in patients without gallstones at baseline undergoing RYGB (0·37, 0·20-0·71, p=0·0016), whereas the subgroup of patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy was too small to draw clear conclusions. Adverse events were rare. In the ursodeoxycholic acid group, diarrhoea occurred in four (0·9%) of 444 patients and skin rash in two (0·5%) patients. In the placebo group, diarrhoea occurred in two (0·4%) of 453 patients and skin rash in two (0·4%) patients. The total number of serious adverse events did not significantly differ between the trial groups (75 [17%] in 444 patients in the ursodeoxycholic acid group and 102 [23%] in 453 patients in the placebo group). The most common serious adverse events were abdominal pain and internal hernia. No serious adverse event was attributed to the study drug. INTERPRETATION: Ursodeoxycholic acid prophylaxis did not significantly reduce the occurrence of symptomatic gallstone disease in all patients after bariatric surgery. In patients without gallstones before RYGB surgery, ursodeoxycholic acid treatment reduced the occurrence of symptomatic gallstone disease compared with placebo. Further research is needed to assess the efficacy of ursodeoxycholic acid after sleeve gastrectomy. FUNDING: The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development, Zambon Netherlands BV, Foundation for Clinical Research of the Slotervaart Hospital, the Spaarne Gasthuis Academy, and Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism.
Assuntos
Colagogos e Coleréticos/uso terapêutico , Colelitíase/prevenção & controle , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Ácido Ursodesoxicólico/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Cirurgia Bariátrica/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Colagogos e Coleréticos/administração & dosagem , Colagogos e Coleréticos/efeitos adversos , Colelitíase/epidemiologia , Colelitíase/etiologia , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Gastrectomia/efeitos adversos , Derivação Gástrica/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Obesidade Mórbida/complicações , Obesidade Mórbida/epidemiologia , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Placebos/administração & dosagem , Segurança , Resultado do Tratamento , Ácido Ursodesoxicólico/administração & dosagem , Ácido Ursodesoxicólico/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The optimal antibiotic therapy duration for cholangitis is unclear. Guideline recommendations vary between 4 and 14 days after biliary drainage. Clinical observations and some evidence however suggest that shorter antibiotic therapy may be sufficient. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of short-course therapy of ≤ 3 days with long-course therapy of ≥ 4 days after biliary drainage in cholangitis patients. METHODS: We searched the databases PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and trial registers for literature up to August 5, 2020. RCTs and observational studies including case series reporting on antibiotic therapy duration for acute cholangitis were eligible for inclusion. Two reviewers independently evaluated study eligibility, extracted data, assessed risk of bias and quality of evidence. A meta-analysis was planned if the included studies were comparable with regard to important study characteristics. Primary outcomes included recurrent cholangitis, subsequent other infection, and mortality. RESULTS: We included eight studies with 938 cholangitis patients. Four observational studies enrolled patients treated for ≤ 3 days. Recurrent cholangitis occurred in 0-26.8% of patients treated with short-course therapy, which did not differ from long-course therapy (range 0-21.1%). Subsequent other infection and mortality rates were also comparable. Quality of available evidence was very low. CONCLUSION: There is no high-quality evidence available to draw a strong conclusion, but heterogeneous observational studies suggest that antibiotic therapy of ≤ 3 days is sufficient in cholangitis patients with common bile duct stones.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibioticoprofilaxia , Colangite/terapia , Drenagem , Doença Aguda , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Antibioticoprofilaxia/efeitos adversos , Colangite/diagnóstico , Drenagem/efeitos adversos , Esquema de Medicação , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Humanos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Approximately 8-15% of patients undergoing bariatric surgery develop symptomatic gallstone disease within 24 months after surgery. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) seems to effectively prevent the formation of gallstones detectable by ultrasound after bariatric surgery. The aim of the UPGRADE trial is to provide evidence on the prophylactic use of UDCA in preventing symptomatic gallstone disease postoperatively. METHODS: The UPGRADE trial is designed as a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind multicentre trial in patients with morbid obesity undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG). Patients are randomly assigned to either UDCA 900 mg daily for 6 months or placebo treatment. This paper details the statistical analysis plan (SAP) of this trial and was submitted before outcome data were available. RESULTS: The primary endpoint of this trial is symptomatic gallstone disease within 24 months after bariatric surgery, defined as admission or hospital visit for symptomatic gallstone disease. Secondary outcomes consist of the development of gallstones/sludge on ultrasound at 24 months in the gallstone-negative group at baseline, presence of gallstones/sludge on ultrasound at 24 months, number of cholecystectomies, side effects of UDCA, therapy compliance, quality of life, costs and revenues. Analyses will be completed according to this pre-specified SAP. The main analysis will be performed as a standard ITT analysis using the chi-squared test. DISCUSSION: The UPGRADE trial will show if prophylactic use of UDCA reduces the incidence of symptomatic gallstone disease after bariatric surgery. Unforeseen deviations from the SAP at the time of analysis will be motivated and discussed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Netherlands Trial Register NL5954 . Registered on 21 November 2016.
Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica , Colelitíase/prevenção & controle , Obesidade Mórbida , Ácido Ursodesoxicólico/uso terapêutico , Cirurgia Bariátrica/efeitos adversos , Gastrectomia , Derivação Gástrica , Humanos , Países Baixos , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Qualidade de VidaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Recommendations for the duration of antimicrobial therapy in cholangitis after successful endoscopic biliary drainage vary. The aim of this study was to compare the occurrence of local infectious complications in patients with acute cholangitis treated with antibiotics for 3 days or less compared with 4 days or more. METHODS: We performed a retrospective multicentre study in seven hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients who received a successful biliary drainage by endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography because of cholangitis due to common bile duct stones between 2012 and 2017 were included. The primary outcome was the occurrence of a local infectious complication within 3 months of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography. Secondary outcomes included Clostridioides difficile infection, total length of hospital stay and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: A total of 426 patients with cholangitis were identified and 296 patients met all inclusion criteria. Therapy duration was ≤3 days in 137 patients (46.3%). During follow-up, 41 patients (13.9%) developed a local infectious complication. Occurrence of infectious complications did not differ between the two groups (p = 0.32). No patient developed Clostridioides difficile infection. Median hospital stay was 6 days (interquartile range 4-8 days) in the short antibiotic group compared with 7 days (interquartile range 5-9 days) in the long group (p = 0.03). Four (1.4%) patients died during follow-up, all were treated for ≥4 days (p = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: Antimicrobial therapy of 3 days or less seems to be sufficient after successful biliary drainage in patients with acute cholangitis. Randomized trials should confirm our findings.
Assuntos
Antibioticoprofilaxia/estatística & dados numéricos , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/efeitos adversos , Colangite/cirurgia , Coledocolitíase/cirurgia , Infecções por Clostridium/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Doença Aguda/terapia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Colangite/etiologia , Colangite/mortalidade , Coledocolitíase/complicações , Coledocolitíase/mortalidade , Clostridioides difficile/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Clostridium/diagnóstico , Infecções por Clostridium/etiologia , Infecções por Clostridium/prevenção & controle , Ducto Colédoco , Drenagem/efeitos adversos , Drenagem/métodos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/diagnóstico , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients who have undergone bariatric surgery are at risk for subsequent cholecystectomy. We aimed to identify risk factors for cholecystectomy after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective case-control study of patients who underwent LRYGB between 2013 and 2015. Cases underwent cholecystectomy because of biliary symptoms after LRYGB. For each case, two controls were selected without subsequent cholecystectomy. Logistic regression analyses were used to identify risk factors. RESULTS: Between 2013 and 2015, 1780 primary LRYGBs were performed. We identified 233 (13.1%) cases who had undergone cholecystectomy after a median (IQR) of 12 (8-17) months, and 466 controls. Female gender (OR (95% CI) 1.83 (1.06-3.17)), Caucasian ethnicity (OR (95% CI) 1.82 (1.10-3.02)), higher percent total weight loss (%TWL) at 12 months (OR (95% CI) 1.06 (1.04-1.09)), and preoperative pain syndrome (OR (95% CI) 2.72 (1.43-5.18)) were significantly associated with an increased risk for cholecystectomy. Older age (OR (95% CI) 0.98 (0.96-0.99)) and preoperative statin use were associated with a reduced risk (OR (95% CI) 0.56 (0.31-1.00)). A dose-effect relationship was found between the intensity of preoperative statin and risk for cholecystectomy. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, higher %TWL and preoperative pain syndrome were associated with an increased risk for cholecystectomy besides the traditional risk factors female gender and Caucasian ethnicity. These factors can be used to identify high-risk patients, who might benefit from preventive measures. Whether statins can protect bariatric patients from developing gallstones should be investigated prospectively.
