Clinical characteristics and outcomes of adrenal hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Although uncommon, adrenal hemorrhage has multiple etiologies. Because clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of patients with adrenal hemorrhage are inadequately described, we examined the underlying etiology, need for intervention, evolution of imaging characteristics, and adequacy of subsequent evaluation. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients diagnosed with adrenal hemorrhage (radiologist-confirmed density consistent with hemorrhage on computed tomography) from 2005 to 2021 at a university-based institution. Demographic characteristics, hemorrhage etiology, and subsequent follow-up were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 193 adrenal hemorrhage patients, the mean age was 49.2 ± 18.3 years, and 35% were female. Clinical presentations included trauma (47%), abdominal or flank pain (28%), incidental findings on imaging acquired for other reasons (12%), postoperative complication (8%), or shock (3%). Hemorrhage outside of the gland was present in 62% of patients. Unilateral hemorrhage was more frequent (93%) than bilateral (7%). A total of 12% of patients had nodules, but only 70% of these were identified on initial imaging, and only 43% had hormonal evaluation. Of 7 patients who had adrenalectomy or biopsy, pathology was either benign (57%) or nonadrenal malignancy (43%). No adrenocortical carcinomas were identified. Follow-up imaging was performed in 56% of patients and revealed decreased, stable, resolved, or increased adrenal hemorrhage size in 39%, 19%, 30%, and 12% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Adrenal hemorrhage is secondary to multiple etiologies, most commonly trauma. In the setting of adrenal hemorrhage, many adrenal nodules were not identified on initial imaging. Only a minority of patients with nodules underwent "complete" biochemical evaluation. Follow-up imaging may improve the identification of underlying nodules needing hormonal evaluation.

Performance of CT With Adrenal-Washout Protocol in Heterogeneous Adrenal Nodules: A Multiinstitutional Study.

BACKGROUND. CT with adrenal-washout protocol (hereafter, adrenal-protocol CT) is commonly performed to distinguish adrenal adenomas from other adrenal tumors. However, the technique's utility among heterogeneous nodules is not well established, and the optimal method for placing ROIs in heterogeneous nodules is not clearly defined. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to determine the diagnostic performance of adrenal-protocol CT to distinguish adenomas from nonadenomas among heterogeneous adrenal nodules and to compare this performance among different methods for ROI placement. METHODS. This retrospective study included 164 patients (mean age, 59.1 years; 61 men, 103 women) with a total of 164 heterogeneous adrenal nodules evaluated using adrenal-protocol CT at seven institutions. All nodules had an available pathologic reference standard. A single investigator at each institution evaluated the CT images. ROIs were placed on portal venous phase images using four ROI methods: standard ROI, which refers to a single large ROI in the nodule's center; high ROI, a single ROI on the nodule's highest-attenuation area; low ROI, a single ROI the on nodule's lowest-attenuation area; and average ROI, the mean of the three ROIs on the nodule's superior, middle, and inferior thirds using the approach for the standard ROI. ROIs were then placed in identical locations on unenhanced and delayed phase images. Absolute washout was determined for all methods. RESULTS. The nodules comprised 82 adenomas and 82 nonadenomas (36 pheochromocytomas, 20 metastases, 12 adrenocortical carcinomas, and 14 nodules with other pathologies). The mean nodule size was 4.5 ± 2.8 (SD) cm (range, 1.6-23.0 cm). Unenhanced CT attenuation of 10 HU or less exhibited sensitivity and specificity for adenoma of 22.0% and 96.3% for standard-ROI, 11.0% and 98.8% for high-ROI, 58.5% and 84.1% for low-ROI, and 30.5% and 97.6% for average-ROI methods. Adrenal-protocol CT overall (unenhanced attenuation ≤ 10 HU or absolute washout of ≥ 60%) exhibited sensitivity and specificity for adenoma of 57.3% and 84.1% for the standard-ROI method, 63.4% and 51.2% for the high-ROI method, 68.3% and 62.2% for the low-ROI method, and 59.8% and 85.4% for the average-ROI method. CONCLUSION. Adrenal-protocol CT has poor diagnostic performance for distinguishing adenomas from nonadenomas among heterogeneous adrenal nodules regardless of the method used for ROI placement. CLINICAL IMPACT. Adrenal-protocol CT has limited utility in the evaluation of heterogeneous adrenal nodules.