Assuntos
Colecistectomia , Cálculos Biliares/etiologia , Cálculos Biliares/cirurgia , Derivação Gástrica/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Adulto , Cirurgia Bariátrica/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Colecistectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Cálculos Biliares/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Obesidade Mórbida/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The number of bariatric interventions for morbid obesity is increasing worldwide. Rapid weight loss is a major risk factor for gallstone development. Approximately 11 % of patients who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass develop symptomatic gallstone disease. Gallstone disease can lead to severe complications and often requires hospitalization and surgery. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) prevents the formation of gallstones after bariatric surgery. However, randomized controlled trials with symptomatic gallstone disease as primary endpoint have not been conducted. Currently, major guidelines make no definite statement about postoperative UDCA prophylaxis and most bariatric centers do not prescribe UDCA. METHODS: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind multicenter trial will be performed for which 980 patients will be included. The study population consists of consecutive patients scheduled to undergo Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy in three bariatric centers in the Netherlands. Patients will undergo a preoperative ultrasound and randomization will be stratified for pre-existing gallstones and for type of surgery. The intervention group will receive UDCA 900 mg once daily for six months. The placebo group will receive similar-looking placebo tablets. The primary endpoint is symptomatic gallstone disease after 24 months, defined as admission or hospital visit for symptomatic gallstone disease. Secondary endpoints consist of the development of gallstones on ultrasound at 24 months, number of cholecystectomies, side-effects of UDCA and quality of life. Furthermore, cost-effectiveness, cost-utility and budget impact analyses will be performed. DISCUSSION: The UPGRADE trial will answer the question whether UDCA reduces the incidence of symptomatic gallstone disease after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy. Furthermore it will determine if treatment with UDCA is cost-effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register (trialregister.nl) 6135 . Date registered: 21-Nov-2016.
Assuntos
Colagogos e Coleréticos/uso terapêutico , Cálculos Biliares/prevenção & controle , Derivação Gástrica/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Ácido Ursodesoxicólico/uso terapêutico , Colagogos e Coleréticos/efeitos adversos , Colagogos e Coleréticos/economia , Protocolos Clínicos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Método Duplo-Cego , Seguimentos , Cálculos Biliares/etiologia , Humanos , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Qualidade de Vida , Ácido Ursodesoxicólico/efeitos adversos , Ácido Ursodesoxicólico/economiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Recent literature suggests that chemo(radio)therapy might reduce the patency of plastic stents in patients with malignant biliary obstruction. Whether this might also be valid for other types of stents is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of chemo(radio)therapy on the patency of fully-covered self-expandable metal stents (FCSEMSs) and plastic stents. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records of patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction who underwent biliary stent placement between April 2001 and July 2015.âPrimary outcome was duration of stent patency. Secondary outcome was stent patency at 3 and 6 months. We used Kaplan-Meier survival analyses to compare stent patency rates between patients who received chemo(radio)therapy and patients who did not. RESULTS: A total of 291 biliary stents (151 metal and 140 plastic) were identified. The median cumulative stent patency of FCSEMSs did not differ between patients receiving chemo(radio)therapy (nâ=â51) and those (nâ=â100) who did not ( P â=â0.70, log-rank test). The estimated cumulative stent patency of plastic stents was also comparable in 99 patients without and 41 patients with chemo(radio)therapy ( P â=â0.73, log-rank test). At 3 and 6 months, FCSEMS patency rates were 87â% and 83â% in patients without chemo(radio)therapy and 96â% and 83â% in patients with therapy, respectively. Plastic patency rates were 69â% and 55â% in patients without and 85â% and 39â% in patients with therapy, respectively. After 1 year, 78â% of the FCSEMSs were still patent in patients without chemo(radio)therapy and 69â% of the FCSEMSs were still patent in patients with therapy. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that chemo(radio)therapy does not reduce the patency of biliary fully-covered metal and plastic stents.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify possible socioeconomic differences in the use of anti-smoking parenting strategies. METHODS: In 2012, survey data of adolescents (N = 225) aged 13 to 17 years and their mothers (N = 122) and fathers (N = 105) were collected in Haarlem, the Netherlands. Questions on smoking behaviour and eleven anti-smoking parenting strategies were answered by adolescents, mothers and fathers. School tracks of adolescents and educational level of parents were measured as indicators of socioeconomic position. Linear multilevel regression analyses were applied to study the association between socioeconomic position (SEP) and standardised scores of anti-smoking strategies. Analyses were controlled for age, sex and smoking by parents and adolescents. RESULTS: We found no consistent socioeconomic differences in the use of anti-smoking parenting strategies. There were no statistically significant differences in relation to parental educational level or when using adolescent reports on parenting practices. However, when using parental reports, a few strategies varied significantly according to adolescent educational track. Adolescents in higher educational tracks were more likely to have no-smoking rules in the home (standardised regression coefficient (ß) = 0.20, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.03; 0.37, p = 0.022) and more likely to have a no-smoking agreement (ß = 0.17, 95 % CI: 0.00; 0.34, p = 0.048). However, they were less likely to frequently communicate about smoking with their parents (ß = -0.25, 95 % CI: -0.41; -0.08, p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: In this specific population, there was no consistent support for the hypothesis that anti-smoking parenting strategies contribute to socioeconomic inequalities in adolescent smoking. Parental factors that are more likely to contribute to these inequalities include parental smoking and parenting styles.